Thursday, November 29, 2012

our love affair with israel

To All Believers In Life After The Empire,
 
    Our Love Affair With Israel. 
 
Here's how I see it.  First, despite our outrage to such an idea, governments do not just dish out foreign aid for altruistic reasons. 
There is always a hook, a benefit to the benefactor. 
The most benign would be for the purpose of gaining friendship and support toward furthering the goals of the giver.  This often is to their mutual benefit.  Of course the extreme is the conquest of another people, and often the attempt to either enslave or annihilate them(see A People's History of the United States, by Howard Zinn). 
The relationship between Israel and the International Corporate Empire falls in the former group.  We are mutually using one another.  Israel is actually nothing more than a massive outpost for the purpose of controlling the Middle East and protecting the interests of the expanding Empire.  Israel is therefore a Puppet State.  It would not matter to the Empire if Israel were a democratic state or a totalitarian state.  The people could be Jews, Christians, Devil Worshippers or Wild Eyed Atheists.  Just so long as they were cooperating with Big Brother. 
The sad truth is that we, the so called Middle Class Americans, are just as much under the boot of the International Corporate Empire.  This Empire knows no national boundaries, nor holds loyalties to any.  But many of us are still stuck with our heads in the sands of the past.  We want to believe all of the propaganda that made us feel important and different than everyone else in the world. 
If we were able to step away from these childhood Fairy Tales and see the world as if we were just arriving from Outer Space, we would find that what now confuses us, makes perfect sense.  We would see a sprawling Empire encircling the entire Planet Earth.  Like a giant Cancer, it will suck all of the resources out of the Globe and leave it a dying husk. 
What might have been the Good Caretakers of this beautiful planet, has become a giant tumor, crowding out any hope of survival. 
But that's just my silly spin on events.  I could be wrong.  But just in case, I'm watching the sky for the return of my space ship. 
 
Carl Jarvis
 

Are we so different, one from another?


My dear Friend,
In all good humor, and sent with sincere love, I must tell you that I actually chuckled at something that you wrote in earnest. 
 You said that you attended a liberal Catholic high school.  "We studied the religions of the world, so we would know if we wanted to remain faithful to our Catholicism." 
I had to ask myself just how many young Catholic students would have taken these studies and turned away from the Church?  How long would that teacher have continued on the school payroll if he/she did not come close to a 100% conclusion that Catholicism is indeed the true and proper religion? 
In my schooling were many classes that taught me about the nations and governments of the world.  Upon graduation I was convinced totally that the United States of America was far and away the best of all nations to live in.  How lucky I was that my parents were Americans and brought me into this glorious Land of Freedom and Opportunity.  My teachers had been successful, if somewhat dishonest. 
But I don't fault them,  They had families to support, too. 
But Mostafa was raised in a different land, under the sway of a very different religious schooling.  It stands to reason that he comes to the conclusions that he does.  This is why I was comparing his remarks to those of our Right Wing Bible Thumping Americans.  Perhaps a bit of an over kill, but my point is that only the names have been changed, but the ideas are the same.  When Mao first swept into power in China, I recall reading that you could visit China and walk the streets day and night without fear of being attacked.  I have no way of knowing if this was really true, but it was what I read.  Yet Christianity was virtually unknown in China.  What I believe made the difference was the strong family ties.  Family pride.  Respect for their Elders.  And the Elders taught the young with respect.  I believe that much of China is still that way, just as much of America continues to have similar family bonds.  We are confused by our Mass Media's need to continually seek out the shocking news in order to sell cars, junk food and preparation H.  But around the quiet neighborhoods people go on as they have for generations.  Good people, like you, continue to raise good children, and to worry about our nation's future. 
Out here on the Great Olympic Peninsula, Cathy and I visit hundreds of homes...over 2,500 people in our 18 years serving the older blind, and we can count the angry, hateful people on one hand.  Walking away, the people we meet are kind, caring, right living people who want to be active in their community.  They have spent their lives raising their children, working, paying taxes, defending our shores and praying in a dozen different churches, as well as living good lives without bending to any religion. 
We really are not so different than those Americans several generations back.  Different stresses, faster pace of life, an overload of information as compared to very little available to the folks back then.  But in the heart, we are no different. 
And those people who bow to a different Deity are basically the same people as we are.  Do not be deceived by the constant pounding of the Empire's propaganda machine.  Do not follow their Pied Pipers without thinking where they are leading you. 
And above all, keep loving all people. 
 
Carl Jarvis
 

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Memory Day

Subject: Memory Day

While most people celebrate distinct Holidays, I prefer to lump them all together under one heading.  Memory Day.      A Memory Day is any day that brings family and friends together. 
Wile most Americans were being thankful for an imagined day when Indians sat peacefully beside gentle Pilgrims, partaking of the feast the Natives had prepared, I am thanking my family and friends for caring enough to gather under our roof and share their adventures, successes and hurts with one another.  This weekend we celebrated my eldest daughter's 50th birthday, my grand son's wife's 30th birthday, the 4th birthday of a grand daughter, covering a full five days.  In fact half the gang is still in the living room watching the Seahawks play.  
Cathy is the head chef and I am in charge of cleanup...which usually means that my eldest daughter and I swamp out the dirty kitchen, whisk away the garbage , and put away the sparkling clean dishes.  
And all the while, the memories keep piling up, tumbling one over another, being carefully stored away for remembering years later when the bones are creaky and cold.  They are guaranteed to drive loneliness   away and bring smiles to old, dry lips. 
 
Carl Jarvis
_______________________________________________
acb-chat mailing list
acb-chat@acb.org
http://www.acb.org/mailman/listinfo/acb-chat


_______________________________________________
acb-chat mailing list
acb-chat@acb.org
http://www.acb.org/mailman/listinfo/acb-chat

independent or interdependent? Newsline: from the senior side; December 2012

Subject: independent or interdependent? Newsline: from the senior side; December 2012

 

independent or interdependent?

by

Carl Jarvis

 

As we blind men and women age, we become more aware of our need to depend upon other people and age related services. 

