This article should be read once a week until everyone understands and
agrees with the message.
Carl Jarvis
On 12/6/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> Published on Alternet (http://www.alternet.org)
> Home > Inequality is Fundamental to U.S. Capitalism: Tweaking the Edges
> Will
> Accomplish Nothing
> ________________________________________
> Inequality is Fundamental to U.S. Capitalism: Tweaking the Edges Will
> Accomplish Nothing
> By Steven W. Thrasher [1] / The Guardian [2]
> December 5, 2015
> The economic hoarding by those at the top has been termed "income
> inequality", but that's neither a strong nor accurate enough phrasing. I
> have never heard poor people complain about "income inequality"; poor
> people
> complain about being screwed out of housing [3] , or about working more
> hours for less pay [4] or about having to choose between medicine and food
> [5].
> "Inequality" sounds like something that happens by accident and can be
> remedied by fiddling around the edges. It is not as if the rich are a
> little
> more equal and the poor a little less equal, and if we shift a bit we'll
> all
> come out in the middle. What we've been calling "income inequality" might
> be
> better understood as a war waged by US political and economic policy on the
> poor.
> A new report from the Institute for Policy Studies [6] issued this week
> analyzed the Forbes list of the 400 richest Americans [7] and found that
> "the wealthiest 100 households now own about as much wealth as the entire
> African American population in the United States". That means that 100
> families - most of whom are white - have as much wealth as the 41,000,000
> black folks [8] walking around the country (and the million or so [9]
> locked
> up) combined.
> Similarly, the report also stated [6] that "the wealthiest 186 members of
> the Forbes 400 own as much wealth as the entire Latino population" of the
> nation. Here again, the breakdown in actual humans is broke down [10]: 186
> overwhelmingly white folks have more money than that an astounding
> 55,000,000 [11] Latino people.
> The disparities in wealth that we term "income inequality" are no accident,
> and they can't be fixed by fiddling at the edges of our current economic
> system. These disparities happened by design, and the system structurally
> disadvantages those at the bottom. The poorest Americans have no realistic
> hope of achieving anything that approaches income equality; even their very
> chances for access to the most basic tools of life are almost nil.
> President Lyndon Johnson's so-called War on Poverty didn't angle to take
> anything from the rich so that the poor could see equality. It was designed
> to keep some of the poor just alive enough that they wouldn't rebel, and
> designed to let other poor people perish as an object lesson to the rest of
> us to keep scampering.
> Income inequality is better termed structural racism. White people earn
> more
> money with less education [12] than black people and consistently have half
> the unemployment [13] of black people. And, as new research [14] has shown,
> "family wealth" predicts outcomes for 10 to 15 generations. Those with
> extreme wealth owe it to events going back "300 to 450" years ago,
> according
> to research published by the New Republic [14] - an era when it wasn't
> unusual for white Americans to benefit from an economy dependent upon
> widespread, unpaid black labor in the form of slavery.
> Income inequality is better viewed as structural sexism. Women earn 78
> cents
> on the dollar [15] overall compared to white men, but black women only earn
> 64 cents and Latinas 56. Women are also routinely [16] discriminated
> against
> economically for bearing children.
> Income equality is better viewed as structural child abuse. In the United
> States, one in five [17] children needs government help to eat. As Aisha
> Sultan recently wrote [18]in the Education Writers Association, if a
> 30-child classroom looked like the nation at large, seven of the children
> would be living in poverty, six would be victims of abuse and one would be
> homeless. These kids aren't just unequal; they are never offered the
> opportunity to achieve equality.
> Income inequality is better viewed as economic genocide, which shortens the
> lives of the poor. As the New York Times bluntly put it [19] last year,
> "where income is higher, life spans are longer". For one of the most
> jarring
> examples of how this plays out, look no further than the Ferguson Report
> [20], which shows how just in St Louis County, the average life expectancy
> ranges from 91 in the whitest neighborhood to 56 in the poorest, blackest
> neighborhood.
> Too often, the answer by those who have hoarded everything is they will
> choose to "give back" in a manner of their choosing - just look at Mark
> Zuckerberg [21] and his much-derided plan to "give away" [22] 99% of his
> Facebook stock. He is unlikely to help change inequality or poverty any
> more
> than "giving away" of $100m [23]helped children in Newark schools.
> Allowing any of the 100 richest Americans to choose how they fix "income
> inequality" will not make the country more equal or even guarantee more
> access to life. You can't take down the master's house with the master's
> tools [24], even when you're the master; but more to the point, who would
> tear down his own house to distribute the bricks among so very many others?
> Share on Facebook Share
> Share on Twitter Tweet
>
> Report typos and corrections to 'corrections@alternet.org'. [25]
> [26]
> ________________________________________
> Source URL:
> http://www.alternet.org/economy/inequality-fundamental-us-capitalism-tweakin
> g-edges-will-accomplish-nothing
> Links:
> [1] http://www.alternet.org/authors/steven-w-thrasher-0
> [2] http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/
> [3]
> http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/gentrification-doesn-poor-report-shows-a
> rticle-1.2393396
> [4]
> http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/06/speed-up-american-workers-long-h
> ours
> [5]
> http://www.salon.com/2015/06/03/america_despises_its_elderly_why_seniors_hav
> e_to_choose_between_food_and_medicine_partner/
> [6] http://www.ips-dc.org/billionaire-bonanza/
> [7] http://www.forbes.com/forbes-400/list/2/#version:static
> [8]
> https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special
> _editions/cb12-ff01.html
> [9] http://www.naacp.org/pages/criminal-justice-fact-sheet
> [10] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=broke+down
> [11]
> http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/25/u-s-hispanic-population-grow
> th-surge-cools/
> [12]
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/03/10/white-high-school-dro
> pouts-are-wealthier-than-black-and-hispanic-college-graduates-can-a-new-poli
> cy-tool-fix-that/
> [13]
> http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2015/08/04/black-unemployment-falls-below-10-
> still-twice-the-rate-for-whites/
> [14]
> https://newrepublic.com/article/116462/family-wealth-lasts-ten-fifteen-gener
> ations
> [15] http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/13/news/economy/equal-pay-day-2015/
> [16]
> http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/09/when-bosses-discriminate
> -against-pregnant-women/380623/
> [17] http://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-16.html
> [18] http://www.ewa.org/blog-educated-reporter/when-grit-isnt-enough
> [19]
> http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/16/business/income-gap-meet-the-longevity-gap
> .html
> [20]
> http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/15/the-ferguson-commission
> -wont-bring-social-change-black-lives-matter-will
> [21] http://www.forbes.com/forbes-400/gallery/mark-zuckerberg
> [22]
> http://gawker.com/mark-zuckerberg-will-donate-massive-fortune-to-own-blin-17
> 45573343
> [23]
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-newark-schools-partially-squande
> red-a-great-prize/2015/10/20/ffff660c-7743-11e5-a958-d889faf561dc_story.html
> [24] http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/lordedismantle.html
> [25] mailto:corrections@alternet.org?Subject=Typo on Inequality is
> Fundamental to U.S. Capitalism: Tweaking the Edges Will Accomplish Nothing
> [26] http://www.alternet.org/
> [27] http://www.alternet.org/%2Bnew_src%2B
>
> Published on Alternet (http://www.alternet.org)
> Home > Inequality is Fundamental to U.S. Capitalism: Tweaking the Edges
> Will
> Accomplish Nothing
>
> Inequality is Fundamental to U.S. Capitalism: Tweaking the Edges Will
> Accomplish Nothing
> By Steven W. Thrasher [1] / The Guardian [2]
> December 5, 2015
> The economic hoarding by those at the top has been termed "income
> inequality", but that's neither a strong nor accurate enough phrasing. I
> have never heard poor people complain about "income inequality"; poor
> people
> complain about being screwed out of housing [3] , or about working more
> hours for less pay [4] or about having to choose between medicine and food
> [5].
> "Inequality" sounds like something that happens by accident and can be
> remedied by fiddling around the edges. It is not as if the rich are a
> little
> more equal and the poor a little less equal, and if we shift a bit we'll
> all
> come out in the middle. What we've been calling "income inequality" might
> be
> better understood as a war waged by US political and economic policy on the
> poor.
> A new report from the Institute for Policy Studies [6] issued this week
> analyzed the Forbes list of the 400 richest Americans [7] and found that
> "the wealthiest 100 households now own about as much wealth as the entire
> African American population in the United States". That means that 100
> families - most of whom are white - have as much wealth as the 41,000,000
> black folks [8] walking around the country (and the million or so [9]
> locked
> up) combined.
> Similarly, the report also stated [6] that "the wealthiest 186 members of
> the Forbes 400 own as much wealth as the entire Latino population" of the
> nation. Here again, the breakdown in actual humans is broke down [10]: 186
> overwhelmingly white folks have more money than that an astounding
> 55,000,000 [11] Latino people.
> The disparities in wealth that we term "income inequality" are no accident,
> and they can't be fixed by fiddling at the edges of our current economic
> system. These disparities happened by design, and the system structurally
> disadvantages those at the bottom. The poorest Americans have no realistic
> hope of achieving anything that approaches income equality; even their very
> chances for access to the most basic tools of life are almost nil.
> President Lyndon Johnson's so-called War on Poverty didn't angle to take
> anything from the rich so that the poor could see equality. It was designed
> to keep some of the poor just alive enough that they wouldn't rebel, and
> designed to let other poor people perish as an object lesson to the rest of
> us to keep scampering.
> Income inequality is better termed structural racism. White people earn
> more
> money with less education [12] than black people and consistently have half
> the unemployment [13] of black people. And, as new research [14] has shown,
> "family wealth" predicts outcomes for 10 to 15 generations. Those with
> extreme wealth owe it to events going back "300 to 450" years ago,
> according
> to research published by the New Republic [14] - an era when it wasn't
> unusual for white Americans to benefit from an economy dependent upon
> widespread, unpaid black labor in the form of slavery.
> Income inequality is better viewed as structural sexism. Women earn 78
> cents
> on the dollar [15] overall compared to white men, but black women only earn
> 64 cents and Latinas 56. Women are also routinely [16] discriminated
> against
> economically for bearing children.
> Income equality is better viewed as structural child abuse. In the United
> States, one in five [17] children needs government help to eat. As Aisha
> Sultan recently wrote [18]in the Education Writers Association, if a
> 30-child classroom looked like the nation at large, seven of the children
> would be living in poverty, six would be victims of abuse and one would be
> homeless. These kids aren't just unequal; they are never offered the
> opportunity to achieve equality.
> Income inequality is better viewed as economic genocide, which shortens the
> lives of the poor. As the New York Times bluntly put it [19] last year,
> "where income is higher, life spans are longer". For one of the most
> jarring
> examples of how this plays out, look no further than the Ferguson Report
> [20], which shows how just in St Louis County, the average life expectancy
> ranges from 91 in the whitest neighborhood to 56 in the poorest, blackest
> neighborhood.
> Too often, the answer by those who have hoarded everything is they will
> choose to "give back" in a manner of their choosing - just look at Mark
> Zuckerberg [21] and his much-derided plan to "give away" [22] 99% of his
> Facebook stock. He is unlikely to help change inequality or poverty any
> more
> than "giving away" of $100m [23]helped children in Newark schools.
> Allowing any of the 100 richest Americans to choose how they fix "income
> inequality" will not make the country more equal or even guarantee more
> access to life. You can't take down the master's house with the master's
> tools [24], even when you're the master; but more to the point, who would
> tear down his own house to distribute the bricks among so very many others?
> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
> Report typos and corrections to 'corrections@alternet.org'. [25]
> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.[26]
>
> Source URL:
> http://www.alternet.org/economy/inequality-fundamental-us-capitalism-tweakin
> g-edges-will-accomplish-nothing
> Links:
> [1] http://www.alternet.org/authors/steven-w-thrasher-0
> [2] http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/
> [3]
> http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/gentrification-doesn-poor-report-shows-a
> rticle-1.2393396
> [4]
> http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/06/speed-up-american-workers-long-h
> ours
> [5]
> http://www.salon.com/2015/06/03/america_despises_its_elderly_why_seniors_hav
> e_to_choose_between_food_and_medicine_partner/
> [6] http://www.ips-dc.org/billionaire-bonanza/
> [7] http://www.forbes.com/forbes-400/list/2/#version:static
> [8]
> https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special
> _editions/cb12-ff01.html
> [9] http://www.naacp.org/pages/criminal-justice-fact-sheet
> [10] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=broke+down
> [11]
> http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/25/u-s-hispanic-population-grow
> th-surge-cools/
> [12]
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/03/10/white-high-school-dro
> pouts-are-wealthier-than-black-and-hispanic-college-graduates-can-a-new-poli
> cy-tool-fix-that/
> [13]
> http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2015/08/04/black-unemployment-falls-below-10-
> still-twice-the-rate-for-whites/
> [14]
> https://newrepublic.com/article/116462/family-wealth-lasts-ten-fifteen-gener
> ations
> [15] http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/13/news/economy/equal-pay-day-2015/
> [16]
> http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/09/when-bosses-discriminate
> -against-pregnant-women/380623/
> [17] http://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-16.html
> [18] http://www.ewa.org/blog-educated-reporter/when-grit-isnt-enough
> [19]
> http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/16/business/income-gap-meet-the-longevity-gap
> .html
> [20]
> http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/15/the-ferguson-commission
> -wont-bring-social-change-black-lives-matter-will
> [21] http://www.forbes.com/forbes-400/gallery/mark-zuckerberg
> [22]
> http://gawker.com/mark-zuckerberg-will-donate-massive-fortune-to-own-blin-17
> 45573343
> [23]
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-newark-schools-partially-squande
> red-a-great-prize/2015/10/20/ffff660c-7743-11e5-a958-d889faf561dc_story.html
> [24] http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/lordedismantle.html
> [25] mailto:corrections@alternet.org?Subject=Typo on Inequality is
> Fundamental to U.S. Capitalism: Tweaking the Edges Will Accomplish Nothing
> [26] http://www.alternet.org/
> [27] http://www.alternet.org/%2Bnew_src%2B
>
>
>
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Friday, December 4, 2015
Re: [blind-democracy] Gun Industry Executives Say Mass Shootings Are Good for Business
"Gun Industry Executives Say Mass Shootings Are Good for Business".
These mouthings from murderers only go to the point that weapon
manufacturers are not concerned about the safety of Americans. It's
all about *Profit*.
Endless war? Fuck the People. It's good for business. Who cares
about the people?
Little children and average every day folks, like your grandma or
grandpa, murdered as they sit in restaurants or stroll the Malls.
To us Working Class folks it hurts deeply when the murderers strike
our Home-Land, but we shrug and go back to our mindless entertainment
when it is happening in other Lands.
Allowing the Weapons Barron's to control our lives puts the blood of
all the world's murders on our hands. We are guilty through failure
to take the guns away from those evil War Mongers who are profiting at
the expense of so much suffering.
Carl Jarvis
On 12/4/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> Fang writes: "The Intercept reviewed investor transcripts for gun
> companies,
> ammunition manufacturers, and sporting stores, and found many instances of
> industry executives discussing mass shooting incidents and the resulting
> political dynamics as lucrative."
>
> Gun sales continue to break records. (photo: Cengiz Yar Jr.AFP/Getty
> Images)
>
>
> Gun Industry Executives Say Mass Shootings Are Good for Business
> By Lee Fang, The Intercept
> 03 December 15
>
> Behind closed doors, speaking with investors and Wall Street analysts, the
> gun industry views mass shootings as an opportunity to make lots of money.
> Ordinary people are despairing about the frequency of tragic events like
> the
> murderous rampage in San Bernardino on Wednesday, or the Planned Parenthood
> massacre last week. And the cycle of mass killing, media frenzy, and
> political stalemate starts anew each time.
> But meanwhile, gun sales continue to break records, a fact that has not
> gone
> ignored by financial analysts.
> The Intercept reviewed investor transcripts for gun companies, ammunition
> manufacturers, and sporting stores, and found many instances of industry
> executives discussing mass shooting incidents and the resulting political
> dynamics as lucrative.
> Here's how it works. Following a mass shooting, there is talk of gun
> control, which the National Rifle Association and other gun advocates
> attack
> as an assault on the Second Amendment. Notably, gun and ammunition
> manufacturers often donate, either directly or as a portion of each sale,
> to
> the NRA. The fear of losing gun rights leads to panic buying, which brings
> greater profits to gun retailers, gun companies and their investors.
> Gun Distributors
> "The gun business was very much accelerated based on what happened after
> the
> election and then the tragedy that happened at Sandy Hook," Ed Stack, the
> chief executive of Dick's Sporting Goods, a leading gun and ammunition
> retailer, said in September 2014 at the Goldman Sachs Global Retailing
> Conference. Stack noted that the industry saw "panic buying" when customers
> "thought there were going to be some very meaningful changes in our gun"
> laws. The new sales "didn't bring hunters in" but rather "brought shooters
> into the industry," he added.
> In 2012, 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot 20 children and 6 adult staff
> members at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.
> Last year, Tommy Millner, the chief executive of Cabela's, a retailer that
> sells guns, boasted at an investor conference in Nebraska that his company
> made a "conscious decision" to stock additional weapons merchandise before
> the 2012 election, hoping Obama's reelection would result in increased
> sales. After the election, the Newtown mass shooting happened, and "the
> business went vertical . I meant it just went crazy," Millner said,
> according to a transcript of the event. Describing the "tailwinds of
> profitability," Millner noted Cabela's "didn't blink as others did to stop
> selling AR-15 platform guns," and so his company "got a lot of new
> customers." The AR-15 is a high-powered assault rifle based on the
> military's M-16 model but without the full automatic capacity,
> Steven Miller, the chief executive of Big 5 Sporting Goods, another gun
> retailer, was asked by investor analysts in 2013 to describe the state of
> the market during a conference call that year. The "real surge" in firearm
> sales, Miller said, "took place following the tragedy in Sandy Hook."
> Gun and Ammunition Manufacturers
> Smith & Wesson chief executive James Debney, speaking to the Roth Capital
> Partners conference in 2013, explained that "the tragedy in Newtown and the
> legislative landscape" resulted in sales that were "significantly up." The
> "fear and uncertainty that there might be increased gun control," Debney
> said, "drove many new people to buy firearms for the first time.
> "You can see after a tragedy, there's also a lot of buying," Jeff Buchanan,
> the chief financial officer of Smith & Wesson, told investors at the RBC
> Capital Markets conference in September of this year. Buchanan noted that
> the political landscape of 2016 is uncertain, but that fear of gun control
> could be on the horizon.
> Michael Fifer, the chief executive of Sturm Ruger, one of the largest
> gunmakers in America, discussed the role of politics in gun sales during a
> conference call with investors in 2013. "If you look back at historical
> patterns back in late '08, early '09, you saw a huge spike in accessory
> sales which then tapered off, and then we saw it again with the really
> tragic events at Sandy Hook that started again as soon as the politicians
> started talking about restricting legal gun use," Fifer said.
> Wall Street Analysts
> Market analysts, including consultants who often hold executives
> accountable
> to investors, have been keen to ask gun companies about how they are able
> to
> respond to surging sales following mass shootings.
> Gautam Khanna, an analyst with Cowen & Co., a market research firm,
> interviewed Mark DeYoung, then the chief executive of ATK, an ammunition
> manufacturer, at the Cowen Aerospace conference in 2013. Khanna asked
> DeYoung if he would make pricing decisions based in part by the "Newtown
> shooting tragedy."
> DeYoung responded that "obviously we are all shocked" by "what happened in
> Newtown and what happened in Aurora, Colorado, and what happened in Tucson,
> Arizona, with Gabby Giffords." But, he added, the company will continue to
> "respond to market pressures," including increases in demand. On a separate
> conference call that year, DeYoung noted that certain "spikes" in demand
> have driven sales.
> James Holmes killed 12 people and injured more than 70 others after opening
> fire in an Aurora, Colorado, movie theater in 2012.
> In 2011, Jim Barrett, a financial analyst, asked Ruger's Fifer during a
> call
> with investors if the "recent shooting incident in Tucson" - referring to
> the shooting that year of Rep. Gabby Giffords - "has stirred gun owners and
> prospective gun owners to go visit the stores?"
> Bob Sales, another analyst, asked Fifer how his company was preparing for
> future gun sales, given that "a combination of the election in 2012 and the
> Sandy Hook incident . spurred a massive binge of gun buying."
> On a conference call with investors, Millner, the chief executive of
> Cabela's, fielded a question about the Aurora mass shooting from an analyst
> with Imperial Capital, who asked him if the incident had "any impact on
> your
> business." Millner responded, "I would say that the trends that you read
> about in the press, we are experiencing at least thus far since the
> incident."
> The business rhetoric around mass shootings "doesn't surprise me at all,"
> says Ladd Everitt, the director of communications of the Coalition to Stop
> Gun Violence. Everitt noted that the National Rifle Association, which is
> funded by gun manufacturers, often uses similar language following mass
> shootings.
> "This just shows the guys in the suits understand this and are utterly
> cynical about it."
> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not
> valid.
>
> Gun sales continue to break records. (photo: Cengiz Yar Jr.AFP/Getty
> Images)
> https://theintercept.com/2015/12/03/mass-shooting-wall-st/https://theinterce
> pt.com/2015/12/03/mass-shooting-wall-st/
> Gun Industry Executives Say Mass Shootings Are Good for Business
> By Lee Fang, The Intercept
> 03 December 15
> ehind closed doors, speaking with investors and Wall Street analysts, the
> gun industry views mass shootings as an opportunity to make lots of money.
> Ordinary people are despairing about the frequency of tragic events like
> the
> murderous rampage in San Bernardino on Wednesday, or the Planned Parenthood
> massacre last week. And the cycle of mass killing, media frenzy, and
> political stalemate starts anew each time.
> But meanwhile, gun sales continue to break records, a fact that has not
> gone
> ignored by financial analysts.
> The Intercept reviewed investor transcripts for gun companies, ammunition
> manufacturers, and sporting stores, and found many instances of industry
> executives discussing mass shooting incidents and the resulting political
> dynamics as lucrative.
> Here's how it works. Following a mass shooting, there is talk of gun
> control, which the National Rifle Association and other gun advocates
> attack
> as an assault on the Second Amendment. Notably, gun and ammunition
> manufacturers often donate, either directly or as a portion of each sale,
> to
> the NRA. The fear of losing gun rights leads to panic buying, which brings
> greater profits to gun retailers, gun companies and their investors.
> Gun Distributors
> "The gun business was very much accelerated based on what happened after
> the
> election and then the tragedy that happened at Sandy Hook," Ed Stack, the
> chief executive of Dick's Sporting Goods, a leading gun and ammunition
> retailer, said in September 2014 at the Goldman Sachs Global Retailing
> Conference. Stack noted that the industry saw "panic buying" when customers
> "thought there were going to be some very meaningful changes in our gun"
> laws. The new sales "didn't bring hunters in" but rather "brought shooters
> into the industry," he added.
> In 2012, 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot 20 children and 6 adult staff
> members at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.
> Last year, Tommy Millner, the chief executive of Cabela's, a retailer that
> sells guns, boasted at an investor conference in Nebraska that his company
> made a "conscious decision" to stock additional weapons merchandise before
> the 2012 election, hoping Obama's reelection would result in increased
> sales. After the election, the Newtown mass shooting happened, and "the
> business went vertical . I meant it just went crazy," Millner said,
> according to a transcript of the event. Describing the "tailwinds of
> profitability," Millner noted Cabela's "didn't blink as others did to stop
> selling AR-15 platform guns," and so his company "got a lot of new
> customers." The AR-15 is a high-powered assault rifle based on the
> military's M-16 model but without the full automatic capacity,
> Steven Miller, the chief executive of Big 5 Sporting Goods, another gun
> retailer, was asked by investor analysts in 2013 to describe the state of
> the market during a conference call that year. The "real surge" in firearm
> sales, Miller said, "took place following the tragedy in Sandy Hook."
> Gun and Ammunition Manufacturers
> Smith & Wesson chief executive James Debney, speaking to the Roth Capital
> Partners conference in 2013, explained that "the tragedy in Newtown and the
> legislative landscape" resulted in sales that were "significantly up." The
> "fear and uncertainty that there might be increased gun control," Debney
> said, "drove many new people to buy firearms for the first time.
> "You can see after a tragedy, there's also a lot of buying," Jeff Buchanan,
> the chief financial officer of Smith & Wesson, told investors at the RBC
> Capital Markets conference in September of this year. Buchanan noted that
> the political landscape of 2016 is uncertain, but that fear of gun control
> could be on the horizon.
> Michael Fifer, the chief executive of Sturm Ruger, one of the largest
> gunmakers in America, discussed the role of politics in gun sales during a
> conference call with investors in 2013. "If you look back at historical
> patterns back in late '08, early '09, you saw a huge spike in accessory
> sales which then tapered off, and then we saw it again with the really
> tragic events at Sandy Hook that started again as soon as the politicians
> started talking about restricting legal gun use," Fifer said.
> Wall Street Analysts
> Market analysts, including consultants who often hold executives
> accountable
> to investors, have been keen to ask gun companies about how they are able
> to
> respond to surging sales following mass shootings.
> Gautam Khanna, an analyst with Cowen & Co., a market research firm,
> interviewed Mark DeYoung, then the chief executive of ATK, an ammunition
> manufacturer, at the Cowen Aerospace conference in 2013. Khanna asked
> DeYoung if he would make pricing decisions based in part by the "Newtown
> shooting tragedy."
> DeYoung responded that "obviously we are all shocked" by "what happened in
> Newtown and what happened in Aurora, Colorado, and what happened in Tucson,
> Arizona, with Gabby Giffords." But, he added, the company will continue to
> "respond to market pressures," including increases in demand. On a separate
> conference call that year, DeYoung noted that certain "spikes" in demand
> have driven sales.
> James Holmes killed 12 people and injured more than 70 others after opening
> fire in an Aurora, Colorado, movie theater in 2012.
> In 2011, Jim Barrett, a financial analyst, asked Ruger's Fifer during a
> call
> with investors if the "recent shooting incident in Tucson" - referring to
> the shooting that year of Rep. Gabby Giffords - "has stirred gun owners and
> prospective gun owners to go visit the stores?"
> Bob Sales, another analyst, asked Fifer how his company was preparing for
> future gun sales, given that "a combination of the election in 2012 and the
> Sandy Hook incident . spurred a massive binge of gun buying."
> On a conference call with investors, Millner, the chief executive of
> Cabela's, fielded a question about the Aurora mass shooting from an analyst
> with Imperial Capital, who asked him if the incident had "any impact on
> your
> business." Millner responded, "I would say that the trends that you read
> about in the press, we are experiencing at least thus far since the
> incident."
> The business rhetoric around mass shootings "doesn't surprise me at all,"
> says Ladd Everitt, the director of communications of the Coalition to Stop
> Gun Violence. Everitt noted that the National Rifle Association, which is
> funded by gun manufacturers, often uses similar language following mass
> shootings.
> "This just shows the guys in the suits understand this and are utterly
> cynical about it."
> http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
> http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
>
>
>
These mouthings from murderers only go to the point that weapon
manufacturers are not concerned about the safety of Americans. It's
all about *Profit*.
Endless war? Fuck the People. It's good for business. Who cares
about the people?
Little children and average every day folks, like your grandma or
grandpa, murdered as they sit in restaurants or stroll the Malls.
To us Working Class folks it hurts deeply when the murderers strike
our Home-Land, but we shrug and go back to our mindless entertainment
when it is happening in other Lands.
Allowing the Weapons Barron's to control our lives puts the blood of
all the world's murders on our hands. We are guilty through failure
to take the guns away from those evil War Mongers who are profiting at
the expense of so much suffering.
Carl Jarvis
On 12/4/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> Fang writes: "The Intercept reviewed investor transcripts for gun
> companies,
> ammunition manufacturers, and sporting stores, and found many instances of
> industry executives discussing mass shooting incidents and the resulting
> political dynamics as lucrative."
>
> Gun sales continue to break records. (photo: Cengiz Yar Jr.AFP/Getty
> Images)
>
>
> Gun Industry Executives Say Mass Shootings Are Good for Business
> By Lee Fang, The Intercept
> 03 December 15
>
> Behind closed doors, speaking with investors and Wall Street analysts, the
> gun industry views mass shootings as an opportunity to make lots of money.
> Ordinary people are despairing about the frequency of tragic events like
> the
> murderous rampage in San Bernardino on Wednesday, or the Planned Parenthood
> massacre last week. And the cycle of mass killing, media frenzy, and
> political stalemate starts anew each time.
> But meanwhile, gun sales continue to break records, a fact that has not
> gone
> ignored by financial analysts.
> The Intercept reviewed investor transcripts for gun companies, ammunition
> manufacturers, and sporting stores, and found many instances of industry
> executives discussing mass shooting incidents and the resulting political
> dynamics as lucrative.
> Here's how it works. Following a mass shooting, there is talk of gun
> control, which the National Rifle Association and other gun advocates
> attack
> as an assault on the Second Amendment. Notably, gun and ammunition
> manufacturers often donate, either directly or as a portion of each sale,
> to
> the NRA. The fear of losing gun rights leads to panic buying, which brings
> greater profits to gun retailers, gun companies and their investors.
> Gun Distributors
> "The gun business was very much accelerated based on what happened after
> the
> election and then the tragedy that happened at Sandy Hook," Ed Stack, the
> chief executive of Dick's Sporting Goods, a leading gun and ammunition
> retailer, said in September 2014 at the Goldman Sachs Global Retailing
> Conference. Stack noted that the industry saw "panic buying" when customers
> "thought there were going to be some very meaningful changes in our gun"
> laws. The new sales "didn't bring hunters in" but rather "brought shooters
> into the industry," he added.
