Friday, April 29, 2011

holding membership in two organizations with different philosophys

American Council of the Blind and National Federation of the Blind. 
(ACB and NFB).
 
There are philosophical differences between the ACB and the NFB that make it difficult for me to understand how anyone could belong to both.  But that is a choice of each of us, and I'll defend people's right to make their own decisions. 
Some folks will say, "But we're all working for the same things."  But we're not.  It isn't that the NFB wears the black hat and the ACB wears the white hat.  It is that we represent two different approaches to running an organization.  The NFB is a tightly run organization from the top down.  In my opinion it has morphed into a National Agency.  Members are directed by the Central Organization, as are the state chapters.  But more important, members are no longer the central concern of the organization.  It's focus is on the development and maintenance of the Jernigan Center.  The organization has chosen to pattern itself after the Corporate Model. 
The ACB is the only Grass Roots Organization of the blind at the national level. 
The ACB gets its purpose and its strength from its many state, local and special interest groups. 
The ACB will continue to be the more democratic, open, representative organization just as long as we members bother to understand that it is our responsibility to participate and make certain that the ACB remains an open forum. 
Years ago I had this discussion with Kenneth Jernigan.  I had expressed concern that the NFB was taking a turn down the wrong road, cutting off local participation.  I had suggested that National Board members might be elected at the District level rather than being hand picked at convention.  In this way the members in the local areas would feel that they had someone they could bring their concerns before. 
"I don't delegate authority!" was Jernigan's reply.  End of discussion. 
Finally, when thinking that we are all working for the same goals, just imagine two countries, side by side.  One is run by a dictator and the other by an open, elected government.  Both nations say that they have the best interest of their people at heart.  But one government tells the people what their "best interests" are, while the other looks to the people to make those determinations. 
Both countries are successful.  But they are not working for the same goals. 
 
We can choose an organization in which we have the privilage of playing a meaningful rolde, or we can join an organization that will tell us what is best for us. 
 
Your choice. 
 
Curious Carl
 

Thursday, April 28, 2011

my brain shut down

    My brain shut down when I read the following:
"President Bush launched the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in
response to 9/11, enacted Medicare Part D to help seniors cope
with the rising prices of medicines, and cut taxes across the
board in an effort to lower tax burdens."

Writer Linda J. Bilms must have just arrived on the last Mars flight after an extended vacation.  If she really believes her own drivel then I will bestow upon her the title, Linda Lackey.  Even the young journalists at the Grade School Gazette know now that President Bush was already itching for a showdown at the O K Corral. 
And only a First Class Fool would believe he could help Seniors offset their rising medical costs without putting the brakes on the Medical Profiteers.  I will not give in to the temptation of suggesting that it was indeed a Fool at the helm. 
And saying "tax cuts across the board", is a real mean spirited statement.  Sure, tax cuts across the board.  This reminds me back when the state of Washington decided to give state employees a 3% pay raise, across the board. 
My $50,000 was increased to $51,500. 
My Administrative Assistant's $25,000 income went up to $25,750. 
Now, even though we both received the same across the board 3% raise, the gap between us had widened just a bit.  Imagine if I were a billionaire and you earned $50,000 a year. 
Some sweet deal for me, huh?  But it's just hunky dory with Linda Lackey. 
Curious Carl
 

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Guide to action


When will we understand that the Ruling Class views Americans as just another natural resource to be used at their pleasure? 
Until we do, and until we take away corporate citizenship, we will continue to be bullied about.  It will not come through voting in new bodies to Congress.  By the time they get to DC., they are bought and paid for and they know who they are beholden to. 
While we cannot wait for Congress to reform itself and to undo this travesty of corporations pretending to be real people, we can begin at the place where all real change takes place, the grass roots.  We can no longer wait for Obama to put on his comfortable shoes and join us, we must put on our own boots and take action. 
Here's a link to some of the goings on in Pennsylvania, as many of that state's towns begin to take their government back. 
- Cached
  • CELDF Model Brief to Eliminate Corporate Rights - CELDF  

    Corporations thus lack the authority to deny people's inalienable rights, including their .... Pennsylvania limited manufacturing charters to twenty years. ..... subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other .... and the Town denied the Corporation's request to site the cell tower. ...
    www.celdf.org/article.php?id
  •  
     
     
    Curious Carl

    Good intentions? Or just trying to avoid confrontation.


    Good intentions?  Or just trying to avoid confrontation. 
       