Maybe it's time we quit selling the idea that any of us humans are truly independent.  It's pretty apparent that we're all interdependent to one degree or another. 

Take something as simple as the recent presidential election,  To say that I just voted independently is silly talk.  Even though many blind people now say that they do.  And I say it, too. 

But what I really did was to vote privately, not independently.   I used an AutoMark voting machine which allowed me to mark my own ballot.  But to use this machine I needed to have Cathy independently drive me the 24 miles to Port Townsend to the courthouse.  We made our independent way to the elevator and to the auditor's office where I independently requested the headphones to the AutoMark.  Then, following my independent  vote, we drove to the nearest restaurant and independently ordered dinner. 

I know that it is good PR for me to say that I work for the Independent Living Program for the Older Blind.  It sends a much needed message to the folks who believe that the absence of eyesight deprives people of their brains.  But we need to remind ourselves that it is just that, a PR tool.  In fact, accommodating my needs as a blind man in an effort to live independently, actually does make me interdependent. 

For example, I want to believe that marking all paper money in such a way as to allow any blind person with normal sense of touch, the ability to tell one bill from the next, will make me more independent. 

But then, the person using any one of the gadgets that are now on the market, making identification of paper money possible, must be considered just as "independent".  Both methods require some accommodations, making us interdependent. 

For me, rather than quibbling over which method makes us more independent, we need to accept our interdependency and look for the method that makes it possible for the greatest number of blind people to individually identify their paper money. 

Recently Cathy and I worked with a totally blind man who is losing his hearing.  He told me, "Don't try to teach me any new skills.  As soon as you stop talking, I have already forgotten what you just said."  Our challenge was to assist this man to travel from his bed room to the kitchen to fix a cup of coffee and take his lunch out of the refrigerator when his care givers were not present.  He could not retain the directions no matter how often he travelled back and forth.  He could make the short trip from bed room to bath room.  So we tied a rope from the bath room, around through the dining room and into the kitchen.  We fastened the end of the rope to the freezer door.  Did using the rope make this man more dependent, or did finding his way to the kitchen make him more independent?  We look at it as having solved a need. 

Solving one problem at a time does give people a sense of accomplishment.  If they see that as being more independent, more power to them. 

Frankly, I think that there are two words that cause blind people great grief. 

Independent and normal. 

I am neither independent nor am I normal. 

As a member of the human race, I am interdependent in all sorts of ways, both with my fellow human beings as well as with Mother Earth.  And as far as normal goes, I have no idea what that means. 

 

 

Friday, November 16, 2012

Anti Abortionists:who's looking out for the little girls?

I recall one story after another of young, desperate girls having their bodies ruined by the efforts of some clumsy practitioner taking a few dollars and doing a crude job of aborting the product of some scum bag who didn't have the guts to stay around and support the product of his lies and unkep promises. 
Is the girl blameless?  Maybe not.  But I've walked among these girls and seen the conditions they lived in and the broken homes, the dirty apartments with foul bedding flung on the floor and drunken mothers and even some fathers sprawled about.  Little girls tiptoeing around so as to not awaken the monsters, fearful of being beaten or worse.  Frightened little girls taken to the bed by foul breathed fathers, uncles, step-father's, boy friends of mother, older brothers, older brother's friends.  Little girls.  Frightened and now pregnant.  Little girls.  Oh God, where are their protectors?  To whom can they turn?  Turn to God?  The God who has turned His back on them.  Written His book to protect His men, subjecting women and children with hollow promises that Man will be good husbands and just fathers. 
Little girls.  Alone.  Hopeless.  Turn to the man with the drugs.  Work for the man who only beats her from time to time.  Do his bidding and suck up his drugs.  Little girls.  Babies.  Forced to drop their pants...no panties, just ragged pants, to any man willing to pay for the ride.  Little girls.  Looking for help.  No help.  The beat cop is no friend.  The social workers grab a quick piece of the action and send them on their way.  Little girls needing help and only being preached to.  Told how bad they are.  Told how they must change their ways.  Reach out to God...to Jesus.  Little girls abandoned while the pure of heart tumble into their warm, clean beds and say their prayers, thanking a Just God for watching over them.  Leaving the little girls to creep down the back alleys and knock on the dreaded door of the dirty abortionist. 
The inner cities are filled with these little girls.  Lift them up and we will not need to be concerned about so many unwanted fetuses being flushed down dirty toilets in filthy, cold rooms, while the blood trickles down her skinny legs and she wonders if she'll see the sun rise. 
These are all the statistics that I need to know that we are not caring for all of those little girls by forbidding them the right to rid their bodies of the unwanted fetus shoved into them. 
 
Carl Jarvis
----- Original Message -----
From: J.Rayl
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 6:11 PM
Subject: [acb-chat] Abortion Sources

Hi.  Lisa, thank you for sharing the sources to back up your assertion.  While they look a little conservative to me, and certainly from pro-life groups, at least you have provided them.
Seems like if others are going to criticize, you might do well to find some of your own--if the liberals keep such things.
 


_______________________________________________
acb-chat mailing list
acb-chat@acb.org
http://www.acb.org/mailman/listinfo/acb-chat

Sunday, November 11, 2012

time to take back our nation


Ted, and all who hope for a bright tomorrow,
Now remember, I am not promoting what I am a bout to predict.  Just the messenger, and all that.  And it's only my personal belief. 
Regardless of what congress does, or does not do in the coming months, if we continue down our present path, we will encounter another down turn that will make the 2008 event look like a Sunday School Picnic. 
This government, both sides of the aisle, is at the mercy of the Corporate Empire.  The Corporate Empire is a World Player, and no longer needs to mess around with the United States of America.  We are just one more opportunity for exploitation.  Remember, the Ruling Class is not paying the bill here at home.  If we fall, they will not be affected.  We will have to bail ourselves out, by borrowing from them.  And if you wonder how that will work out, just look no further than Greece.  You might even take a glance at Haiti, but that will really bring you down. 
The Corporate Empire has been building its power base for years.  All we can do, if it's not too late, is to take back our nation and hope to do better next time. 
 