> In 2012, 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot 20 children and 6 adult staff
> members at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.
> Last year, Tommy Millner, the chief executive of Cabela's, a retailer that
> sells guns, boasted at an investor conference in Nebraska that his company
> made a "conscious decision" to stock additional weapons merchandise before
> the 2012 election, hoping Obama's reelection would result in increased
> sales. After the election, the Newtown mass shooting happened, and "the
> business went vertical . I meant it just went crazy," Millner said,
> according to a transcript of the event. Describing the "tailwinds of
> profitability," Millner noted Cabela's "didn't blink as others did to stop
> selling AR-15 platform guns," and so his company "got a lot of new
> customers." The AR-15 is a high-powered assault rifle based on the
> military's M-16 model but without the full automatic capacity,
> Steven Miller, the chief executive of Big 5 Sporting Goods, another gun
> retailer, was asked by investor analysts in 2013 to describe the state of
> the market during a conference call that year. The "real surge" in firearm
> sales, Miller said, "took place following the tragedy in Sandy Hook."
> Gun and Ammunition Manufacturers
> Smith & Wesson chief executive James Debney, speaking to the Roth Capital
> Partners conference in 2013, explained that "the tragedy in Newtown and the
> legislative landscape" resulted in sales that were "significantly up." The
> "fear and uncertainty that there might be increased gun control," Debney
> said, "drove many new people to buy firearms for the first time.
> "You can see after a tragedy, there's also a lot of buying," Jeff Buchanan,
> the chief financial officer of Smith & Wesson, told investors at the RBC
> Capital Markets conference in September of this year. Buchanan noted that
> the political landscape of 2016 is uncertain, but that fear of gun control
> could be on the horizon.
> Michael Fifer, the chief executive of Sturm Ruger, one of the largest
> gunmakers in America, discussed the role of politics in gun sales during a
> conference call with investors in 2013. "If you look back at historical
> patterns back in late '08, early '09, you saw a huge spike in accessory
> sales which then tapered off, and then we saw it again with the really
> tragic events at Sandy Hook that started again as soon as the politicians
> started talking about restricting legal gun use," Fifer said.
> Wall Street Analysts
> Market analysts, including consultants who often hold executives
> accountable
> to investors, have been keen to ask gun companies about how they are able
> to
> respond to surging sales following mass shootings.
> Gautam Khanna, an analyst with Cowen & Co., a market research firm,
> interviewed Mark DeYoung, then the chief executive of ATK, an ammunition
> manufacturer, at the Cowen Aerospace conference in 2013. Khanna asked
> DeYoung if he would make pricing decisions based in part by the "Newtown
> shooting tragedy."
> DeYoung responded that "obviously we are all shocked" by "what happened in
> Newtown and what happened in Aurora, Colorado, and what happened in Tucson,
> Arizona, with Gabby Giffords." But, he added, the company will continue to
> "respond to market pressures," including increases in demand. On a separate
> conference call that year, DeYoung noted that certain "spikes" in demand
> have driven sales.
> James Holmes killed 12 people and injured more than 70 others after opening
> fire in an Aurora, Colorado, movie theater in 2012.
> In 2011, Jim Barrett, a financial analyst, asked Ruger's Fifer during a
> call
> with investors if the "recent shooting incident in Tucson" - referring to
> the shooting that year of Rep. Gabby Giffords - "has stirred gun owners and
> prospective gun owners to go visit the stores?"
> Bob Sales, another analyst, asked Fifer how his company was preparing for
> future gun sales, given that "a combination of the election in 2012 and the
> Sandy Hook incident . spurred a massive binge of gun buying."
> On a conference call with investors, Millner, the chief executive of
> Cabela's, fielded a question about the Aurora mass shooting from an analyst
> with Imperial Capital, who asked him if the incident had "any impact on
> your
> business." Millner responded, "I would say that the trends that you read
> about in the press, we are experiencing at least thus far since the
> incident."
> The business rhetoric around mass shootings "doesn't surprise me at all,"
> says Ladd Everitt, the director of communications of the Coalition to Stop
> Gun Violence. Everitt noted that the National Rifle Association, which is
> funded by gun manufacturers, often uses similar language following mass
> shootings.
> "This just shows the guys in the suits understand this and are utterly
> cynical about it."
> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not
> valid.
>
> Gun sales continue to break records. (photo: Cengiz Yar Jr.AFP/Getty
> Images)
> https://theintercept.com/2015/12/03/mass-shooting-wall-st/https://theinterce
> pt.com/2015/12/03/mass-shooting-wall-st/
> Gun Industry Executives Say Mass Shootings Are Good for Business
> By Lee Fang, The Intercept
> 03 December 15
> ehind closed doors, speaking with investors and Wall Street analysts, the
> gun industry views mass shootings as an opportunity to make lots of money.
> Ordinary people are despairing about the frequency of tragic events like
> the
> murderous rampage in San Bernardino on Wednesday, or the Planned Parenthood
> massacre last week. And the cycle of mass killing, media frenzy, and
> political stalemate starts anew each time.
> But meanwhile, gun sales continue to break records, a fact that has not
> gone
> ignored by financial analysts.
> The Intercept reviewed investor transcripts for gun companies, ammunition
> manufacturers, and sporting stores, and found many instances of industry
> executives discussing mass shooting incidents and the resulting political
> dynamics as lucrative.
> Here's how it works. Following a mass shooting, there is talk of gun
> control, which the National Rifle Association and other gun advocates
> attack
> as an assault on the Second Amendment. Notably, gun and ammunition
> manufacturers often donate, either directly or as a portion of each sale,
> to
> the NRA. The fear of losing gun rights leads to panic buying, which brings
> greater profits to gun retailers, gun companies and their investors.
> Gun Distributors
> "The gun business was very much accelerated based on what happened after
> the
> election and then the tragedy that happened at Sandy Hook," Ed Stack, the
> chief executive of Dick's Sporting Goods, a leading gun and ammunition
> retailer, said in September 2014 at the Goldman Sachs Global Retailing
> Conference. Stack noted that the industry saw "panic buying" when customers
> "thought there were going to be some very meaningful changes in our gun"
> laws. The new sales "didn't bring hunters in" but rather "brought shooters
> into the industry," he added.
> In 2012, 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot 20 children and 6 adult staff
> members at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.
> Last year, Tommy Millner, the chief executive of Cabela's, a retailer that
> sells guns, boasted at an investor conference in Nebraska that his company
> made a "conscious decision" to stock additional weapons merchandise before
> the 2012 election, hoping Obama's reelection would result in increased
> sales. After the election, the Newtown mass shooting happened, and "the
> business went vertical . I meant it just went crazy," Millner said,
> according to a transcript of the event. Describing the "tailwinds of
> profitability," Millner noted Cabela's "didn't blink as others did to stop
> selling AR-15 platform guns," and so his company "got a lot of new
> customers." The AR-15 is a high-powered assault rifle based on the
> military's M-16 model but without the full automatic capacity,
> Steven Miller, the chief executive of Big 5 Sporting Goods, another gun
> retailer, was asked by investor analysts in 2013 to describe the state of
> the market during a conference call that year. The "real surge" in firearm
> sales, Miller said, "took place following the tragedy in Sandy Hook."
> Gun and Ammunition Manufacturers
> Smith & Wesson chief executive James Debney, speaking to the Roth Capital
> Partners conference in 2013, explained that "the tragedy in Newtown and the
> legislative landscape" resulted in sales that were "significantly up." The
> "fear and uncertainty that there might be increased gun control," Debney
> said, "drove many new people to buy firearms for the first time.
> "You can see after a tragedy, there's also a lot of buying," Jeff Buchanan,
> the chief financial officer of Smith & Wesson, told investors at the RBC
> Capital Markets conference in September of this year. Buchanan noted that
> the political landscape of 2016 is uncertain, but that fear of gun control
> could be on the horizon.
> Michael Fifer, the chief executive of Sturm Ruger, one of the largest
> gunmakers in America, discussed the role of politics in gun sales during a
> conference call with investors in 2013. "If you look back at historical
> patterns back in late '08, early '09, you saw a huge spike in accessory
> sales which then tapered off, and then we saw it again with the really
> tragic events at Sandy Hook that started again as soon as the politicians
> started talking about restricting legal gun use," Fifer said.
> Wall Street Analysts
> Market analysts, including consultants who often hold executives
> accountable
> to investors, have been keen to ask gun companies about how they are able
> to
> respond to surging sales following mass shootings.
> Gautam Khanna, an analyst with Cowen & Co., a market research firm,
> interviewed Mark DeYoung, then the chief executive of ATK, an ammunition
> manufacturer, at the Cowen Aerospace conference in 2013. Khanna asked
> DeYoung if he would make pricing decisions based in part by the "Newtown
> shooting tragedy."
> DeYoung responded that "obviously we are all shocked" by "what happened in
> Newtown and what happened in Aurora, Colorado, and what happened in Tucson,
> Arizona, with Gabby Giffords." But, he added, the company will continue to
> "respond to market pressures," including increases in demand. On a separate
> conference call that year, DeYoung noted that certain "spikes" in demand
> have driven sales.
> James Holmes killed 12 people and injured more than 70 others after opening
> fire in an Aurora, Colorado, movie theater in 2012.
> In 2011, Jim Barrett, a financial analyst, asked Ruger's Fifer during a
> call
> with investors if the "recent shooting incident in Tucson" - referring to
> the shooting that year of Rep. Gabby Giffords - "has stirred gun owners and
> prospective gun owners to go visit the stores?"
> Bob Sales, another analyst, asked Fifer how his company was preparing for
> future gun sales, given that "a combination of the election in 2012 and the
> Sandy Hook incident . spurred a massive binge of gun buying."
> On a conference call with investors, Millner, the chief executive of
> Cabela's, fielded a question about the Aurora mass shooting from an analyst
> with Imperial Capital, who asked him if the incident had "any impact on
> your
> business." Millner responded, "I would say that the trends that you read
> about in the press, we are experiencing at least thus far since the
> incident."
> The business rhetoric around mass shootings "doesn't surprise me at all,"
> says Ladd Everitt, the director of communications of the Coalition to Stop
> Gun Violence. Everitt noted that the National Rifle Association, which is
> funded by gun manufacturers, often uses similar language following mass
> shootings.
> "This just shows the guys in the suits understand this and are utterly
> cynical about it."
> http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
> http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
>
>
>
Re: [blind-democracy] WikiLeaks Releases Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) Secret Documents
What is the percentage of information within our Federal Government
that is so secret that the American People are not permitted to know
about, before our so called democracy is removed from the Public's
control?
How can we be, "We, The People", when we do not have a clue as to what
is going on in our name?
What will it take for the American People to wake up to the fact that
we are no longer Citizens? At best we are Consumers. At worst we are
Servants or Subjects held ignorant of the dealings of the government.
When I hear phrases like, "Justice for All", I have to wonder just
who, "All" is.
Carl Jarvis
On 12/4/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
> v
> Excerpt: "WikiLeaks releases new secret documents from the huge Trade in
> Services Agreement (TiSA) which is being negotiated by the US, EU and 22
> other countries that account for 2/3rds of global GDP. Coinciding with the
> ongoing climate talks in Paris, today's publication touches on issues of
> crucial relevance including the regulation of energy, industrial
> development, workers' rights and the natural environment."
>
> Wikileaks. (image: Guardian UK)
>
>
> WikiLeaks Releases Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) Secret Documents
> By Press Release | WikiLeaks
> 03 December 15
>
> Today, Thursday, December 3, 10am EST, WikiLeaks releases new secret
> documents from the huge Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) which is being
> negotiated by the US, EU and 22 other countries that account for 2/3rds of
> global GDP. Coinciding with the ongoing climate talks in Paris, today's
> publication touches on issues of crucial relevance including the regulation
> of energy, industrial development, workers' rights and the natural
> environment. WikiLeaks is also publishing expert analyses of the documents.
> The Trade In Services Agreement is the largest trade treaty of its kind in
> history. The economies of the 52 countries involved in the negotiation,
> which is being led by the United States, are mostly the supply of services.
> According to World Bank figures, services comprise 75% of the EU economy,
> 80% of the US economy and the majority of the global economy. Notably
> excluded in the TiSA negotiations are the emerging economies and the BRICS
> (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa).
> The "Energy Related Services Annex Proposal: Questions and Answers"
> document
> sets out TiSA designs to create an international market in energy-related
> services for foreign suppliers. While heads of state prepare to sign
> climate
> accords in Paris, TiSA negotiators are meeting behind closed doors in
> Geneva
> to forge new limits on energy regulation.
> The "Annex on Environmental Services" reveals that TiSA will aim to ensure
> that national environmental protections within TiSA countries will be
> "harmonized down", promoting the interests of multinational companies
> providing water purification, sanitation and refuse disposal services over
> worker safety, public health and the natural environment. Assessing the
> agreement, Friends of the Earth calls TiSA "an environmental hazard",
> pointing out that public services of an environmentally sensitive nature
> are
> in danger of being privatized. Commenting on the "Annex on Road Freight
> Transport and Related Logistical Services", the International Transport
> Workers Federation (ITF) calls TiSA a "race to the bottom," observing that
> the Annex joins other Annexes published by WikiLeaks to form an overarching
> trade liberalization agenda, fragmenting the trucking industry, opening up
> sensitive areas of the transport sector to international competition, and
> contributing to the ongoing privatization of public services, undercutting
> workers' rights, public health and safety, and the ability of national
> governments to plan and direct their own industrial and infrastructural
> development.
> While the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and
> Investment Pact (TTIP) have received attention, the TiSA is the largest
> component of the United States' "Big Three," the triumvirate of strategic
> neoliberal trade deals being advanced by the Obama administration.
> Together,
> the three treaties form not only a new legal order hospitable for
> transnational corporations, but a new economic "grand enclosure", which
> excludes China and all other BRICS countries.
>
> READ MORE
> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not
> valid.
>
> Wikileaks. (image: Guardian UK)
> https://wikileaks.org/tisa/press.htmlhttps://wikileaks.org/tisa/press.html
> WikiLeaks Releases Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) Secret Documents
> By Press Release | WikiLeaks
> 03 December 15
> oday, Thursday, December 3, 10am EST, WikiLeaks releases new secret
> documents from the huge Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) which is being
> negotiated by the US, EU and 22 other countries that account for 2/3rds of
> global GDP. Coinciding with the ongoing climate talks in Paris, today's
> publication touches on issues of crucial relevance including the regulation
> of energy, industrial development, workers' rights and the natural
> environment. WikiLeaks is also publishing expert analyses of the documents.
> The Trade In Services Agreement is the largest trade treaty of its kind in
> history. The economies of the 52 countries involved in the negotiation,
> which is being led by the United States, are mostly the supply of services.
> According to World Bank figures, services comprise 75% of the EU economy,
> 80% of the US economy and the majority of the global economy. Notably
> excluded in the TiSA negotiations are the emerging economies and the BRICS
> (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa).
> The "Energy Related Services Annex Proposal: Questions and Answers"
> document
> sets out TiSA designs to create an international market in energy-related
> services for foreign suppliers. While heads of state prepare to sign
> climate
> accords in Paris, TiSA negotiators are meeting behind closed doors in
> Geneva
> to forge new limits on energy regulation.
> The "Annex on Environmental Services" reveals that TiSA will aim to ensure
> that national environmental protections within TiSA countries will be
> "harmonized down", promoting the interests of multinational companies
> providing water purification, sanitation and refuse disposal services over
> worker safety, public health and the natural environment. Assessing the
> agreement, Friends of the Earth calls TiSA "an environmental hazard",
> pointing out that public services of an environmentally sensitive nature
> are
> in danger of being privatized. Commenting on the "Annex on Road Freight
> Transport and Related Logistical Services", the International Transport
> Workers Federation (ITF) calls TiSA a "race to the bottom," observing that
> the Annex joins other Annexes published by WikiLeaks to form an overarching
> trade liberalization agenda, fragmenting the trucking industry, opening up
> sensitive areas of the transport sector to international competition, and
> contributing to the ongoing privatization of public services, undercutting
> workers' rights, public health and safety, and the ability of national
> governments to plan and direct their own industrial and infrastructural
> development.
> While the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and
> Investment Pact (TTIP) have received attention, the TiSA is the largest
> component of the United States' "Big Three," the triumvirate of strategic
> neoliberal trade deals being advanced by the Obama administration.
> Together,
> the three treaties form not only a new legal order hospitable for
> transnational corporations, but a new economic "grand enclosure", which
> excludes China and all other BRICS countries.
> http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
> http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
>
>
>
that is so secret that the American People are not permitted to know
about, before our so called democracy is removed from the Public's
control?
How can we be, "We, The People", when we do not have a clue as to what
is going on in our name?
What will it take for the American People to wake up to the fact that
we are no longer Citizens? At best we are Consumers. At worst we are
Servants or Subjects held ignorant of the dealings of the government.
When I hear phrases like, "Justice for All", I have to wonder just
who, "All" is.
Carl Jarvis
On 12/4/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
> v
> Excerpt: "WikiLeaks releases new secret documents from the huge Trade in
> Services Agreement (TiSA) which is being negotiated by the US, EU and 22
> other countries that account for 2/3rds of global GDP. Coinciding with the
> ongoing climate talks in Paris, today's publication touches on issues of
> crucial relevance including the regulation of energy, industrial
> development, workers' rights and the natural environment."
>
> Wikileaks. (image: Guardian UK)
>
>
> WikiLeaks Releases Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) Secret Documents
> By Press Release | WikiLeaks
> 03 December 15
>
> Today, Thursday, December 3, 10am EST, WikiLeaks releases new secret
> documents from the huge Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) which is being
> negotiated by the US, EU and 22 other countries that account for 2/3rds of
> global GDP. Coinciding with the ongoing climate talks in Paris, today's
> publication touches on issues of crucial relevance including the regulation
> of energy, industrial development, workers' rights and the natural
> environment. WikiLeaks is also publishing expert analyses of the documents.
> The Trade In Services Agreement is the largest trade treaty of its kind in
> history. The economies of the 52 countries involved in the negotiation,
> which is being led by the United States, are mostly the supply of services.
> According to World Bank figures, services comprise 75% of the EU economy,
> 80% of the US economy and the majority of the global economy. Notably
> excluded in the TiSA negotiations are the emerging economies and the BRICS
> (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa).
> The "Energy Related Services Annex Proposal: Questions and Answers"
> document
> sets out TiSA designs to create an international market in energy-related
> services for foreign suppliers. While heads of state prepare to sign
> climate
> accords in Paris, TiSA negotiators are meeting behind closed doors in
> Geneva
> to forge new limits on energy regulation.
> The "Annex on Environmental Services" reveals that TiSA will aim to ensure
> that national environmental protections within TiSA countries will be
> "harmonized down", promoting the interests of multinational companies
> providing water purification, sanitation and refuse disposal services over
> worker safety, public health and the natural environment. Assessing the
> agreement, Friends of the Earth calls TiSA "an environmental hazard",
> pointing out that public services of an environmentally sensitive nature
> are
> in danger of being privatized. Commenting on the "Annex on Road Freight
> Transport and Related Logistical Services", the International Transport
> Workers Federation (ITF) calls TiSA a "race to the bottom," observing that
> the Annex joins other Annexes published by WikiLeaks to form an overarching
> trade liberalization agenda, fragmenting the trucking industry, opening up
> sensitive areas of the transport sector to international competition, and
> contributing to the ongoing privatization of public services, undercutting
> workers' rights, public health and safety, and the ability of national
> governments to plan and direct their own industrial and infrastructural
> development.
> While the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and
> Investment Pact (TTIP) have received attention, the TiSA is the largest
> component of the United States' "Big Three," the triumvirate of strategic
> neoliberal trade deals being advanced by the Obama administration.
> Together,
> the three treaties form not only a new legal order hospitable for
> transnational corporations, but a new economic "grand enclosure", which
> excludes China and all other BRICS countries.
>
> READ MORE
> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not
> valid.
>
> Wikileaks. (image: Guardian UK)
> https://wikileaks.org/tisa/press.htmlhttps://wikileaks.org/tisa/press.html
> WikiLeaks Releases Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) Secret Documents
> By Press Release | WikiLeaks
> 03 December 15
> oday, Thursday, December 3, 10am EST, WikiLeaks releases new secret
> documents from the huge Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) which is being
> negotiated by the US, EU and 22 other countries that account for 2/3rds of
> global GDP. Coinciding with the ongoing climate talks in Paris, today's
> publication touches on issues of crucial relevance including the regulation
> of energy, industrial development, workers' rights and the natural
> environment. WikiLeaks is also publishing expert analyses of the documents.
> The Trade In Services Agreement is the largest trade treaty of its kind in
> history. The economies of the 52 countries involved in the negotiation,
> which is being led by the United States, are mostly the supply of services.
> According to World Bank figures, services comprise 75% of the EU economy,
> 80% of the US economy and the majority of the global economy. Notably
> excluded in the TiSA negotiations are the emerging economies and the BRICS
> (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa).
> The "Energy Related Services Annex Proposal: Questions and Answers"
> document
> sets out TiSA designs to create an international market in energy-related
> services for foreign suppliers. While heads of state prepare to sign
> climate
> accords in Paris, TiSA negotiators are meeting behind closed doors in
> Geneva
> to forge new limits on energy regulation.
> The "Annex on Environmental Services" reveals that TiSA will aim to ensure
> that national environmental protections within TiSA countries will be
> "harmonized down", promoting the interests of multinational companies
> providing water purification, sanitation and refuse disposal services over
> worker safety, public health and the natural environment. Assessing the
> agreement, Friends of the Earth calls TiSA "an environmental hazard",
> pointing out that public services of an environmentally sensitive nature
> are
> in danger of being privatized. Commenting on the "Annex on Road Freight
> Transport and Related Logistical Services", the International Transport
> Workers Federation (ITF) calls TiSA a "race to the bottom," observing that
> the Annex joins other Annexes published by WikiLeaks to form an overarching
> trade liberalization agenda, fragmenting the trucking industry, opening up
> sensitive areas of the transport sector to international competition, and
> contributing to the ongoing privatization of public services, undercutting
> workers' rights, public health and safety, and the ability of national
> governments to plan and direct their own industrial and infrastructural
> development.
> While the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and
> Investment Pact (TTIP) have received attention, the TiSA is the largest
> component of the United States' "Big Three," the triumvirate of strategic
> neoliberal trade deals being advanced by the Obama administration.
> Together,
> the three treaties form not only a new legal order hospitable for
> transnational corporations, but a new economic "grand enclosure", which
> excludes China and all other BRICS countries.
> http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
> http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
>
>
>
Saturday, November 28, 2015
[blind-democracy] Washington, Paris ramp up war moves, attack rights
no surprises here. Any justification for increasing our attacks, will do.
Anyone who can read and who owns a history book knows that increased
violence never brings about Peace. But our Ruling Class is not
interested in peace. They see only the short term profits of War.
Until working men and women stand up and look out for our own needs we
will continue to sacrifice our youth on the Alter of Greed.
Carl Jarvis
On 11/28/15, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@freelists.org> wrote:
> http://themilitant.com/2015/7944/794401.html
> The Militant (logo)
>
> Vol. 79/No. 44 December 7, 2015
>
> (lead article)
>
> Washington, Paris ramp up war moves, attack rights
>
>
> BY NAOMI CRAINE
>
> Washington, Paris and other imperialist governments have seized on
> reactionary Islamic State's deadly attacks that killed 130 people in
> France to widen their military and diplomatic efforts to shore up their
> interests in the Middle East. The war drive is coupled with the
> capitalist rulers' deepening assault on political rights and the working
> class — first and foremost targeting Muslims and Arabs.
> Since the Nov. 13 terrorist attacks by Islamic State, French forces have
> stepped up bombardment of Raqqa, the group's de facto capital, and other
> targets in Syria. Paris deployed aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle off
> the coast of Syria, tripling its airpower in the region.
>
> Washington has stepped up bombings against IS targets and says more U.S.
> special forces are on the way. British Prime Minister David Cameron met
> with French President Francois Hollande Nov. 23, asserting his "firm
> conviction" that U.K. forces should join in the bombing.
>
> Moscow has also intensified bombings, hitting nearly 500 targets over
> the Nov. 21-22 weekend. The Russian government has targeted not only
> Islamic State, but used most of its firepower to bomb other opponents of
> the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad, including forces backed by
> Washington.
>
> The challenge of putting together a "grand alliance" of capitalist
> powers with competing interests was highlighted Nov. 24 when a Turkish
> fighter jet shot down a Russian warplane that Ankara says entered
> Turkish airspace. Turkey — a NATO member — had been demanding Moscow
> stop bombing Turkmen forces on Syria's northern border opposed to
> Assad's rule.
>
> Russian President Vladimir Putin threatened "serious consequences,"
> saying Moscow had been stabbed in the back by "the accomplices of
> terrorists."
>
> Hollande met with President Barack Obama Nov. 24, urging closer
> collaboration with Moscow in the fight against Islamic State. He travels
> next to Moscow to meet Putin.
>
> Even before the assault in Paris, the White House had been seeking ways
> to forge a bloc with the Russian and Iranian governments to stabilize
> Syria and Iraq and impose a new balance of power in the region.
>
> Obama faces bipartisan calls to take more aggressive military action.
> Democratic Party presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton called on
> Congress to authorize expanded use of military force against Islamic
> State Nov. 19, saying, "We should get this done." Three days later
> Dianne Feinstein, top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee,
> said, "I don't think the approach is sufficient. … We need to be
> aggressive." Republican Sen. John McCain called for sending ground
> troops to Syria, as have many of the Republican presidential candidates.
>
> Paris extends police powers
> Immediately after the terrorist attacks on civilians at a rock concert,
> a soccer game and several restaurants, Hollande imposed a state of
> emergency, giving authorities broad power to search homes, place
> individuals under house arrest, ban demonstrations, dissolve
> organizations deemed subversive and block Internet sites they claim
> advocate terrorism.
> The French National Assembly voted 551 to 6 Nov. 19 to extend the state
> of emergency for three months. "We believe the extension is warranted
> and necessary," said André Chassaigne of the Communist Party, placing
> the party's Left Front parliamentary bloc firmly in defense of the
> French capitalist state.
>
> Heavily armed police have been breaking down doors in Muslim communities
> across France, interrogating people at will. As of Nov. 23, police say
> they have carried out 1,072 warrantless searches, detained 117 people
> and placed about 180 under house arrest.
>
> Cops searched thousands of workers' lockers at Air France Cargo, FedEx
> and caterer Servair at the Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris. L'Express
> reported they found "elements of proselytizing and some signs of
> radicalization," such as prayer rugs and copies of the Koran "annotated
> along radical or fundamentalist lines." Authorities revoked security
> badges for 58 workers, effectively putting them out of work.
>
> The state of emergency has been used to ban a large, union-sponsored
> environmental rally planned for Paris Nov. 29, on the eve of the U.N.
> summit on climate change in the French capital, and a "Rally with
> Muslims of France for Peace and National Unity," organized to oppose
> both the Islamic State attacks and scapegoating of Muslims, planned for
> Nov. 20 near the Grand Mosque in Paris.
>
> A similar rally was allowed to go ahead in Toulouse the next day and
> drew 10,000 Muslims and others.
>
> Most workers who are Muslim despise Islamic State and its terrorist
> methods. "These people are fanatics and have nothing to do with any
> religion. My neighbors say the same thing," Abdel Kheddouma, an auto
> assembly plant worker near Paris, told the Militant.
>
> Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve Nov. 16 vowed to increase
> surveillance and shut "mosques where hate is preached."
>
> Widespread police raids are also taking place in neighboring Belgium.
> Authorities locked down Brussels, the capital, closing schools, stores
> and the metro transit system for several days, after Prime Minister
> Charles Michel claimed there was a "serious and imminent" threat of an
> attack.
>
> Scapegoating of Muslims
> In Washington the House of Representatives voted by a two-to-one margin
> to suspend the government program that allows refugees from Syria and
> Iraq to enter the United States. Governors of 31 states, Democrats as
> well as Republicans, have said they want to prevent Syrians from coming
> to their states.
> Since the attacks in France, Republican presidential front-runner Donald
> Trump has put anti-Muslim demagogy at the center of his campaign —
> calling for registering Muslims in a government database, closing
> mosques and claiming that "thousands" of Muslims in New Jersey cheered
> the Sept. 11 attack on the World Trade Center.
>
> Rival candidate Marco Rubio said the government should be able not just
> to shut mosques, but "any place — whether it's a cafe, a diner, an
> Internet site — any place where radicals are being inspired."
>
> Democrat David Bowers, mayor of Roanoke, Virginia, issued a statement
> Nov. 18 in support of barring Syrian refugees as a security measure
> comparable to the decision to "sequester Japanese foreign nationals"
> during World War II. When it got wide publicity, Bowers backtracked,
> apologizing.
>
> "We must never let another group of people be singled out and punished
> because of their race or religion," Roz Tonai, director of the National
> Japanese American Historical Society, told the Militant Nov. 23.
>
> Mosques in Omaha, Nebraska; St. Petersburg, Florida; and Portland,
> Oregon, have been vandalized or threatened. Some 200 residents of all
> nationalities rallied in solidarity with the Islamic Center of
> Pflugerville, Texas, Nov. 21 after worshipers found the doorway
> splattered with feces and torn pages of the Koran.
>
>
> Related articles:
> Campaign against imperialist war! Protest attacks on Muslims, mosques!