    How often do we see someone show what appears to be an act of kindness or an extra consideration to one person, but it is at the expense of many others.  You might have seen them on the highway, dropping back to allow several cars crowd in ahead of them, and of you.  Or the shopper with the full grocery cart being allowed to sneak into the front of a long line while your feet are killing you.  My wife worked for the Seattle prosecutor's office preparing cases for court.  Her boss allowed two of her co-workers to come in an hour late because of poor bus connections.  But early mornings were when all the rush and crunch occured.  The slack had to be picked up by those who came in on time, making their job even more difficult. 
    This hits home for me since it's a lesson I've had to learn over and over and over again.  It comes from my being a Rescuer.  It's what brings many of us into Social Service because we believe that if we just try real hard we can rescue everybody.  Even folks who don't want to be rescued.  I mean, just who do they think they are anyway? 
    Being a Rescuer is a tough place to be when you are charged with running a rehabilitation training center for newly blinded people, on limited resources. 
    Now at the same time, the Vocational Rehab Counselors were operating under the same limited resources.  So what they did was to push through folks who might have benefitted from our program but they could shove them into a job with a smile and a prayer, not to mention the savings of their budget dollars.  And who do you think they trotted up to our training program?  It was the folks they couldn't figure out what else to do with. 
    "Fix them!" seemed to be the order of the day. 
    And here I sat, the Rescuer, ready to charge in and do just that. 
    It took me what seemed like forever to realize that spending extra time and staff energy with people who'd been through these sort of programs two, three and four times before, that they were not going to be rehabilitated no matter how much I wanted it. 
    An observer once said to me, "Why do you think you can rehabilitate people who have never been habilitated in the first place?"  And of course these were many of the people the VRC's were bringing to us.  The people who had been sheltered, smothered and never allowed to explore their world. 
    But I kept taking them in because I saw my program as their Court of Last Resort.  If we didn't rescue them, what would happen to them? 
    It took me a long, hard struggle before I came to understand that all of the compassion I was pouring out to these people was at the expense of other folks who had come ready and eager to learn and move back into the work force.  And more than that, I was not helping the people I was so diligently trying to rescue.  I was merely providing them a place to live until they moved on to be rescued somewhere else. 
    This brings me back to that supervisor who thought she was being kind to allow two employees to adjust their schedules.  Of course from our lofty position we can see that the only lesson they were learning was that they were not part of the team.  They were privilaged.  Naturally this had serious repercussions  .   
    And what about those youngs blind children whose parents want to protect them and to ensure that they are kept safe from harm?  By not stepping back and allowing their children to experience life, with all of its bumps and bruises,
    they are teaching the wrong lesson to those children. In truth, they are not only doing the child a grave disservice but also every person whose life will be impacted by that child. 
    I think the best term I ever heard was, "Tough Love".  We need to stop trying to be the nice guy, or to rescue everybody, and realize that when we avoid confrontation we are simply passing the problem on to others. 
     
    Curious Carl

    Monday, April 25, 2011

    For what it's worth: Blind, Blinder and Blindest

    Subject: For what it's worth: Blind, Blinder and Blindest

    Interesting what each of us brings to the discussion table. 
    Some of my sighted friends say, "It must be harder to have seen and then to loose your sight".  Some of my, blind from birth friends say, "It would have been better if I'd seen and then lost my sight.  I'd have a better picture of the world around me." 
    But then, some of my brown, straight haired friends wish they were blond, or had curly hair, while my curly headed friends long for straight hair. 
    Short people wonder what it would be like to look down on the tops of other folks heads, and tall people wish they could just blend into the crowd for a change.  When I was skinny I longed to be husky.  Now that I am...uh...well I long to be thin again. 
    On the one hand it can be a little frustrating, this wanting that which we are not.  But on the other hand it is what drives us to clamber into leaky boats and set sail for strange and distant lands.  If the day ever comes when Man steps from his ship and looks about the planet Mars, it will be because of that little dissatisfying itch. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    Good News! I'll never be in the dog house.

     
     

    Mardel,
    Your note brings back fond memories.  I loved the sound of rain on the roof at night.  We had a tar paper roof, too.  And I helped my dad many a time patching leaks with the old tar bucket. 
    But I wanted you to know that we never had a dog house around here.  And that's a good thing since if we did I might have spent some time out there.  We're cat people.  And Cathy would never banish me to the Cat House. 
     
    Curious Carl

    just where is that liberal media?

    What I'm curious about is who the Liberal Media is?  Oh sure, I hear a few liberal programs mostly on low power public funded stations, but please list for me the Liberal outlets that are broadcasting via national networks. 
     
    The last time I looked, TV, radio, newspapers and major magazines were all being supported by advertisements.  As I glance through the companies promoting their products and services, most are huge national and international corporations. 
    Let me know who among them are the Liberals? 
    I often wonder why our brains go mushy on certain subjects. 
    In our neighborhoods we would never think of allowing people to sit on our library patrons advisory committee if they were advocating shutting down the library and turning it into a private club.  And yet we think that the people who own the mass media are just real happy or stupid enough to open their mikes and presses to folks advocating their downfall? 
    These super rich media owners know how to take care of their businesses. 
    Who do you think it is promoting the idea that the media is liberal?  It's folks like the Koch brothers who know that if they keep us stirred up we will not trust anything we hear.  The media will be able to continue moving to the Right to placate their controllers.  We will keep on believing that they are too liberal and still not trust them.  This all plays to the advantage of the Ruling Class.  Keep us dumb and divided. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    Waiting for Warmer weather is like waiting for access...

    The Access Bus is a Blessing, if it ever shows up. 
     
    Poor Chris.  Chilled and damp to the bone while waiting for Spring...or the Access bus...whichever comes first. 
    The drizzle has never let up today and the temperature out here on the Olympic Peninsula never reached 45 degrees.  Still, I grabbed the big golf umbrella and pulled on my heavy winter coat and sloshed out to the mailbox and on up the road to the Beaver dam to see how much water is pouring down Ripley Creek.  By the time I headed back home, about half a mile, I was too hot and had to pop open the snaps on my coat. 
    My sister-in-law's two dogs ran with me, joyfully splashing through the puddles and even managed to splash me.  But it didn't matter because I stomped into a few deep puddles myself.  As we reached the front door and began to head for the hearth, we were halted mid stride.  "Don't you dare come in here all soaking wet and muddy". 
    Oops!  I pulled off my wet shoes and pants and sadly patted the dripping dogs heads, telling them that this is what they get for having coats that won't unzip. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    For what it's worth.

    While having a disability can impact ones self esteem, self advocacy is a learned skill and must be practiced continuously.  Folks accepted into the group, regardless of whether it is a minority group or not, will have greater self esteem than those pushed to the edges of the group. 
    This is another strong plus for an organization like the ACB.  If we treat ourselves properly, with respect  and tolerance, we will be assisting one another toward becoming better at self advocating. 
     
    Curious Carl
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Marsha
    Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 6:07 PM
    Subject: Re: For what it's worth.

    Hi
      although I was born blind, I didn't know that I was until I entered
    college.  I think I had 20/300 vision until I got out of college.  I now
    have no real vision.  Sometimes I can see light and sometimes I cannot.
    Maybe if I had known my life might be different.  I'm always willing to
    fight for others but not for myself.