Carl Jarvis
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 5:24 AM
Subject: RE: Petreus

Miriam:
Many on the far right want us to go over "the damn cliff" as well. Their hope is that once people don't need government anymore, they will start "doing for themselves what they should have been doing for themselves all along".
--
Ted Chittenden

Every story has at least two sides if not more.
---- Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
Well, I agree with Krugman. Obama should allow us to go over the damn cliff.
Where did I read that op-ed? It's excellent if anyone runs across it and can
post it.

Miriam

-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org] On Behalf Of Claude Everett
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 9:54 PM
To: 'Blind Democracy Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Petreus

Just another distraction the magicians have performed, to have the gullible
public to look the other way while the budget and treasury is crashed.


Claude Everett
"First of all:  what is work?
Work is of two kinds:
  first, altering the position of matter at or near the earth's surface
relatively to other such matter;  second, telling other people to do so.
  The first kind is unpleasant and ill paid; the second is pleasant and
highly paid."
From The collection of essays "In Praise of Idleness" by Bertrand Russell
 
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org] On Behalf Of Miriam Vieni
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 3:06 PM
To: 'Blind Democracy Discussion List'
Subject: Petreus

Is it really relevant to his job that he had an extra marital affair? I
mean, the CIA isn't exactly an ethically pure governmental agency.

And Obama is still offering compromise to everyone to avoid the fiscal
cliff.

Miriam

_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy

_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy

_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy


_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy

is this a ludlum novel in real time?

Subject: Re: is this a ludlum novel in real time?

You know, I'm sorry, but if every extra marital affair were to be exposed, and the parties involved were forced to quit their jobs and hang their heads in shame, the unemployment lines would be out the door, down the block and around the corner.  Government offices would be locked.  Churches would be without pastors, school rooms would be teacherless, and the few who are left would be few in number...and probably lying. 
 
Carl Jarvis, the Pure
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 7:12 AM
Subject: is this a ludlum novel in real time?

Petraeus Resigns at C.I.A.; F.B.I. Discovered an Affair. By MICHAEL D. SHEAR; Reporting was contributed by Peter Baker, Helene Cooper, Michael S. Schmidt,

Eric Schmitt and Scott Shane.. WASHINGTON -- David H. Petraeus, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency and one of America's most decorated four-star

generals, resigned on Friday after an F.B.I. investigation uncovered evidence that he had been involved in an extramarital affair. Mr. Petraeus issued

a statement acknowledging the affair after President Obama accepted his resignation and it was announced by the C.I.A. The disclosure ended a triumphant

re-election week for the president with an unfolding scandal.. Government officials said that the F.B.I. began an investigation into a 'potential criminal

matter' several months ago that was not focused on Mr. Petraeus. In the course of their inquiry into whether a computer used by Mr. Petraeus had been compromised,

agents discovered evidence of the relationship as well as other security concerns. About two weeks ago, F.B.I. agents met with Mr. Petraeus to discuss

the investigation. Administration and Congressional officials identified the woman as Paula Broadwell, the co-author of a biography of Mr. Petraeus. Her

book, 'All In: The Education of General David Petraeus,' was published this year. Ms. Broadwell could not be reached for comment. Ms. Broadwell, a graduate

of the United States Military Academy at West Point, spent 15 years in the military, according to a biography that had appeared on her Web site. She spent

extended periods of time with Mr. Petraeus in Afghanistan, interviewing him for her book, which grew out of a two-year research project for her doctoral

dissertation and which she promoted on a high-profile tour that included an appearance on 'The Daily Show With Jon Stewart. Married with two children,

she has described Mr. Petraeus as her mentor. Senior members of Congress were alerted to Mr. Petraeus's impending resignation by intelligence officials

about six hours before the C.I.A. announced it. One Congressional official who was briefed on the matter said that Mr. Petraeus had been encouraged 'to

get out in front of the issue' and resign, and that he agreed. As for how the affair came to light, the Congressional official said that 'it was portrayed

to us that the F.B.I. was investigating something else and came upon him. My impression is that the F.B.I. stumbled across this. The Federal Bureau of

Investigation did not inform the Senate and House Intelligence Committees about the inquiry until this week, according to Congressional officials, who

noted that by law the panels -- and especially their chairmen and ranking members -- are supposed to be told about significant developments in the intelligence

arena. The Senate committee plans to pursue the question of why it was not told, one official said. The revelation of a secret inquiry into the head of

the nation's premier spy agency raised urgent questions about Mr. Petraeus's 14-month tenure at the C.I.A. and the decision by Mr. Obama to elevate him

to head the agency after leading the country's war effort in Afghanistan. White House officials said they did not know about the affair until this week,

when Mr. Petraeus informed them. After being married for over 37 years, I showed extremely poor judgment by engaging in an extramarital affair,' Mr. Petraeus

said in his statement, expressing regret for his abrupt departure. Such behavior is unacceptable, both as a husband and as the leader of an organization

such as ours. This afternoon, the president graciously accepted my resignation. Mr. Petraeus's admission and resignation represent a remarkable fall from

grace for one of the most prominent figures in America's modern military and intelligence community, a commander who helped lead the nation's wartime activities

in the decade after the Sept. 11 attacks and was credited with turning around the failing war effort in Iraq. Mr. Petraeus almost single-handedly forced

a profound evolution in the country's military thinking and doctrine with his philosophy of counterinsurgency, focused more on protecting the civilian

population than on killing enemies. More than most of his flag officer peers, he understood how to navigate Washington politics and news media, helping

him rise through the ranks and obtain resources he needed, although fellow Army leaders often resented what they saw as a grasping careerism. To an important

degree, a generation of officers tried to pattern themselves after Petraeus,' said Stephen Biddle, a military scholar at George Washington University who

advised Mr. Petraeus at times. He was controversial; a lot of people didn't like him. But everybody looked at him as the model of what a modern general

was to be. At the C.I.A., Mr. Petraeus maintained a low profile, in contrast to the celebrity that surrounded him as a general. But since the attack in

Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans two months ago, critics had increasingly pressured him to give the agency's account of the chaotic night. Mr.