> New York meeting: 'Join fight against US war drive'
>
>
>
> Front page (for this issue) | Home | Text-version home
>
>
>
>
Anyone who can read and who owns a history book knows that increased
violence never brings about Peace. But our Ruling Class is not
interested in peace. They see only the short term profits of War.
Until working men and women stand up and look out for our own needs we
will continue to sacrifice our youth on the Alter of Greed.
Carl Jarvis
On 11/28/15, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@freelists.org> wrote:
> http://themilitant.com/2015/7944/794401.html
> The Militant (logo)
>
> Vol. 79/No. 44 December 7, 2015
>
> (lead article)
>
> Washington, Paris ramp up war moves, attack rights
>
>
> BY NAOMI CRAINE
>
> Washington, Paris and other imperialist governments have seized on
> reactionary Islamic State's deadly attacks that killed 130 people in
> France to widen their military and diplomatic efforts to shore up their
> interests in the Middle East. The war drive is coupled with the
> capitalist rulers' deepening assault on political rights and the working
> class — first and foremost targeting Muslims and Arabs.
> Since the Nov. 13 terrorist attacks by Islamic State, French forces have
> stepped up bombardment of Raqqa, the group's de facto capital, and other
> targets in Syria. Paris deployed aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle off
> the coast of Syria, tripling its airpower in the region.
>
> Washington has stepped up bombings against IS targets and says more U.S.
> special forces are on the way. British Prime Minister David Cameron met
> with French President Francois Hollande Nov. 23, asserting his "firm
> conviction" that U.K. forces should join in the bombing.
>
> Moscow has also intensified bombings, hitting nearly 500 targets over
> the Nov. 21-22 weekend. The Russian government has targeted not only
> Islamic State, but used most of its firepower to bomb other opponents of
> the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad, including forces backed by
> Washington.
>
> The challenge of putting together a "grand alliance" of capitalist
> powers with competing interests was highlighted Nov. 24 when a Turkish
> fighter jet shot down a Russian warplane that Ankara says entered
> Turkish airspace. Turkey — a NATO member — had been demanding Moscow
> stop bombing Turkmen forces on Syria's northern border opposed to
> Assad's rule.
>
> Russian President Vladimir Putin threatened "serious consequences,"
> saying Moscow had been stabbed in the back by "the accomplices of
> terrorists."
>
> Hollande met with President Barack Obama Nov. 24, urging closer
> collaboration with Moscow in the fight against Islamic State. He travels
> next to Moscow to meet Putin.
>
> Even before the assault in Paris, the White House had been seeking ways
> to forge a bloc with the Russian and Iranian governments to stabilize
> Syria and Iraq and impose a new balance of power in the region.
>
> Obama faces bipartisan calls to take more aggressive military action.
> Democratic Party presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton called on
> Congress to authorize expanded use of military force against Islamic
> State Nov. 19, saying, "We should get this done." Three days later
> Dianne Feinstein, top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee,
> said, "I don't think the approach is sufficient. … We need to be
> aggressive." Republican Sen. John McCain called for sending ground
> troops to Syria, as have many of the Republican presidential candidates.
>
> Paris extends police powers
> Immediately after the terrorist attacks on civilians at a rock concert,
> a soccer game and several restaurants, Hollande imposed a state of
> emergency, giving authorities broad power to search homes, place
> individuals under house arrest, ban demonstrations, dissolve
> organizations deemed subversive and block Internet sites they claim
> advocate terrorism.
> The French National Assembly voted 551 to 6 Nov. 19 to extend the state
> of emergency for three months. "We believe the extension is warranted
> and necessary," said André Chassaigne of the Communist Party, placing
> the party's Left Front parliamentary bloc firmly in defense of the
> French capitalist state.
>
> Heavily armed police have been breaking down doors in Muslim communities
> across France, interrogating people at will. As of Nov. 23, police say
> they have carried out 1,072 warrantless searches, detained 117 people
> and placed about 180 under house arrest.
>
> Cops searched thousands of workers' lockers at Air France Cargo, FedEx
> and caterer Servair at the Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris. L'Express
> reported they found "elements of proselytizing and some signs of
> radicalization," such as prayer rugs and copies of the Koran "annotated
> along radical or fundamentalist lines." Authorities revoked security
> badges for 58 workers, effectively putting them out of work.
>
> The state of emergency has been used to ban a large, union-sponsored
> environmental rally planned for Paris Nov. 29, on the eve of the U.N.
> summit on climate change in the French capital, and a "Rally with
> Muslims of France for Peace and National Unity," organized to oppose
> both the Islamic State attacks and scapegoating of Muslims, planned for
> Nov. 20 near the Grand Mosque in Paris.
>
> A similar rally was allowed to go ahead in Toulouse the next day and
> drew 10,000 Muslims and others.
>
> Most workers who are Muslim despise Islamic State and its terrorist
> methods. "These people are fanatics and have nothing to do with any
> religion. My neighbors say the same thing," Abdel Kheddouma, an auto
> assembly plant worker near Paris, told the Militant.
>
> Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve Nov. 16 vowed to increase
> surveillance and shut "mosques where hate is preached."
>
> Widespread police raids are also taking place in neighboring Belgium.
> Authorities locked down Brussels, the capital, closing schools, stores
> and the metro transit system for several days, after Prime Minister
> Charles Michel claimed there was a "serious and imminent" threat of an
> attack.
>
> Scapegoating of Muslims
> In Washington the House of Representatives voted by a two-to-one margin
> to suspend the government program that allows refugees from Syria and
> Iraq to enter the United States. Governors of 31 states, Democrats as
> well as Republicans, have said they want to prevent Syrians from coming
> to their states.
> Since the attacks in France, Republican presidential front-runner Donald
> Trump has put anti-Muslim demagogy at the center of his campaign —
> calling for registering Muslims in a government database, closing
> mosques and claiming that "thousands" of Muslims in New Jersey cheered
> the Sept. 11 attack on the World Trade Center.
>
> Rival candidate Marco Rubio said the government should be able not just
> to shut mosques, but "any place — whether it's a cafe, a diner, an
> Internet site — any place where radicals are being inspired."
>
> Democrat David Bowers, mayor of Roanoke, Virginia, issued a statement
> Nov. 18 in support of barring Syrian refugees as a security measure
> comparable to the decision to "sequester Japanese foreign nationals"
> during World War II. When it got wide publicity, Bowers backtracked,
> apologizing.
>
> "We must never let another group of people be singled out and punished
> because of their race or religion," Roz Tonai, director of the National
> Japanese American Historical Society, told the Militant Nov. 23.
>
> Mosques in Omaha, Nebraska; St. Petersburg, Florida; and Portland,
> Oregon, have been vandalized or threatened. Some 200 residents of all
> nationalities rallied in solidarity with the Islamic Center of
> Pflugerville, Texas, Nov. 21 after worshipers found the doorway
> splattered with feces and torn pages of the Koran.
>
>
> Related articles:
> Campaign against imperialist war! Protest attacks on Muslims, mosques!
> New York meeting: 'Join fight against US war drive'
>
>
>
> Front page (for this issue) | Home | Text-version home
>
>
>
>
Tuesday, November 24, 2015
If Ignorance is bliss, then what is, Stupid?
They say "ignorance is bliss".
Maybe Yes, maybe No. But being ignorant is very different from being,
Stupid. And ignorant person may be very wise in many areas, but lacks
training or natural abilities to gain enough information to rise above
ignorance in a specific subject.
Ignorant people often rise above their ignorance. But stupid people
wallow in the Pig Pen they have helped to create. Ignorant people are
often able to educate themselves and become knowledgeable. Stupid
people are mentally lazy, and revel in their own stupidity, building
on it and refusing to allow any outside influence to enter.
An ignorant person may come to question what they know or do not know
on a particular subject. A stupid person is so dull witted that they
actually believe that their opinion is the only truth.
When I was a young man, I believed we had many ignorant young people.
But, said I, with proper education they will rise above this ignorance
and come to a wiser place. In retrospect, I believe I was young and
foolish, and unable to differentiate between ignorance and stupidity.
This morning I listened to Donald Trump spew venom to the nation.
Around him came cheers and frantic cries. A cunning man gathering his
stupid forces of hate.
Heil Trump! Heil Trump! Heil Trump!
Carl Jarvis
On 11/24/15, R. E. Driscoll Sr <llocsirdsr@att.net> wrote:
> All:
> A beautifully written article.
> R. E. (Dick) Driscoll, Sr.
>
> On 11/24/2015 8:29 AM, Miriam Vieni wrote:
>>
>> Herzog writes: "There's a secret intelligence network funded by evil
>> billionaire brothers determined to choose the next American president.
>> No,
>> that's not the plot of the new James Bond movie - it's life in the U.S.A.
>> circa 2015."
>>
>> David Koch and his brother Charles are trying to buy young peoples minds.
>> (photo: Brendan Mcdermid/Reuters/Corbis)
>>
>>
>> No, You're Not Paranoid: The Koch Brothers Really Are Spying on You
>> By Katie Herzog, Grist
>> 23 November 15
>>
>> There's a secret intelligence network funded by evil billionaire brothers
>> determined to choose the next American president. No, that's not the plot
>> of
>> the new James Bond movie - it's life in the U.S.A. circa 2015.
>> A Politico article reveals that industrialist brothers Charles and David
>> Koch have a team of 25 - including at least one former CIA operative -
>> quietly gathering intelligence on the American left. "The operation,"
>> reporter Kenneth Vogel writes, "which is little-known even within the
>> Koch
>> network, gathers what Koch insiders refer to as 'competitive
>> intelligence'
>> that is used to try to thwart liberal groups and activists, and to
>> identify
>> potential threats to the expansive network."
>> Terrifying! But is it really all that surprising? The Kochs are
>> reportedly
>> sinking $889 million into this campaign season. Why not have a secret
>> agency
>> to spy on the opposition too?! Gotta cover all your bases when you're
>> dropping nearly a billion dollars on an election.
>> The motivation for this secret spy network, according to Politico, was
>> the
>> 2012 presidential election, when the Kochs' handpicked heir to the White
>> House was trounced by the Democratic incumbent. But the brothers want
>> more
>> than just a president in their pocket. "While the Republican Party
>> focuses
>> on winning elections, the Kochs want to realign American politics,
>> government and society around free enterprise philosophies that they hope
>> to
>> spread more broadly," Vogel writes. That's right: Welcome to Earth,
>> brought
>> to you by Koch Industries.
>> Here's more from Politico:
>> In addition to delving into the left, the competitive intelligence team
>> also
>> monitors potential Koch network threats, according to sources familiar
>> with
>> it. It tracks people deemed suspicious outside the offices of Koch
>> network
>> groups, circulating be-on-the-lookout photos to internal network email
>> lists, while keeping an eye on the network's own ranks for possible
>> leakers
>> or disloyal employees.
>>
>> One former network executive remembers an email containing a photo of a
>> man
>> identified as an operative with the environmental group Greenpeace who
>> allegedly had been spotted taking his own photos outside the network's
>> cluster of offices in the Courthouse neighborhood of Arlington.
>>
>> Connor Gibson, a Greenpeace researcher who focuses on the Koch network,
>> said
>> he visits its component groups' offices once a year to pick up their tax
>> filings, and he speculated he could have been the operative photographed
>> by
>> the competitive intelligence unit. While he said he's never sought to
>> conceal his identity during such visits, he added "If the Kochs consider
>> me
>> an opponent, I'm flattered."
>>
>> In another instance, sources say, [the surveillance] team set out to
>> identify an IT contractor who was working for one of the network's groups
>> and was posting anonymous messages to Reddit, proclaiming that he worked
>> for
>> the Koch brothers but despised their stances. Within 48 hours, the team
>> had
>> sleuthed out the offender and his contract was terminated.
>>
>> "They were scared to death of moles," said the former executive.
>> And the rest of us should be scared to death of them.
>>
>> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not
>> valid.
>>
>> David Koch and his brother Charles are trying to buy young peoples minds.
>> (photo: Brendan Mcdermid/Reuters/Corbis)
>> http://grist.org/article/no-youre-not-paranoid-the-koch-brothers-really-are-
>> spying-on-you/http://grist.org/article/no-youre-not-paranoid-the-koch-brothe
>> rs-really-are-spying-on-you/
>> No, You're Not Paranoid: The Koch Brothers Really Are Spying on You
>> By Katie Herzog, Grist
>> 23 November 15
>> here's a secret intelligence network funded by evil billionaire
>> brothers
>> determined to choose the next American president. No, that's not the plot
>> of
>> the new James Bond movie - it's life in the U.S.A. circa 2015.
>> A Politico article reveals that industrialist brothers Charles and David
>> Koch have a team of 25 - including at least one former CIA operative -
>> quietly gathering intelligence on the American left. "The operation,"
>> reporter Kenneth Vogel writes, "which is little-known even within the
>> Koch
>> network, gathers what Koch insiders refer to as 'competitive
>> intelligence'
>> that is used to try to thwart liberal groups and activists, and to
>> identify
>> potential threats to the expansive network."
>> Terrifying! But is it really all that surprising? The Kochs are
>> reportedly
>> sinking $889 million into this campaign season. Why not have a secret
>> agency
>> to spy on the opposition too?! Gotta cover all your bases when you're
>> dropping nearly a billion dollars on an election.
>> The motivation for this secret spy network, according to Politico, was
>> the
>> 2012 presidential election, when the Kochs' handpicked heir to the White
>> House was trounced by the Democratic incumbent. But the brothers want
>> more
>> than just a president in their pocket. "While the Republican Party
>> focuses
>> on winning elections, the Kochs want to realign American politics,
>> government and society around free enterprise philosophies that they hope
>> to
>> spread more broadly," Vogel writes. That's right: Welcome to Earth,
>> brought
>> to you by Koch Industries.
>> Here's more from Politico:
>> In addition to delving into the left, the competitive intelligence team
>> also
>> monitors potential Koch network threats, according to sources familiar
>> with
>> it. It tracks people deemed suspicious outside the offices of Koch
>> network
>> groups, circulating be-on-the-lookout photos to internal network email
>> lists, while keeping an eye on the network's own ranks for possible
>> leakers
>> or disloyal employees.
>>
>> One former network executive remembers an email containing a photo of a
>> man
>> identified as an operative with the environmental group Greenpeace who
>> allegedly had been spotted taking his own photos outside the network's
>> cluster of offices in the Courthouse neighborhood of Arlington.
>>
>> Connor Gibson, a Greenpeace researcher who focuses on the Koch network,
>> said
>> he visits its component groups' offices once a year to pick up their tax
>> filings, and he speculated he could have been the operative photographed
>> by
>> the competitive intelligence unit. While he said he's never sought to
>> conceal his identity during such visits, he added "If the Kochs consider
>> me
>> an opponent, I'm flattered."
>>
>> In another instance, sources say, [the surveillance] team set out to
>> identify an IT contractor who was working for one of the network's groups
>> and was posting anonymous messages to Reddit, proclaiming that he worked
>> for
>> the Koch brothers but despised their stances. Within 48 hours, the team
>> had
>> sleuthed out the offender and his contract was terminated.
>>
>> "They were scared to death of moles," said the former executive.
>> And the rest of us should be scared to death of them.
>> http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
>> http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
Maybe Yes, maybe No. But being ignorant is very different from being,
Stupid. And ignorant person may be very wise in many areas, but lacks
training or natural abilities to gain enough information to rise above
ignorance in a specific subject.
Ignorant people often rise above their ignorance. But stupid people
wallow in the Pig Pen they have helped to create. Ignorant people are
often able to educate themselves and become knowledgeable. Stupid
people are mentally lazy, and revel in their own stupidity, building
on it and refusing to allow any outside influence to enter.
An ignorant person may come to question what they know or do not know
on a particular subject. A stupid person is so dull witted that they
actually believe that their opinion is the only truth.
When I was a young man, I believed we had many ignorant young people.
But, said I, with proper education they will rise above this ignorance
and come to a wiser place. In retrospect, I believe I was young and
foolish, and unable to differentiate between ignorance and stupidity.
This morning I listened to Donald Trump spew venom to the nation.
Around him came cheers and frantic cries. A cunning man gathering his
stupid forces of hate.
Heil Trump! Heil Trump! Heil Trump!
Carl Jarvis
On 11/24/15, R. E. Driscoll Sr <llocsirdsr@att.net> wrote:
> All:
> A beautifully written article.
> R. E. (Dick) Driscoll, Sr.
>
> On 11/24/2015 8:29 AM, Miriam Vieni wrote:
>>
>> Herzog writes: "There's a secret intelligence network funded by evil
>> billionaire brothers determined to choose the next American president.
>> No,
>> that's not the plot of the new James Bond movie - it's life in the U.S.A.
>> circa 2015."
>>
>> David Koch and his brother Charles are trying to buy young peoples minds.
>> (photo: Brendan Mcdermid/Reuters/Corbis)
>>
>>
>> No, You're Not Paranoid: The Koch Brothers Really Are Spying on You
>> By Katie Herzog, Grist
>> 23 November 15
>>
>> There's a secret intelligence network funded by evil billionaire brothers
>> determined to choose the next American president. No, that's not the plot
>> of
>> the new James Bond movie - it's life in the U.S.A. circa 2015.
>> A Politico article reveals that industrialist brothers Charles and David
>> Koch have a team of 25 - including at least one former CIA operative -
>> quietly gathering intelligence on the American left. "The operation,"
>> reporter Kenneth Vogel writes, "which is little-known even within the
>> Koch
>> network, gathers what Koch insiders refer to as 'competitive
>> intelligence'
>> that is used to try to thwart liberal groups and activists, and to
>> identify
>> potential threats to the expansive network."
>> Terrifying! But is it really all that surprising? The Kochs are
>> reportedly
>> sinking $889 million into this campaign season. Why not have a secret
>> agency
>> to spy on the opposition too?! Gotta cover all your bases when you're
>> dropping nearly a billion dollars on an election.
>> The motivation for this secret spy network, according to Politico, was
>> the
>> 2012 presidential election, when the Kochs' handpicked heir to the White
>> House was trounced by the Democratic incumbent. But the brothers want
>> more
>> than just a president in their pocket. "While the Republican Party
>> focuses
>> on winning elections, the Kochs want to realign American politics,
>> government and society around free enterprise philosophies that they hope
>> to
>> spread more broadly," Vogel writes. That's right: Welcome to Earth,
>> brought
>> to you by Koch Industries.
>> Here's more from Politico:
>> In addition to delving into the left, the competitive intelligence team
>> also
>> monitors potential Koch network threats, according to sources familiar
>> with
>> it. It tracks people deemed suspicious outside the offices of Koch
>> network
>> groups, circulating be-on-the-lookout photos to internal network email
>> lists, while keeping an eye on the network's own ranks for possible
>> leakers
>> or disloyal employees.
>>
>> One former network executive remembers an email containing a photo of a
>> man
>> identified as an operative with the environmental group Greenpeace who
>> allegedly had been spotted taking his own photos outside the network's
>> cluster of offices in the Courthouse neighborhood of Arlington.
>>
>> Connor Gibson, a Greenpeace researcher who focuses on the Koch network,
>> said
>> he visits its component groups' offices once a year to pick up their tax
>> filings, and he speculated he could have been the operative photographed
>> by
>> the competitive intelligence unit. While he said he's never sought to
>> conceal his identity during such visits, he added "If the Kochs consider
>> me
>> an opponent, I'm flattered."
>>
>> In another instance, sources say, [the surveillance] team set out to
>> identify an IT contractor who was working for one of the network's groups
>> and was posting anonymous messages to Reddit, proclaiming that he worked
>> for
>> the Koch brothers but despised their stances. Within 48 hours, the team
>> had
>> sleuthed out the offender and his contract was terminated.
>>
>> "They were scared to death of moles," said the former executive.
>> And the rest of us should be scared to death of them.
>>
>> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not
>> valid.
>>
>> David Koch and his brother Charles are trying to buy young peoples minds.
>> (photo: Brendan Mcdermid/Reuters/Corbis)
>> http://grist.org/article/no-youre-not-paranoid-the-koch-brothers-really-are-
>> spying-on-you/http://grist.org/article/no-youre-not-paranoid-the-koch-brothe
>> rs-really-are-spying-on-you/
>> No, You're Not Paranoid: The Koch Brothers Really Are Spying on You
>> By Katie Herzog, Grist
>> 23 November 15
>> here's a secret intelligence network funded by evil billionaire
>> brothers
>> determined to choose the next American president. No, that's not the plot
>> of
>> the new James Bond movie - it's life in the U.S.A. circa 2015.
>> A Politico article reveals that industrialist brothers Charles and David
>> Koch have a team of 25 - including at least one former CIA operative -
>> quietly gathering intelligence on the American left. "The operation,"
>> reporter Kenneth Vogel writes, "which is little-known even within the
>> Koch
>> network, gathers what Koch insiders refer to as 'competitive
>> intelligence'
>> that is used to try to thwart liberal groups and activists, and to
>> identify
>> potential threats to the expansive network."
>> Terrifying! But is it really all that surprising? The Kochs are
>> reportedly
>> sinking $889 million into this campaign season. Why not have a secret
>> agency
>> to spy on the opposition too?! Gotta cover all your bases when you're
>> dropping nearly a billion dollars on an election.
>> The motivation for this secret spy network, according to Politico, was
>> the
>> 2012 presidential election, when the Kochs' handpicked heir to the White
>> House was trounced by the Democratic incumbent. But the brothers want
>> more
>> than just a president in their pocket. "While the Republican Party
>> focuses
>> on winning elections, the Kochs want to realign American politics,
>> government and society around free enterprise philosophies that they hope
>> to
>> spread more broadly," Vogel writes. That's right: Welcome to Earth,
>> brought
>> to you by Koch Industries.
>> Here's more from Politico:
>> In addition to delving into the left, the competitive intelligence team
>> also
>> monitors potential Koch network threats, according to sources familiar
>> with
>> it. It tracks people deemed suspicious outside the offices of Koch
>> network
>> groups, circulating be-on-the-lookout photos to internal network email
>> lists, while keeping an eye on the network's own ranks for possible
>> leakers
>> or disloyal employees.
>>
>> One former network executive remembers an email containing a photo of a
>> man
>> identified as an operative with the environmental group Greenpeace who
>> allegedly had been spotted taking his own photos outside the network's
>> cluster of offices in the Courthouse neighborhood of Arlington.
>>
>> Connor Gibson, a Greenpeace researcher who focuses on the Koch network,
>> said
>> he visits its component groups' offices once a year to pick up their tax
>> filings, and he speculated he could have been the operative photographed
>> by
>> the competitive intelligence unit. While he said he's never sought to
>> conceal his identity during such visits, he added "If the Kochs consider
>> me
>> an opponent, I'm flattered."
>>
>> In another instance, sources say, [the surveillance] team set out to
>> identify an IT contractor who was working for one of the network's groups
>> and was posting anonymous messages to Reddit, proclaiming that he worked
>> for
>> the Koch brothers but despised their stances. Within 48 hours, the team
>> had
>> sleuthed out the offender and his contract was terminated.
>>
>> "They were scared to death of moles," said the former executive.
>> And the rest of us should be scared to death of them.
>> http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
>> http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
Sunday, November 15, 2015
Re: [blind-democracy] the definition of insanity
And who stands to suffer most from this angry lashing out by France?
I won't even name them. Their lives matter not at all to the Empire
Barons. Anyone who advocates murdering innocent people, just because
they look different, dress differently, worship different Gods, are
Empire Barons infected by insanity.
We are that Ship of Fools, sailing into extinction.
Carl Jarvis
On 11/15/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
> The Washington Post
> News Alert
>
> Sun., Nov. 15, 2015 4:22 p.m.
>
> France launches airstrikes on Islamic State stronghold in Syria
> The French government announced Sunday it hit up to 30 targets in Raqqa,
> the
> militant group's de facto capital, after Friday's attacks in Paris.
> Read more >
> and from Truthdig
> Islamic State Says Paris Attacks Were Retaliation for French Airstrikes in
> Syria
> http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/islamic_state_says_paris_attacks
> _were_retaliation_for_20151114/
> Posted on Nov 14, 2015
> Islamic State has reportedly claimed responsibility for the wave of
> bombings
> and shootings that have left at least 127 people dead and more than 180
> injured across Paris, citing France's leadership role in airstrikes against
> the group in Iraq and Syria.
> VIDEO: Above, French special forces converge on the Bataclan concert hall,
> where hostages were held during the attacks.
> The Friday-night attacks in Paris were the deadliest in Europe since the
> 2004 railway bombings in Madrid. Eight of the attackers have been reported
> dead. French President Francois Hollande denounced the assault as an "act
> of
> war."
> The Guardian reports:
> Isis said it had dispatched jihadis wearing suicide bomb belts and carrying
> machine guns around the French capital on Friday night in a coordinated
> series of attacks intended to show that France would remain one of its main
> targets as long as its present policies continued.
> "France and those who follow her voice must know that they remain the main
> target of Islamic State and that they will continue to smell the odour of
> death for having led the crusade, for having dared to insult our prophet,
> for having boasted of fighting Islam in France and striking Muslims in the
> caliphate with their planes," the group said in a statement.
> Hollande described the attacks as cowardly and "an act of war" that had
> been
> carefully "prepared, organised and planned from outside the country by
> Islamic State, but with help from inside". "Faced with war, the country
> must
> take appropriate action," the president said. He did not say what form that
> action might take.
> These were attacks "against France, against the values that we defend
> everywhere in the world, against what we are: a free country that means
> something to the whole planet," Hollande said, calling for unity and
> courage
> and saying he would address an extraordinary meeting of parliament on
> Monday.
> Continue reading here. Follow updates by The Guardian here.
> -Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
>
>
>
> http://www.truthdig.com/ http://www.truthdig.com/
> Islamic State Says Paris Attacks Were Retaliation for French Airstrikes in
> Syria
> http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/islamic_state_says_paris_attacks
> _were_retaliation_for_20151114/
> Posted on Nov 14, 2015
> Islamic State has reportedly claimed responsibility for the wave of
> bombings
> and shootings that have left at least 127 people dead and more than 180
> injured across Paris, citing France's leadership role in airstrikes against
> the group in Iraq and Syria.
> VIDEO: Above, French special forces converge on the Bataclan concert hall,
> where hostages were held during the attacks.
> The Friday-night attacks in Paris were the deadliest in Europe since the
> 2004 railway bombings in Madrid. Eight of the attackers have been reported
> dead. French President Francois Hollande denounced the assault as an "act
> of
> war."
> The Guardian reports:
> Isis said it had dispatched jihadis wearing suicide bomb belts and carrying
> machine guns around the French capital on Friday night in a coordinated
> series of attacks intended to show that France would remain one of its main
> targets as long as its present policies continued.
> "France and those who follow her voice must know that they remain the main
> target of Islamic State and that they will continue to smell the odour of
> death for having led the crusade, for having dared to insult our prophet,
> for having boasted of fighting Islam in France and striking Muslims in the
> caliphate with their planes," the group said in a statement.
> Hollande described the attacks as cowardly and "an act of war" that had
> been
> carefully "prepared, organised and planned from outside the country by
> Islamic State, but with help from inside". "Faced with war, the country
> must
> take appropriate action," the president said. He did not say what form that
> action might take.
> These were attacks "against France, against the values that we defend
> everywhere in the world, against what we are: a free country that means
> something to the whole planet," Hollande said, calling for unity and
> courage
> and saying he would address an extraordinary meeting of parliament on
> Monday.
> Continue reading here. Follow updates by The Guardian here.
> -Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
> http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/hillary_clintons_big_debate_gaffe_bizarr
> ely_linking_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/hillary_clintons_big_debate_gaffe_bizarr
> ely_linking_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/hillary_clintons_big_debate_gaffe_bizarr
> ely_linking_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pray_with_your_feet_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pray_with_your_feet_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pray_with_your_feet_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/france_launches_airstrikes_on_is
> lamic_state_stronghold_in_syria_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/france_launches_airstrikes_on_is
> lamic_state_stronghold_in_syria_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/france_launches_airstrikes_on_is
> lamic_state_stronghold_in_syria_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/our_brand_is_crisis_film_review_sa
> ndra_bullocks_film_history_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/our_brand_is_crisis_film_review_sa
> ndra_bullocks_film_history_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/our_brand_is_crisis_film_review_sa
> ndra_bullocks_film_history_20151115/ http://www.truthdig.com/
> http://www.truthdig.com/
> http://www.truthdig.com/about/http://www.truthdig.com/contact/http://www.tru
> thdig.com/about/advertising/http://www.truthdig.com/user_agreement/http://ww
> w.truthdig.com/privacy_policy/http://www.truthdig.com/about/comment_policy/
> C 2015 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
> http://www.hopstudios.com/
> http://support.truthdig.com/signup_page/subscribe
> http://support.truthdig.com/signup_page/subscribe
> http://www.facebook.com/truthdighttp://twitter.com/intent/follow?source=foll
> owbutton&variant=1.0&screen_name=truthdighttps://plus.google.com/+truthdight
> tp://www.linkedin.com/company/truthdighttp://truthdig.tumblr.com/http://www.
> truthdig.com/connect
>
>
> Tonight I found a Washington Post news alert to the effect that France is
> now
>
>
>
I won't even name them. Their lives matter not at all to the Empire
Barons. Anyone who advocates murdering innocent people, just because
they look different, dress differently, worship different Gods, are
Empire Barons infected by insanity.
We are that Ship of Fools, sailing into extinction.
Carl Jarvis
On 11/15/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
> The Washington Post
> News Alert
>
> Sun., Nov. 15, 2015 4:22 p.m.
>
> France launches airstrikes on Islamic State stronghold in Syria
> The French government announced Sunday it hit up to 30 targets in Raqqa,
> the
> militant group's de facto capital, after Friday's attacks in Paris.