    Marsha

    _______________________________________________
    Blind-Democracy mailing list
    Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
    http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy

    Saturday, April 16, 2011

    Education; how much is too much; how much is not enough

    When I entered the University of Washington in 1954, Tuition was $50 per quarter.  Books ran around $2.50 to $3.50 each.  Bus fare was ten cents each way.  I lived at home and worked part time for $1.25 an hour and paid my way through school...as far as I went that time.  I never graduated. 
    When I hired on as a Rehab Teacher at the Department of Services for the Blind in 1975, all I needed was two years of college and two years working with blind people.  That's where my volunteer work came in handy. 
    Today, 36 years later, I have never been out of a job.  And, perhaps I should not fess up to this, I am still one quarter shy of a Bachelor's degree. 
    But the young college grad who wants my job today must have not only a Master's degree but be a Certified Rehabilitation Counselor, too. 
    The interesting thing is that I see little difference between the accomplishments of these VRC's and the old warriors with their much more limited education.  Perhaps there is something to be said about laboring in the trenches. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    Evangelical Liberty Univ. received half billion dollars in federal aid

    Subject: Re: Evangelical Liberty University received half a billion dollars infederal aid

    Attention!!!
    Watch for the grand opening of Jarvis University.  Coming to an internet link near you. 
    Yes!  The Jarvis University has your best interest at heart.  In fact we'll take not only your best interest but the entire savings account, lock, stocks and bonds. 
    Our Dean of Students, Doctor Ivan Rippenoff, will personally walk you through our very simple Virtual enrollment. 
    Once enrolled our student financial administrative staff, Doctors Dewey, Cheatum and Howe, will teach you how to apply for Federal Student Dollars.  Each student will promptly send 50% of all Federal Funds to Jarvis University and apply the remaining 50% to any of our classes listed in our one page catalog. 
    Now let us all bow to the continent of Africa and chant the name of our Gracious and Mighty benefactor.  Oh! Bah! Maa! 
     
    Doctor C. Allen Jarvis, Esq. 
     
    *********Subject: Evangelical Liberty University received half a billion dollars infederal aid

    Evangelical Liberty University received half a billion dollars in federal
    aid money



    One conservative college got more government cash than NPR last year

    This is what didn't get passed today or reported on.

    Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 6:58 PM
    Subject: This is what didn't get passed today or reported on.



          Here's a Real Democratic Budget that Serves the Interests of the
    American People
          By Rep. Mike Honda and Rep. Raúl Grijalva, AlterNet
          Posted on April 11, 2011, Printed on April 15, 2011
          http://www.alternet.org/story/150582/here%27s_a_real_democratic_budget_that_serves_the_interests_of_the_american_people

          Budgets are more than collections of numbers. They are a statement of
    our values. The Congressional Progressive Caucus Budget is a reflection of
    the values and priorities of America's working families. The "People's
    Budget" charts a path that keeps America exceptional in the 21st century,
    while addressing the most pressing problems facing the nation today. Our
    Budget eliminates the deficit, stabilizes the debt, puts Americans back to
    work, and restores our economic competiveness.

          The CPC Budget does this by listening to the American people. In poll
    after poll, the public is telling us that they want to preserve Social
    Security, Medicare and Medicaid, make higher education more affordable,
    expand job-training programs, cut taxes burdening the middle class,
    subsidize affordable housing and assist those struggling to prevent
    foreclosures. The majority of America, furthermore, thinks cuts to Social
    Security, Medicare and Medicaid, K-12 education, heating assistance to
    low-income families, student loans, unemployment insurance, scientific and
    medical research, are completely unacceptable.

          In contrast, Americans find a progressive tax policy very acceptable.
    The overwhelming majority of America supports additional taxes on
    millionaires and billionaires, eliminating unnecessary weapons systems,
    eliminating tax credits for the oil and gas industries, phasing out Bush tax
    cuts, and eliminating subsidies for new nuclear power plants. Poll after
    poll gives voice to what Americans are asking of us.

          Our Budget listens to what the American people are telling us. It does
    all of the above in a fiscally responsible way that dramatically reduces our
    borrowing from banks and foreign governments and ensures our long-term
    economic competitiveness. It does all of the above recognizing that in order
    to compete we need every American to be productive, and in order to be
    productive, we need to raise the skill level of every American while making
    sure that basic needs of every working family are met. It does all of the
    above, while remaining rooted in fairness, recognizing that America works
    only when everyone has an opportunity to make it in America.

          Our Budget Eliminates the Deficit by 2021: The CPC budget eliminates
    the deficit in a way that does not devastate what Americans want preserved,
    specifically, Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. Instead of eroding
    America's hard-earned retirement plan and social safety net, our budget
    targets the true drivers of deficits in the next decade: the Bush Tax Cuts,
    the wars overseas, and the causes and effects of the recent recession. By
    implementing a fair tax code, by building a resilient American economy, and
    by bringing our troops home, we achieve a budget surplus of over $30 billion
    by 2021 and we end up with a debt that is less than 65% of our GDP. This is
    what sustainability looks like.

          Our Budget Puts America Back to Work & Restores America's
    Competitiveness: The CPC budget rebuilds America and makes it competitive
    again. We put America back to work. We rebuild our roads and bridges,
    ensuring that those who use it help pay for it. We rebuild our dams and
    waterways with seed money for shipping systems that can compete with the
    rest of the world. We rebuild our education system by training more and
    better teachers, restoring schools, helping each student graduate, and
    supporting community colleges. This is what competitiveness looks like.

