Friday, March 29, 2013

Unfit for Work: The startling riseof disabilityinAmerica

Subject: Unfit for Work: The startling rise of disabilityinAmerica

My dear Ann,
Thank you for saying it so succinctly.  We are, all of us, far more than what we do for a living.  We have had the "work ethic" hammered at us our entire lives, and so narrowly defined that we believe that we must hold down a paying job in order to be someone.  In a word, we allow our job to define us.  "I am a doctor", or, "I am a legal secretary".  Once the job title is laid on us, the person has been defined.  We all know what doctors are, and we know how efficient legal secretaries are. 
We can even cash in on someone else's job.  "I was having lunch with my close friend Doctor Jones the other day".  That tells you that I hob knob with pretty important people. 
Just as we blind people are identified by our Universal Blind Stereotype, so are other people identified by their job stereotypes. 
We actually seem to forget that we are each unique, complex human beings. 
Each of us might consider taking some time to think about who we are and then write a list.  We might even share that with folks on this list.  For certain, we will amaze ourselves by all of the pieces that go into making us who we are. 
Once we are free of being defined by what we do for a living, or what we are blocked from doing, we will be able to go forth into the world and bring meaning to our lives. 
On the day my dad retired, he said, "Now I can do all of the things that having to work kept me from doing".  And Dad became far busier than he'd ever been when he slaved away at his job. 
For those of us who desire a job, and all that a job brings, we will find that by becoming active, doing the things that bring meaning to us, at some point we will discover that employment doors open.  For those of us who feel life has passed us by, becoming active, offering our services in whatever places we can, we will discover that life has been waiting for us to come out of hiding. 
Let's rebel against being defined in this one demensional manner. 
We are more than what we do for a living.  Let's put that idea in its place.  We are no longer held prisoner by how others define us.  We shall define ourselves as whole, complex Beings.  We have something to offer the world, and ourselves.  We will hop out of bed each morning and begin the day by saying, "I shall find value and meaning in my life today."  Then go have your cup of coffee. 
 
Carl Jarvis
 

Fw: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD

Subject: Re: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD

In the far distant future a group of scientists will announce to all Mankind, "We have made a major break through!  We have communicated with a Force which informs us that It is the Being that brought this Universe into being". 
They will then give us the bad news.  "In an even more complex Universe, a young Being was playing with what we might call his chemistry set.  He mixed up several ingredients and, Poof!  our Universe was formed.  Since he had been told not to mix chemicals without parental guidance, he has been afraid to admit to his mistake.  But now things are out of hand and his parents are about to "put out the fire". 
The End. 
 
Carl Jarvis
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD

Miriam, 
I don't think that is the case…it's not that an agnostic does not have the "courage of his convictions, " it is that his "conviction" is that it is unknowable and impossible to prove   whether God exists or not. That is the primary component of agnosticism as I see it. 
Alice 
On Mar 27, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:

If you're right, you're an atheist, but you don't have the courage of your
convictions, just like most other people who call themselves agnostics.

Miriam

________________________________

From: blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org] On Behalf Of Carl Jarvis
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:30 AM
To: Blind Democracy Discussion List
Subject: Re: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD


Roger,  please never leave this list.  I am absolutely enchanted by your
explanations.  On the one hand, you cause me to think, an exercise we should
all be doing daily, and on the other hand, as you march step by step through
your logical explanations, I find myself grinning from ear to ear.  
You are about the most methodical thinker I've met in a long time.  
Nonetheless, I am going to continue to call myself an Agnostic.  At least
until I stumble upon a better word.  I place no percentages on whether God
exists in any form, or not.  I simply see no way of proving that which
cannot be measured.  
As I've said before, I believe that God had to be invented to answer
unanswerable questions that troubled Man.  
If I'm right, then there is no room for a 5% or 50% possibility of some sort
of God.  
Of course Believers everywhere will tell me that I'm wrong, that God does
exist, and that He created Man.  They are 100% positive that they are right.
But they have 0% proof.  
They would be better off trying to prove that the Easter Bunny exists.  At
least they can show the numbers of colored eggs that mysteriously appear
hidden on Easter Day.  Some might argue that the eggs were placed there by
Mom and Dad, while others would say that a Rabbit came around during the
night.  The young child can't prove either claim.  All they can see are the
eggs tucked in open hiding.  And a big basket of tooth decay sitting at the
end of their beds.  
When the children grow wiser, they figure out just what is going on.  
But our Universe is so vast and time is so eternal that we may never become
wise enough to figure it all out.  So until then, I say we can't prove the
unprovable.  