> Read more >
> and from Truthdig
> Islamic State Says Paris Attacks Were Retaliation for French Airstrikes in
> Syria
> http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/islamic_state_says_paris_attacks
> _were_retaliation_for_20151114/
> Posted on Nov 14, 2015
> Islamic State has reportedly claimed responsibility for the wave of
> bombings
> and shootings that have left at least 127 people dead and more than 180
> injured across Paris, citing France's leadership role in airstrikes against
> the group in Iraq and Syria.
> VIDEO: Above, French special forces converge on the Bataclan concert hall,
> where hostages were held during the attacks.
> The Friday-night attacks in Paris were the deadliest in Europe since the
> 2004 railway bombings in Madrid. Eight of the attackers have been reported
> dead. French President Francois Hollande denounced the assault as an "act
> of
> war."
> The Guardian reports:
> Isis said it had dispatched jihadis wearing suicide bomb belts and carrying
> machine guns around the French capital on Friday night in a coordinated
> series of attacks intended to show that France would remain one of its main
> targets as long as its present policies continued.
> "France and those who follow her voice must know that they remain the main
> target of Islamic State and that they will continue to smell the odour of
> death for having led the crusade, for having dared to insult our prophet,
> for having boasted of fighting Islam in France and striking Muslims in the
> caliphate with their planes," the group said in a statement.
> Hollande described the attacks as cowardly and "an act of war" that had
> been
> carefully "prepared, organised and planned from outside the country by
> Islamic State, but with help from inside". "Faced with war, the country
> must
> take appropriate action," the president said. He did not say what form that
> action might take.
> These were attacks "against France, against the values that we defend
> everywhere in the world, against what we are: a free country that means
> something to the whole planet," Hollande said, calling for unity and
> courage
> and saying he would address an extraordinary meeting of parliament on
> Monday.
> Continue reading here. Follow updates by The Guardian here.
> -Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
>
>
>
> http://www.truthdig.com/ http://www.truthdig.com/
> Islamic State Says Paris Attacks Were Retaliation for French Airstrikes in
> Syria
> http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/islamic_state_says_paris_attacks
> _were_retaliation_for_20151114/
> Posted on Nov 14, 2015
> Islamic State has reportedly claimed responsibility for the wave of
> bombings
> and shootings that have left at least 127 people dead and more than 180
> injured across Paris, citing France's leadership role in airstrikes against
> the group in Iraq and Syria.
> VIDEO: Above, French special forces converge on the Bataclan concert hall,
> where hostages were held during the attacks.
> The Friday-night attacks in Paris were the deadliest in Europe since the
> 2004 railway bombings in Madrid. Eight of the attackers have been reported
> dead. French President Francois Hollande denounced the assault as an "act
> of
> war."
> The Guardian reports:
> Isis said it had dispatched jihadis wearing suicide bomb belts and carrying
> machine guns around the French capital on Friday night in a coordinated
> series of attacks intended to show that France would remain one of its main
> targets as long as its present policies continued.
> "France and those who follow her voice must know that they remain the main
> target of Islamic State and that they will continue to smell the odour of
> death for having led the crusade, for having dared to insult our prophet,
> for having boasted of fighting Islam in France and striking Muslims in the
> caliphate with their planes," the group said in a statement.
> Hollande described the attacks as cowardly and "an act of war" that had
> been
> carefully "prepared, organised and planned from outside the country by
> Islamic State, but with help from inside". "Faced with war, the country
> must
> take appropriate action," the president said. He did not say what form that
> action might take.
> These were attacks "against France, against the values that we defend
> everywhere in the world, against what we are: a free country that means
> something to the whole planet," Hollande said, calling for unity and
> courage
> and saying he would address an extraordinary meeting of parliament on
> Monday.
> Continue reading here. Follow updates by The Guardian here.
> -Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
> http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/hillary_clintons_big_debate_gaffe_bizarr
> ely_linking_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/hillary_clintons_big_debate_gaffe_bizarr
> ely_linking_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/hillary_clintons_big_debate_gaffe_bizarr
> ely_linking_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pray_with_your_feet_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pray_with_your_feet_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pray_with_your_feet_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/france_launches_airstrikes_on_is
> lamic_state_stronghold_in_syria_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/france_launches_airstrikes_on_is
> lamic_state_stronghold_in_syria_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/france_launches_airstrikes_on_is
> lamic_state_stronghold_in_syria_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/our_brand_is_crisis_film_review_sa
> ndra_bullocks_film_history_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/our_brand_is_crisis_film_review_sa
> ndra_bullocks_film_history_20151115/
> http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/our_brand_is_crisis_film_review_sa
> ndra_bullocks_film_history_20151115/ http://www.truthdig.com/
> http://www.truthdig.com/
> http://www.truthdig.com/about/http://www.truthdig.com/contact/http://www.tru
> thdig.com/about/advertising/http://www.truthdig.com/user_agreement/http://ww
> w.truthdig.com/privacy_policy/http://www.truthdig.com/about/comment_policy/
> C 2015 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
> http://www.hopstudios.com/
> http://support.truthdig.com/signup_page/subscribe
> http://support.truthdig.com/signup_page/subscribe
> http://www.facebook.com/truthdighttp://twitter.com/intent/follow?source=foll
> owbutton&variant=1.0&screen_name=truthdighttps://plus.google.com/+truthdight
> tp://www.linkedin.com/company/truthdighttp://truthdig.tumblr.com/http://www.
> truthdig.com/connect
>
>
> Tonight I found a Washington Post news alert to the effect that France is
> now
>
>
>
Sunday, November 8, 2015
[blind-democracy] Koch Brothers' Higher Education Investments Advance Political Goals
No surprise here. If we had billions of dollars, we could meet the
Koch Brothers head to head. But we don't have the big bucks. And
fussing around trying to figure out how to blunt the impact of their
expensive, long range programs is simply an exercise in futility. The
answer is not to try to fund a campaign to oppose them, because they
can out spend us ten to one. The solution is to change governments.
It's time we understood that the present government is serving the
Koch Brothers and their comrades very well, and they do not plan to
give up any of their ill gotten gains.
Times are different today than they were back when FDR pushed through
reforms that saved Capitalism despite the best efforts of the
Capitalists to stop him. But today we have seen the methodical
dismantling of the so called Middle Class, the destruction of Unions,
the negativism toward our government. And through it all we are being
brain washed to believe that Libertarian ism will save us all.
We have been so dummied down that we can't see that our greatest
strength is in our numbers. We are being divided and subdivided just
as surely as if we were cattle being sorted for slaughter.
As tenuous as it may be, we need to continue reaching out to one
another, encouraging and teaching. It is my personal belief that we,
the human species, is in for a near self extinction, and those of us
who survive need to be ready to raise up a new civilization from the
ashes.
Carl Jarvis
On 11/8/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
> Koch Brothers' Higher Education Investments Advance Political Goals
> Sunday, 08 November 2015 00:00 By Dave Levinthal, The Center for Public
> Integrity | News Analysis
> Charles Koch appears in a video promoting a partnership between Koch
> Industries, the Charles Koch Foundation and the United Negro College Fund.
> (Screenshot: Koch Industries)
> Last year, a top lieutenant of Charles and David Koch's vast network of
> philanthropic institutions laid bare the billionaire brothers' strategy to
> evangelize their gospel of economic freedom.
> Political success, Kevin Gentry told a crowd of elite supporters attending
> the annual Koch confab in Dana Point, Calif., begins with reaching young
> minds in college lecture halls, thereby preparing bright,
> libertarian-leaning students to one day occupy the halls of political
> power.
> "The [Koch] network is fully integrated, so it's not just work at the
> universities with the students, but it's also building state-based
> capabilities and election capabilities and integrating this talent
> pipeline," he said.
> "So you can see how this is useful to each other over time," he continued.
> "No one else has this infrastructure. We're very excited about doing it."
> The Center for Public Integrity obtained a previously unpublished audio
> recording of the meeting, which focused on the Kochs' higher education
> funding strategy, from liberal activists who produce The Undercurrent, an
> online video program.
> Higher education has become a top Koch priority in recent years. And
> funding
> - as well as pushback against it - is increasing.
> During 2013, a pair of private charitable foundations Charles Koch leads
> and
> personally bankrolls combined to spread more than $19.3 million across 210
> college campuses in 46 states and the District of Columbia, according to a
> Center for Public Integrity analysis of Internal Revenue Service tax
> filings.
> That represents a significant increase from the $12.7 million the Koch
> foundations distributed among 163 college campuses in 41 states and the
> District of Columbia during 2012. It's also exponentially more than what
> the
> Koch foundations together spent directly on higher education a decade ago.
> The Center for Public Integrity reviewed hundreds of private documents,
> emails and audio recordings that, along with interviews with more than 75
> college officials, professors, students and others, indicate the Koch
> brothers' spending on higher education is now a critical part of their
> broader campaign to infuse politics and government with free-market
> principles.
> Spreading the Free-Market Gospel
> It is no secret that the Kochs' network has invested hundreds of millions
> of
> hard-to-track dollars in conservative political nonprofits that influence
> elections. The brothers, who earned their billions leading private oil,
> chemical and manufacturing conglomerate Koch Industries Inc., were dominant
> forces in recent election cycles. They're now poised to rank among the most
> influential Americans shaping next year's presidential and congressional
> vote.
> Much less well known: their activities on college campuses.
> The Kochs are among many wealthy political patrons who give money to
> education, including conservative Robert McNair, independent Michael
> Bloomberg and liberal billionaire financier George Soros. (The Center for
> Public Integrity receives funding from the Open Society Foundations, which
> Soros funds. A complete list of Center for Public Integrity funders is
> found
> here.)
> The Kochs' giving, however, has a laser-like focus on a specific,
> politically relevant discipline - free market economics - unmatched by
> other
> political mega-donors. Koch officials routinely cultivate relationships
> with
> professors and deans and fund specific courses of economic study pitched by
> them.
> Detractors argue the Koch brothers' college-focused money, by helping
> advance a philosophy of economic liberty, is eroding a fundamental aspect
> of
> higher education: academic freedom.
> But some conservatives and libertarians consider the Kochs' investments in
> higher education a much-needed counterweight to an American higher
> education
> system that historically tilts leftward.
> And they explain the Kochs' decision to influence education most certainly
> does not spring, as many liberal partisans would like the body politic to
> believe, from the compulsions of steel-souled industrialists more concerned
> about fortune and power than, say, protecting the environment or helping
> the
> poor.
> "Since the '60s, they've been imbued with the sense that the world would be
> a better place if the country instituted their libertarian values," author
> Brian Doherty said of the brothers.
> "For Charles, his time horizon, as he gets a little older, has become a
> little shorter. He has lots of money, and he wants to see action in his
> lifetime," continued Doherty, the author of "Radicals for Capitalism: A
> Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement" and
> senior
> editor at Reason who's interviewed both Koch brothers.
> "I'm not doing anything I'm ashamed of," Charles Koch himself told Forbes
> last month. "You've gotta change the hearts and minds of the people to
> understand what really makes society fairer and what's going to change
> their
> lives. And it's not more of this government control."
> The Kochs educational giving, while rarefied, isn't the nation's largest.
> With his wife, Betty, Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Intel, this year
> pledged $100 million to the California Institute of Technology - and
> allowed
> the school to spend it as it sees fit.
> Koch defenders also note, accurately, that the pair has donated generously
> to educational causes not necessarily animated by political considerations:
> the Smithsonian, public television, media organizations, music
> scholarships,
> medical research and a variety of others. David Koch, for his part, has
> poured hundreds of millions of dollars into medicine and the arts over the
> years.
> But it's clear where there is an ideological bent to their giving: Tax
> returns, as well as emails and private documents exchanged among Charles
> Koch Foundation officers and various college and university officials,
> indicate the foundation's commitment to funding academics is deep and
> growing. Koch education funding, which is almost singularly focused on
> economics, also sometimes comes with certain strings attached.
> Also see: "How Colleges Use Koch Money"
> Recruiting New Believers
> At the College of Charleston in South Carolina, for example, documents show
> the foundation wanted more than just academic excellence for its money. It
> wanted information about students it could potentially use for its own
> benefit - and influence over information officials at the public university
> disseminated about the Charles Koch Foundation.
> It sought, for one, the names and email addresses - "preferably not ending
> in .edu" - of any student who participated in a Koch-sponsored class,
> reading group, club or fellowship. The stated purpose: "to notify students
> of opportunities" through both the Charles Koch Foundation and the
> Institute
> for Humane Studies at George Mason University.
> And the foundation certainly did not want the College of Charleston to
> speak
> to news reporters about its Koch-funded programs without prior consent from
> the Charles Koch Foundation.
> "[I]f you intend to engage in press releases or other media outreach
> associated with programmatic activities, please notify us in advance,"
> Charles Koch Foundation officials Charlie Ruger and Derek Johnson wrote
> Peter Calcagno, director of the College of Charleston's Center for Public
> Choice and Market Process. "We consider media outreach a collaborative
> effort and would appreciate the opportunity to both assist and advise."
> Donors are often sent unpublished press releases about programs they fund
> "as a courtesy so that they will know the contents," school spokesman Mike
> Robertson said.
> At Florida State University, one of the nation's top educational recipients
> of Koch foundation money this decade - about $1.38 million from 2010
> through
> 2013 - a similar request is more direct.
> "FSU will allow [the Charles Koch Foundation] to review and approve the
> text
> of any proposed publicity which includes mention of CKF," reads a
> memorandum
> of understanding signed between the university and foundation in 2013.
> Such provisions aren't new at Florida State University: the Center for
> Public Integrity last year reported that the Charles Koch Foundation first
> attempted in 2007 to place specific conditions on its financial support of
> the school, when it initially considered providing funding.
> Among the proposed conditions: Teachings must align with the libertarian
> economic philosophy of Charles Koch, the Charles Koch Foundation would
> maintain partial control over faculty hiring and the chairman of the
> school's economics department - a prominent economic theorist - must stay
> in
> place for another three years despite his plans to step down.
> Florida State University ultimately didn't agree to the initial requests
> when, in 2008, it reached a funding agreement with the foundation. It's
> also
> tightened and clarified policies that affect private donors' contributions
> to the university.
> Relationships between certain school officials and the Charles Koch
> Foundation personnel nevertheless blossomed. One gatekeeper to Charles
> Koch's riches practically became family - if not by blood, then money.
> "Thought you might want to see our 'nephew!'" wrote executive assistant
> Tonja Guilford to David Rasmussen, her boss and dean of Florida State
> University's College of Social Sciences and Public Policy.
> Attached to the October 2014 email were photos of this "nephew" - the
> tow-headed toddler son of John C. Hardin, director of university relations
> for the Charles Koch Foundation.
> Hardin and his family had previously visited with Florida State University
> officials in Tallahassee. Talk of future get-togethers, and more pictures
> of
> Hardin's son in a Superman costume, aloft in his father's arms, would
> follow.
> "I was just thinking this morning I needed new pictures to post outside my
> door," Guilford fawned to Hardin in an email. "He is just way too cute in
> his superman costume. He's my 'little' superman - I just love him!"
> Friend-Raising
> Rasmussen, who routinely pursues private funding on behalf of his
> department, declined interview requests from the Center for Public
> Integrity, as did Guilford.
> Florida State University spokesman Dennis Schnittker described the email
> exchanges as "friendly correspondence between individuals," adding that
> collegial communications are a valuable part of school culture.
> "Most university presidents would tell you before you can fundraise, you
> have to 'friend raise,'" Schnittker said.
> Today, the Kochs' friendship with Florida State University appears stronger
> than ever.
> An email written in September 2014 by Jesse Colvin, Florida State
> University's College of Social Sciences and Public Policy development
> director, indicates the Charles Koch Foundation is committed to funding the
> work of economic department doctoral students "during 2015-2016 and in
> subsequent years."
> A series of other meetings and conversations between Hardin, from the
> Charles Koch Foundation, and Florida State University officials followed,
> documents indicate.
> In November 2014, Florida State University officials huddled in the office
> of newly installed university President John Thrasher for a meeting
> entitled
> "Koch briefing." Schnittker, the university spokesman, said the meeting was
> an "opportunity for our new president to be briefed by university staff
> about a gift agreement that obviously preceded his tenure." Hardin of the
> Charles Koch Foundation was not present, Schnittker said.
> Meanwhile, when officials at the Florida State University Project on
> Accountable Justice went hunting for funding, the Charles Koch Foundation
> factored into their strategy.
> The Koch brothers, after all, were telegraphing their intent to make
> criminal justice reform a personal priority, reasoning that
> "overcriminalization," like overregulation of industry, is resulting in
> more
> Americans enjoying fewer economic freedoms.
> Not everyone at the Florida State University Project on Accountable Justice
> appeared thrilled at pursuing Koch cash.
> "I know you really hate them, but we really need to send them some stuff,"
> then-Chairman Allison DeFoor wrote Executive Director Deborrah Brodsky late
> last year. "They have money. We don't."
> Reached separately by phone last week, DeFoor, an unabashed conservative,
> and Brodsky, a Canadian whose politics point more leftward, both laughed
> off
> the exchange as comedic banter between longtime colleagues.
> But they confirmed they had pursued the Charles Koch Foundation. It hasn't
> yet funded the project but did provide the organization "strategic
> support,"
> including co-hosting a forum on criminal justice.
> DeFoor would conclude, following presentations in Washington, D.C., to both
> the Charles Koch Foundation and the conservative American Legislative
> Exchange Council, that Koch interest in issues the project researches "is
> sincere, potentially aggressive and deep."
> As a small, three-year-old "research- and evidence-based" program, the
> Florida State University Project on Accountable Justice will gladly take
> money from most anyone along the ideological spectrum who's dedicated to
> its
> study of and work on criminal justice system reforms, Brodsky said. She
> counts liberal lions such as the American Civil Liberties Union, Southern
> Poverty Law Center and Human Rights Watch as partners.
> The Charles Koch Foundation executives declined to be interviewed
> individually. Trice Jacobson, a foundation spokesperson, instead provided a
> statement that she said "captures what we all hope to share for this
> piece."
> "Like many charities, the Charles Koch Foundation recognizes the importance
> of supporting a diversity of ideas so scholars and students can continue to
> push the frontiers of knowledge and help people discover new and better
> ways
> to live fulfilling lives," the statement read. "Our giving has expanded to
> support new research and programs on critical issues ranging from criminal
> justice reform to corporate welfare."
> In a separate statement of its "academic giving principles," the Charles
> Koch Foundation asserts that it is "committed to advancing a marketplace of
> ideas and supporting a 'Republic of Science' where scholarship is free,
> open
> and subject to rigorous and honest intellectual challenge."
> It also notes that scholars and students "who are free to teach, learn,
> research, speak, critique and receive support for their work without
> interference" are in the "best position to discover the advances that will
> help improve well-being."
> George Mason, aka Koch U
> Nowhere is expanded Koch involvement in higher education more evident than
> at George Mason University, which receives more funding from the Kochs than
> any other school.
> The large, diverse public school in northern Virginia, about 20 miles from
> the White House, today houses and lends its name to what's effectively
> Charles Koch's personal academic workshop. The Charles Koch Foundation in
> 2013 donated more than $14.4 million to George Mason University and the
> research centers it hosts. That's on top of tens of millions in Koch
> dollars
> that George Mason University and the affiliated research centers have
> collectively received in recent years.
> Charles Koch himself is a George Mason University fixture. He's the
> recipient of an honorary doctorate in science from the university, which
> boasts a student population of more than 33,700. He is a director of the
> university-based Mercatus Center - Mercatus means "market" in Latin - that
> Charles Koch Foundation Vice President Ryan Stowers described at the 2014
> Koch gathering in California as "critical" to advancing policy priorities.
> Koch also enjoys the company of several current and former George Mason
> University affiliates who play multiple roles across the Koch brothers'
> sprawling educational, corporate and political network.
> Chief among them is Gentry, who presided over the Koch's closed-door higher
> education workshop last year.
> Gentry possesses unique knowledge about the interconnectivity of the Koch's
> various interests and operations because he embodies its reach. He's a
> Charles Koch Foundation vice president and a key fundraiser for the Kochs'
> political action arm. He's a former vice president of both the Mercatus
> Center and the Institute for Humane Studies at George Mason University. And
> today, he's even Eastern vice chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia.
> Brian Hooks, now president of the Charles Koch Foundation, is another key
> Koch network player.
> Hooks served as the Mercatus Center's executive director and chief
> operating
> officer from 2005 until 2014 and remains a Mercatus Center board member.
> The
> year Hooks took over, the Mercatus Center posted $4.9 million in total
> revenue, according to tax filings. The year he left, it posted nearly $20.7
> million.
> "Our job is to make sure that we've got a strategy for our work to have a
> disproportionate impact," Hooks said at the Kochs' conference in 2014,
> noting that the Mercatus Center is the "largest collection" of "free market
> faculty" at any university in the world. "These guys are producing research
> that groups in this network can rely on to advance economic freedom every
> single day."
> Scholarly research performed by academics at Koch-funded schools and
> programs is indeed sometimes used by Koch-backed nonprofit organizations
> that, in turn, overtly advocate for political candidates or causes.
> For instance, to support assertions made in a recent, 67-page policy paper,
> Koch-supported American Encore regularly cites and quotes Mercatus Center
> research and mentions the center nearly a dozen times.
> Among the academic work American Encore's paper highlights: a 2014 Mercatus
> Center study by Keith Hall, a senior research fellow who had previously
> served as commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and a 2014
> commentary about a federal regulations tracking and measurement tool by
> Patrick A. McLaughlin, another senior research fellow.
> "Yet another study has confirmed what we already knew - states with lower
> taxes do better," read an article by the Kochs' flagship nonprofit,
> Americans for Prosperity, about a study published July 7 by the Mercatus
> Center. "Overall, the rankings provide more evidence that economic freedom
> works, and bigger government means bigger trouble."
> And the 60 Plus Association, a retiree-focused nonprofit that's benefited
> from tens of millions of dollars of the Koch brothers' money over the
> years,
> for a time tapped Walter Williams, a George Mason University economics
> professor, syndicated columnist and Rush Limbaugh Show fill-in host, as a
> member of its "truth squad." His mission: to "battle" against Democrats on
> Social Security and Medicare programs.
> Congress Takes Notice
> Congress is also paying more attention to the Mercatus Center, which from
> 1999 to 2008 was mentioned by name 32 times in either the Congressional
> Record or congressional committee reports. Since 2009, it's been mentioned
> 93 times, often in reference to Mercatus Center faculty who were testifying
> before Congress.
> This year, Congress even cited Mercatus Center research in the text of
> budget bills. House Concurrent Resolution 27 and Senate Concurrent
> Resolution 11 note that a Mercatus Center study "estimates that Obamacare
> will reduce employment by up to 3 percent, or about 4 million full-time
> equivalent workers."
> Mercatus Center Vice President Carrie Conko, while declining to address
> critics' "ad hominem attacks" of Charles Koch, stressed the institution's
> work is the product of hard work and high standards - not the whims of some
> patron puppet master.
> "As a university research center, our scholarship is independent and
> subjected to rigorous peer review," Conko said. "Our researchers are
> interested in understanding what shapes societies and economies and that
> covers a spectrum of research from the history of economic thought to the
> application of economics to questions of public policy."
> Conko also noted that the Mercatus Center abides by a strong conflict of
> interest and research independence policy, which she described as "stronger
> than those of most found with typical academic centers or departments."
> Mercatus Center officials note that the center isn't part of George Mason
> University the same way as, say, its chemistry or psychology departments.
> Instead, it's organized as a stand-alone nonprofit, and as such, George
> Mason University isn't directly responsible for it.
> The Mercatus Center doesn't receive direct funding from George Mason
> University, Conko said.
> But George Mason University and its students do receive millions of dollars
> in annual financial benefit from the Mercatus Center, according to federal
> tax filings.
> That alone is a major incentive for a public university in Virginia, where
> state funding of higher education is dwindling, to host a privately funded
> operation on its campus - today, a fairly common practice among public
> schools.
> The Mercatus Center spent $3.64 million during that time to "support
> graduate students at George Mason University" by "training future scholars
> and decision-makers to advance and apply a research agenda for
> understanding
> institutions and change," according to a tax filing.
> The Mercatus Center helped fund $1.82 million worth of communication
> efforts
> that included promoting its research and ideas "to the media and opinion
> shapers."
> And it made a $10,000 grant to the Atlas Economic Research Foundation,
> which
> operates a "global network of more than 400 free market organizations."
> They
> include several Koch-backed nonprofit groups such as Americans for
> Prosperity, the American Legislative Exchange Council and Americans for Tax
> Reform.
> McAuliffe Mum?
> The Mason-Mercatus-Koch nexus may seem like rich fodder for a Democrat such
> as Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, whose national party brethren makes
> demonizing the Koch brothers a central strategy of their electoral and
> fundraising agenda.
> McAuliffe's own political committee, Common Good VA, bashed the "ultra
> right wing Koch Brothers" in an email earlier this month, accusing them of
> working against "expanding health care for all" and "ensuring a living
> wage."
> But McAuliffe - the outspoken former chairman of both the Democratic
> National Committee and Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign -
> declined Center for Public Integrity requests to discuss George Mason
> University's relationship with the Koch brothers.
> George Mason University's top undergraduate leader, Student Body President
> Khushboo Bhatia, also declined comment.
> University spokesman Michael Sandler explained that George Mason is among
> the nation's most diverse campuses, and "this notion of diversity and
> inclusion that is so central to our mission applies to our donors, as
> well."
> Sandler said the university appreciates the Charles Koch Foundation's
> donations, as well as those from thousands of other donors.
> "While we are grateful for all of the gifts we receive, we value academic
> freedom above all else," Sandler said. "This freedom allows our faculty and
> researchers to ask questions and make discoveries that others wouldn't
> otherwise pursue, and we will not compromise that freedom for anything or
> anyone."
> Jennifer Victor, a George Mason University politics professor who
> specializes in how individuals and groups influence government, is
> skeptical.
> George Mason University's marriage to an ideologically motivated donor with
> a policy agenda to achieve "raises some eyebrows," Victor said. "I don't
> really see what Mason gets from them, and I don't think the situation is
> healthy or consistent with the university's teaching mission."
> No Comment on Koch Funding
> Some college officials such as Sandler are willing to discuss the financial
> support their schools receive from Koch-run private foundations, with many
> emphasizing that gifts from donors, whether liberal or conservative, don't
> affect coursework or the manner in which students learn. They also note
> that
> their schools receive hundreds, and sometimes thousands of contributions
> each year from individuals, private foundations and the like.
> But it's not uncommon for other school officials to button up.
> Take Victor Nakas, a spokesman for The Catholic University of America in
> Washington, D.C.
> Posed a series of questions about the $215,000 the university received in
> 2013 from the Charles Koch Foundation, he emailed a pair of dated press
> releases announcing grants.
> "We will be unable to provide you with more than links to these
> announcements," he said.
> Follow-up messages went unreturned.
> Michael Schoenfeld, the vice president for public affairs and government
> relations at Duke University, declined to say how the school used the
> $37,000 it recently received from the Charles Koch Foundation.
> "As a rule, we do not comment on individual donors or contributions without
> the donor's permission," he explained.
> Officials at Oklahoma State University likewise offered no details about
> how
> the school used the $69,000 the Charles Koch Foundation recently gave it.
> Why the silence?
> An email exchange between two Florida State University officials, obtained
> by the Center for Public Integrity, offers a measure of explanation.
> In it, the officials indicate deep concern about the potential effects of
> releasing more information about the school's moneyed donors in response to
> activist demands.
> "[R]equiring donors to disclose more than they already do will likely
> result
> in fewer gifts and smaller gifts, and it will impose an additional
> administrative hurdle for the university," wrote Thomas W. Jennings, vice
> president for university advancement, to David Coburn, Florida State
> University chief of staff.
> Revealing donor gift agreements, even for donors who have not requested
> anonymity, might "have a negative effect on FSU's relationships with many
> of
> its donors, who don't want that kind of attention," Jennings continued.
> The University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill received $115,000 from the
> Charles Koch Foundation in 2013, one of nearly 100 schools that year to
> receive a five-figure contribution from a Koch foundation.
> But that's information not easily accessed by students. Whether by design,
> happenstance or ignorance, "most individuals don't know where any of the
> university's funds come from," University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
> Student Body President Houston Summers said.
> University spokesman Jim Gregory confirmed the school received $110,000 for
> the Charles Koch Visiting Scholars Program in UNC-Chapel Hill's Philosophy,
> Politics and Economics Program, conducted in collaboration with Duke
> University. Donors are allowed to remain anonymous, if they choose.
> However, some universities are facing blowback over scant information about
> school donors from increasingly organized anti-Koch groups and activists.
> The umbrella group UnKoch My Campus, for one, has staged protests, demanded
> meetings with administrators and launched chapters at George Mason
> University and Florida State University, among others. The organization
> accuses the Kochs and their allies of undermining issues many students care
> about, such as environmental protection, workers' rights, healthcare
> expansion and public education.
> Its immediate goal, beyond convincing colleges to de-Koch themselves?
> "Transparency, because students should have the capability to be more aware
> of who's funding their school and their education, and where funding might
> conflict with student interests," said Kalin Jordan, an UnKoch My Campus
> organizer. "The universities - most don't do a good job of informing
> students at all."
> Said Colin Nackerman, a student activist at George Mason University: "You
> should know, if you're going into a classroom, that $30 million is going
> into your school from someone who wants you to think a certain way."
> Largely silent in the past, the Charles Koch Foundation has begun to push
> back at such dissenters.