          Our Budget's Fair Tax System: The CPC budget implements a fair tax
    system, based on the American notion that fairness and equality are integral
    to our society. Our budget restores fairness to a system that unfairly
    benefitted the richest few while hurting the majority of America. Our budget
    heeds America's call to end the Bush Tax Cuts and the estate tax and create
    fair tax brackets for millionaires and billionaires -while maintaining
    credits for the middle class and for students. It ensures that the banks
    which wrecked our economy pay a modest financial responsibility fee and that
    exotic trading, by Wall Street traders who gambled away America's savings,
    is levied a tax. It guarantees that hedge fund managers (and those who use
    them) do not get special treatment, by taxing capital gains and dividends as
    ordinary income. It eliminates charity to oil companies making record
    profits from prices paid at the pump by the American people, given that it
    is unfair that the American people must also give these oil companies
    billions of dollars in handouts. Finally, our budget taxes US corporate
    income as it is earned, in much the same way Americans are taxed. This is
    what fairness looks like.

          Our Budget Brings Our Troops Home: The CPC budget responsibly ends our
    wars, currently paid for by American taxpayer dollars we do not have. We end
    these wars, not simply to save massive amounts of money or because this is
    what the majority of America is polling in favor of, but because these wars
    are making America less safe, are reducing America's standing in the world,
    and are doing nothing to reduce America's burgeoning energy security crisis.
    The CPC budget offers a real solution to these fiscal, diplomatic and energy
    crises - leaving America more secure, both here and abroad. The CPC budget
    also ensures that our country's defense spending does not continue to
    contribute significantly to our current fiscal burden - a trend we reverse
    by ending the wars and realigning conventional and strategic forces,
    resulting in $2.3 trillion worth of savings. This is what security looks
    like.

          Our Budget's Bottom Line (Over 10 year Window)

          . Deficit reduction of $5.6 trillion

          . Primary spending cuts of $869 billion

          . Net interest savings of $856 billion

          . Total spending cuts: $1.7 trillion

          . Revenue increase of $3.9 trillion

          . Public investment of $1.7 trillion

          . Budget surplus of $30.7 billion in 2021, debt at 64.1% of GDP.


          US Representative Michael Honda is a member of the House Budget
    Committee and the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Follow Rep Honda on
    Facebook and Twitter. US Representative Raul Grijalva is co-chair of the
    Congressional Progressive Caucus. Follow Rep Grijalva on Facebook and
    Twitter.

          © 2011 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
          View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/150582/

    Radioactive Human Embryos: Our Nuclear Legacy?

    Subject: Re: Radioactive Human Embryos: Our Nuclear Legacy?

    Right now we might have visitors from the future among us.  But of course, thanks to our playing with forces beyond our control, they'll be so altered that we won't know one from a tree stump...wait a minute!  Did that tree stump just move? 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    Nearly 300 Legal Scholars Sign Letter Protesting Torture of BradleyManning

    Subject: Re: Nearly 300 Legal Scholars Sign Letter Protesting Torture of BradleyManning

    The only signatures that will make a difference in the criminal treatment of Bradley Manning, would be those of the Multinational Corporate CEO's and the Pentagon. 
    No one cares if the herd fusses just as long as they keep heading toward the slaughter house. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    who counts our votes?

    When I first voted, Washington State had moved away from the paper ballot, at least in Seattle, and I entered a booth, pulled closed a curtain and moved little levers beside the names of the people and issues I wished to support.  When finished, I pulled a lever and the curtain opened and my vote was tallied honestly.  I never questioned that fact.  My vote was tallied because I believed that I lived in America where we held open, fair elections and had officials who counted all votes without prejudice. 
    That was then and this is now.  Today I would have no trust in that machine to fairly and impartially register my vote.  Why?  Because I no longer believe we hold open, fair elections.  So it's not the recording method that I have come to distrust.  It is the Human Factor.  We are once again being distracted by the method of how we caste our vote while the real issue, one of honest government, flies under our radar. 
    When the system, the government is fair, almost any method of counting votes will do.  When the system, government is corrupt or when it is weighted to support only a small percentage of the people, then no method will work. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    where the heck is Spring?

    Looks like a rerun of last year's Spring and Summer.  My poor little Rhodies are just now trying to put out  buds.  I recall past years when they would have been in full bloom in mid April. 
    But it is looking more and more as if this Spring is merely a continuation of our wet, dreary Winter, which was hard to tell from the wet, dribbly Fall, almost indistinguishable from the soggy Summer that actually looked just like last year's unseasonable Spring. 
     
    Curious Carl

    Monday, April 11, 2011

    Obama, Prince of Peace

    Ah, our Prince of Peace.  It does bring into question the integrity of the Nobel committee. 
    Obama seems bent on proving that he can, out Bush George Bush.  And he is proving to be just as agile with his campaign promises.  The closure of our prison at Guantánamo Bay  stands out.  But what about such buddy buddy promises as promising to put on his boots and walk the picket line with oppressed workers?  While Obama is not the extremist that Scott Walker is, both are owned by the same Masters.  Obama is no more a man of the people than was George Bush or Bill Clinton.  All have been brought under the thumb of the international corporate military Empire. 
    The good news is that this Empire, like all Empires before it, will crash and burn.  The bad news is that it probably won't happen until it has sucked the marrow from our bones. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    blind super hero does it again

    Imagine that you turn the corner and come face to face with the ugliest punk you ever met.  He slams you in the face with his beer bottle and grabs your fat wallet and heads down the road.  He is caught and his ratty behind is hauled before a judge and jury.  Your attorney tells of this pug ugly, towering, mean man of violence.  His attorney trots him         out looking like the Sunday School Superintendent, all humble, shy smile, clean shaven,. 
    "Your honor", he says softly.  "This gentleman came around the corner and ran right into me.  He screamed something and threw his wallet into my hands and ran down the road". 
    The jury looks at him, then at you, dressed in your cleanest faded jeans and tye dyed shirt, with your pony tail dangling down your back and your Hispanic face hanging out. 
    The Sunday School boy goes on in almost a whisper, "I was running after him when an officer of the law ordered me to halt, which I promptly did." 
     