Carl Jarvis(the Agnostic)


----- Original Message -----
From: Roger Loran Bailey <mailto:rogerbailey81@aol.com>  
To: Blind Democracy Discussion List
<mailto:blind-democracy@octothorp.org>  
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:50 AM
Subject: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD

I am just getting on my computer for the first time today and I have
not
yet checked my email. Since I have an off line life it will be some
time
before I do check it too, but I have been thinking about Bob's post
about estimating a five percent probability of a god and I feel
compelled to add to my response to him. First, Let's look at how an
estimate of      five percent probability is established. To
estimate a
five percent probability it is necessary to run at least twenty
trials.
Since we are talking about looking for an event that would be the
existence of a creator of the universe then each trial would consist
of
examining a universe and either detecting a god or not detecting
one. If
you looked at twenty universes and found nineteen of them without a
god
and one with a god then you could estimate that the probability of
finding a god for the next one was five percent. Twenty is the
minimum
though. If you examined a hundred universes and found five gods or
if
you examined a thousand universes and found fifty gods then your
estimate of five percent would be a more and more accurate estimate
and
your degree of confidence in that estimate would increase. In order
to
speak of a probability, though, you must have not examined the
universe
that you are estimating a five percent probability of a god for. I
suppose that is this universe. So why do you not examine this
universe
using the same techniques that you used for the other minimum of
twenty
universes and then you could establish a certainty of either a god
or no
god for this universe? Then, have you examined any universes at all?
The
traditional definition of the word universe is everything. That
would
leave you with only one universe to examine at all. It means that
you
only get one trial and you either find one or you don't find one and
so
you either establish a one hundred percent probability or you
establish
a zero probability if your method is unambiguous. If you do not have
an
unambiguous method for detecting a god and you find no evidence of a
god
then you are back at a probability of one in infinity and that
amounts
to zero. Now, there are some cutting edge physicists who propose the

existence of parallel universes. They are really only revising the
definition of the word universe. They posit the existence of
something
that they call the multiverse that contains all of the universes. In
the
way they use those words they are only calling everything the
multiverse
and the word universe is demoted to something less than everything.
This
still remains only a proposal though. It is based on the behavior of

certain subatomic particles and a mathematical model. They have not
actually detected or examined another universe. Have you found a way
to
examine the other universes in the multiverse? If you have I would
be
interested in learning about your technique and you will be looking
at a
Nobel prize. Then, if you have found a way to examine the various
universes in the multiverse, what technique do you use to detect a
god  
for these universes? That would be worthy of a nobel prize too. If,
on
the other hand, you have examined only the universe in which you
reside
then what technique do you use to establish a that five percent
probability and why does it not establish the existence of a god one
way
or another? Is it that it is unreliable and you must run a trial on
the
same universe many times? Does it show the existence of a god only
one
time out of twenty times you use it. I suppose that there are many
unreliable techniques around that might produce results like that in
a
number of fields, but it would be very useful to look closely at the

technique and see if there is a way to refine it to make it more
reliable. The real question is, how do you determine that five
percent
probability of a god? I will tell you what I suspect and if I am
wrong
then I would be very interested in knowing what your method really
is
and that could also be a basis for a nobel prize. I suspect that you
are
just pulling the five percent figure out of thin air. If that is the