> "They don't want students and scholars to expand their educational
> horizons," Hardin, the foundation's university relations director, wrote in
> a May 26 Wall Street Journal op-ed. "Rather than engage in a vigorous and
> civil debate about the merits of different ideas, they seek to prevent
> those
> with which they disagree from ever being heard."
> Liberals Give Big, Too
> If George Mason University is Charles Koch's academic playground, Bard
> College is that of Democratic bankroller George Soros, often viewed as the
> Koch brothers' pre-eminent liberal foil.
> The tiny New York liberal arts school nestled along the Hudson River is
> renowned for both scholarship and hippy-dippyness. It received more than
> $11.2 million from Soros' private foundation in 2013 - part of a $60
> million, multiyear commitment.
> But for Soros, himself a multibillionaire with wealth comparable to the
> Kochs, his contributions to Bard College aren't generally earmarked for
> core
> academics or domestic political considerations.
> Instead, Soros' money mainly helps fund Bard College's Center for Civic
> Engagement, which houses a broad portfolio of both U.S. and overseas
> programs aimed at "advancing the ideals of an innovative, hands-on liberal
> arts education through a myriad of opportunities across the globe."
> This tracks with Soros' broader tack on educational giving: The vast
> majority of his tens of millions of dollars in education-related
> contributions fund foreign schools and programs, particularly in Eastern
> Europe and the Middle East. (Soros lived his early life in Hungary, where
> as
> a Jew, he survived Nazi occupation before emigrating.)
> Among the U.S. schools Soros does aid, many of his most sizable grants are
> earmarked for programs with international goals, such as $500,000 to
> Harvard
> University funding a project on economic growth in Albania, and $159,834 to
> The George Washington University in Washington, D.C., to "develop effective
> and influential public policy leaders in Central Asia."
> Soros' foundation even gave George Mason University more than $22,500 - not
> to fund economics programs, but to organize meetings in Mexico and Peru
> about conflict reconciliation.
> "As a general rule," Soros said in 2011, "I do not support higher education
> in the United States."
> Soros does make exceptions.
> An avowed advocate of campaign finance reform, Soros has used his private
> foundations to fund certain domestic college initiatives squarely rooted in
> American politics and elections.
> One Soros foundation, for example, gave New York City's Fordham University
> $200,000 in 2013 to study the "role of money in democratic process."
> The money is part of a $1 million, multi-year grant to determine how
> disclosure of campaign money influences voters - an awfully political
> endeavor by any measure.
> But school officials say the research they conduct is free of outside
> influence and subject to the highest academic and legal reviews and
> standards.
> "None of this work is 'political' per se in terms of any ideological
> dimensions . it is all strictly nonpartisan," said Costas Panagopoulos,
> director of Fordham's Center for Electoral Politics and Democracy, who is
> leading the program.
> Penn State University's economics department in 2013 benefited from
> $150,000
> in Soros money to help build a research center focused in part on
> "interactions between new media and society."
> And the Ohio State University Research Foundation received $50,000 to
> conduct a research project aimed at better understanding the role
> independent expenditures play in federal elections and "how those
> expenditures influence the legislative process."
> Bard College officials do hear their share of criticism for taking a
> massive
> amount of money from Soros' private foundation, said Jonathan Becker, the
> school's vice president for academic affairs and director for civic
> engagement.
> But, similar to some of the schools that accept Koch money, the school's
> tenuous budget situation means that it'd take funding from just about
> anyone
> so long as the transaction was legal and wasn't intended to fund an
> initiative "antithetical to our vision," Becker said.
> That vision, in the words of its student handbook, imagines a "supportive,
> intellectually rich environment where students can engage themselves to the
> fullest while respecting all members of the community."
> So what if the Charles Koch Foundation wanted to donate $1 million to Bard
> College?
> Or $10 million?
> "We would say 'thank you,' and we would cash the check quickly," Becker
> said.
> Other Conservative Donors
> Unlike the Kochs, Soros and many other prominent political donors, both
> left
> and right of center, have charitable agendas that largely diverge from
> their
> domestic political agendas.
> Robert McNair, the Houston Texans owner who this year alone has spread $3
> million among five super PACs backing several Republican presidential
> candidates, used his private foundation to give millions of dollars to
> various medical schools and a scholarship program for doctors performing
> research in areas such as breast cancer, juvenile diabetes and
> neuroscience.
> Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, two other top-shelf Republican donors whom 2016
> presidential candidates have endlessly wooed, directed almost all of their
> university-related private foundation funding - millions of it in 2013 - to
> medical research.
> A private foundation co-run by former World Wrestling Entertainment honcho
> Linda McMahon, a major GOP donor who herself twice unsuccessfully ran
> self-funded U.S. Senate campaigns, gave its most sizable, six-figure
> contributions to substance abuse help group Liberation Programs.
> Then there's one late Republican superdonor whose philanthropy has been at
> war with his political giving: Harold Simmons.
> The Texas businessman bankrolled his eponymous foundation, but his liberal
> daughters run it. In doing so, they saw to it that Planned Parenthood - the
> ultimate Republican scourge of late - received more than $300,000 of his
> money during 2013. It's also given hundreds of thousands of dollars to
> Public Campaign, a Washington, D.C.-based money-in-politics reform group
> also supported in 2013 with $300,000 from a private foundation led by
> liberal hedge fund manager Jonathan Soros, son of George Soros.
> Money the Harold Simmons Foundation did give to colleges in 2013 mostly
> went
> toward infrastructure and general operating expenses.
> University of Dayton Says "No Thanks"
> While more schools than ever are engaging with Koch foundations, at least
> one school - the University of Dayton in Ohio - has seemingly soured on
> Koch
> cash, which it has previously accepted in five-figure amounts.
> Jay Riestenberg, a research analyst at campaign reform advocacy group
> Common
> Cause and University of Dayton alumnus, earlier this year emailed the
> school's Interim Provost Paul H. Benson, asking him if the University of
> Dayton is still funded by, or seeking new funding from Koch foundations.
> Attached was an op-ed Riestenberg has written for the school's student
> newspaper. In it, he explains that his education at the small Catholic
> school inspired him to care about other people, protect the environment and
> fight for social justice.
> "UD accepting Koch funding is in clear violation of the institution's
> Catholic Marianist values," Riestenberg wrote in the April 28 email.
> Benson replied later that night. His answer: The University of Dayton no
> longer accepts Koch cash, and it will not in the future - despite the
> efforts of Koch-backed organizations.
> "There have been instances in which other foundations who are funded in
> part
> by the Koch Brothers have tried to interest us in establishing centers at
> UD," Benson wrote Riestenberg. "We have not supported those proposals,
> precisely for the reasons you cite."
> Benson declined an interview request by the Center for Public Integrity.
> In a statement, University of Dayton spokeswoman Cilla Shindell explained
> that the school did reject a recent proposal from a "foundation that is in
> part funded by the Koch family" because it "would have been structured in a
> way that would limit oversight by the university in such areas as
> curriculum
> and faculty hiring."
> She did not name the foundation.
> Kochs' Higher Education Funding Strategy
> This previously unpublished recording of Koch aides discussing education
> funding strategy with potential donors was provided to the Center for
> Public
> Integrity by The Undercurrent, an online program produced by liberal
> political activists.
> Key Kochworld Lieutenants
> Several associates of Charles and David Koch span multiple aspects of the
> billionaire brothers' political, educational, charitable and industrial
> juggernauts. Among them:
> Richard Fink is among Charles Koch's top aides. Fink is the co-founder of
> George Mason University's Mercatus Center and a current member of the
> center's board of directors. Fink has also served on the boards of several
> of Charles and David Koch's private foundations. That includes serving as
> president of the Charles Koch Foundation until 2014 and as a director for
> the Fred C. & Mary R. Koch Foundation alongside Charles and David Koch
> themselves. Fink likewise sits on the board of directors for Americans for
> Prosperity, a "social welfare" nonprofit that doesn't reveal its donors but
> spent more than $33.5 million during the 2012 election advocating against
> President Barack Obama's re-election. Fink also works as chairman and chief
> executive of Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC, the legal, government and
> public affairs wing of Koch Industries Inc.
> Kevin Gentry is vice president of the Charles Koch Foundation. He is also a
> board member for Koch-backed nonprofit Freedom Partners and vice president
> for special projects/development at Koch Companies Public Sector LLC.
> Gentry
> previously served as vice president of the Koch-funded Institute for Humane
> Studies and the Mercatus Center at George Mason University and as volunteer
> faculty at the Leadership Institute, which "identifies, recruits, trains
> and
> places conservatives in government, politics and the media." In party
> politics, Gentry serves as eastern vice chairman for the Republican Party
> of
> Virginia.
> Brian Hooks is president of the Charles Koch Foundation, having been hired
> in 2014. Hooks is also a Mercatus Center board member and served as the
> Mercatus Center's executive director and chief operating officer from 2005
> until 2014.
> Wayne Gable is a board member of the Koch-funded Freedom Partners, itself a
> nonprofit that has largely provided seed money to other Koch-backed
> political nonprofits over many years. He served from 1999 to 2000 as
> president of the Charles Koch Foundation as well. Gable is also a former
> managing director of international government affairs at Koch Industries
> Inc. and a onetime registered federal lobbyist for the company. He received
> a doctoral degree in economics from George Mason University.
> Nancy Pfotenhauer served from 2010 to 2014 on George Mason University's
> Board of Visitors - a 16-member university governing body appointed by
> Virginia's governor that "exercises its authority principally in
> policy-making and oversight." She received a master's degree in economics
> from George Mason University. Pfotenhauer today serves on Americans for
> Prosperity's board of directors and runs a communications firm. She is also
> a former director of the Independent Women's Forum, which in 2010 received
> $350,000 from the Koch-controlled (and now defunct) Claude R. Lambe
> Charitable Foundation, according to IRS tax documents. She once led Koch
> Industries Inc.'s Washington, D.C., office.
> Dale Gibbens is the human resources vice president for Koch Industries Inc.
> He is a board member for Koch-backed nonprofit Freedom Partners, described
> by Politico in 2013 as "the Koch brothers secret bank." Since then, Freedom
> Partners' sister super PAC spent about $23.4 million advocating for
> Republican congressional candidates and against Democratic candidates. In
> 2014, Gibbens also helped fund the Koch Center for Leadership and Ethics at
> Emporia State University in Kansas, which is focused on "free market
> principles, leadership and ethical theories."
> Patrick Hedger is policy director for American Encore, a heavily
> Koch-backed
> political nonprofit previously known as the Center to Protect Patient
> Rights. He is a recent graduate of George Mason University, where he is
> also
> pursuing a master's degree in public policy.
> A version of this story was co-published with The Atlantic.
> This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not
> be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.
> DAVE LEVINTHAL
> Dave Levinthal joined the Center for Public Integrity in 2013 to help lead
> its Consider the Source project investigating the influence of money in
> politics. For two years prior to joining the Center, Dave reported on
> campaign finance and lobbying issues for Politico and co-wrote the daily
> Politico Influence column. He also edited OpenSecrets.org from 2009 to
> 2011,
> where he led coverage that won the Online News Association's top honors in
> 2011 for best topical reporting and blogging and was a finalist the same
> year for the Scripps Howard Foundation's Distinguished Service to the First
> Amendment award. From 2003 to 2009, Dave worked for The Dallas Morning
> News,
> primarily covering Dallas City Hall also reporting on national elections
> and
> aviation security. From 2000 to 2002, he covered the New Hampshire
> Statehouse for The Eagle-Tribune of Lawrence, Mass. A native of Buffalo,
> N.Y., Dave graduated from Syracuse University with degrees in newspaper
> journalism and political philosophy and edited The Daily Orange. He is also
> a two-time winner (2007 and 2010) of Canada's Northern Lights Award for his
> travel writing about the arctic.
> RELATED STORIES
> Koch Funding of Universities Shrouded in Secrecy
> By Kalin Jordan, PR Watch | Op-Ed
> Koch PR Games: College Football Brought to You by Koch Industries
> By Nick Surgey, PR Watch | Report
> Koch Brothers Hit the Airwaves in Support of Wisconsin Corruption Measures
> By Brendan Fischer, PR Watch | Report
> ________________________________________
> Show Comments
> Hide Comments
> <a href="http://truthout.disqus.com/?url=ref">View the discussion
> thread.</a>
> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
> Koch Brothers' Higher Education Investments Advance Political Goals
> Sunday, 08 November 2015 00:00 By Dave Levinthal, The Center for Public
> Integrity | News Analysis
> . font size Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink
> reference not valid.Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink
> reference not valid.
> . Charles Koch appears in a video promoting a partnership between
> Koch Industries, the Charles Koch Foundation and the United Negro College
> Fund. (Screenshot: Koch Industries)
> . Last year, a top lieutenant of Charles and David Koch's vast network
> of philanthropic institutions laid bare the billionaire brothers' strategy
> to evangelize their gospel of economic freedom.
> Political success, Kevin Gentry told a crowd of elite supporters attending
> the annual Koch confab in Dana Point, Calif., begins with reaching young
> minds in college lecture halls, thereby preparing bright,
> libertarian-leaning students to one day occupy the halls of political
> power.
> "The [Koch] network is fully integrated, so it's not just work at the
> universities with the students, but it's also building state-based
> capabilities and election capabilities and integrating this talent
> pipeline," he said.
> "So you can see how this is useful to each other over time," he continued.
> "No one else has this infrastructure. We're very excited about doing it."
> The Center for Public Integrity obtained a previously unpublished audio
> recording of the meeting, which focused on the Kochs' higher education
> funding strategy, from liberal activists who produce The Undercurrent, an
> online video program.
> Higher education has become a top Koch priority in recent years. And
> funding
> - as well as pushback against it - is increasing.
> During 2013, a pair of private charitable foundations Charles Koch leads
> and
> personally bankrolls combined to spread more than $19.3 million across 210
> college campuses in 46 states and the District of Columbia, according to a
> Center for Public Integrity analysis of Internal Revenue Service tax
> filings.
> That represents a significant increase from the $12.7 million the Koch
> foundations distributed among 163 college campuses in 41 states and the
> District of Columbia during 2012. It's also exponentially more than what
> the
> Koch foundations together spent directly on higher education a decade ago.
> The Center for Public Integrity reviewed hundreds of private documents,
> emails and audio recordings that, along with interviews with more than 75
> college officials, professors, students and others, indicate the Koch
> brothers' spending on higher education is now a critical part of their
> broader campaign to infuse politics and government with free-market
> principles.
> Spreading the Free-Market Gospel
> It is no secret that the Kochs' network has invested hundreds of millions
> of
> hard-to-track dollars in conservative political nonprofits that influence
> elections. The brothers, who earned their billions leading private oil,
> chemical and manufacturing conglomerate Koch Industries Inc., were dominant
> forces in recent election cycles. They're now poised to rank among the most
> influential Americans shaping next year's presidential and congressional
> vote.
> Much less well known: their activities on college campuses.
> The Kochs are among many wealthy political patrons who give money to
> education, including conservative Robert McNair, independent Michael
> Bloomberg and liberal billionaire financier George Soros. (The Center for
> Public Integrity receives funding from the Open Society Foundations, which
> Soros funds. A complete list of Center for Public Integrity funders is
> found
> here.)
> The Kochs' giving, however, has a laser-like focus on a specific,
> politically relevant discipline - free market economics - unmatched by
> other
> political mega-donors. Koch officials routinely cultivate relationships
> with
> professors and deans and fund specific courses of economic study pitched by
> them.
> Detractors argue the Koch brothers' college-focused money, by helping
> advance a philosophy of economic liberty, is eroding a fundamental aspect
> of
> higher education: academic freedom.
> But some conservatives and libertarians consider the Kochs' investments in
> higher education a much-needed counterweight to an American higher
> education
> system that historically tilts leftward.
> And they explain the Kochs' decision to influence education most certainly
> does not spring, as many liberal partisans would like the body politic to
> believe, from the compulsions of steel-souled industrialists more concerned
> about fortune and power than, say, protecting the environment or helping
> the
> poor.
> "Since the '60s, they've been imbued with the sense that the world would be
> a better place if the country instituted their libertarian values," author
> Brian Doherty said of the brothers.
> "For Charles, his time horizon, as he gets a little older, has become a
> little shorter. He has lots of money, and he wants to see action in his
> lifetime," continued Doherty, the author of "Radicals for Capitalism: A
> Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement" and
> senior
> editor at Reason who's interviewed both Koch brothers.
> "I'm not doing anything I'm ashamed of," Charles Koch himself told Forbes
> last month. "You've gotta change the hearts and minds of the people to
> understand what really makes society fairer and what's going to change
> their
> lives. And it's not more of this government control."
> The Kochs educational giving, while rarefied, isn't the nation's largest.
> With his wife, Betty, Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Intel, this year
> pledged $100 million to the California Institute of Technology - and
> allowed
> the school to spend it as it sees fit.
> Koch defenders also note, accurately, that the pair has donated generously
> to educational causes not necessarily animated by political considerations:
> the Smithsonian, public television, media organizations, music
> scholarships,
> medical research and a variety of others. David Koch, for his part, has
> poured hundreds of millions of dollars into medicine and the arts over the
> years.
> But it's clear where there is an ideological bent to their giving: Tax
> returns, as well as emails and private documents exchanged among Charles
> Koch Foundation officers and various college and university officials,
> indicate the foundation's commitment to funding academics is deep and
> growing. Koch education funding, which is almost singularly focused on
> economics, also sometimes comes with certain strings attached.
> Also see: "How Colleges Use Koch Money"
> Recruiting New Believers
> At the College of Charleston in South Carolina, for example, documents show
> the foundation wanted more than just academic excellence for its money. It
> wanted information about students it could potentially use for its own
> benefit - and influence over information officials at the public university
> disseminated about the Charles Koch Foundation.
> It sought, for one, the names and email addresses - "preferably not ending
> in .edu" - of any student who participated in a Koch-sponsored class,
> reading group, club or fellowship. The stated purpose: "to notify students
> of opportunities" through both the Charles Koch Foundation and the
> Institute
> for Humane Studies at George Mason University.
> And the foundation certainly did not want the College of Charleston to
> speak
> to news reporters about its Koch-funded programs without prior consent from
> the Charles Koch Foundation.
> "[I]f you intend to engage in press releases or other media outreach
> associated with programmatic activities, please notify us in advance,"
> Charles Koch Foundation officials Charlie Ruger and Derek Johnson wrote
> Peter Calcagno, director of the College of Charleston's Center for Public
> Choice and Market Process. "We consider media outreach a collaborative
> effort and would appreciate the opportunity to both assist and advise."
> Donors are often sent unpublished press releases about programs they fund
> "as a courtesy so that they will know the contents," school spokesman Mike
> Robertson said.
> At Florida State University, one of the nation's top educational recipients
> of Koch foundation money this decade - about $1.38 million from 2010
> through
> 2013 - a similar request is more direct.
> "FSU will allow [the Charles Koch Foundation] to review and approve the
> text
> of any proposed publicity which includes mention of CKF," reads a
> memorandum
> of understanding signed between the university and foundation in 2013.
> Such provisions aren't new at Florida State University: the Center for
> Public Integrity last year reported that the Charles Koch Foundation first
> attempted in 2007 to place specific conditions on its financial support of
> the school, when it initially considered providing funding.
> Among the proposed conditions: Teachings must align with the libertarian
> economic philosophy of Charles Koch, the Charles Koch Foundation would
> maintain partial control over faculty hiring and the chairman of the
> school's economics department - a prominent economic theorist - must stay
> in
> place for another three years despite his plans to step down.
> Florida State University ultimately didn't agree to the initial requests
> when, in 2008, it reached a funding agreement with the foundation. It's
> also
> tightened and clarified policies that affect private donors' contributions
> to the university.
> Relationships between certain school officials and the Charles Koch
> Foundation personnel nevertheless blossomed. One gatekeeper to Charles
> Koch's riches practically became family - if not by blood, then money.
> "Thought you might want to see our 'nephew!'" wrote executive assistant
> Tonja Guilford to David Rasmussen, her boss and dean of Florida State
> University's College of Social Sciences and Public Policy.
> Attached to the October 2014 email were photos of this "nephew" - the
> tow-headed toddler son of John C. Hardin, director of university relations
> for the Charles Koch Foundation.
> Hardin and his family had previously visited with Florida State University
> officials in Tallahassee. Talk of future get-togethers, and more pictures
> of
> Hardin's son in a Superman costume, aloft in his father's arms, would
> follow.
> "I was just thinking this morning I needed new pictures to post outside my
> door," Guilford fawned to Hardin in an email. "He is just way too cute in
> his superman costume. He's my 'little' superman - I just love him!"
> Friend-Raising
> Rasmussen, who routinely pursues private funding on behalf of his
> department, declined interview requests from the Center for Public
> Integrity, as did Guilford.
> Florida State University spokesman Dennis Schnittker described the email
> exchanges as "friendly correspondence between individuals," adding that
> collegial communications are a valuable part of school culture.
> "Most university presidents would tell you before you can fundraise, you
> have to 'friend raise,'" Schnittker said.
> Today, the Kochs' friendship with Florida State University appears stronger
> than ever.
> An email written in September 2014 by Jesse Colvin, Florida State
> University's College of Social Sciences and Public Policy development
> director, indicates the Charles Koch Foundation is committed to funding the
> work of economic department doctoral students "during 2015-2016 and in
> subsequent years."
> A series of other meetings and conversations between Hardin, from the
> Charles Koch Foundation, and Florida State University officials followed,
> documents indicate.
> In November 2014, Florida State University officials huddled in the office
> of newly installed university President John Thrasher for a meeting
> entitled
> "Koch briefing." Schnittker, the university spokesman, said the meeting was
> an "opportunity for our new president to be briefed by university staff
> about a gift agreement that obviously preceded his tenure." Hardin of the
> Charles Koch Foundation was not present, Schnittker said.
> Meanwhile, when officials at the Florida State University Project on
> Accountable Justice went hunting for funding, the Charles Koch Foundation
> factored into their strategy.
> The Koch brothers, after all, were telegraphing their intent to make
> criminal justice reform a personal priority, reasoning that
> "overcriminalization," like overregulation of industry, is resulting in
> more
> Americans enjoying fewer economic freedoms.
> Not everyone at the Florida State University Project on Accountable Justice
> appeared thrilled at pursuing Koch cash.
> "I know you really hate them, but we really need to send them some stuff,"
> then-Chairman Allison DeFoor wrote Executive Director Deborrah Brodsky late
> last year. "They have money. We don't."
> Reached separately by phone last week, DeFoor, an unabashed conservative,
> and Brodsky, a Canadian whose politics point more leftward, both laughed
> off
> the exchange as comedic banter between longtime colleagues.
> But they confirmed they had pursued the Charles Koch Foundation. It hasn't
> yet funded the project but did provide the organization "strategic
> support,"
> including co-hosting a forum on criminal justice.
> DeFoor would conclude, following presentations in Washington, D.C., to both
> the Charles Koch Foundation and the conservative American Legislative
> Exchange Council, that Koch interest in issues the project researches "is
> sincere, potentially aggressive and deep."
> As a small, three-year-old "research- and evidence-based" program, the
> Florida State University Project on Accountable Justice will gladly take
> money from most anyone along the ideological spectrum who's dedicated to
> its
> study of and work on criminal justice system reforms, Brodsky said. She
> counts liberal lions such as the American Civil Liberties Union, Southern
> Poverty Law Center and Human Rights Watch as partners.
> The Charles Koch Foundation executives declined to be interviewed
> individually. Trice Jacobson, a foundation spokesperson, instead provided a
> statement that she said "captures what we all hope to share for this
> piece."
> "Like many charities, the Charles Koch Foundation recognizes the importance
> of supporting a diversity of ideas so scholars and students can continue to
> push the frontiers of knowledge and help people discover new and better
> ways
> to live fulfilling lives," the statement read. "Our giving has expanded to
> support new research and programs on critical issues ranging from criminal
> justice reform to corporate welfare."
> In a separate statement of its "academic giving principles," the Charles
> Koch Foundation asserts that it is "committed to advancing a marketplace of
> ideas and supporting a 'Republic of Science' where scholarship is free,
> open
> and subject to rigorous and honest intellectual challenge."
> It also notes that scholars and students "who are free to teach, learn,
> research, speak, critique and receive support for their work without
> interference" are in the "best position to discover the advances that will
> help improve well-being."
> George Mason, aka Koch U
> Nowhere is expanded Koch involvement in higher education more evident than
> at George Mason University, which receives more funding from the Kochs than
> any other school.
> The large, diverse public school in northern Virginia, about 20 miles from
> the White House, today houses and lends its name to what's effectively
> Charles Koch's personal academic workshop. The Charles Koch Foundation in
> 2013 donated more than $14.4 million to George Mason University and the
> research centers it hosts. That's on top of tens of millions in Koch
> dollars
> that George Mason University and the affiliated research centers have
> collectively received in recent years.
> Charles Koch himself is a George Mason University fixture. He's the
> recipient of an honorary doctorate in science from the university, which
> boasts a student population of more than 33,700. He is a director of the
> university-based Mercatus Center - Mercatus means "market" in Latin - that
> Charles Koch Foundation Vice President Ryan Stowers described at the 2014
> Koch gathering in California as "critical" to advancing policy priorities.
> Koch also enjoys the company of several current and former George Mason
> University affiliates who play multiple roles across the Koch brothers'
> sprawling educational, corporate and political network.
> Chief among them is Gentry, who presided over the Koch's closed-door higher
> education workshop last year.
> Gentry possesses unique knowledge about the interconnectivity of the Koch's
> various interests and operations because he embodies its reach. He's a
> Charles Koch Foundation vice president and a key fundraiser for the Kochs'
> political action arm. He's a former vice president of both the Mercatus
> Center and the Institute for Humane Studies at George Mason University. And
> today, he's even Eastern vice chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia.
> Brian Hooks, now president of the Charles Koch Foundation, is another key
> Koch network player.
> Hooks served as the Mercatus Center's executive director and chief
> operating
> officer from 2005 until 2014 and remains a Mercatus Center board member.
> The
> year Hooks took over, the Mercatus Center posted $4.9 million in total
> revenue, according to tax filings. The year he left, it posted nearly $20.7
> million.
> "Our job is to make sure that we've got a strategy for our work to have a
> disproportionate impact," Hooks said at the Kochs' conference in 2014,
> noting that the Mercatus Center is the "largest collection" of "free market
> faculty" at any university in the world. "These guys are producing research
> that groups in this network can rely on to advance economic freedom every
> single day."
> Scholarly research performed by academics at Koch-funded schools and
> programs is indeed sometimes used by Koch-backed nonprofit organizations
> that, in turn, overtly advocate for political candidates or causes.
> For instance, to support assertions made in a recent, 67-page policy paper,
> Koch-supported American Encore regularly cites and quotes Mercatus Center
> research and mentions the center nearly a dozen times.
> Among the academic work American Encore's paper highlights: a 2014 Mercatus
> Center study by Keith Hall, a senior research fellow who had previously
> served as commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and a 2014
> commentary about a federal regulations tracking and measurement tool by
> Patrick A. McLaughlin, another senior research fellow.
> "Yet another study has confirmed what we already knew - states with lower
> taxes do better," read an article by the Kochs' flagship nonprofit,
> Americans for Prosperity, about a study published July 7 by the Mercatus
> Center. "Overall, the rankings provide more evidence that economic freedom
> works, and bigger government means bigger trouble."
> And the 60 Plus Association, a retiree-focused nonprofit that's benefited
> from tens of millions of dollars of the Koch brothers' money over the
> years,
> for a time tapped Walter Williams, a George Mason University economics
> professor, syndicated columnist and Rush Limbaugh Show fill-in host, as a
> member of its "truth squad." His mission: to "battle" against Democrats on
> Social Security and Medicare programs.
> Congress Takes Notice
> Congress is also paying more attention to the Mercatus Center, which from
> 1999 to 2008 was mentioned by name 32 times in either the Congressional
> Record or congressional committee reports. Since 2009, it's been mentioned
> 93 times, often in reference to Mercatus Center faculty who were testifying
> before Congress.
> This year, Congress even cited Mercatus Center research in the text of
> budget bills. House Concurrent Resolution 27 and Senate Concurrent
> Resolution 11 note that a Mercatus Center study "estimates that Obamacare
> will reduce employment by up to 3 percent, or about 4 million full-time
> equivalent workers."
> Mercatus Center Vice President Carrie Conko, while declining to address
> critics' "ad hominem attacks" of Charles Koch, stressed the institution's
> work is the product of hard work and high standards - not the whims of some
> patron puppet master.
> "As a university research center, our scholarship is independent and
> subjected to rigorous peer review," Conko said. "Our researchers are
> interested in understanding what shapes societies and economies and that
> covers a spectrum of research from the history of economic thought to the
> application of economics to questions of public policy."
> Conko also noted that the Mercatus Center abides by a strong conflict of
> interest and research independence policy, which she described as "stronger
> than those of most found with typical academic centers or departments."
> Mercatus Center officials note that the center isn't part of George Mason
> University the same way as, say, its chemistry or psychology departments.
> Instead, it's organized as a stand-alone nonprofit, and as such, George
> Mason University isn't directly responsible for it.
> The Mercatus Center doesn't receive direct funding from George Mason
> University, Conko said.
> But George Mason University and its students do receive millions of dollars
> in annual financial benefit from the Mercatus Center, according to federal
> tax filings.
> That alone is a major incentive for a public university in Virginia, where
> state funding of higher education is dwindling, to host a privately funded
> operation on its campus - today, a fairly common practice among public
> schools.