    The jurors are swayed.  They see what they see.  A case of mistaken identity, or an attempt by this scruffy fellow to smear the reputation of an upstanding young Christian man. 
    But the blind juror, one Curious Carl, is not fooled by appearances.  He rises up and declares, "The defendant is guilty as sin!" 
    And how did he know this with such certainty?  Well, his super blind man hearing, overheard the fellow whisper to his attorney, "Watch this con job pal." 
    Yes friends, Blind Super Hero does it again! 
    Tune in again tomorrow at this same time for another in the Adventures of a Blind American Hero. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    Aborting a fetus solely becauseitwill have a disability.

    Many a girl has believed that she would see justice served if she went before a judge and told her story.  Many a young girl has been shocked as a lawyer tears her life apart and makes her appear to be nothing but a common slut.  Not only does she have the shame of going public with the most intimate details of her abuse, but she now carries a Scarlet Letter for all to see. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    Paul Krugman missed this one


    Paul Krugman wrote: "But if you ask me, I'd say that the nation wants - and more important, the
    nation needs - a president who believes in something, and is willing to take
    a stand."
     
    Carl Jarvis answers: Take off your blinders Paul Krugman.  President Obama  has taken a stand.  It's just that we either can't believe it or refuse to recognize it. 
    President Obama now stands squarely in the road blocking the recovery of the American Middle/Working Class. 
    President Obama stands in his house slippers and has never looked for that comfortable pair of shoes that he was going to put on and stand with the Union men and women. 
    President Obama stands on his promises to end the illegal wars and close Guantanamo
     prison.  He not only stands on his promises, he stomps on them and spits on them, too. 
    President Obama stands tall and straight with his new friends on Wall Street. 
    President Obama stands ready to raise 1 billion dollars for his useless re-election campaign.  Useless because it will not matter if he wins or loses because even winning we all lose. 
    Yup, Paul Krugman missed this one all right. 
     
    Curious Carl

    film on Aborting a fetus; good viewing for pregnant girls?

    While we are showing what it is like to have an abortion, let us also show what it is like for a young girl to be forced into sex and then after that trauma show how she gets to be the one carrying the baby and the shame and the curses of her parents.  For heaven sake, does anyone care about the children who are being victimized?  What are we going to do, grab some little girl who has been raped or forced into sex and make her watch what will happen if she even thinks of aborting the fetus?  We are some pieces of work! 
     
    Curious Carl
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Gigi
    Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 5:06 PM
    Subject: Re: [acb-chat] Aborting a fetus solely because itwill have a disability.

    And, by the same token, Abby, et al, illustrate the truth about what happens during an abortion.  Show how the baby 'cringes' when something comes near....I'll spare you the detail.  Show the different methods used to end a preborn baby's life, and further, what's done...well, not done, when the baby survives!! 

     

    THEN, see how many still consider it a choice.

     

    Was a time, in high school, when I didn't know what that precious baby goes through before it dies, I didn't think one way or another about abortion.  Once I learned, OMG, I just couldn't support what SHOULD be the embarrassment of our society--killing infants at our convenience!!

     

    Gigi

     


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Abby Vincent" <aevincent@ca.rr.com>
    To: "Ken Metz" <kenmetz@dslextreme.com>, "Kevin Minor" <kminor@windstream.net>, acb-chat@acb.org
    Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 6:43:38 PM
    Subject: Re: [acb-chat] Aborting a fetus solely because it will        have        a        disability.

    I'd like to see parents get some realistic information about what it is like to have a disability as a child and as an adult.  The way it's been for years, women get the prenatal tests for certain abnormalities in the unborn child.  If they are found, they get to have the pregnancy terminated, even if it's a late term pregnancy.  Perhaps we should advocate that if parents will become parents of a blind baby, they should see a video, audio-described of course, showing that living with blindness isn't the end of the world. ACB, of course, should produce the video.  Then they can make an informed choice about abortion or blind baby.

    Abby

     

    From: acb-chat-bounces@acb.org [mailto:acb-chat-bounces@acb.org] On Behalf Of Ken Metz
    Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:13 PM
    To: 'Kevin Minor'; acb-chat@acb.org
    Subject: Re: [acb-chat] Aborting a fetus solely because it will have a disability.

     

    Hi Kevin and all.

     

    Years ago I might have agreed with you. However, today, I'd have to say that it should be the right of both parents married or not, to make a decision on an abortion based on a disability. This may sound harsh, but the way that blind and disabled children are being taught in today's world, that decision must be the parents. How many blind folks of employment age are working? How many blind folks are getting the proper vocational rehabilitation services today that they require for top notch training? How many blind children are really receiving what they need in education with the numerous state schools for the blind being shut down? And, how many parents of blind children are really involved in their young lives to help make them productive?

     

    Of course, I don't mean all, but those who don't care to be responsible for having children when they're not ready

    or who just walk away from them are going to leave them with who, and then what happens to them?

     

    KEN

     

     

    From: acb-chat-bounces@acb.org [mailto:acb-chat-bounces@acb.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Minor
    Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 10:58 AM
    To: acb-chat@acb.org
    Subject: [acb-chat] Aborting a fetus solely because it will have a disability.

     

    Hi again.

     

    I can accept to a point that a woman should have the right to choose what happens to her, but let's look at this in another way.  Suppose there were a test that could show a fetus would be born blind or with limited vision.  The mother has the means to raise the child, and she decides to abort the fetus solely because it were going to have a disability.  Should she have the right to choose an abortion in this case?  Look at how society views blind people.  They fear losing their vision very much.  If these people could be found out before they were born then wouldn't aborting these individuals be a good option?

     

    I'm intentionally playing devil's advocate here.  I think that abortions are being used too often as a convenience rather than children being born in situations where they will die slowly.

     

    Just my thoughts.