case then the figure has no more meaning than the implied
probability of
fifty percent that most agnostics advocate with actually giving
figures.
If that is the case also, then I would expect that you will try to
justify your figure with arguments like, I just feel it or I just
think
it or it just seems that way to me. In other words, you would be
using
the very same arguments that the proponents of a hundred percent
probability use and it would be just as valid, that is, not valid at

all. Unless you can produce a god detector or at least some way that
a
god detector would work, that is, a falsifiable theory of god that
can
be tested, you are right back to making an assertion with no
supporting
evidence and it will be only one of the set of assertions that have
no
support and that set numbers a total of infinity. That is, the
assertion
of a five percent probability of the existence of a god would have
exactly the probability of being true as the assertion that there is
a
hundred percent probability of a god, one in infinity.

_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy



_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy


_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy

Fw: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD

Alice and Miriam,
For sure I don't find any tangible support for the various forms of God as described in the many Holy Books.  Each is filled with hope and desire.  But there is no solid facts proving that one of these many Gods really exists. 
On the other hand, I have experienced some interesting phenomena.  Nothing within my experience explains them.  I am sure that there is an explanation, but it is currently out of my reach.  I also believe that our senses only provide us with a small window into all that is going on about us in this thing we call The Universe. 
Also, I am a Dreamer, with a capital D.  I love wandering off into the "What if" world. 
What if there really are Flying Saucers?  What if people have found a way to travel through Time?  What if there is a faster method of moving through space than at the speed of light?  What if Mary had a little Lamb?  Would that mean the the Ram is as horny as the shepherd? 
 
Carl Jarvis
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:47 PM
Subject: RE: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD

Alice,

I wasn't talking about agnostics as a group, just about Carl. From what he
said, it sounded like he was quite sure that there is no God, but he just
didn't want to say that. I realize that not everyone is in that place.

Miriam

________________________________

From: blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org] On Behalf Of Alice Dampman
Humel
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:20 AM
To: Blind Democracy Discussion List
Subject: Re: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD


Miriam, 
I don't think that is the case.it's not that an agnostic does not have the
"courage of his convictions, " it is that his "conviction" is that it is
unknowable and impossible to prove   whether God exists or not. That is the
primary component of agnosticism as I see it. 
Alice

On Mar 27, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:


If you're right, you're an atheist, but you don't have the courage
of your
convictions, just like most other people who call themselves
agnostics.

Miriam

________________________________

From: blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org] On Behalf Of Carl
Jarvis
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:30 AM
To: Blind Democracy Discussion List
Subject: Re: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD


Roger,  please never leave this list.  I am absolutely enchanted by
your
explanations.  On the one hand, you cause me to think, an exercise
we should
all be doing daily, and on the other hand, as you march step by step
through
your logical explanations, I find myself grinning from ear to ear. 
You are about the most methodical thinker I've met in a long time. 
Nonetheless, I am going to continue to call myself an Agnostic.  At
least
until I stumble upon a better word.  I place no percentages on
whether God
exists in any form, or not.  I simply see no way of proving that
which
cannot be measured. 
As I've said before, I believe that God had to be invented to answer
unanswerable questions that troubled Man. 
If I'm right, then there is no room for a 5% or 50% possibility of
some sort
of God. 
Of course Believers everywhere will tell me that I'm wrong, that God
does
exist, and that He created Man.  They are 100% positive that they
are right.
But they have 0% proof. 
They would be better off trying to prove that the Easter Bunny
exists.  At
least they can show the numbers of colored eggs that mysteriously
appear
hidden on Easter Day.  Some might argue that the eggs were placed
there by
Mom and Dad, while others would say that a Rabbit came around during
the
night.  The young child can't prove either claim.  All they can see
are the
eggs tucked in open hiding.  And a big basket of tooth decay sitting
at the
end of their beds. 
When the children grow wiser, they figure out just what is going on.