Petraeus was scheduled to testify before a closed Congressional hearing next week. White House officials say they were informed on Wednesday night that

Mr. Petraeus was considering resigning because of an extramarital affair. Intelligence officials notified the president's national security staff. Mr.

Obama at the time was on his way back to Washington from Chicago, where he had gone to receive election returns. On Thursday morning, just before a staff

meeting at the White House, Mr. Obama was told. He was surprised, and he was disappointed,' one senior administration official said. You don't expect to

hear that the Thursday after you were re-elected. The president was in the White House all day on Thursday, getting back to his old routine after months

on the campaign trail. That afternoon, Mr. Petraeus came in to see him, and informed him that he strongly believed he had to resign. Mr. Obama did not

accept his resignation right away. He told him, 'I'll think about it overnight,' ' the administration official said. After months on the road, the disclosure

of a career-killing extramarital affair from his larger-than-life C.I.A. director was the last thing that Mr. Obama was expecting, the official said. The

president, officials said, did not want Mr. Petraeus to leave. But he ultimately decided that he would not lean heavily on him to stay. On Friday, he called

Mr. Petraeus and accepted the resignation, 'agreeing with Petraeus's judgment that he couldn't continue to lead the agency,' a White House official said.

The White House had hoped to keep the news under wraps until after the daily briefing for the news media, but as it was reported on MSNBC, reporters checking

their e-mail confronted Jay Carney, the press secretary, who tried to duck the questions. I think I'll let General Petraeus address this,' Mr. Carney said.

Shortly after the news broke, Mr. Obama released a statement praising Mr. Petraeus for his 'extraordinary service' to the country and expressing support

for him and his wife, Holly. By any measure, through his lifetime of service, David Petraeus has made our country safer and stronger,' the president said.

Without directly addressing the affair, Mr. Obama added, 'Going forward, my thoughts and prayers are with Dave and Holly Petraeus, who has done so much

to help military families through her own work. A favorite of President George W. Bush and once the subject of intense speculation about his future as

a possible presidential candidate, Mr. Petraeus managed the awkward move from a Republican administration to a Democratic one. He was one of the most telegenic

faces of the military during his tenure, testifying frequently in Congress about the country's difficult battles overseas. Mr. Petraeus clashed with Mr.

Obama in 2008 during a campaign visit to Iraq, having what David Plouffe, his campaign manager, called in his book a 'healthy debate' over troop levels

in the country. But the president's decision to tap Mr. Petraeus to command the war in Afghanistan, and later picking him to lead the C.I.A., effectively

ended lingering concerns among Obama political advisers that the popular general might challenge his commander in chief during the election. Mr. Petraeus

and his wife met when he was a cadet at West Point; she was the daughter of the academy's superintendent and a student at Dickinson College in Pennsylvania.

Holly Petraeus works for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, running a branch dedicated to educating military families about financial matters and

monitoring their consumer complaints. Mr. Petraeus's resignation and the circumstances surrounding it stunned military officers who have served alongside

him in war zones over the past two decades and the national security establishment he later served. It was a punch in the gut for those of us who know

him,' said Col. Michael J. Meese, a professor at West Point who has known Mr. Petraeus for a decade and served as one of his top aides in Bosnia, Iraq

and Afghanistan. Dave's decision to step down represents the loss of one of our nation's most respected public servants. James R. Clapper, the director

of national intelligence, said in a statement. By acknowledging an extramarital affair, Mr. Petraeus, 60, was confronting a sensitive issue for a spy chief.

Intelligence agencies are often concerned about the possibility that agents who engage in such behavior could be blackmailed for information. Mr. Petraeus

praised his colleagues at the C.I.A.'s headquarters in Langley, Va., calling them 'truly exceptional in every regard' and thanking them for their service

to the country. He made it clear that his departure was not how he had envisioned ending a storied career in the military and in intelligence. Teddy Roosevelt

once observed that life's greatest gift is the opportunity to work hard at work worth doing,' he said. I will always treasure my opportunity to have done

that with you, and I will always regret the circumstances that brought that work with you to an end. Under Mr. Bush, Mr. Petraeus was credited for helping

to develop and put in place the 'surge' in troops in Iraq that helped wind down the war there. Mr. Petraeus was moved to Afghanistan in 2010 after Mr.

Obama fired Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal over comments he made to a reporter. In his statement on Friday, Mr. Obama said that Michael J. Morell, the deputy

director of the C.I.A., would take over once again as acting director, as he did briefly after Leon E. Panetta left the agency last year. Among those who

might succeed Mr. Petraeus permanently is John O. Brennan, the president's adviser for domestic security and counterterrorism. Mr. Brennan was considered

for C.I.A. director before Mr. Obama's term began but withdrew amid criticism from some of the president's liberal supporters. Another possibility is Michael

G. Vickers, the top Pentagon intelligence policy official and a former C.I.A. paramilitary officer.. PHOTOS: David H. Petraeus (A1); Gen. David H. Petraeus

with Paula Broadwell on their way to Afghanistan in June 2011. She has described him as her mentor. (PHOTOGRAPH BY COMMAND SGT. MAJ. MARVIN L. HILL) (A14).

 

 

my best advice to Mike

Mike,
A snit or two never hurt anyone.  Reminds me of an article I wrote some while ago. 
 