     

    Kevin Minor, Lexington, KY

    kminor@windstream.net


    _______________________________________________
    acb-chat mailing list
    acb-chat@acb.org
    http://www.acb.org/mailman/listinfo/acb-chat


    _______________________________________________
    acb-chat mailing list
    acb-chat@acb.org
    http://www.acb.org/mailman/listinfo/acb-chat

    Fw: babies. Conceived in Lust. Who will love them?

    A great number of unwanted babies are the by-product of lonely unwanted children giving themselves in Lust because they have no idea of how to give themselves in Love. 
    These pregnant children come from broken homes, abusive home, insestual homes, left by uncaring adults to raise themselves.  Of course there are the children from caring families who go beyond limits and find themselves pregnant, but these are not the repeaters.  The lost children who keep making the same mistake over and over, thinking that this time will be different because it is a different man, or being forced into the corner by an older brother, uncle, step-father. 
    We keep thinking of these children as if they were our children or the kids down the street. 
    Think instead that you are a 14 year old girl huddled on a soiled, bare mattress tossed in the corner of a room filled with filth.  In the next room your mother is screwing Heaven only knows who, just so she can get a fix.  In the kitchenette food from weeks back is stuck to the counter tops and all over the stove.  The apartment refrigerator stinks and has gray stuff growing on the shelves.  The bread is moldy.  And that's all there is to eat.  Outside your door is wild noise.  Horns, screams, sometimes the crack of a gun.  Violence everywhere.  And all you have in the whole world to hold onto is the older neighbor boy who even now is sliding his hand down your pants. 
    You most likely are Black or Latino.  You might be a mix of white, Black and Latino. 
    At 15 you have a baby in your arms and another in your belly. 
    How are we going to educate you to be careful when you are being dragged onto the mattress?  "'Scuse me, do you got a rubber on?"
    This is the pregnant girl I'm talking about.  She is a victim of our neglect.  She is the product of a Greed Driven Ruling Class.  Tell me what we have done for her and for our nation by telling her it is against God's Will to kill a Fetus? 
    For God's Sake, we're killing her.  Slowly, but surely.  And we gather and march on the abortion clinic and get all puffed up with Jesus.  And that child mother lays shivering in the darkness praying, praying the just tonight, just tonight for once please dear God, don't let him come. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    Saturday, April 9, 2011

    Disposal of Waste Materials

    Reply to a friend who wonders if they couldn't breed an animal that doesn't need to potty.
     
    Actually Dick, few folks know this, but there was an effort to develop just such an animal for the blind.  After many years of special breeding they finally brought forth one pup born with a mouth but no exit.  They named him No Go.  And even better, No Go's temperament was perfect for use as a Guide Dog.  At the age of one, No Go was taken to a Nationally known dog training school and for the next year he was secretly trained.  The reason I know of this dog is because a very close friend of mine was selected to receive this unique animal.  Not only did No Go not go, but he hardly needed feeding.  And we also learned that he did not need much exercise, which suited my friend to a "T". 
    But despite eating only small amounts, No Go grew rapidly.  By the time my friend began training with him, No Go tipped the scales at over 150 pounds, and after the four week program was nearing its end, No Go was over five hundred pounds and barely able to get in and out the front door.  In fact when the day finally arrived for them to leave for the airport, they could not get No Go through.  Halfway out he became stuck.  Pushing and pulling did not help one bit.  Finally, in desperation the trainer took out a big old hat pin, telling my friend to get behind No Go and jab him with it.  "That'll make him jump right out", he assured everyone.  So my friend stepped up to No Go's backside, took a deep breath and jammed the hat pin in. 
    They say that my friend never knew what hit him, and it was a closed casket service.  As for No Go, last anyone saw of him he was shooting straight for the Moon. 
     
    Curious Carl
     
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 10:39 AM
    Subject: [acb-l] Disposal of Waste Materials

    Dear Friends:

    I wonder if it would be possible to develop a 'poopless' pet?

    Regards,

    R. E. (Dick) Driscoll, Sr.

     

    Friday, April 8, 2011

    can the blind serve on juries?

    My fellow lister tells us that blind people can't serve on juries because they have to rely on others visual accounts to determine a persons innocence or guilt. 
    This caused me to wonder about the accuracy of the eye report. 
     
     
    Imagine that you turn the corner and come face to face with the ugliest punk you ever met.  He slams you in the face with his beer bottle and grabs your fat wallet and heads down the road.  He is caught and his ratty behind is hauled before a judge and jury.  Your attorney tells of this pug ugly, towering, mean man of violence.  His attorney trots him         out looking like the Sunday School Superintendent, all humble, shy smile, clean shaven,. 
    "Your honor", he says softly.  "This gentleman came around the corner and ran right into me.  He screamed something and threw his wallet into my hands and ran down the road". 
    The jury looks at him, then at you, dressed in your cleanest faded jeans and tye dyed shirt, with your pony tail dangling down your back and your Hispanic face hanging out. 
    The Sunday School boy goes on in almost a whisper, "I was running after him when an officer of the law ordered me to halt, which I promptly did." 
     