> The Mercatus Center spent $3.64 million during that time to "support
> graduate students at George Mason University" by "training future scholars
> and decision-makers to advance and apply a research agenda for
> understanding
> institutions and change," according to a tax filing.
> The Mercatus Center helped fund $1.82 million worth of communication
> efforts
> that included promoting its research and ideas "to the media and opinion
> shapers."
> And it made a $10,000 grant to the Atlas Economic Research Foundation,
> which
> operates a "global network of more than 400 free market organizations."
> They
> include several Koch-backed nonprofit groups such as Americans for
> Prosperity, the American Legislative Exchange Council and Americans for Tax
> Reform.
> McAuliffe Mum?
> The Mason-Mercatus-Koch nexus may seem like rich fodder for a Democrat such
> as Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, whose national party brethren makes
> demonizing the Koch brothers a central strategy of their electoral and
> fundraising agenda.
> McAuliffe's own political committee, Common Good VA, bashed the "ultra
> right
> wing Koch Brothers" in an email earlier this month, accusing them of
> working
> against "expanding health care for all" and "ensuring a living wage."
> But McAuliffe - the outspoken former chairman of both the Democratic
> National Committee and Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign -
> declined Center for Public Integrity requests to discuss George Mason
> University's relationship with the Koch brothers.
> George Mason University's top undergraduate leader, Student Body President
> Khushboo Bhatia, also declined comment.
> University spokesman Michael Sandler explained that George Mason is among
> the nation's most diverse campuses, and "this notion of diversity and
> inclusion that is so central to our mission applies to our donors, as
> well."
> Sandler said the university appreciates the Charles Koch Foundation's
> donations, as well as those from thousands of other donors.
> "While we are grateful for all of the gifts we receive, we value academic
> freedom above all else," Sandler said. "This freedom allows our faculty and
> researchers to ask questions and make discoveries that others wouldn't
> otherwise pursue, and we will not compromise that freedom for anything or
> anyone."
> Jennifer Victor, a George Mason University politics professor who
> specializes in how individuals and groups influence government, is
> skeptical.
> George Mason University's marriage to an ideologically motivated donor with
> a policy agenda to achieve "raises some eyebrows," Victor said. "I don't
> really see what Mason gets from them, and I don't think the situation is
> healthy or consistent with the university's teaching mission."
> No Comment on Koch Funding
> Some college officials such as Sandler are willing to discuss the financial
> support their schools receive from Koch-run private foundations, with many
> emphasizing that gifts from donors, whether liberal or conservative, don't
> affect coursework or the manner in which students learn. They also note
> that
> their schools receive hundreds, and sometimes thousands of contributions
> each year from individuals, private foundations and the like.
> But it's not uncommon for other school officials to button up.
> Take Victor Nakas, a spokesman for The Catholic University of America in
> Washington, D.C.
> Posed a series of questions about the $215,000 the university received in
> 2013 from the Charles Koch Foundation, he emailed a pair of dated press
> releases announcing grants.
> "We will be unable to provide you with more than links to these
> announcements," he said.
> Follow-up messages went unreturned.
> Michael Schoenfeld, the vice president for public affairs and government
> relations at Duke University, declined to say how the school used the
> $37,000 it recently received from the Charles Koch Foundation.
> "As a rule, we do not comment on individual donors or contributions without
> the donor's permission," he explained.
> Officials at Oklahoma State University likewise offered no details about
> how
> the school used the $69,000 the Charles Koch Foundation recently gave it.
> Why the silence?
> An email exchange between two Florida State University officials, obtained
> by the Center for Public Integrity, offers a measure of explanation.
> In it, the officials indicate deep concern about the potential effects of
> releasing more information about the school's moneyed donors in response to
> activist demands.
> "[R]equiring donors to disclose more than they already do will likely
> result
> in fewer gifts and smaller gifts, and it will impose an additional
> administrative hurdle for the university," wrote Thomas W. Jennings, vice
> president for university advancement, to David Coburn, Florida State
> University chief of staff.
> Revealing donor gift agreements, even for donors who have not requested
> anonymity, might "have a negative effect on FSU's relationships with many
> of
> its donors, who don't want that kind of attention," Jennings continued.
> The University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill received $115,000 from the
> Charles Koch Foundation in 2013, one of nearly 100 schools that year to
> receive a five-figure contribution from a Koch foundation.
> But that's information not easily accessed by students. Whether by design,
> happenstance or ignorance, "most individuals don't know where any of the
> university's funds come from," University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
> Student Body President Houston Summers said.
> University spokesman Jim Gregory confirmed the school received $110,000 for
> the Charles Koch Visiting Scholars Program in UNC-Chapel Hill's Philosophy,
> Politics and Economics Program, conducted in collaboration with Duke
> University. Donors are allowed to remain anonymous, if they choose.
> However, some universities are facing blowback over scant information about
> school donors from increasingly organized anti-Koch groups and activists.
> The umbrella group UnKoch My Campus, for one, has staged protests, demanded
> meetings with administrators and launched chapters at George Mason
> University and Florida State University, among others. The organization
> accuses the Kochs and their allies of undermining issues many students care
> about, such as environmental protection, workers' rights, healthcare
> expansion and public education.
> Its immediate goal, beyond convincing colleges to de-Koch themselves?
> "Transparency, because students should have the capability to be more aware
> of who's funding their school and their education, and where funding might
> conflict with student interests," said Kalin Jordan, an UnKoch My Campus
> organizer. "The universities - most don't do a good job of informing
> students at all."
> Said Colin Nackerman, a student activist at George Mason University: "You
> should know, if you're going into a classroom, that $30 million is going
> into your school from someone who wants you to think a certain way."
> Largely silent in the past, the Charles Koch Foundation has begun to push
> back at such dissenters.
> "They don't want students and scholars to expand their educational
> horizons," Hardin, the foundation's university relations director, wrote in
> a May 26 Wall Street Journal op-ed. "Rather than engage in a vigorous and
> civil debate about the merits of different ideas, they seek to prevent
> those
> with which they disagree from ever being heard."
> Liberals Give Big, Too
> If George Mason University is Charles Koch's academic playground, Bard
> College is that of Democratic bankroller George Soros, often viewed as the
> Koch brothers' pre-eminent liberal foil.
> The tiny New York liberal arts school nestled along the Hudson River is
> renowned for both scholarship and hippy-dippyness. It received more than
> $11.2 million from Soros' private foundation in 2013 - part of a $60
> million, multiyear commitment.
> But for Soros, himself a multibillionaire with wealth comparable to the
> Kochs, his contributions to Bard College aren't generally earmarked for
> core
> academics or domestic political considerations.
> Instead, Soros' money mainly helps fund Bard College's Center for Civic
> Engagement, which houses a broad portfolio of both U.S. and overseas
> programs aimed at "advancing the ideals of an innovative, hands-on liberal
> arts education through a myriad of opportunities across the globe."
> This tracks with Soros' broader tack on educational giving: The vast
> majority of his tens of millions of dollars in education-related
> contributions fund foreign schools and programs, particularly in Eastern
> Europe and the Middle East. (Soros lived his early life in Hungary, where
> as
> a Jew, he survived Nazi occupation before emigrating.)
> Among the U.S. schools Soros does aid, many of his most sizable grants are
> earmarked for programs with international goals, such as $500,000 to
> Harvard
> University funding a project on economic growth in Albania, and $159,834 to
> The George Washington University in Washington, D.C., to "develop effective
> and influential public policy leaders in Central Asia."
> Soros' foundation even gave George Mason University more than $22,500 - not
> to fund economics programs, but to organize meetings in Mexico and Peru
> about conflict reconciliation.
> "As a general rule," Soros said in 2011, "I do not support higher education
> in the United States."
> Soros does make exceptions.
> An avowed advocate of campaign finance reform, Soros has used his private
> foundations to fund certain domestic college initiatives squarely rooted in
> American politics and elections.
> One Soros foundation, for example, gave New York City's Fordham University
> $200,000 in 2013 to study the "role of money in democratic process."
> The money is part of a $1 million, multi-year grant to determine how
> disclosure of campaign money influences voters - an awfully political
> endeavor by any measure.
> But school officials say the research they conduct is free of outside
> influence and subject to the highest academic and legal reviews and
> standards.
> "None of this work is 'political' per se in terms of any ideological
> dimensions . it is all strictly nonpartisan," said Costas Panagopoulos,
> director of Fordham's Center for Electoral Politics and Democracy, who is
> leading the program.
> Penn State University's economics department in 2013 benefited from
> $150,000
> in Soros money to help build a research center focused in part on
> "interactions between new media and society."
> And the Ohio State University Research Foundation received $50,000 to
> conduct a research project aimed at better understanding the role
> independent expenditures play in federal elections and "how those
> expenditures influence the legislative process."
> Bard College officials do hear their share of criticism for taking a
> massive
> amount of money from Soros' private foundation, said Jonathan Becker, the
> school's vice president for academic affairs and director for civic
> engagement.
> But, similar to some of the schools that accept Koch money, the school's
> tenuous budget situation means that it'd take funding from just about
> anyone
> so long as the transaction was legal and wasn't intended to fund an
> initiative "antithetical to our vision," Becker said.
> That vision, in the words of its student handbook, imagines a "supportive,
> intellectually rich environment where students can engage themselves to the
> fullest while respecting all members of the community."
> So what if the Charles Koch Foundation wanted to donate $1 million to Bard
> College?
> Or $10 million?
> "We would say 'thank you,' and we would cash the check quickly," Becker
> said.
> Other Conservative Donors
> Unlike the Kochs, Soros and many other prominent political donors, both
> left
> and right of center, have charitable agendas that largely diverge from
> their
> domestic political agendas.
> Robert McNair, the Houston Texans owner who this year alone has spread $3
> million among five super PACs backing several Republican presidential
> candidates, used his private foundation to give millions of dollars to
> various medical schools and a scholarship program for doctors performing
> research in areas such as breast cancer, juvenile diabetes and
> neuroscience.
> Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, two other top-shelf Republican donors whom 2016
> presidential candidates have endlessly wooed, directed almost all of their
> university-related private foundation funding - millions of it in 2013 - to
> medical research.
> A private foundation co-run by former World Wrestling Entertainment honcho
> Linda McMahon, a major GOP donor who herself twice unsuccessfully ran
> self-funded U.S. Senate campaigns, gave its most sizable, six-figure
> contributions to substance abuse help group Liberation Programs.
> Then there's one late Republican superdonor whose philanthropy has been at
> war with his political giving: Harold Simmons.
> The Texas businessman bankrolled his eponymous foundation, but his liberal
> daughters run it. In doing so, they saw to it that Planned Parenthood - the
> ultimate Republican scourge of late - received more than $300,000 of his
> money during 2013. It's also given hundreds of thousands of dollars to
> Public Campaign, a Washington, D.C.-based money-in-politics reform group
> also supported in 2013 with $300,000 from a private foundation led by
> liberal hedge fund manager Jonathan Soros, son of George Soros.
> Money the Harold Simmons Foundation did give to colleges in 2013 mostly
> went
> toward infrastructure and general operating expenses.
> University of Dayton Says "No Thanks"
> While more schools than ever are engaging with Koch foundations, at least
> one school - the University of Dayton in Ohio - has seemingly soured on
> Koch
> cash, which it has previously accepted in five-figure amounts.
> Jay Riestenberg, a research analyst at campaign reform advocacy group
> Common
> Cause and University of Dayton alumnus, earlier this year emailed the
> school's Interim Provost Paul H. Benson, asking him if the University of
> Dayton is still funded by, or seeking new funding from Koch foundations.
> Attached was an op-ed Riestenberg has written for the school's student
> newspaper. In it, he explains that his education at the small Catholic
> school inspired him to care about other people, protect the environment and
> fight for social justice.
> "UD accepting Koch funding is in clear violation of the institution's
> Catholic Marianist values," Riestenberg wrote in the April 28 email.
> Benson replied later that night. His answer: The University of Dayton no
> longer accepts Koch cash, and it will not in the future - despite the
> efforts of Koch-backed organizations.
> "There have been instances in which other foundations who are funded in
> part
> by the Koch Brothers have tried to interest us in establishing centers at
> UD," Benson wrote Riestenberg. "We have not supported those proposals,
> precisely for the reasons you cite."
> Benson declined an interview request by the Center for Public Integrity.
> In a statement, University of Dayton spokeswoman Cilla Shindell explained
> that the school did reject a recent proposal from a "foundation that is in
> part funded by the Koch family" because it "would have been structured in a
> way that would limit oversight by the university in such areas as
> curriculum
> and faculty hiring."
> She did not name the foundation.
> Kochs' Higher Education Funding Strategy
> This previously unpublished recording of Koch aides discussing education
> funding strategy with potential donors was provided to the Center for
> Public
> Integrity by The Undercurrent, an online program produced by liberal
> political activists.
> Key Kochworld Lieutenants
> Several associates of Charles and David Koch span multiple aspects of the
> billionaire brothers' political, educational, charitable and industrial
> juggernauts. Among them:
> Richard Fink is among Charles Koch's top aides. Fink is the co-founder of
> George Mason University's Mercatus Center and a current member of the
> center's board of directors. Fink has also served on the boards of several
> of Charles and David Koch's private foundations. That includes serving as
> president of the Charles Koch Foundation until 2014 and as a director for
> the Fred C. & Mary R. Koch Foundation alongside Charles and David Koch
> themselves. Fink likewise sits on the board of directors for Americans for
> Prosperity, a "social welfare" nonprofit that doesn't reveal its donors but
> spent more than $33.5 million during the 2012 election advocating against
> President Barack Obama's re-election. Fink also works as chairman and chief
> executive of Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC, the legal, government and
> public affairs wing of Koch Industries Inc.
> Kevin Gentry is vice president of the Charles Koch Foundation. He is also a
> board member for Koch-backed nonprofit Freedom Partners and vice president
> for special projects/development at Koch Companies Public Sector LLC.
> Gentry
> previously served as vice president of the Koch-funded Institute for Humane
> Studies and the Mercatus Center at George Mason University and as volunteer
> faculty at the Leadership Institute, which "identifies, recruits, trains
> and
> places conservatives in government, politics and the media." In party
> politics, Gentry serves as eastern vice chairman for the Republican Party
> of
> Virginia.
> Brian Hooks is president of the Charles Koch Foundation, having been hired
> in 2014. Hooks is also a Mercatus Center board member and served as the
> Mercatus Center's executive director and chief operating officer from 2005
> until 2014.
> Wayne Gable is a board member of the Koch-funded Freedom Partners, itself a
> nonprofit that has largely provided seed money to other Koch-backed
> political nonprofits over many years. He served from 1999 to 2000 as
> president of the Charles Koch Foundation as well. Gable is also a former
> managing director of international government affairs at Koch Industries
> Inc. and a onetime registered federal lobbyist for the company. He received
> a doctoral degree in economics from George Mason University.
> Nancy Pfotenhauer served from 2010 to 2014 on George Mason University's
> Board of Visitors - a 16-member university governing body appointed by
> Virginia's governor that "exercises its authority principally in
> policy-making and oversight." She received a master's degree in economics
> from George Mason University. Pfotenhauer today serves on Americans for
> Prosperity's board of directors and runs a communications firm. She is also
> a former director of the Independent Women's Forum, which in 2010 received
> $350,000 from the Koch-controlled (and now defunct) Claude R. Lambe
> Charitable Foundation, according to IRS tax documents. She once led Koch
> Industries Inc.'s Washington, D.C., office.
> Dale Gibbens is the human resources vice president for Koch Industries Inc.
> He is a board member for Koch-backed nonprofit Freedom Partners, described
> by Politico in 2013 as "the Koch brothers secret bank." Since then, Freedom
> Partners' sister super PAC spent about $23.4 million advocating for
> Republican congressional candidates and against Democratic candidates. In
> 2014, Gibbens also helped fund the Koch Center for Leadership and Ethics at
> Emporia State University in Kansas, which is focused on "free market
> principles, leadership and ethical theories."
> Patrick Hedger is policy director for American Encore, a heavily
> Koch-backed
> political nonprofit previously known as the Center to Protect Patient
> Rights. He is a recent graduate of George Mason University, where he is
> also
> pursuing a master's degree in public policy.
> A version of this story was co-published with The Atlantic.
> This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not
> be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.
> Dave Levinthal
> Dave Levinthal joined the Center for Public Integrity in 2013 to help lead
> its Consider the Source project investigating the influence of money in
> politics. For two years prior to joining the Center, Dave reported on
> campaign finance and lobbying issues for Politico and co-wrote the daily
> Politico Influence column. He also edited OpenSecrets.org from 2009 to
> 2011,
> where he led coverage that won the Online News Association's top honors in
> 2011 for best topical reporting and blogging and was a finalist the same
> year for the Scripps Howard Foundation's Distinguished Service to the First
> Amendment award. From 2003 to 2009, Dave worked for The Dallas Morning
> News,
> primarily covering Dallas City Hall also reporting on national elections
> and
> aviation security. From 2000 to 2002, he covered the New Hampshire
> Statehouse for The Eagle-Tribune of Lawrence, Mass. A native of Buffalo,
> N.Y., Dave graduated from Syracuse University with degrees in newspaper
> journalism and political philosophy and edited The Daily Orange. He is also
> a two-time winner (2007 and 2010) of Canada's Northern Lights Award for his
> travel writing about the arctic.
> Related Stories
> Koch Funding of Universities Shrouded in Secrecy
> By Kalin Jordan, PR Watch | Op-EdKoch PR Games: College Football Brought to
> You by Koch Industries
> By Nick Surgey, PR Watch | ReportKoch Brothers Hit the Airwaves in Support
> of Wisconsin Corruption Measures
> By Brendan Fischer, PR Watch | Report
>
> Show Comments
>
>
>
Koch Brothers head to head. But we don't have the big bucks. And
fussing around trying to figure out how to blunt the impact of their
expensive, long range programs is simply an exercise in futility. The
answer is not to try to fund a campaign to oppose them, because they
can out spend us ten to one. The solution is to change governments.
It's time we understood that the present government is serving the
Koch Brothers and their comrades very well, and they do not plan to
give up any of their ill gotten gains.
Times are different today than they were back when FDR pushed through
reforms that saved Capitalism despite the best efforts of the
Capitalists to stop him. But today we have seen the methodical
dismantling of the so called Middle Class, the destruction of Unions,
the negativism toward our government. And through it all we are being
brain washed to believe that Libertarian ism will save us all.
We have been so dummied down that we can't see that our greatest
strength is in our numbers. We are being divided and subdivided just
as surely as if we were cattle being sorted for slaughter.
As tenuous as it may be, we need to continue reaching out to one
another, encouraging and teaching. It is my personal belief that we,
the human species, is in for a near self extinction, and those of us
who survive need to be ready to raise up a new civilization from the
ashes.
Carl Jarvis
On 11/8/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
> Koch Brothers' Higher Education Investments Advance Political Goals
> Sunday, 08 November 2015 00:00 By Dave Levinthal, The Center for Public
> Integrity | News Analysis
> Charles Koch appears in a video promoting a partnership between Koch
> Industries, the Charles Koch Foundation and the United Negro College Fund.
> (Screenshot: Koch Industries)
> Last year, a top lieutenant of Charles and David Koch's vast network of
> philanthropic institutions laid bare the billionaire brothers' strategy to
> evangelize their gospel of economic freedom.
> Political success, Kevin Gentry told a crowd of elite supporters attending
> the annual Koch confab in Dana Point, Calif., begins with reaching young
> minds in college lecture halls, thereby preparing bright,
> libertarian-leaning students to one day occupy the halls of political
> power.
> "The [Koch] network is fully integrated, so it's not just work at the
> universities with the students, but it's also building state-based
> capabilities and election capabilities and integrating this talent
> pipeline," he said.
> "So you can see how this is useful to each other over time," he continued.
> "No one else has this infrastructure. We're very excited about doing it."
> The Center for Public Integrity obtained a previously unpublished audio
> recording of the meeting, which focused on the Kochs' higher education
> funding strategy, from liberal activists who produce The Undercurrent, an
> online video program.
> Higher education has become a top Koch priority in recent years. And
> funding
> - as well as pushback against it - is increasing.
> During 2013, a pair of private charitable foundations Charles Koch leads
> and
> personally bankrolls combined to spread more than $19.3 million across 210
> college campuses in 46 states and the District of Columbia, according to a
> Center for Public Integrity analysis of Internal Revenue Service tax
> filings.
> That represents a significant increase from the $12.7 million the Koch
> foundations distributed among 163 college campuses in 41 states and the
> District of Columbia during 2012. It's also exponentially more than what
> the
> Koch foundations together spent directly on higher education a decade ago.
> The Center for Public Integrity reviewed hundreds of private documents,
> emails and audio recordings that, along with interviews with more than 75
> college officials, professors, students and others, indicate the Koch
> brothers' spending on higher education is now a critical part of their
> broader campaign to infuse politics and government with free-market
> principles.
> Spreading the Free-Market Gospel
> It is no secret that the Kochs' network has invested hundreds of millions
> of
> hard-to-track dollars in conservative political nonprofits that influence
> elections. The brothers, who earned their billions leading private oil,
> chemical and manufacturing conglomerate Koch Industries Inc., were dominant
> forces in recent election cycles. They're now poised to rank among the most
> influential Americans shaping next year's presidential and congressional
> vote.
> Much less well known: their activities on college campuses.
> The Kochs are among many wealthy political patrons who give money to
> education, including conservative Robert McNair, independent Michael
> Bloomberg and liberal billionaire financier George Soros. (The Center for
> Public Integrity receives funding from the Open Society Foundations, which
> Soros funds. A complete list of Center for Public Integrity funders is
> found
> here.)
> The Kochs' giving, however, has a laser-like focus on a specific,
> politically relevant discipline - free market economics - unmatched by
> other
> political mega-donors. Koch officials routinely cultivate relationships
> with
> professors and deans and fund specific courses of economic study pitched by
> them.
> Detractors argue the Koch brothers' college-focused money, by helping
> advance a philosophy of economic liberty, is eroding a fundamental aspect
> of
> higher education: academic freedom.
> But some conservatives and libertarians consider the Kochs' investments in
> higher education a much-needed counterweight to an American higher
> education
> system that historically tilts leftward.
> And they explain the Kochs' decision to influence education most certainly
> does not spring, as many liberal partisans would like the body politic to
> believe, from the compulsions of steel-souled industrialists more concerned
> about fortune and power than, say, protecting the environment or helping
> the
> poor.
> "Since the '60s, they've been imbued with the sense that the world would be
> a better place if the country instituted their libertarian values," author
> Brian Doherty said of the brothers.
> "For Charles, his time horizon, as he gets a little older, has become a
> little shorter. He has lots of money, and he wants to see action in his
> lifetime," continued Doherty, the author of "Radicals for Capitalism: A
> Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement" and
> senior
> editor at Reason who's interviewed both Koch brothers.
> "I'm not doing anything I'm ashamed of," Charles Koch himself told Forbes
> last month. "You've gotta change the hearts and minds of the people to
> understand what really makes society fairer and what's going to change
> their
> lives. And it's not more of this government control."
> The Kochs educational giving, while rarefied, isn't the nation's largest.
> With his wife, Betty, Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Intel, this year
> pledged $100 million to the California Institute of Technology - and
> allowed
> the school to spend it as it sees fit.
> Koch defenders also note, accurately, that the pair has donated generously
> to educational causes not necessarily animated by political considerations:
> the Smithsonian, public television, media organizations, music
> scholarships,
> medical research and a variety of others. David Koch, for his part, has
> poured hundreds of millions of dollars into medicine and the arts over the
> years.
> But it's clear where there is an ideological bent to their giving: Tax
> returns, as well as emails and private documents exchanged among Charles
> Koch Foundation officers and various college and university officials,
> indicate the foundation's commitment to funding academics is deep and
> growing. Koch education funding, which is almost singularly focused on
> economics, also sometimes comes with certain strings attached.
> Also see: "How Colleges Use Koch Money"
> Recruiting New Believers
> At the College of Charleston in South Carolina, for example, documents show
> the foundation wanted more than just academic excellence for its money. It
> wanted information about students it could potentially use for its own
> benefit - and influence over information officials at the public university
> disseminated about the Charles Koch Foundation.
> It sought, for one, the names and email addresses - "preferably not ending
> in .edu" - of any student who participated in a Koch-sponsored class,
> reading group, club or fellowship. The stated purpose: "to notify students
> of opportunities" through both the Charles Koch Foundation and the
> Institute
> for Humane Studies at George Mason University.
> And the foundation certainly did not want the College of Charleston to
> speak
> to news reporters about its Koch-funded programs without prior consent from
> the Charles Koch Foundation.
> "[I]f you intend to engage in press releases or other media outreach
> associated with programmatic activities, please notify us in advance,"
> Charles Koch Foundation officials Charlie Ruger and Derek Johnson wrote
> Peter Calcagno, director of the College of Charleston's Center for Public
> Choice and Market Process. "We consider media outreach a collaborative
> effort and would appreciate the opportunity to both assist and advise."
> Donors are often sent unpublished press releases about programs they fund
> "as a courtesy so that they will know the contents," school spokesman Mike
> Robertson said.
> At Florida State University, one of the nation's top educational recipients
> of Koch foundation money this decade - about $1.38 million from 2010
> through
> 2013 - a similar request is more direct.
> "FSU will allow [the Charles Koch Foundation] to review and approve the
> text
> of any proposed publicity which includes mention of CKF," reads a
> memorandum
> of understanding signed between the university and foundation in 2013.
> Such provisions aren't new at Florida State University: the Center for
> Public Integrity last year reported that the Charles Koch Foundation first
> attempted in 2007 to place specific conditions on its financial support of
> the school, when it initially considered providing funding.
> Among the proposed conditions: Teachings must align with the libertarian
> economic philosophy of Charles Koch, the Charles Koch Foundation would
> maintain partial control over faculty hiring and the chairman of the
> school's economics department - a prominent economic theorist - must stay
> in
> place for another three years despite his plans to step down.
> Florida State University ultimately didn't agree to the initial requests
> when, in 2008, it reached a funding agreement with the foundation. It's
> also
> tightened and clarified policies that affect private donors' contributions
> to the university.
> Relationships between certain school officials and the Charles Koch
> Foundation personnel nevertheless blossomed. One gatekeeper to Charles
> Koch's riches practically became family - if not by blood, then money.
> "Thought you might want to see our 'nephew!'" wrote executive assistant
> Tonja Guilford to David Rasmussen, her boss and dean of Florida State
> University's College of Social Sciences and Public Policy.
> Attached to the October 2014 email were photos of this "nephew" - the
> tow-headed toddler son of John C. Hardin, director of university relations
> for the Charles Koch Foundation.
> Hardin and his family had previously visited with Florida State University
> officials in Tallahassee. Talk of future get-togethers, and more pictures
> of
> Hardin's son in a Superman costume, aloft in his father's arms, would
> follow.
> "I was just thinking this morning I needed new pictures to post outside my
> door," Guilford fawned to Hardin in an email. "He is just way too cute in
> his superman costume. He's my 'little' superman - I just love him!"
> Friend-Raising
> Rasmussen, who routinely pursues private funding on behalf of his
> department, declined interview requests from the Center for Public
> Integrity, as did Guilford.
> Florida State University spokesman Dennis Schnittker described the email
> exchanges as "friendly correspondence between individuals," adding that
> collegial communications are a valuable part of school culture.
> "Most university presidents would tell you before you can fundraise, you
> have to 'friend raise,'" Schnittker said.
> Today, the Kochs' friendship with Florida State University appears stronger
> than ever.
> An email written in September 2014 by Jesse Colvin, Florida State
> University's College of Social Sciences and Public Policy development
> director, indicates the Charles Koch Foundation is committed to funding the
> work of economic department doctoral students "during 2015-2016 and in
> subsequent years."
> A series of other meetings and conversations between Hardin, from the
> Charles Koch Foundation, and Florida State University officials followed,
> documents indicate.
> In November 2014, Florida State University officials huddled in the office
> of newly installed university President John Thrasher for a meeting
> entitled
> "Koch briefing." Schnittker, the university spokesman, said the meeting was
> an "opportunity for our new president to be briefed by university staff
> about a gift agreement that obviously preceded his tenure." Hardin of the
> Charles Koch Foundation was not present, Schnittker said.
> Meanwhile, when officials at the Florida State University Project on
> Accountable Justice went hunting for funding, the Charles Koch Foundation
> factored into their strategy.
> The Koch brothers, after all, were telegraphing their intent to make
> criminal justice reform a personal priority, reasoning that
> "overcriminalization," like overregulation of industry, is resulting in
> more
> Americans enjoying fewer economic freedoms.
> Not everyone at the Florida State University Project on Accountable Justice
> appeared thrilled at pursuing Koch cash.
> "I know you really hate them, but we really need to send them some stuff,"
> then-Chairman Allison DeFoor wrote Executive Director Deborrah Brodsky late
> last year. "They have money. We don't."
> Reached separately by phone last week, DeFoor, an unabashed conservative,
> and Brodsky, a Canadian whose politics point more leftward, both laughed
> off
> the exchange as comedic banter between longtime colleagues.
> But they confirmed they had pursued the Charles Koch Foundation. It hasn't
> yet funded the project but did provide the organization "strategic
> support,"
> including co-hosting a forum on criminal justice.
> DeFoor would conclude, following presentations in Washington, D.C., to both
> the Charles Koch Foundation and the conservative American Legislative
> Exchange Council, that Koch interest in issues the project researches "is
> sincere, potentially aggressive and deep."