SNITS AND FITS

by

Carl Jarvis

"Don't get in a snit," my mother used to say, when she'd see my face all puckered up in disappointment. But her favorite expression was, "Why don't you throw a fit and fall in it?" In some parts of the country folks have a, "Hissy Fit". But the best of all is when we throw a, "Snit-Fit". "Who, Me?" you ask. Yes you, and me. We all do some of it.

For the past several months I've been involved in a couple of chat groups on E Voice, the telephones answer to E Mail. From all corners of America large numbers of blind people are using E Voice to network, exchange information, share dreams, develop new friendships, and yes, to throw snit-fits. A goodly amount of time is given over to venting our indignation and outrage.

A woman caller, her voice still seething, relates that she and her sighted husband visited a local restaurant for dinner. Upon placing her order she requested that her food be cut up in the kitchen. The waitress loudly announced that neither the cook nor she had the time to do that. "That's what you have a husband for", she declared.

The caller was outraged and promptly threw a fit and fell in it. How dare they refuse her request, and just who were they to tell her what she had a husband for. Then she ordered the waitress to comply. The ensuing standoff caused the woman to believe she was discriminated against and that the restaurant failed to provide her reasonable accommodation. She felt she should file a complaint under the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA).

A young man grumbled into the phone that his Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor(VRC) refused to purchase him a Braille "N" Speak for use in note taking during college. "They don't care if I make it or not," he complained. "If I fail it won't be on my head."

During a lengthy discussion on how we, as blind people, should respond to questions and comments by the sighted public, a very angry lady shouted, "I'm sick and tired of answering the same stupid questions over and over. Why do I always have to play the teacher? I don't go around asking Them stupid, nosey questions."

And so it goes, story after story of blind people being abused, neglected or misunderstood. It's just one snit-fit after another. "If you think you have anything to grumble about, hey! listen to what happened to me..."

Like I said, certainly there are times when all of us feel picked on, put upon or just plain pushed around. But what is troubling are the numbers; the vast multitude of voices spilling out their tales of woe and misery, and the small number of folks offering reasoned advice, counsel and instruction. What it tells me is that in our blind community nation-wide, there is a growing sense that we are disenfranchised, hopelessly cut off, with no recourse but to complain. And in our complaining we have no expectation of anything ever coming of it.

When I was a boy someone said to me, "If you're going to be a man, act like one". I was probably having a snit at the time. Anyway, growing up to be a man turned out to be a life-time job. But I am where I am in the process by observing and copying those attributes that I desired to see in myself. It seems reasonable to me that if we blind people want to be First Class Citizens we ought to begin by playing the part. In my minds eye I hold up an image of me, as an equal participant in my community. I visualize how I want to conduct myself and how I see others responding to me. As time passes I shape this image, adding or improving, as my understanding and ability expand. Taking responsibility for my actions is probably as good a place to start as I know.

When we have a snit-fit we are playing the role of the victim. "Poor me, I'm unloved and misunderstood." Sometimes it's very tempting, just to be out of control. "It's not my fault. They're the ones to blame." But if that's the part we choose to play, we cannot expect others to treat us as equals. Victims are to be pitied and given handouts. You don't ever hear anyone say, "Hey, my lucky day. I hired a very highly qualified victim to head up my sales staff"; or, "He was such a pathetic victim I just knew he'd make a wonderful husband".

Can it be that in our culture the words "Blind" and Victim" are synonymous? If true, it would go a long way toward explaining some of our "knee jerk" response. A simple act of kindness, "Here dear, let me show you your seat", will be seen by a victim as condescending. "Get your hands off me! I don't need no help".

The victim is always out of control. Relationships are always unequal. But if we remove the word "Victim" and insert "Different", making "Blind" and Different" synonymous, we create a more neutral relationship. "Here dear, let me show you your seat", becomes a gesture of kindness. "Why, thank you so very much."

Establishing ourselves in the role of "Different" calls for building a new mental image of who we are. It is now possible to be "different, but equal". Being different carries with it considerable responsibility. We do find ourselves in the role of teacher. We are the experts in being different, therefore it is on our shoulders to educate others as to what exactly "different" means. We expect people not to know about us and we take great pleasure in explaining all about our differences. We are in the business of bringing our sighted partners up to speed in what blindness is all about.

Of course, being human we reserve the right to throw a little snit-fit from time to time.

 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: [Wcb-l] finally did it

I pretty-much agree with you, Carl. Wise words. And I'm just replying to you so Meka won't get into a snit over an "I agree" post. (grin)

 

Mike

 

 

From: Carl Jarvis [mailto:carjar82@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 12:14 PM
To: Mike Freeman; 'debby phillips'; 'Randy Tedrow'; wcb-l@wcbinfo.org
Subject: Re: [Wcb-l] finally did it

 

Mike,

So let's quit selling the idea that any of us humans are independent.  We're all interdependent to one degree or another.  To say that I just voted independently is silly talk.  Even though I say it, too.  But what I did was to vote privately, using an AutoMark voting machine.  To use this machine I needed to have Cathy independently drive me to Port Townsend to the courthouse.  We took the independent elevator to the auditor's office and independently requested the headphones to the AutoMark.  Then we drove to the nearest restaurant and independently ordered dinner. 

I know that it is good PR to say that we are the Independent Blind.  It sends a much needed message to the folks who believe that the absence of eyesight deprives people of their brains.  But we need to remind ourselves that it is just that, a PR tool.  In fact, accommodating my needs as a blind man makes me interdependent. 

For example, I want all paper money to be marked in such a way as to allow any blind person with normal sense of touch, the ability to tell one bill from the next. 

But I also understand that the person using any one of the gadgets that are now on the market, making identification of paper money possible, are just as "independent".  For me, the issue is to find the method that makes it possible for the greatest number of blind people to "independently" identify their paper money. 

We blind folk just love to pick nits.  Do dog guides or white travel canes make a person more independent? 

The list is endless because we keep focusing on our need to show the world, as well as ourselves,  that we are truly independent. 

I think that there are two words that cause blind people great grief. 

Independent and normal. 

I am neither independent nor am I normal. 