    The jurors are swayed.  They see what they see.  A case of mistaken identity, or an attempt by this scruffy fellow to smear the reputation of an upstanding young Christian man. 
    But the blind juror, one Carl Jarvis, is not fooled by appearances.  He rises up and declares, "The defendant is guilty as sin!" 
    And how did he know this with such certainty?  Well, his super blind man hearing overheard the fellow whisper to his attorney, "Watch this con job pal." 
    Yes friends, Blind Super Hero does it again! 
    Tune in again tomorrow at this same time for another in the Adventures of a Blind American Hero. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    Fw: woman accused of stealing from vi man

    Subject: Re: woman accused of stealing from visually impaired man

    Many blind people reflect the stereotypical view that blind people are unable to make sound observations because of the loss of sight.  This belief is rammed down our throats from the cradle to the grave.  All of us, blind and sighted alike.  It is natural to find among our own organizations of blind people those who honestly believe that they should not be allowed to serve on a jury. 
    But if I concede this view, then I would have to back off our struggle for first class standing in our great nation.  I would have to say that blind people, because of the disadvantage enforced upon them by the lack of eyesight, cannot be equal to sighted people in any activity calling for sight.  In fact, how dare we vote.  We can't look old Straight Arrow in the eye and know that he will do right by us.  We can't see the nervous twitch at the corner of her mouth, telling us that she is putting one over on us. 
    Oh sure, all of this electronic accommodation is fine and dandy, as far as allowing us blind people to access public services.  But fancy googaws do not make us equal.  Can't we blind folk see that?  Of course not!  We're blind.  I tell you, it's amazing that we find the edge of the bed in the morning.  How do we keep from putting our shoes on backward and walking all over where we went yesterday. 
    What silly gooses we all are, us blind folk, pretending to believe that we can come and go in this Land like as if we were real members. 
    We might consider just getting us a Care Giver, except our government is cutting out that money, too. 
     
     
    Curious Carl

    instructions for blind man cleaning the kitty litter box

     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 9:34 AM
    Subject: Re: [acb-l] Disclosure

    instructions for blind man cleaning the kitty litter box. 
    1: use only scoopable kitty litter. 
    2: have dust pan and whisk broom. 
    3: have bar of soap and scrub brush by sink.
    4. reach into litter box and stir the sand with bare hand, lifting out clotted sand and lumps which most likely are poop. 
    5: Place these materials into dust pan and go to outside door. 
    6: Toss material from dust pan into the bushes. 
    7: use whisk broom to clean up around litter box and toss out the door. 
    8: hang up dust pan and whisk broom. 9: thoroughly scrub hands with soap, hot water and scrub brush before putting fingers in mouth. 
    10: Pour another cup of coffee and feed the cat. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    the new middle class

     
    With McDonald setting the new standard for Middle Class wages, Wal-Mart Associates will be looked upon with envy. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    Saturday, April 2, 2011

    education: How many classes does America have?

     
    Back in the 40's, when K through 8th grade was known as Grade School, our teachers actually looked us in the eye and said, "We live in a classless nation".  
    But in High 
    School our social studies books listed: Working Class, Middle Class, Upper Middle Class and Upper Class.  
    Sounded pretty classy to me.  
    But my dad took me out to the countryside and introduced me to another class, the Forgotten Class.  These were the migrant workers, the field hands, the transient    workers, the people who put the food on our tables.  They lived in something between a rabbit hutch and a chicken coop.  On another field trip, Dad took me to the mud flats in Seattle and introduced me to the unemployed men and women living in cardboard shacks in a place they called Hooverville. 
    It was not until I turned 30 and became totally blind that I came to know the Invisible Class, the blind and disabled folks. 
    Two Americas?  John Edwards didn't look hard enough. 
    Today, besides adding the Invisible and Forgotten Classes, I would put in one more, The Empire Builders, AKA Ruling Class.  These include the super human first class corporate Americans as well as the CEO's of the international mega corporations that buy and sell our politicians. 
    So, when it comes down to getting an education for blind people, the deck is really stacked against us.  Since we're invisible, we are going to have to make alot of noise to receive any attention. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    snits and fits

    I wrote this back around 2001 or 2002. 

     

      SNITS AND FITS

    by

    Carl Jarvis

    "Don't get in a snit," my mother used to say, when she'd see my face all puckered up in disappointment. But her favorite expression was, "Why don't you throw a fit and fall in it?" In some parts of the country folks have a, "Hissy Fit". But the best of all is when we throw a, "Snit-Fit". "Who, Me?" you ask. Yes you, and me. We all do some of it.

    For the past several months I've been involved in a couple of chat groups on E Voice, the telephones answer to E Mail. From all corners of America large numbers of blind people are using E Voice to network, exchange information, share dreams, develop new friendships, and yes, to throw snit-fits. A goodly amount of time is given over to venting our indignation and outrage.

    A woman caller, her voice still seething, relates that she and her sighted husband visited a local restaurant for dinner. Upon placing her order she requested that her food be cut up in the kitchen. The waitress loudly announced that neither the cook nor she had the time to do that. "That's what you have a husband for", she declared.

    The caller was outraged and promptly threw a fit and fell in it. How dare they refuse her request, and just who were they to tell her what she had a husband for. Then she ordered the waitress to comply. The ensuing standoff caused the woman to believe she was discriminated against and that the restaurant failed to provide her reasonable accommodation. She felt she should file a complaint under the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA).

    A young man grumbled into the phone that his Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor(VRC) refused to purchase him a Braille "N" Speak for use in note taking during college. "They don't care if I make it or not," he complained. "If I fail it won't be on my head."

    During a lengthy discussion on how we, as blind people, should respond to questions and comments by the sighted public, a very angry lady shouted, "I'm sick and tired of answering the same stupid questions over and over. Why do I always have to play the teacher? I don't go around asking Them stupid, nosey questions."

    And so it goes, story after story of blind people being abused, neglected or misunderstood. It's just one snit-fit after another. "If you think you have anything to grumble about, hey! listen to what happened to me..."

    Like I said, certainly there are times when all of us feel picked on, put upon or just plain pushed around. But what is troubling are the numbers; the vast multitude of voices spilling out their tales of woe and misery, and the small number of folks offering reasoned advice, counsel and instruction. What it tells me is that in our blind community nation-wide, there is a growing sense that we are disenfranchised, hopelessly cut off, with no recourse but to complain. And in our complaining we have no expectation of anything ever coming of it.