> As a small, three-year-old "research- and evidence-based" program, the
> Florida State University Project on Accountable Justice will gladly take
> money from most anyone along the ideological spectrum who's dedicated to
> its
> study of and work on criminal justice system reforms, Brodsky said. She
> counts liberal lions such as the American Civil Liberties Union, Southern
> Poverty Law Center and Human Rights Watch as partners.
> The Charles Koch Foundation executives declined to be interviewed
> individually. Trice Jacobson, a foundation spokesperson, instead provided a
> statement that she said "captures what we all hope to share for this
> piece."
> "Like many charities, the Charles Koch Foundation recognizes the importance
> of supporting a diversity of ideas so scholars and students can continue to
> push the frontiers of knowledge and help people discover new and better
> ways
> to live fulfilling lives," the statement read. "Our giving has expanded to
> support new research and programs on critical issues ranging from criminal
> justice reform to corporate welfare."
> In a separate statement of its "academic giving principles," the Charles
> Koch Foundation asserts that it is "committed to advancing a marketplace of
> ideas and supporting a 'Republic of Science' where scholarship is free,
> open
> and subject to rigorous and honest intellectual challenge."
> It also notes that scholars and students "who are free to teach, learn,
> research, speak, critique and receive support for their work without
> interference" are in the "best position to discover the advances that will
> help improve well-being."
> George Mason, aka Koch U
> Nowhere is expanded Koch involvement in higher education more evident than
> at George Mason University, which receives more funding from the Kochs than
> any other school.
> The large, diverse public school in northern Virginia, about 20 miles from
> the White House, today houses and lends its name to what's effectively
> Charles Koch's personal academic workshop. The Charles Koch Foundation in
> 2013 donated more than $14.4 million to George Mason University and the
> research centers it hosts. That's on top of tens of millions in Koch
> dollars
> that George Mason University and the affiliated research centers have
> collectively received in recent years.
> Charles Koch himself is a George Mason University fixture. He's the
> recipient of an honorary doctorate in science from the university, which
> boasts a student population of more than 33,700. He is a director of the
> university-based Mercatus Center - Mercatus means "market" in Latin - that
> Charles Koch Foundation Vice President Ryan Stowers described at the 2014
> Koch gathering in California as "critical" to advancing policy priorities.
> Koch also enjoys the company of several current and former George Mason
> University affiliates who play multiple roles across the Koch brothers'
> sprawling educational, corporate and political network.
> Chief among them is Gentry, who presided over the Koch's closed-door higher
> education workshop last year.
> Gentry possesses unique knowledge about the interconnectivity of the Koch's
> various interests and operations because he embodies its reach. He's a
> Charles Koch Foundation vice president and a key fundraiser for the Kochs'
> political action arm. He's a former vice president of both the Mercatus
> Center and the Institute for Humane Studies at George Mason University. And
> today, he's even Eastern vice chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia.
> Brian Hooks, now president of the Charles Koch Foundation, is another key
> Koch network player.
> Hooks served as the Mercatus Center's executive director and chief
> operating
> officer from 2005 until 2014 and remains a Mercatus Center board member.
> The
> year Hooks took over, the Mercatus Center posted $4.9 million in total
> revenue, according to tax filings. The year he left, it posted nearly $20.7
> million.
> "Our job is to make sure that we've got a strategy for our work to have a
> disproportionate impact," Hooks said at the Kochs' conference in 2014,
> noting that the Mercatus Center is the "largest collection" of "free market
> faculty" at any university in the world. "These guys are producing research
> that groups in this network can rely on to advance economic freedom every
> single day."
> Scholarly research performed by academics at Koch-funded schools and
> programs is indeed sometimes used by Koch-backed nonprofit organizations
> that, in turn, overtly advocate for political candidates or causes.
> For instance, to support assertions made in a recent, 67-page policy paper,
> Koch-supported American Encore regularly cites and quotes Mercatus Center
> research and mentions the center nearly a dozen times.
> Among the academic work American Encore's paper highlights: a 2014 Mercatus
> Center study by Keith Hall, a senior research fellow who had previously
> served as commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and a 2014
> commentary about a federal regulations tracking and measurement tool by
> Patrick A. McLaughlin, another senior research fellow.
> "Yet another study has confirmed what we already knew - states with lower
> taxes do better," read an article by the Kochs' flagship nonprofit,
> Americans for Prosperity, about a study published July 7 by the Mercatus
> Center. "Overall, the rankings provide more evidence that economic freedom
> works, and bigger government means bigger trouble."
> And the 60 Plus Association, a retiree-focused nonprofit that's benefited
> from tens of millions of dollars of the Koch brothers' money over the
> years,
> for a time tapped Walter Williams, a George Mason University economics
> professor, syndicated columnist and Rush Limbaugh Show fill-in host, as a
> member of its "truth squad." His mission: to "battle" against Democrats on
> Social Security and Medicare programs.
> Congress Takes Notice
> Congress is also paying more attention to the Mercatus Center, which from
> 1999 to 2008 was mentioned by name 32 times in either the Congressional
> Record or congressional committee reports. Since 2009, it's been mentioned
> 93 times, often in reference to Mercatus Center faculty who were testifying
> before Congress.
> This year, Congress even cited Mercatus Center research in the text of
> budget bills. House Concurrent Resolution 27 and Senate Concurrent
> Resolution 11 note that a Mercatus Center study "estimates that Obamacare
> will reduce employment by up to 3 percent, or about 4 million full-time
> equivalent workers."
> Mercatus Center Vice President Carrie Conko, while declining to address
> critics' "ad hominem attacks" of Charles Koch, stressed the institution's
> work is the product of hard work and high standards - not the whims of some
> patron puppet master.
> "As a university research center, our scholarship is independent and
> subjected to rigorous peer review," Conko said. "Our researchers are
> interested in understanding what shapes societies and economies and that
> covers a spectrum of research from the history of economic thought to the
> application of economics to questions of public policy."
> Conko also noted that the Mercatus Center abides by a strong conflict of
> interest and research independence policy, which she described as "stronger
> than those of most found with typical academic centers or departments."
> Mercatus Center officials note that the center isn't part of George Mason
> University the same way as, say, its chemistry or psychology departments.
> Instead, it's organized as a stand-alone nonprofit, and as such, George
> Mason University isn't directly responsible for it.
> The Mercatus Center doesn't receive direct funding from George Mason
> University, Conko said.
> But George Mason University and its students do receive millions of dollars
> in annual financial benefit from the Mercatus Center, according to federal
> tax filings.
> That alone is a major incentive for a public university in Virginia, where
> state funding of higher education is dwindling, to host a privately funded
> operation on its campus - today, a fairly common practice among public
> schools.
> The Mercatus Center spent $3.64 million during that time to "support
> graduate students at George Mason University" by "training future scholars
> and decision-makers to advance and apply a research agenda for
> understanding
> institutions and change," according to a tax filing.
> The Mercatus Center helped fund $1.82 million worth of communication
> efforts
> that included promoting its research and ideas "to the media and opinion
> shapers."
> And it made a $10,000 grant to the Atlas Economic Research Foundation,
> which
> operates a "global network of more than 400 free market organizations."
> They
> include several Koch-backed nonprofit groups such as Americans for
> Prosperity, the American Legislative Exchange Council and Americans for Tax
> Reform.
> McAuliffe Mum?
> The Mason-Mercatus-Koch nexus may seem like rich fodder for a Democrat such
> as Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, whose national party brethren makes
> demonizing the Koch brothers a central strategy of their electoral and
> fundraising agenda.
> McAuliffe's own political committee, Common Good VA, bashed the "ultra
> right wing Koch Brothers" in an email earlier this month, accusing them of
> working against "expanding health care for all" and "ensuring a living
> wage."
> But McAuliffe - the outspoken former chairman of both the Democratic
> National Committee and Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign -
> declined Center for Public Integrity requests to discuss George Mason
> University's relationship with the Koch brothers.
> George Mason University's top undergraduate leader, Student Body President
> Khushboo Bhatia, also declined comment.
> University spokesman Michael Sandler explained that George Mason is among
> the nation's most diverse campuses, and "this notion of diversity and
> inclusion that is so central to our mission applies to our donors, as
> well."
> Sandler said the university appreciates the Charles Koch Foundation's
> donations, as well as those from thousands of other donors.
> "While we are grateful for all of the gifts we receive, we value academic
> freedom above all else," Sandler said. "This freedom allows our faculty and
> researchers to ask questions and make discoveries that others wouldn't
> otherwise pursue, and we will not compromise that freedom for anything or
> anyone."
> Jennifer Victor, a George Mason University politics professor who
> specializes in how individuals and groups influence government, is
> skeptical.
> George Mason University's marriage to an ideologically motivated donor with
> a policy agenda to achieve "raises some eyebrows," Victor said. "I don't
> really see what Mason gets from them, and I don't think the situation is
> healthy or consistent with the university's teaching mission."
> No Comment on Koch Funding
> Some college officials such as Sandler are willing to discuss the financial
> support their schools receive from Koch-run private foundations, with many
> emphasizing that gifts from donors, whether liberal or conservative, don't
> affect coursework or the manner in which students learn. They also note
> that
> their schools receive hundreds, and sometimes thousands of contributions
> each year from individuals, private foundations and the like.
> But it's not uncommon for other school officials to button up.
> Take Victor Nakas, a spokesman for The Catholic University of America in
> Washington, D.C.
> Posed a series of questions about the $215,000 the university received in
> 2013 from the Charles Koch Foundation, he emailed a pair of dated press
> releases announcing grants.
> "We will be unable to provide you with more than links to these
> announcements," he said.
> Follow-up messages went unreturned.
> Michael Schoenfeld, the vice president for public affairs and government
> relations at Duke University, declined to say how the school used the
> $37,000 it recently received from the Charles Koch Foundation.
> "As a rule, we do not comment on individual donors or contributions without
> the donor's permission," he explained.
> Officials at Oklahoma State University likewise offered no details about
> how
> the school used the $69,000 the Charles Koch Foundation recently gave it.
> Why the silence?
> An email exchange between two Florida State University officials, obtained
> by the Center for Public Integrity, offers a measure of explanation.
> In it, the officials indicate deep concern about the potential effects of
> releasing more information about the school's moneyed donors in response to
> activist demands.
> "[R]equiring donors to disclose more than they already do will likely
> result
> in fewer gifts and smaller gifts, and it will impose an additional
> administrative hurdle for the university," wrote Thomas W. Jennings, vice
> president for university advancement, to David Coburn, Florida State
> University chief of staff.
> Revealing donor gift agreements, even for donors who have not requested
> anonymity, might "have a negative effect on FSU's relationships with many
> of
> its donors, who don't want that kind of attention," Jennings continued.
> The University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill received $115,000 from the
> Charles Koch Foundation in 2013, one of nearly 100 schools that year to
> receive a five-figure contribution from a Koch foundation.
> But that's information not easily accessed by students. Whether by design,
> happenstance or ignorance, "most individuals don't know where any of the
> university's funds come from," University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
> Student Body President Houston Summers said.
> University spokesman Jim Gregory confirmed the school received $110,000 for
> the Charles Koch Visiting Scholars Program in UNC-Chapel Hill's Philosophy,
> Politics and Economics Program, conducted in collaboration with Duke
> University. Donors are allowed to remain anonymous, if they choose.
> However, some universities are facing blowback over scant information about
> school donors from increasingly organized anti-Koch groups and activists.
> The umbrella group UnKoch My Campus, for one, has staged protests, demanded
> meetings with administrators and launched chapters at George Mason
> University and Florida State University, among others. The organization
> accuses the Kochs and their allies of undermining issues many students care
> about, such as environmental protection, workers' rights, healthcare
> expansion and public education.
> Its immediate goal, beyond convincing colleges to de-Koch themselves?
> "Transparency, because students should have the capability to be more aware
> of who's funding their school and their education, and where funding might
> conflict with student interests," said Kalin Jordan, an UnKoch My Campus
> organizer. "The universities - most don't do a good job of informing
> students at all."
> Said Colin Nackerman, a student activist at George Mason University: "You
> should know, if you're going into a classroom, that $30 million is going
> into your school from someone who wants you to think a certain way."
> Largely silent in the past, the Charles Koch Foundation has begun to push
> back at such dissenters.
> "They don't want students and scholars to expand their educational
> horizons," Hardin, the foundation's university relations director, wrote in
> a May 26 Wall Street Journal op-ed. "Rather than engage in a vigorous and
> civil debate about the merits of different ideas, they seek to prevent
> those
> with which they disagree from ever being heard."
> Liberals Give Big, Too
> If George Mason University is Charles Koch's academic playground, Bard
> College is that of Democratic bankroller George Soros, often viewed as the
> Koch brothers' pre-eminent liberal foil.
> The tiny New York liberal arts school nestled along the Hudson River is
> renowned for both scholarship and hippy-dippyness. It received more than
> $11.2 million from Soros' private foundation in 2013 - part of a $60
> million, multiyear commitment.
> But for Soros, himself a multibillionaire with wealth comparable to the
> Kochs, his contributions to Bard College aren't generally earmarked for
> core
> academics or domestic political considerations.
> Instead, Soros' money mainly helps fund Bard College's Center for Civic
> Engagement, which houses a broad portfolio of both U.S. and overseas
> programs aimed at "advancing the ideals of an innovative, hands-on liberal
> arts education through a myriad of opportunities across the globe."
> This tracks with Soros' broader tack on educational giving: The vast
> majority of his tens of millions of dollars in education-related
> contributions fund foreign schools and programs, particularly in Eastern
> Europe and the Middle East. (Soros lived his early life in Hungary, where
> as
> a Jew, he survived Nazi occupation before emigrating.)
> Among the U.S. schools Soros does aid, many of his most sizable grants are
> earmarked for programs with international goals, such as $500,000 to
> Harvard
> University funding a project on economic growth in Albania, and $159,834 to
> The George Washington University in Washington, D.C., to "develop effective
> and influential public policy leaders in Central Asia."
> Soros' foundation even gave George Mason University more than $22,500 - not
> to fund economics programs, but to organize meetings in Mexico and Peru
> about conflict reconciliation.
> "As a general rule," Soros said in 2011, "I do not support higher education
> in the United States."
> Soros does make exceptions.
> An avowed advocate of campaign finance reform, Soros has used his private
> foundations to fund certain domestic college initiatives squarely rooted in
> American politics and elections.
> One Soros foundation, for example, gave New York City's Fordham University
> $200,000 in 2013 to study the "role of money in democratic process."
> The money is part of a $1 million, multi-year grant to determine how
> disclosure of campaign money influences voters - an awfully political
> endeavor by any measure.
> But school officials say the research they conduct is free of outside
> influence and subject to the highest academic and legal reviews and
> standards.
> "None of this work is 'political' per se in terms of any ideological
> dimensions . it is all strictly nonpartisan," said Costas Panagopoulos,
> director of Fordham's Center for Electoral Politics and Democracy, who is
> leading the program.
> Penn State University's economics department in 2013 benefited from
> $150,000
> in Soros money to help build a research center focused in part on
> "interactions between new media and society."
> And the Ohio State University Research Foundation received $50,000 to
> conduct a research project aimed at better understanding the role
> independent expenditures play in federal elections and "how those
> expenditures influence the legislative process."
> Bard College officials do hear their share of criticism for taking a
> massive
> amount of money from Soros' private foundation, said Jonathan Becker, the
> school's vice president for academic affairs and director for civic
> engagement.
> But, similar to some of the schools that accept Koch money, the school's
> tenuous budget situation means that it'd take funding from just about
> anyone
> so long as the transaction was legal and wasn't intended to fund an
> initiative "antithetical to our vision," Becker said.
> That vision, in the words of its student handbook, imagines a "supportive,
> intellectually rich environment where students can engage themselves to the
> fullest while respecting all members of the community."
> So what if the Charles Koch Foundation wanted to donate $1 million to Bard
> College?
> Or $10 million?
> "We would say 'thank you,' and we would cash the check quickly," Becker
> said.
> Other Conservative Donors
> Unlike the Kochs, Soros and many other prominent political donors, both
> left
> and right of center, have charitable agendas that largely diverge from
> their
> domestic political agendas.
> Robert McNair, the Houston Texans owner who this year alone has spread $3
> million among five super PACs backing several Republican presidential
> candidates, used his private foundation to give millions of dollars to
> various medical schools and a scholarship program for doctors performing
> research in areas such as breast cancer, juvenile diabetes and
> neuroscience.
> Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, two other top-shelf Republican donors whom 2016
> presidential candidates have endlessly wooed, directed almost all of their
> university-related private foundation funding - millions of it in 2013 - to
> medical research.
> A private foundation co-run by former World Wrestling Entertainment honcho
> Linda McMahon, a major GOP donor who herself twice unsuccessfully ran
> self-funded U.S. Senate campaigns, gave its most sizable, six-figure
> contributions to substance abuse help group Liberation Programs.
> Then there's one late Republican superdonor whose philanthropy has been at
> war with his political giving: Harold Simmons.
> The Texas businessman bankrolled his eponymous foundation, but his liberal
> daughters run it. In doing so, they saw to it that Planned Parenthood - the
> ultimate Republican scourge of late - received more than $300,000 of his
> money during 2013. It's also given hundreds of thousands of dollars to
> Public Campaign, a Washington, D.C.-based money-in-politics reform group
> also supported in 2013 with $300,000 from a private foundation led by
> liberal hedge fund manager Jonathan Soros, son of George Soros.
> Money the Harold Simmons Foundation did give to colleges in 2013 mostly
> went
> toward infrastructure and general operating expenses.
> University of Dayton Says "No Thanks"
> While more schools than ever are engaging with Koch foundations, at least
> one school - the University of Dayton in Ohio - has seemingly soured on
> Koch
> cash, which it has previously accepted in five-figure amounts.
> Jay Riestenberg, a research analyst at campaign reform advocacy group
> Common
> Cause and University of Dayton alumnus, earlier this year emailed the
> school's Interim Provost Paul H. Benson, asking him if the University of
> Dayton is still funded by, or seeking new funding from Koch foundations.
> Attached was an op-ed Riestenberg has written for the school's student
> newspaper. In it, he explains that his education at the small Catholic
> school inspired him to care about other people, protect the environment and
> fight for social justice.
> "UD accepting Koch funding is in clear violation of the institution's
> Catholic Marianist values," Riestenberg wrote in the April 28 email.
> Benson replied later that night. His answer: The University of Dayton no
> longer accepts Koch cash, and it will not in the future - despite the
> efforts of Koch-backed organizations.
> "There have been instances in which other foundations who are funded in
> part
> by the Koch Brothers have tried to interest us in establishing centers at
> UD," Benson wrote Riestenberg. "We have not supported those proposals,
> precisely for the reasons you cite."
> Benson declined an interview request by the Center for Public Integrity.
> In a statement, University of Dayton spokeswoman Cilla Shindell explained
> that the school did reject a recent proposal from a "foundation that is in
> part funded by the Koch family" because it "would have been structured in a
> way that would limit oversight by the university in such areas as
> curriculum
> and faculty hiring."
> She did not name the foundation.
> Kochs' Higher Education Funding Strategy
> This previously unpublished recording of Koch aides discussing education
> funding strategy with potential donors was provided to the Center for
> Public
> Integrity by The Undercurrent, an online program produced by liberal
> political activists.
> Key Kochworld Lieutenants
> Several associates of Charles and David Koch span multiple aspects of the
> billionaire brothers' political, educational, charitable and industrial
> juggernauts. Among them:
> Richard Fink is among Charles Koch's top aides. Fink is the co-founder of
> George Mason University's Mercatus Center and a current member of the
> center's board of directors. Fink has also served on the boards of several
> of Charles and David Koch's private foundations. That includes serving as
> president of the Charles Koch Foundation until 2014 and as a director for
> the Fred C. & Mary R. Koch Foundation alongside Charles and David Koch
> themselves. Fink likewise sits on the board of directors for Americans for
> Prosperity, a "social welfare" nonprofit that doesn't reveal its donors but
> spent more than $33.5 million during the 2012 election advocating against
> President Barack Obama's re-election. Fink also works as chairman and chief
> executive of Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC, the legal, government and
> public affairs wing of Koch Industries Inc.
> Kevin Gentry is vice president of the Charles Koch Foundation. He is also a
> board member for Koch-backed nonprofit Freedom Partners and vice president
> for special projects/development at Koch Companies Public Sector LLC.
> Gentry
> previously served as vice president of the Koch-funded Institute for Humane
> Studies and the Mercatus Center at George Mason University and as volunteer
> faculty at the Leadership Institute, which "identifies, recruits, trains
> and
> places conservatives in government, politics and the media." In party
> politics, Gentry serves as eastern vice chairman for the Republican Party
> of
> Virginia.
> Brian Hooks is president of the Charles Koch Foundation, having been hired
> in 2014. Hooks is also a Mercatus Center board member and served as the
> Mercatus Center's executive director and chief operating officer from 2005
> until 2014.
> Wayne Gable is a board member of the Koch-funded Freedom Partners, itself a
> nonprofit that has largely provided seed money to other Koch-backed
> political nonprofits over many years. He served from 1999 to 2000 as
> president of the Charles Koch Foundation as well. Gable is also a former
> managing director of international government affairs at Koch Industries
> Inc. and a onetime registered federal lobbyist for the company. He received
> a doctoral degree in economics from George Mason University.
> Nancy Pfotenhauer served from 2010 to 2014 on George Mason University's
> Board of Visitors - a 16-member university governing body appointed by
> Virginia's governor that "exercises its authority principally in
> policy-making and oversight." She received a master's degree in economics
> from George Mason University. Pfotenhauer today serves on Americans for
> Prosperity's board of directors and runs a communications firm. She is also
> a former director of the Independent Women's Forum, which in 2010 received
> $350,000 from the Koch-controlled (and now defunct) Claude R. Lambe
> Charitable Foundation, according to IRS tax documents. She once led Koch
> Industries Inc.'s Washington, D.C., office.
> Dale Gibbens is the human resources vice president for Koch Industries Inc.
> He is a board member for Koch-backed nonprofit Freedom Partners, described
> by Politico in 2013 as "the Koch brothers secret bank." Since then, Freedom
> Partners' sister super PAC spent about $23.4 million advocating for
> Republican congressional candidates and against Democratic candidates. In
> 2014, Gibbens also helped fund the Koch Center for Leadership and Ethics at
> Emporia State University in Kansas, which is focused on "free market
> principles, leadership and ethical theories."
> Patrick Hedger is policy director for American Encore, a heavily
> Koch-backed
> political nonprofit previously known as the Center to Protect Patient
> Rights. He is a recent graduate of George Mason University, where he is
> also
> pursuing a master's degree in public policy.
> A version of this story was co-published with The Atlantic.
> This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not
> be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.
> DAVE LEVINTHAL
> Dave Levinthal joined the Center for Public Integrity in 2013 to help lead
> its Consider the Source project investigating the influence of money in
> politics. For two years prior to joining the Center, Dave reported on
> campaign finance and lobbying issues for Politico and co-wrote the daily
> Politico Influence column. He also edited OpenSecrets.org from 2009 to
> 2011,
> where he led coverage that won the Online News Association's top honors in
> 2011 for best topical reporting and blogging and was a finalist the same
> year for the Scripps Howard Foundation's Distinguished Service to the First
> Amendment award. From 2003 to 2009, Dave worked for The Dallas Morning
> News,
> primarily covering Dallas City Hall also reporting on national elections
> and
> aviation security. From 2000 to 2002, he covered the New Hampshire
> Statehouse for The Eagle-Tribune of Lawrence, Mass. A native of Buffalo,
> N.Y., Dave graduated from Syracuse University with degrees in newspaper
> journalism and political philosophy and edited The Daily Orange. He is also
> a two-time winner (2007 and 2010) of Canada's Northern Lights Award for his
> travel writing about the arctic.
> RELATED STORIES
> Koch Funding of Universities Shrouded in Secrecy
> By Kalin Jordan, PR Watch | Op-Ed
> Koch PR Games: College Football Brought to You by Koch Industries
> By Nick Surgey, PR Watch | Report
> Koch Brothers Hit the Airwaves in Support of Wisconsin Corruption Measures
> By Brendan Fischer, PR Watch | Report
> ________________________________________
> Show Comments
> Hide Comments
> <a href="http://truthout.disqus.com/?url=ref">View the discussion
> thread.</a>
> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
> Koch Brothers' Higher Education Investments Advance Political Goals
> Sunday, 08 November 2015 00:00 By Dave Levinthal, The Center for Public
> Integrity | News Analysis
> . font size Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink
> reference not valid.Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink
> reference not valid.
> . Charles Koch appears in a video promoting a partnership between
> Koch Industries, the Charles Koch Foundation and the United Negro College
> Fund. (Screenshot: Koch Industries)
> . Last year, a top lieutenant of Charles and David Koch's vast network
> of philanthropic institutions laid bare the billionaire brothers' strategy
> to evangelize their gospel of economic freedom.
> Political success, Kevin Gentry told a crowd of elite supporters attending
> the annual Koch confab in Dana Point, Calif., begins with reaching young
> minds in college lecture halls, thereby preparing bright,
> libertarian-leaning students to one day occupy the halls of political
> power.
> "The [Koch] network is fully integrated, so it's not just work at the
> universities with the students, but it's also building state-based
> capabilities and election capabilities and integrating this talent
> pipeline," he said.
> "So you can see how this is useful to each other over time," he continued.
> "No one else has this infrastructure. We're very excited about doing it."
> The Center for Public Integrity obtained a previously unpublished audio
> recording of the meeting, which focused on the Kochs' higher education
> funding strategy, from liberal activists who produce The Undercurrent, an
> online video program.
> Higher education has become a top Koch priority in recent years. And
> funding
> - as well as pushback against it - is increasing.
> During 2013, a pair of private charitable foundations Charles Koch leads
> and
> personally bankrolls combined to spread more than $19.3 million across 210
> college campuses in 46 states and the District of Columbia, according to a
> Center for Public Integrity analysis of Internal Revenue Service tax
> filings.
> That represents a significant increase from the $12.7 million the Koch
> foundations distributed among 163 college campuses in 41 states and the
> District of Columbia during 2012. It's also exponentially more than what
> the
> Koch foundations together spent directly on higher education a decade ago.
> The Center for Public Integrity reviewed hundreds of private documents,
> emails and audio recordings that, along with interviews with more than 75
> college officials, professors, students and others, indicate the Koch
> brothers' spending on higher education is now a critical part of their
> broader campaign to infuse politics and government with free-market
> principles.
> Spreading the Free-Market Gospel
> It is no secret that the Kochs' network has invested hundreds of millions
> of
> hard-to-track dollars in conservative political nonprofits that influence
> elections. The brothers, who earned their billions leading private oil,
> chemical and manufacturing conglomerate Koch Industries Inc., were dominant
> forces in recent election cycles. They're now poised to rank among the most
> influential Americans shaping next year's presidential and congressional
> vote.
> Much less well known: their activities on college campuses.
> The Kochs are among many wealthy political patrons who give money to
> education, including conservative Robert McNair, independent Michael
> Bloomberg and liberal billionaire financier George Soros. (The Center for
> Public Integrity receives funding from the Open Society Foundations, which
> Soros funds. A complete list of Center for Public Integrity funders is
> found
> here.)
> The Kochs' giving, however, has a laser-like focus on a specific,
> politically relevant discipline - free market economics - unmatched by
> other
> political mega-donors. Koch officials routinely cultivate relationships
> with
> professors and deans and fund specific courses of economic study pitched by
> them.
> Detractors argue the Koch brothers' college-focused money, by helping
> advance a philosophy of economic liberty, is eroding a fundamental aspect
> of
> higher education: academic freedom.
> But some conservatives and libertarians consider the Kochs' investments in
> higher education a much-needed counterweight to an American higher
> education
> system that historically tilts leftward.
> And they explain the Kochs' decision to influence education most certainly
> does not spring, as many liberal partisans would like the body politic to
> believe, from the compulsions of steel-souled industrialists more concerned
> about fortune and power than, say, protecting the environment or helping
> the
> poor.
> "Since the '60s, they've been imbued with the sense that the world would be
> a better place if the country instituted their libertarian values," author
> Brian Doherty said of the brothers.
> "For Charles, his time horizon, as he gets a little older, has become a
> little shorter. He has lots of money, and he wants to see action in his
> lifetime," continued Doherty, the author of "Radicals for Capitalism: A
> Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement" and
> senior
> editor at Reason who's interviewed both Koch brothers.
> "I'm not doing anything I'm ashamed of," Charles Koch himself told Forbes
> last month. "You've gotta change the hearts and minds of the people to
> understand what really makes society fairer and what's going to change
> their
> lives. And it's not more of this government control."
> The Kochs educational giving, while rarefied, isn't the nation's largest.
> With his wife, Betty, Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Intel, this year
> pledged $100 million to the California Institute of Technology - and
> allowed
> the school to spend it as it sees fit.
> Koch defenders also note, accurately, that the pair has donated generously
> to educational causes not necessarily animated by political considerations:
> the Smithsonian, public television, media organizations, music
> scholarships,
> medical research and a variety of others. David Koch, for his part, has
> poured hundreds of millions of dollars into medicine and the arts over the
> years.
> But it's clear where there is an ideological bent to their giving: Tax
> returns, as well as emails and private documents exchanged among Charles
> Koch Foundation officers and various college and university officials,
> indicate the foundation's commitment to funding academics is deep and
> growing. Koch education funding, which is almost singularly focused on
> economics, also sometimes comes with certain strings attached.
> Also see: "How Colleges Use Koch Money"
> Recruiting New Believers
> At the College of Charleston in South Carolina, for example, documents show
> the foundation wanted more than just academic excellence for its money. It
> wanted information about students it could potentially use for its own
> benefit - and influence over information officials at the public university
> disseminated about the Charles Koch Foundation.