As a member of the human race, I am interdependent in all sorts of ways, both with my fellow human beings as well as with Mother Earth.  And as far as normal goes, I have no idea what that means. 

 

Carl Jarvis

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Mike Freeman

Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 9:48 AM

Subject: Re: [Wcb-l] finally did it

 

It's a sad day for the blind when using an amanuensis is seen as not acting
independently. I think we'll rue the day when this notion gained currency.

Mike Freeman


-----Original Message-----
From: Wcb-l [mailto:wcb-l-bounces@wcbinfo.org] On Behalf Of debby phillips
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:00 AM
To: Randy Tedrow; wcb-l@wcbinfo.org
Subject: Re: [Wcb-l] finally did it

hey Randy, congratulations on being able to vote independently! 
Good for you!    Debby

independent or interdependent?

 
So let's quit selling the idea that any of us humans are independent.  We're all interdependent to one degree or another.  To say that I just voted independently is silly talk.  Even though I say it, too.  But what I did was to vote privately, using an AutoMark voting machine.  To use this machine I needed to have Cathy independently drive me to Port Townsend to the courthouse.  We took the independent elevator to the auditor's office and independently requested the headphones to the AutoMark.  Then we drove to the nearest restaurant and independently ordered dinner. 
I know that it is good PR to say that we are the Independent Blind.  It sends a much needed message to the folks who believe that the absence of eyesight deprives people of their brains.  But we need to remind ourselves that it is just that, a PR tool.  In fact, accommodating my needs as a blind man makes me interdependent. 
For example, I want all paper money to be marked in such a way as to allow any blind person with normal sense of touch, the ability to tell one bill from the next. 
But I also understand that the person using any one of the gadgets that are now on the market, making identification of paper money possible, are just as "independent".  For me, the issue is to find the method that makes it possible for the greatest number of blind people to "independently" identify their paper money. 
We blind folk just love to pick nits.  Do dog guides or white travel canes make a person more independent? 
The list is endless because we keep focusing on our need to show the world, as well as ourselves,  that we are truly independent. 
I think that there are two words that cause blind people great grief. 
Independent and normal. 
I am neither independent nor am I normal. 
As a member of the human race, I am interdependent in all sorts of ways, both with my fellow human beings as well as with Mother Earth.  And as far as normal goes, I have no idea what that means. 
 
Carl Jarvis
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Wcb-l] finally did it

It's a sad day for the blind when using an amanuensis is seen as not acting
independently. I think we'll rue the day when this notion gained currency.

Mike Freeman


-----Original Message-----
From: Wcb-l [mailto:wcb-l-bounces@wcbinfo.org] On Behalf Of debby phillips
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:00 AM
To: Randy Tedrow; wcb-l@wcbinfo.org
Subject: Re: [Wcb-l] finally did it

hey Randy, congratulations on being able to vote independently! 
Good for you!    Debby

_______________________________________________
Wcb-l mailing list
Wcb-l@wcbinfo.org
http://wcbinfo.org/mailman/listinfo/wcb-l_wcbinfo.org


_______________________________________________
Wcb-l mailing list
Wcb-l@wcbinfo.org
http://wcbinfo.org/mailman/listinfo/wcb-l_wcbinfo.org

profit is the bottom line...the only line


Good example of Capitalism at its finest.  Take over a public service, milk it for all the profit you can, and make few provisions for resolving problems or dealing with disasters.  That's when the Capitalist quits talking about oppressive and inefficient government, and runs screaming for a bail out. 
Carl Jarvis
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 7:20 AM
Subject: RE: goodly letter

Bob,

Our Long Island Power Authroity, (LIPA), is doing the worst job. It is a
privatized public ultility that is completely unaccountable to the public,
aside from receiving a license from the state to function. But the areas in
Nassau and Suffolk County that were destroyed, contained private homes.
People in these counties moved there in order to live in private, one family
dwellings. But the Rockaway areas in Queens that were devastated, were
filled with poor people and those are the wons that might be handled as you
suggest.

Miriam

________________________________

From: blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org] On Behalf Of Bob Hachey
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 3:27 AM
To: Blind Democracy Discussion List
Subject: Re: goodly letter


Hi Joe and all,
I am very concerned that the poorer neighborhoods of New York and New Jersey
including parts of long Island will be yet another chapter in Naomi Klein's
The shock Doctrine. If this happens, we will get more high priced hotels,
boutique cities and the like at the expense of poor and middle income
Americans.
While the government has certainly done better in dealing with Sandy than it
did with Katrina, it looks like it's more of the same old shit for those
living in poor neighborhoods and public housing.
I saw reference in one recent piece about how Cuba does a better job doing
storm recovery and I'd love to see more specifics on that such as how severe
was the storm, how long did it take to get power restored and was the damage
in Cuba comparable to some of the worst damage in New York and New Jersey.
Bob Hachey

_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy

capitalism at its lovely best


Bob and any lovers of Capitalism, 
 
To the capitalist, human suffering is a resource, just like large numbers of unemployed, or the growing number of elders, or our public education, or our social security, or our Medicare.  All of these resources are opportunities for exploitation.  The capitalist is skilled at convincing you that what you have are lemons.  He takes the lemons and makes lemonade and then sells you your lemons at huge profits.  Even though the last thing you wanted was lemonade. 
Oh well, that's a lousy example, but it's early out here on the Great Olympic Peninsula. 
The point is, we average Americans think of how tragic this super storm was, but the capitalist thinks of how to move in and grab off the pieces, package it and sell it back to us at huge profits. 
And where will the displaced people go?  Not the problem of the capitalist. 
But hey, the capitalist goes to bed on a full stomach with no guilty feelings. 
Carl Jarvis
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Hachey
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: goodly letter

Hi Joe and all,
I am very concerned that the poorer neighborhoods of New York and New Jersey including parts of long Island will be yet another chapter in Naomi Klein's The shock Doctrine. If this happens, we will get more high priced hotels, boutique cities and the like at the expense of poor and middle income Americans.
While the government has certainly done better in dealing with Sandy than it did with Katrina, it looks like it's more of the same old shit for those living in poor neighborhoods and public housing.
I saw reference in one recent piece about how Cuba does a better job doing storm recovery and I'd love to see more specifics on that such as how severe was the storm, how long did it take to get power restored and was the damage in Cuba comparable to some of the worst damage in New York and New Jersey.
Bob Hachey


_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy

Christian Teacher Burned Crosses onto Students' Arms and Pushed Creationism--Now He's Claims His "Free Speech" Was Violated?