    When I was a boy someone said to me, "If you're going to be a man, act like one". I was probably having a snit at the time. Anyway, growing up to be a man turned out to be a life-time job. But I am where I am in the process by observing and copying those attributes that I desired to see in myself. It seems reasonable to me that if we blind people want to be First Class Citizens we ought to begin by playing the part. In my minds eye I hold up an image of me, as an equal participant in my community. I visualize how I want to conduct myself and how I see others responding to me. As time passes I shape this image, adding or improving, as my understanding and ability expand. Taking responsibility for my actions is probably as good a place to start as I know.

    When we have a snit-fit we are playing the role of the victim. "Poor me, I'm unloved and misunderstood." Sometimes it's very tempting, just to be out of control. "It's not my fault. They're the ones to blame." But if that's the part we choose to play, we cannot expect others to treat us as equals. Victims are to be pitied and given handouts. You don't ever hear anyone say, "Hey, my lucky day. I hired a very highly qualified victim to head up my sales staff"; or, "He was such a pathetic victim I just knew he'd make a wonderful husband".

    Can it be that in our culture the words "Blind" and Victim" are synonymous? If true, it would go a long way toward explaining some of our "knee jerk" response. A simple act of kindness, "Here dear, let me show you your seat", will be seen by a victim as condescending. "Get your hands off me! I don't need no help".

    The victim is always out of control. Relationships are always unequal. But if we remove the word "Victim" and insert "Different", making "Blind" and Different" synonymous, we create a more neutral relationship. "Here dear, let me show you your seat", becomes a gesture of kindness. "Why, thank you so very much."

    Establishing ourselves in the role of "Different" calls for building a new mental image of who we are. It is now possible to be "different, but equal". Being different carries with it considerable responsibility. We do find ourselves in the role of teacher. We are the experts in being different, therefore it is on our shoulders to educate others as to what exactly "different" means. We expect people not to know about us and we take great pleasure in explaining all about our differences. We are in the business of bringing our sighted partners up to speed in what blindness is all about.

    Of course, being human we reserve the right to throw a little snit-fit from time to time.

     

    Friday, April 1, 2011

    Elder Care: We can't win for losing.

    We can't win for losing.

     
    Hello to All Who Plan to Grow Old,
    My buddy confided in me that he had developed a fool proof system.  "I'll never put away enough to take care of my old age," he sighed "So I've worked out a sure fire method of beating the table."  Of course he meant the Tables at Vegas.  I tried to point out that those big fancy casinos were not built on the owners good looks, but he was absolutely certain about his system.  So my buddy drew out all the savings he had, somewhere around 5 thousand dollars, and off he went.  Another friend of mine worked 30 years for the Department of Services for the Blind, and pumped money into a deferred compensation account.  "Along with my state pension I'll bring home as much as if I were still working," she told me only weeks before retiring.  It was right then that all Ned broke loose and she lost over 100 thousand dollars.  Now that she is retired she has no way to recoup that money, so she is living a very scaled down life style.  And it will not get better as she gets older. 
    So much for depending on careful planning and saving.  We work with many clients who believe that they had salted enough into savings that they could live comfortably on the interest.  Then the bottom dropped out and they are now worrying about where they will move once they run out of money. 
    We are being conned.  On the one hand we are told that we must look out for our future and save for retirement.  But we live in a system that is designed to find ways of grabbing our hard earned dollars. 
    And what about my buddy who went off to Vegas?  He parried his 5 thousand dollars into a quarter of a million.  He's now living in Chili. 
     
    Curious Carl
     

    Political Correctness.What do we call ourselves and what does it mean?


    Political correctness: What do we call ourselves and what does it mean? 
     
    As your friendly Radical Agnostic Blind Man, I would remind us all that Party labels are meaningless in this world of confusion. 
    We should be exploring ideas, not waving badges.  Regardless of how we vote we need to know why.  And in that we will never agree with one another 100% of the time.  But respecting one another is the first big step toward building a new, better world. 
    My people were Working Class folk, My grandparents on both sides were Bible Belt, Abraham Lincoln Republicans.  But the label didn't matter.  They all understood the struggle they and their people were in.  They stood tall with the working men and women.  Oh sure, my grandpa Ludwig dreamed of coming up with some clever scheme and striking it rich.  But in the meantime he joined the Grange and gathered with other small businessmen in protest of the high handed treatment by the railroad barons.  And yes, my grandmother Jarvis voted for Hoover and honestly believed that the rich would trickle money down from the top to the poor.  But while she was waiting she began a neighborhood committee to clean up the garbage and keep an eye on the children playing stick ball in the alley. 
    We blind folks had best figure out who we are going to stand with.  Party lines aside, who is out to do us dirt?  Who is most likely to back us in a fight? 
    Frankly, I am full up to here with labels and tags.  And I'm fed up with name calling.  That is what will destroy us if we can't practice a little respect. 
     
    Respectfully yours Curious Carl
     
     

    the role of the blind in the right to organize

    Frank wrote, "you claim to be in support of the working class but rail against these few rare opportunities for the average working class slob(Prostitute) to take home a paycheck".
    That's an interesting point, Frank.  Where should blind people take a stand?  Should we show our support for the Working/Middle Class by endorsing off-shore drilling because it gives working stiffs a job?  Should we defend the right of Sweat Shops to hire children and work employees 14 hours per day in hopes that some of us blind workers might have jobs?  Perhaps we could eliminate unemployment compensation totally in order to help encourage unemployed workers into substandard jobs.  Or just eliminate the wage minimum  to allow employers to hire lots of workers. 
    Now regarding prostitution as an employment opportunity, I have no position on what consenting adults do, for fun or profit.  But what I think we blind people need to consider is whether we are allowing certain members of our society to be enslaved and forced into working conditions that we would never wish upon our own children, let alone upon ourselves.  If we cannot understand that we must stand for the right of citizens to gather and bargain collectively for better working conditions and decent pay, then we will find ourselves among the disenfranchised.  We will all be either standing on the street corners or selling our bodies.  That is the lot of the blind in empoverished nations. 
     
    Curious Carl