> It sought, for one, the names and email addresses - "preferably not ending
> in .edu" - of any student who participated in a Koch-sponsored class,
> reading group, club or fellowship. The stated purpose: "to notify students
> of opportunities" through both the Charles Koch Foundation and the
> Institute
> for Humane Studies at George Mason University.
> And the foundation certainly did not want the College of Charleston to
> speak
> to news reporters about its Koch-funded programs without prior consent from
> the Charles Koch Foundation.
> "[I]f you intend to engage in press releases or other media outreach
> associated with programmatic activities, please notify us in advance,"
> Charles Koch Foundation officials Charlie Ruger and Derek Johnson wrote
> Peter Calcagno, director of the College of Charleston's Center for Public
> Choice and Market Process. "We consider media outreach a collaborative
> effort and would appreciate the opportunity to both assist and advise."
> Donors are often sent unpublished press releases about programs they fund
> "as a courtesy so that they will know the contents," school spokesman Mike
> Robertson said.
> At Florida State University, one of the nation's top educational recipients
> of Koch foundation money this decade - about $1.38 million from 2010
> through
> 2013 - a similar request is more direct.
> "FSU will allow [the Charles Koch Foundation] to review and approve the
> text
> of any proposed publicity which includes mention of CKF," reads a
> memorandum
> of understanding signed between the university and foundation in 2013.
> Such provisions aren't new at Florida State University: the Center for
> Public Integrity last year reported that the Charles Koch Foundation first
> attempted in 2007 to place specific conditions on its financial support of
> the school, when it initially considered providing funding.
> Among the proposed conditions: Teachings must align with the libertarian
> economic philosophy of Charles Koch, the Charles Koch Foundation would
> maintain partial control over faculty hiring and the chairman of the
> school's economics department - a prominent economic theorist - must stay
> in
> place for another three years despite his plans to step down.
> Florida State University ultimately didn't agree to the initial requests
> when, in 2008, it reached a funding agreement with the foundation. It's
> also
> tightened and clarified policies that affect private donors' contributions
> to the university.
> Relationships between certain school officials and the Charles Koch
> Foundation personnel nevertheless blossomed. One gatekeeper to Charles
> Koch's riches practically became family - if not by blood, then money.
> "Thought you might want to see our 'nephew!'" wrote executive assistant
> Tonja Guilford to David Rasmussen, her boss and dean of Florida State
> University's College of Social Sciences and Public Policy.
> Attached to the October 2014 email were photos of this "nephew" - the
> tow-headed toddler son of John C. Hardin, director of university relations
> for the Charles Koch Foundation.
> Hardin and his family had previously visited with Florida State University
> officials in Tallahassee. Talk of future get-togethers, and more pictures
> of
> Hardin's son in a Superman costume, aloft in his father's arms, would
> follow.
> "I was just thinking this morning I needed new pictures to post outside my
> door," Guilford fawned to Hardin in an email. "He is just way too cute in
> his superman costume. He's my 'little' superman - I just love him!"
> Friend-Raising
> Rasmussen, who routinely pursues private funding on behalf of his
> department, declined interview requests from the Center for Public
> Integrity, as did Guilford.
> Florida State University spokesman Dennis Schnittker described the email
> exchanges as "friendly correspondence between individuals," adding that
> collegial communications are a valuable part of school culture.
> "Most university presidents would tell you before you can fundraise, you
> have to 'friend raise,'" Schnittker said.
> Today, the Kochs' friendship with Florida State University appears stronger
> than ever.
> An email written in September 2014 by Jesse Colvin, Florida State
> University's College of Social Sciences and Public Policy development
> director, indicates the Charles Koch Foundation is committed to funding the
> work of economic department doctoral students "during 2015-2016 and in
> subsequent years."
> A series of other meetings and conversations between Hardin, from the
> Charles Koch Foundation, and Florida State University officials followed,
> documents indicate.
> In November 2014, Florida State University officials huddled in the office
> of newly installed university President John Thrasher for a meeting
> entitled
> "Koch briefing." Schnittker, the university spokesman, said the meeting was
> an "opportunity for our new president to be briefed by university staff
> about a gift agreement that obviously preceded his tenure." Hardin of the
> Charles Koch Foundation was not present, Schnittker said.
> Meanwhile, when officials at the Florida State University Project on
> Accountable Justice went hunting for funding, the Charles Koch Foundation
> factored into their strategy.
> The Koch brothers, after all, were telegraphing their intent to make
> criminal justice reform a personal priority, reasoning that
> "overcriminalization," like overregulation of industry, is resulting in
> more
> Americans enjoying fewer economic freedoms.
> Not everyone at the Florida State University Project on Accountable Justice
> appeared thrilled at pursuing Koch cash.
> "I know you really hate them, but we really need to send them some stuff,"
> then-Chairman Allison DeFoor wrote Executive Director Deborrah Brodsky late
> last year. "They have money. We don't."
> Reached separately by phone last week, DeFoor, an unabashed conservative,
> and Brodsky, a Canadian whose politics point more leftward, both laughed
> off
> the exchange as comedic banter between longtime colleagues.
> But they confirmed they had pursued the Charles Koch Foundation. It hasn't
> yet funded the project but did provide the organization "strategic
> support,"
> including co-hosting a forum on criminal justice.
> DeFoor would conclude, following presentations in Washington, D.C., to both
> the Charles Koch Foundation and the conservative American Legislative
> Exchange Council, that Koch interest in issues the project researches "is
> sincere, potentially aggressive and deep."
> As a small, three-year-old "research- and evidence-based" program, the
> Florida State University Project on Accountable Justice will gladly take
> money from most anyone along the ideological spectrum who's dedicated to
> its
> study of and work on criminal justice system reforms, Brodsky said. She
> counts liberal lions such as the American Civil Liberties Union, Southern
> Poverty Law Center and Human Rights Watch as partners.
> The Charles Koch Foundation executives declined to be interviewed
> individually. Trice Jacobson, a foundation spokesperson, instead provided a
> statement that she said "captures what we all hope to share for this
> piece."
> "Like many charities, the Charles Koch Foundation recognizes the importance
> of supporting a diversity of ideas so scholars and students can continue to
> push the frontiers of knowledge and help people discover new and better
> ways
> to live fulfilling lives," the statement read. "Our giving has expanded to
> support new research and programs on critical issues ranging from criminal
> justice reform to corporate welfare."
> In a separate statement of its "academic giving principles," the Charles
> Koch Foundation asserts that it is "committed to advancing a marketplace of
> ideas and supporting a 'Republic of Science' where scholarship is free,
> open
> and subject to rigorous and honest intellectual challenge."
> It also notes that scholars and students "who are free to teach, learn,
> research, speak, critique and receive support for their work without
> interference" are in the "best position to discover the advances that will
> help improve well-being."
> George Mason, aka Koch U
> Nowhere is expanded Koch involvement in higher education more evident than
> at George Mason University, which receives more funding from the Kochs than
> any other school.
> The large, diverse public school in northern Virginia, about 20 miles from
> the White House, today houses and lends its name to what's effectively
> Charles Koch's personal academic workshop. The Charles Koch Foundation in
> 2013 donated more than $14.4 million to George Mason University and the
> research centers it hosts. That's on top of tens of millions in Koch
> dollars
> that George Mason University and the affiliated research centers have
> collectively received in recent years.
> Charles Koch himself is a George Mason University fixture. He's the
> recipient of an honorary doctorate in science from the university, which
> boasts a student population of more than 33,700. He is a director of the
> university-based Mercatus Center - Mercatus means "market" in Latin - that
> Charles Koch Foundation Vice President Ryan Stowers described at the 2014
> Koch gathering in California as "critical" to advancing policy priorities.
> Koch also enjoys the company of several current and former George Mason
> University affiliates who play multiple roles across the Koch brothers'
> sprawling educational, corporate and political network.
> Chief among them is Gentry, who presided over the Koch's closed-door higher
> education workshop last year.
> Gentry possesses unique knowledge about the interconnectivity of the Koch's
> various interests and operations because he embodies its reach. He's a
> Charles Koch Foundation vice president and a key fundraiser for the Kochs'
> political action arm. He's a former vice president of both the Mercatus
> Center and the Institute for Humane Studies at George Mason University. And
> today, he's even Eastern vice chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia.
> Brian Hooks, now president of the Charles Koch Foundation, is another key
> Koch network player.
> Hooks served as the Mercatus Center's executive director and chief
> operating
> officer from 2005 until 2014 and remains a Mercatus Center board member.
> The
> year Hooks took over, the Mercatus Center posted $4.9 million in total
> revenue, according to tax filings. The year he left, it posted nearly $20.7
> million.
> "Our job is to make sure that we've got a strategy for our work to have a
> disproportionate impact," Hooks said at the Kochs' conference in 2014,
> noting that the Mercatus Center is the "largest collection" of "free market
> faculty" at any university in the world. "These guys are producing research
> that groups in this network can rely on to advance economic freedom every
> single day."
> Scholarly research performed by academics at Koch-funded schools and
> programs is indeed sometimes used by Koch-backed nonprofit organizations
> that, in turn, overtly advocate for political candidates or causes.
> For instance, to support assertions made in a recent, 67-page policy paper,
> Koch-supported American Encore regularly cites and quotes Mercatus Center
> research and mentions the center nearly a dozen times.
> Among the academic work American Encore's paper highlights: a 2014 Mercatus
> Center study by Keith Hall, a senior research fellow who had previously
> served as commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and a 2014
> commentary about a federal regulations tracking and measurement tool by
> Patrick A. McLaughlin, another senior research fellow.
> "Yet another study has confirmed what we already knew - states with lower
> taxes do better," read an article by the Kochs' flagship nonprofit,
> Americans for Prosperity, about a study published July 7 by the Mercatus
> Center. "Overall, the rankings provide more evidence that economic freedom
> works, and bigger government means bigger trouble."
> And the 60 Plus Association, a retiree-focused nonprofit that's benefited
> from tens of millions of dollars of the Koch brothers' money over the
> years,
> for a time tapped Walter Williams, a George Mason University economics
> professor, syndicated columnist and Rush Limbaugh Show fill-in host, as a
> member of its "truth squad." His mission: to "battle" against Democrats on
> Social Security and Medicare programs.
> Congress Takes Notice
> Congress is also paying more attention to the Mercatus Center, which from
> 1999 to 2008 was mentioned by name 32 times in either the Congressional
> Record or congressional committee reports. Since 2009, it's been mentioned
> 93 times, often in reference to Mercatus Center faculty who were testifying
> before Congress.
> This year, Congress even cited Mercatus Center research in the text of
> budget bills. House Concurrent Resolution 27 and Senate Concurrent
> Resolution 11 note that a Mercatus Center study "estimates that Obamacare
> will reduce employment by up to 3 percent, or about 4 million full-time
> equivalent workers."
> Mercatus Center Vice President Carrie Conko, while declining to address
> critics' "ad hominem attacks" of Charles Koch, stressed the institution's
> work is the product of hard work and high standards - not the whims of some
> patron puppet master.
> "As a university research center, our scholarship is independent and
> subjected to rigorous peer review," Conko said. "Our researchers are
> interested in understanding what shapes societies and economies and that
> covers a spectrum of research from the history of economic thought to the
> application of economics to questions of public policy."
> Conko also noted that the Mercatus Center abides by a strong conflict of
> interest and research independence policy, which she described as "stronger
> than those of most found with typical academic centers or departments."
> Mercatus Center officials note that the center isn't part of George Mason
> University the same way as, say, its chemistry or psychology departments.
> Instead, it's organized as a stand-alone nonprofit, and as such, George
> Mason University isn't directly responsible for it.
> The Mercatus Center doesn't receive direct funding from George Mason
> University, Conko said.
> But George Mason University and its students do receive millions of dollars
> in annual financial benefit from the Mercatus Center, according to federal
> tax filings.
> That alone is a major incentive for a public university in Virginia, where
> state funding of higher education is dwindling, to host a privately funded
> operation on its campus - today, a fairly common practice among public
> schools.
> The Mercatus Center spent $3.64 million during that time to "support
> graduate students at George Mason University" by "training future scholars
> and decision-makers to advance and apply a research agenda for
> understanding
> institutions and change," according to a tax filing.
> The Mercatus Center helped fund $1.82 million worth of communication
> efforts
> that included promoting its research and ideas "to the media and opinion
> shapers."
> And it made a $10,000 grant to the Atlas Economic Research Foundation,
> which
> operates a "global network of more than 400 free market organizations."
> They
> include several Koch-backed nonprofit groups such as Americans for
> Prosperity, the American Legislative Exchange Council and Americans for Tax
> Reform.
> McAuliffe Mum?
> The Mason-Mercatus-Koch nexus may seem like rich fodder for a Democrat such
> as Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, whose national party brethren makes
> demonizing the Koch brothers a central strategy of their electoral and
> fundraising agenda.
> McAuliffe's own political committee, Common Good VA, bashed the "ultra
> right
> wing Koch Brothers" in an email earlier this month, accusing them of
> working
> against "expanding health care for all" and "ensuring a living wage."
> But McAuliffe - the outspoken former chairman of both the Democratic
> National Committee and Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign -
> declined Center for Public Integrity requests to discuss George Mason
> University's relationship with the Koch brothers.
> George Mason University's top undergraduate leader, Student Body President
> Khushboo Bhatia, also declined comment.
> University spokesman Michael Sandler explained that George Mason is among
> the nation's most diverse campuses, and "this notion of diversity and
> inclusion that is so central to our mission applies to our donors, as
> well."
> Sandler said the university appreciates the Charles Koch Foundation's
> donations, as well as those from thousands of other donors.
> "While we are grateful for all of the gifts we receive, we value academic
> freedom above all else," Sandler said. "This freedom allows our faculty and
> researchers to ask questions and make discoveries that others wouldn't
> otherwise pursue, and we will not compromise that freedom for anything or
> anyone."
> Jennifer Victor, a George Mason University politics professor who
> specializes in how individuals and groups influence government, is
> skeptical.
> George Mason University's marriage to an ideologically motivated donor with
> a policy agenda to achieve "raises some eyebrows," Victor said. "I don't
> really see what Mason gets from them, and I don't think the situation is
> healthy or consistent with the university's teaching mission."
> No Comment on Koch Funding
> Some college officials such as Sandler are willing to discuss the financial
> support their schools receive from Koch-run private foundations, with many
> emphasizing that gifts from donors, whether liberal or conservative, don't
> affect coursework or the manner in which students learn. They also note
> that
> their schools receive hundreds, and sometimes thousands of contributions
> each year from individuals, private foundations and the like.
> But it's not uncommon for other school officials to button up.
> Take Victor Nakas, a spokesman for The Catholic University of America in
> Washington, D.C.
> Posed a series of questions about the $215,000 the university received in
> 2013 from the Charles Koch Foundation, he emailed a pair of dated press
> releases announcing grants.
> "We will be unable to provide you with more than links to these
> announcements," he said.
> Follow-up messages went unreturned.
> Michael Schoenfeld, the vice president for public affairs and government
> relations at Duke University, declined to say how the school used the
> $37,000 it recently received from the Charles Koch Foundation.
> "As a rule, we do not comment on individual donors or contributions without
> the donor's permission," he explained.
> Officials at Oklahoma State University likewise offered no details about
> how
> the school used the $69,000 the Charles Koch Foundation recently gave it.
> Why the silence?
> An email exchange between two Florida State University officials, obtained
> by the Center for Public Integrity, offers a measure of explanation.
> In it, the officials indicate deep concern about the potential effects of
> releasing more information about the school's moneyed donors in response to
> activist demands.
> "[R]equiring donors to disclose more than they already do will likely
> result
> in fewer gifts and smaller gifts, and it will impose an additional
> administrative hurdle for the university," wrote Thomas W. Jennings, vice
> president for university advancement, to David Coburn, Florida State
> University chief of staff.
> Revealing donor gift agreements, even for donors who have not requested
> anonymity, might "have a negative effect on FSU's relationships with many
> of
> its donors, who don't want that kind of attention," Jennings continued.
> The University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill received $115,000 from the
> Charles Koch Foundation in 2013, one of nearly 100 schools that year to
> receive a five-figure contribution from a Koch foundation.
> But that's information not easily accessed by students. Whether by design,
> happenstance or ignorance, "most individuals don't know where any of the
> university's funds come from," University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
> Student Body President Houston Summers said.
> University spokesman Jim Gregory confirmed the school received $110,000 for
> the Charles Koch Visiting Scholars Program in UNC-Chapel Hill's Philosophy,
> Politics and Economics Program, conducted in collaboration with Duke
> University. Donors are allowed to remain anonymous, if they choose.
> However, some universities are facing blowback over scant information about
> school donors from increasingly organized anti-Koch groups and activists.
> The umbrella group UnKoch My Campus, for one, has staged protests, demanded
> meetings with administrators and launched chapters at George Mason
> University and Florida State University, among others. The organization
> accuses the Kochs and their allies of undermining issues many students care
> about, such as environmental protection, workers' rights, healthcare
> expansion and public education.
> Its immediate goal, beyond convincing colleges to de-Koch themselves?
> "Transparency, because students should have the capability to be more aware
> of who's funding their school and their education, and where funding might
> conflict with student interests," said Kalin Jordan, an UnKoch My Campus
> organizer. "The universities - most don't do a good job of informing
> students at all."
> Said Colin Nackerman, a student activist at George Mason University: "You
> should know, if you're going into a classroom, that $30 million is going
> into your school from someone who wants you to think a certain way."
> Largely silent in the past, the Charles Koch Foundation has begun to push
> back at such dissenters.
> "They don't want students and scholars to expand their educational
> horizons," Hardin, the foundation's university relations director, wrote in
> a May 26 Wall Street Journal op-ed. "Rather than engage in a vigorous and
> civil debate about the merits of different ideas, they seek to prevent
> those
> with which they disagree from ever being heard."
> Liberals Give Big, Too
> If George Mason University is Charles Koch's academic playground, Bard
> College is that of Democratic bankroller George Soros, often viewed as the
> Koch brothers' pre-eminent liberal foil.
> The tiny New York liberal arts school nestled along the Hudson River is
> renowned for both scholarship and hippy-dippyness. It received more than
> $11.2 million from Soros' private foundation in 2013 - part of a $60
> million, multiyear commitment.
> But for Soros, himself a multibillionaire with wealth comparable to the
> Kochs, his contributions to Bard College aren't generally earmarked for
> core
> academics or domestic political considerations.
> Instead, Soros' money mainly helps fund Bard College's Center for Civic
> Engagement, which houses a broad portfolio of both U.S. and overseas
> programs aimed at "advancing the ideals of an innovative, hands-on liberal
> arts education through a myriad of opportunities across the globe."
> This tracks with Soros' broader tack on educational giving: The vast
> majority of his tens of millions of dollars in education-related
> contributions fund foreign schools and programs, particularly in Eastern
> Europe and the Middle East. (Soros lived his early life in Hungary, where
> as
> a Jew, he survived Nazi occupation before emigrating.)
> Among the U.S. schools Soros does aid, many of his most sizable grants are
> earmarked for programs with international goals, such as $500,000 to
> Harvard
> University funding a project on economic growth in Albania, and $159,834 to
> The George Washington University in Washington, D.C., to "develop effective
> and influential public policy leaders in Central Asia."
> Soros' foundation even gave George Mason University more than $22,500 - not
> to fund economics programs, but to organize meetings in Mexico and Peru
> about conflict reconciliation.
> "As a general rule," Soros said in 2011, "I do not support higher education
> in the United States."
> Soros does make exceptions.
> An avowed advocate of campaign finance reform, Soros has used his private
> foundations to fund certain domestic college initiatives squarely rooted in
> American politics and elections.
> One Soros foundation, for example, gave New York City's Fordham University
> $200,000 in 2013 to study the "role of money in democratic process."
> The money is part of a $1 million, multi-year grant to determine how
> disclosure of campaign money influences voters - an awfully political
> endeavor by any measure.
> But school officials say the research they conduct is free of outside
> influence and subject to the highest academic and legal reviews and
> standards.
> "None of this work is 'political' per se in terms of any ideological
> dimensions . it is all strictly nonpartisan," said Costas Panagopoulos,
> director of Fordham's Center for Electoral Politics and Democracy, who is
> leading the program.
> Penn State University's economics department in 2013 benefited from
> $150,000
> in Soros money to help build a research center focused in part on
> "interactions between new media and society."
> And the Ohio State University Research Foundation received $50,000 to
> conduct a research project aimed at better understanding the role
> independent expenditures play in federal elections and "how those
> expenditures influence the legislative process."
> Bard College officials do hear their share of criticism for taking a
> massive
> amount of money from Soros' private foundation, said Jonathan Becker, the
> school's vice president for academic affairs and director for civic
> engagement.
> But, similar to some of the schools that accept Koch money, the school's
> tenuous budget situation means that it'd take funding from just about
> anyone
> so long as the transaction was legal and wasn't intended to fund an
> initiative "antithetical to our vision," Becker said.
> That vision, in the words of its student handbook, imagines a "supportive,
> intellectually rich environment where students can engage themselves to the
> fullest while respecting all members of the community."
> So what if the Charles Koch Foundation wanted to donate $1 million to Bard
> College?
> Or $10 million?
> "We would say 'thank you,' and we would cash the check quickly," Becker
> said.
> Other Conservative Donors
> Unlike the Kochs, Soros and many other prominent political donors, both
> left
> and right of center, have charitable agendas that largely diverge from
> their
> domestic political agendas.
> Robert McNair, the Houston Texans owner who this year alone has spread $3
> million among five super PACs backing several Republican presidential
> candidates, used his private foundation to give millions of dollars to
> various medical schools and a scholarship program for doctors performing
> research in areas such as breast cancer, juvenile diabetes and
> neuroscience.
> Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, two other top-shelf Republican donors whom 2016
> presidential candidates have endlessly wooed, directed almost all of their
> university-related private foundation funding - millions of it in 2013 - to
> medical research.
> A private foundation co-run by former World Wrestling Entertainment honcho
> Linda McMahon, a major GOP donor who herself twice unsuccessfully ran
> self-funded U.S. Senate campaigns, gave its most sizable, six-figure
> contributions to substance abuse help group Liberation Programs.
> Then there's one late Republican superdonor whose philanthropy has been at
> war with his political giving: Harold Simmons.
> The Texas businessman bankrolled his eponymous foundation, but his liberal
> daughters run it. In doing so, they saw to it that Planned Parenthood - the
> ultimate Republican scourge of late - received more than $300,000 of his
> money during 2013. It's also given hundreds of thousands of dollars to
> Public Campaign, a Washington, D.C.-based money-in-politics reform group
> also supported in 2013 with $300,000 from a private foundation led by
> liberal hedge fund manager Jonathan Soros, son of George Soros.
> Money the Harold Simmons Foundation did give to colleges in 2013 mostly
> went
> toward infrastructure and general operating expenses.
> University of Dayton Says "No Thanks"
> While more schools than ever are engaging with Koch foundations, at least
> one school - the University of Dayton in Ohio - has seemingly soured on
> Koch
> cash, which it has previously accepted in five-figure amounts.
> Jay Riestenberg, a research analyst at campaign reform advocacy group
> Common
> Cause and University of Dayton alumnus, earlier this year emailed the
> school's Interim Provost Paul H. Benson, asking him if the University of
> Dayton is still funded by, or seeking new funding from Koch foundations.
> Attached was an op-ed Riestenberg has written for the school's student
> newspaper. In it, he explains that his education at the small Catholic
> school inspired him to care about other people, protect the environment and
> fight for social justice.
> "UD accepting Koch funding is in clear violation of the institution's
> Catholic Marianist values," Riestenberg wrote in the April 28 email.
> Benson replied later that night. His answer: The University of Dayton no
> longer accepts Koch cash, and it will not in the future - despite the
> efforts of Koch-backed organizations.
> "There have been instances in which other foundations who are funded in
> part
> by the Koch Brothers have tried to interest us in establishing centers at
> UD," Benson wrote Riestenberg. "We have not supported those proposals,
> precisely for the reasons you cite."
> Benson declined an interview request by the Center for Public Integrity.
> In a statement, University of Dayton spokeswoman Cilla Shindell explained
> that the school did reject a recent proposal from a "foundation that is in
> part funded by the Koch family" because it "would have been structured in a
> way that would limit oversight by the university in such areas as
> curriculum
> and faculty hiring."
> She did not name the foundation.
> Kochs' Higher Education Funding Strategy
> This previously unpublished recording of Koch aides discussing education
> funding strategy with potential donors was provided to the Center for
> Public
> Integrity by The Undercurrent, an online program produced by liberal
> political activists.
> Key Kochworld Lieutenants
> Several associates of Charles and David Koch span multiple aspects of the
> billionaire brothers' political, educational, charitable and industrial
> juggernauts. Among them:
> Richard Fink is among Charles Koch's top aides. Fink is the co-founder of
> George Mason University's Mercatus Center and a current member of the
> center's board of directors. Fink has also served on the boards of several
> of Charles and David Koch's private foundations. That includes serving as
> president of the Charles Koch Foundation until 2014 and as a director for
> the Fred C. & Mary R. Koch Foundation alongside Charles and David Koch
> themselves. Fink likewise sits on the board of directors for Americans for
> Prosperity, a "social welfare" nonprofit that doesn't reveal its donors but
> spent more than $33.5 million during the 2012 election advocating against
> President Barack Obama's re-election. Fink also works as chairman and chief
> executive of Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC, the legal, government and
> public affairs wing of Koch Industries Inc.
> Kevin Gentry is vice president of the Charles Koch Foundation. He is also a
> board member for Koch-backed nonprofit Freedom Partners and vice president
> for special projects/development at Koch Companies Public Sector LLC.
> Gentry
> previously served as vice president of the Koch-funded Institute for Humane
> Studies and the Mercatus Center at George Mason University and as volunteer
> faculty at the Leadership Institute, which "identifies, recruits, trains
> and
> places conservatives in government, politics and the media." In party
> politics, Gentry serves as eastern vice chairman for the Republican Party
> of
> Virginia.
> Brian Hooks is president of the Charles Koch Foundation, having been hired
> in 2014. Hooks is also a Mercatus Center board member and served as the
> Mercatus Center's executive director and chief operating officer from 2005
> until 2014.
> Wayne Gable is a board member of the Koch-funded Freedom Partners, itself a
> nonprofit that has largely provided seed money to other Koch-backed
> political nonprofits over many years. He served from 1999 to 2000 as
> president of the Charles Koch Foundation as well. Gable is also a former
> managing director of international government affairs at Koch Industries
> Inc. and a onetime registered federal lobbyist for the company. He received
> a doctoral degree in economics from George Mason University.
> Nancy Pfotenhauer served from 2010 to 2014 on George Mason University's
> Board of Visitors - a 16-member university governing body appointed by
> Virginia's governor that "exercises its authority principally in
> policy-making and oversight." She received a master's degree in economics
> from George Mason University. Pfotenhauer today serves on Americans for
> Prosperity's board of directors and runs a communications firm. She is also
> a former director of the Independent Women's Forum, which in 2010 received
> $350,000 from the Koch-controlled (and now defunct) Claude R. Lambe
> Charitable Foundation, according to IRS tax documents. She once led Koch
> Industries Inc.'s Washington, D.C., office.
> Dale Gibbens is the human resources vice president for Koch Industries Inc.
> He is a board member for Koch-backed nonprofit Freedom Partners, described
> by Politico in 2013 as "the Koch brothers secret bank." Since then, Freedom
> Partners' sister super PAC spent about $23.4 million advocating for
> Republican congressional candidates and against Democratic candidates. In
> 2014, Gibbens also helped fund the Koch Center for Leadership and Ethics at
> Emporia State University in Kansas, which is focused on "free market
> principles, leadership and ethical theories."
> Patrick Hedger is policy director for American Encore, a heavily
> Koch-backed
> political nonprofit previously known as the Center to Protect Patient
> Rights. He is a recent graduate of George Mason University, where he is
> also
> pursuing a master's degree in public policy.
> A version of this story was co-published with The Atlantic.
> This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not
> be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.
> Dave Levinthal
> Dave Levinthal joined the Center for Public Integrity in 2013 to help lead
> its Consider the Source project investigating the influence of money in
> politics. For two years prior to joining the Center, Dave reported on
> campaign finance and lobbying issues for Politico and co-wrote the daily
> Politico Influence column. He also edited OpenSecrets.org from 2009 to
> 2011,
> where he led coverage that won the Online News Association's top honors in
> 2011 for best topical reporting and blogging and was a finalist the same
> year for the Scripps Howard Foundation's Distinguished Service to the First
> Amendment award. From 2003 to 2009, Dave worked for The Dallas Morning
> News,
> primarily covering Dallas City Hall also reporting on national elections
> and
> aviation security. From 2000 to 2002, he covered the New Hampshire
> Statehouse for The Eagle-Tribune of Lawrence, Mass. A native of Buffalo,
> N.Y., Dave graduated from Syracuse University with degrees in newspaper
> journalism and political philosophy and edited The Daily Orange. He is also
> a two-time winner (2007 and 2010) of Canada's Northern Lights Award for his
> travel writing about the arctic.
> Related Stories
> Koch Funding of Universities Shrouded in Secrecy
> By Kalin Jordan, PR Watch | Op-EdKoch PR Games: College Football Brought to
> You by Koch Industries
> By Nick Surgey, PR Watch | ReportKoch Brothers Hit the Airwaves in Support
> of Wisconsin Corruption Measures
> By Brendan Fischer, PR Watch | Report
>
> Show Comments
>
>
>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)