Subject: Re: [acb-chat] Christian Teacher Burned Crosses onto Students' Arms and Pushed Creationism--Now He's Claims His "Free Speech" Was Violated?

My grandpa Ludwig(1882-1979) believed the world was flat.  Raised in Iowa, on a farm, he could look out his door and see forever.  And his logic said that the reason objects seemed to drop out of sight over the horizon was simply because they were too far off to see clearly. 
No one would have ever attempted to teach Grandpa Ludwig's belief in public school.  But in his mind he had clear proof that he was right.  Even more proof than those believing in Creationism. 
Looking across his nursery stock Grandpa Ludwig told me, "As far as I can see, the land is flat.  If others believe it to be round, and that serves their needs, so be it.  But for me, what I need is flat, fertile ground for planting." 
Yet, Grandpa Ludwig never pushed his beliefs onto me or anyone else.  He was satisfied with what he knew, because it met his needs. 
What is it that drives some people into trying to cram their beliefs down others throats? 
 
Carl Jarvis
***
 
Subject: [acb-chat] Christian Teacher Burned Crosses onto Students' Arms and Pushed Creationism--Now He's Claims His "Free Speech" Was Violated?

Hi all,
Here's a rather sad piece about a science teacher by the name of John Freshwater. I'd categorize Freshwater not as a conservative, but as a right-winger of the lunatic fringe variety. His kind are trying their best to shove right-wing radical religion down the throats of others including public school students.
When i was in school, I was taught evolution. I was also taught that some folks believe in creationism but that established science favored evolution.
Bob Hachey
 
 
Christian Teacher Burned Crosses onto Students' Arms and Pushed Creationism--Now He's Claims His "Free Speech" Was Violated?
 
By Rob Boston [1]
 
Church & State Magazine, November 8, 2012 |
 
 
Jenifer and Steve Dennis enjoyed living in Mount Vernon, Ohio, a city of
about 16,000 people in the center of the state, but they no longer reside
there. After an incident in 2007, they stopped feeling welcome.
 
The Dennis family's problems began one day when their son Zachary, then 13,
showed them some marks on his arm. The red burns were in the shape of a
cross, and Zachary told his parents that a science teacher named John
Freshwater was responsible for them. Freshwater had made the mark with an
electronic device called a Tesla coil.
 
It soon came to light that Zachary wasn't the only student who had been
burned. While investigating the matter, school officials soon uncovered a
host of problems in Freshwater's classroom.
 
It turned out that Freshwater, who in 2003 had publicly attacked the school
district for mandating that evolution be taught, had been pushing
"intelligent design"--- a variant of creationism--- in class and
distributing materials designed to cast doubt on the validity of evolution.
 
The investigation revealed that Freshwater had put religious posters in his
classroom, asked students questions about their religious beliefs and the
depth of their commitment and even offered "healing" services at meetings of
the Fellowship of Christian Athletes. He had also distributed "work sheets"
to students that undermined evolution (but, interestingly, hadn't let
students take the materials home where parents might see them).
 
In June of 2008, education officials told Freshwater he was being fired. He
refused to go quietly, at first demanding a hearing before the school board
and, when that failed, asking for an administrative hearing.
 
That also went against him, so Freshwater filed a lawsuit charging that his
right to free speech and academic freedom had been violated.
 
The community quickly became polarized over the matter, and every twist of
the case dominated the local news. The Dennis family decided that they had
had enough. They moved out of town and didn't look back.
 
"Although Mount Vernon has many positive attributes and we still spend time
there," Jenifer Dennis said, "we are extremely fortunate to have found a
warm and welcoming community in an adjacent county that we've now become a
part of. It is a community that is accepting of all ideas, thoughts and
people from all walks of life and our family is now a part of it, so we
haven't thought about moving back to Mount Vernon."
 
It may seem hard to believe, but five years later the Freshwater legal saga
is still dragging on. Two Ohio courts ruled against the maverick teacher,
but in a move that surprised many observers, the Ohio Supreme Court in July
announced that it will hear an appeal ofFreshwater v. Mount Vernon City
School District Board of Education. Oral arguments will take place soon.
 
At the time Freshwater was let go, his antics were growing tiresome to many
in the school. One anonymous teacher told The New York Times that she
routinely had to re-instruct Freshwater's students in evolution because they
had not been taught the basics of theory.
 
But Freshwater has supporters in the community--- and they've made a lot of
noise. Anchored in the Trinity Worship Center, an Assemblies of God
congregation in Mount Vernon, Freshwater's backers regularly attended school
board meetings and launched supportive websites. They even rallied
sympathetic students on his behalf in 2008 by asking youngsters to carry
Bibles to school and wear pro-Freshwater t-shirts.
 
Freshwater's appeal is being handled by the Rutherford Institute, a
Virginia-based legal group that asserts in court papers that the teacher's
academic freedom rights have been violated.
 
"Academic freedom was once the bedrock of American education," Rutherford
Institute President John W. Whitehead said in a media statement. "That is no
longer the state of affairs, as this case makes clear. What we need today
are more teachers and school administrators who understand that young people
don't need to be indoctrinated. Rather, they need to be taught how to think
for themselves."
 
In a legal filing asking the Ohio Supreme Court to hear the case, Rutherford
attorney R. Kelly Hamilton dismisses the cross burned onto Zachary Dennis'
arm. Hamilton calls the burn the result of a "common classroom science
experiment" and blames school officials for responding to "community
hysteria resulting from rumors about Freshwater."
 
Jenifer Dennis begs to differ. In 2010, she told Church & State that her son's
arm was covered with welts and blisters.
 
"I compare it to a sunburn, curling iron burn or an oven burn," she said.
"It was a red raised area that was swollen.... He had trouble sleeping that
night."
 
She even shared a photo with Americans United that clearly showed the red
marks on his arm. (See "Mr. Freshwater's Classroom Crusade," March 2010
Church & State.)
 
Today, Dennis says she is stunned that the case has taken so long to
resolve. Yet she considers it a learning experience.
 
"It has taught me that what I once considered a given about individual
rights is not in fact such an easy issue," Dennis told Church & State. "I am
dumbfounded that individuals still feel the need to inject personal beliefs
to a captive audience of minors and that using an instrument such as a Tesla
coil on a student's flesh is an issue that I had to approach the school
about to have the matter addressed.
 
"If families do not confront wrongdoings," she added, "they will continue to
happen and the rights of all Americans will slowly be stripped away, leaving
everyone to have to follow another's beliefs or ideals."
 
Americans United for Separation of Church and State agrees with the Dennis
family and is standing up for religious neutrality and sound science
education in public schools. In a friend-of-the-court brief filed with the
Ohio high court, the organization argues that Freshwater has no
constitutional right to spread his religious views in the classroom.
 
AU's brief was drafted by Richard B. Katskee, a former AU assistant legal
director now in private practice with the Washington, D.C., law firm of
Mayer Brown.
 
This subject is very familiar to Katskee. In 2005, he and allied attorneys
put a stop to the teaching of intelligent design in Dover, Pa., public
schools. The result was a landmark decision--- Kitzmiller v. Dover Area
School District--- by a federal judge that declared the teaching of
intelligent design to be a violation of the First Amendment.
 
Katskee said he's pleased to be defending church-state separation and sound
science education again.
 
"It's clear what's going on here," Katskee told Church & State. "The courts
have struck down so-called 'balanced treatment' laws that require that
creationism be taught alongside evolution in public school science classes.
Backdoor efforts such as anti-evolution disclaimers pasted into science
texts have also not fared well, so now the creationists are trying to walk
right through the front door of the schoolhouse with a bogus 'academic
freedom' argument.
 
"Say what you will about the creationists, they're creative," Katskee added.
"One might say their strategies are evolving."
 
Previous attempts by teachers who oppose evolution to secure an academic
freedom right to teach creationism have not fared well in the courts. Two
federal appeals courts and one state supreme court have ruled against
teachers making this claim.
 
In 1987, Ray Webster, a junior high school social studies teacher in
Illinois, sued the district after he was told to stop proselytizing in
class, including teaching creationism. In court, Webster argued that he had
a First Amendment right to determine his own curriculum and that he had to
discuss creationism to provide balance in the classroom.
 
A district court ruled against Webster, and the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of
Appeals upheld the decision in Webster v. New Lenox School District.
 
Seven years later, a California biology teacher named John E. Peloza sued
his school district after officials refused to allow him to teach
creationism.
 
Peloza, who, like Freshwater, received representation from the Rutherford
Institute, argued in court that school policies violated his right to free
speech and freedom of religion. He also asserted that the school had
endorsed a view of "evolutionism" that was a component of the "religion of
secular humanism."
 
Peloza's claims did not fare well in court. He lost at the district level,
and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later affirmed that ruling.
Rutherford attorneys took the Peloza v. Capistrano Unified School District
case to the U.S. Supreme Court, which refused to hear it.
 
In 1999, a high school science and math teacher in Minnesota, Rodney LeVake,
sued his school district in state court after he was denied permission to
teach creationism alongside evolution. The case, LeVake v. Independent
School District #656, went all the way to the Minnesota Supreme Court, with
LeVake losing at every level.
 
Critics of the academic freedom argument say results like this aren't
surprising. They point out that if public school teachers had an unfettered
right to ignore the accepted curriculum and teach whatever they wanted,
classroom chaos would soon follow.
 
The National Center for Science Education, a California-based organization
that defends the teaching of evolution in public schools, has been following
the Freshwater case closely.
 
"If Freshwater had his way, teachers could present any nonsense they wanted
under the shield of 'academic freedom'--- and schools would be powerless to
stop them from mis-educating their students," Glenn Branch, deputy director
of the organization, told Church & State.
 
As Freshwater's appeal lurches toward what will probably be its final round,
the Dennis family is watching developments from their new community.
Zachary, now 18, is a freshman at a university in Pennsylvania.
 
"It is unfortunate that this happened to him in 8th grade when he was 13
years old, and Mr. Freshwater is still making this an issue even though this
case has been reject--ed four different times," Dennis said.
 
She added, "There are so many different religions and different views of
each religion that I do not feel a public school has the right to allow
teachers to insert their own personal beliefs into their curriculum.
 
"This should be the choice of parents and guardians," Dennis concluded.
"They are the ones to guide their children spiritually, no matter what
religion that may be. This is a private family and individual choice, and
when this is breached the rights of those parents and guardians are taken
away."

Veteran's Day: My dad's 100th birthday!

Subject: Veteran's Day: My dad's 100th birthday!

It's hard to believe that my dad would have turned 100 today.  100!  He was born long before his birthday was declared Armistice Day and then morphed into Veteran's Day. 
Not a single day passes that I don't thank whatever powers caused this man to become my dad.  Even though he's been dead these past 11 years, I find myself turning to him for his wise counsel.  "What would you do in this situation?" I ask.  And his silent answer is always the same.  "Be true to your convictions, son." 
And so today, as on every day, I answer, "I'll do my best, dad." 
I sure miss you. 
 
Carl Jarvis.  Son of Clyde Fletcher Jarvis, and proud of it.