But our Universe is so vast and time is so eternal that we may never
become
wise enough to figure it all out.  So until then, I say we can't
prove the
unprovable. 

Carl Jarvis(the Agnostic)


----- Original Message -----
From: Roger Loran Bailey <mailto:rogerbailey81@aol.com
To: Blind Democracy Discussion List
<mailto:blind-democracy@octothorp.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:50 AM
Subject: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD

I am just getting on my computer for the first time today and I have
not
yet checked my email. Since I have an off line life it will be some
time
before I do check it too, but I have been thinking about Bob's post
about estimating a five percent probability of a god and I feel
compelled to add to my response to him. First, Let's look at how an
estimate of      five percent probability is established. To
estimate a
five percent probability it is necessary to run at least twenty
trials.
Since we are talking about looking for an event that would be the
existence of a creator of the universe then each trial would consist
of
examining a universe and either detecting a god or not detecting
one. If
you looked at twenty universes and found nineteen of them without a
god
and one with a god then you could estimate that the probability of
finding a god for the next one was five percent. Twenty is the
minimum
though. If you examined a hundred universes and found five gods or
if
you examined a thousand universes and found fifty gods then your
estimate of five percent would be a more and more accurate estimate
and
your degree of confidence in that estimate would increase. In order
to
speak of a probability, though, you must have not examined the
universe
that you are estimating a five percent probability of a god for. I
suppose that is this universe. So why do you not examine this
universe
using the same techniques that you used for the other minimum of
twenty
universes and then you could establish a certainty of either a god
or no
god for this universe? Then, have you examined any universes at all?
The
traditional definition of the word universe is everything. That
would
leave you with only one universe to examine at all. It means that
you
only get one trial and you either find one or you don't find one and
so
you either establish a one hundred percent probability or you
establish
a zero probability if your method is unambiguous. If you do not have
an
unambiguous method for detecting a god and you find no evidence of a
god
then you are back at a probability of one in infinity and that
amounts
to zero. Now, there are some cutting edge physicists who propose the

existence of parallel universes. They are really only revising the
definition of the word universe. They posit the existence of
something
that they call the multiverse that contains all of the universes. In
the
way they use those words they are only calling everything the
multiverse
and the word universe is demoted to something less than everything.
This
still remains only a proposal though. It is based on the behavior of

certain subatomic particles and a mathematical model. They have not
actually detected or examined another universe. Have you found a way
to
examine the other universes in the multiverse? If you have I would
be
interested in learning about your technique and you will be looking
at a
Nobel prize. Then, if you have found a way to examine the various
universes in the multiverse, what technique do you use to detect a
god 
for these universes? That would be worthy of a nobel prize too. If,
on
the other hand, you have examined only the universe in which you
reside
then what technique do you use to establish a that five percent
probability and why does it not establish the existence of a god one
way
or another? Is it that it is unreliable and you must run a trial on
the
same universe many times? Does it show the existence of a god only
one
time out of twenty times you use it. I suppose that there are many
unreliable techniques around that might produce results like that in
a
number of fields, but it would be very useful to look closely at the

technique and see if there is a way to refine it to make it more
reliable. The real question is, how do you determine that five
percent
probability of a god? I will tell you what I suspect and if I am
wrong
then I would be very interested in knowing what your method really
is
and that could also be a basis for a nobel prize. I suspect that you
are
just pulling the five percent figure out of thin air. If that is the

case then the figure has no more meaning than the implied
probability of
fifty percent that most agnostics advocate with actually giving
figures.
If that is the case also, then I would expect that you will try to
justify your figure with arguments like, I just feel it or I just
think
it or it just seems that way to me. In other words, you would be
using
the very same arguments that the proponents of a hundred percent
probability use and it would be just as valid, that is, not valid at

all. Unless you can produce a god detector or at least some way that
a
god detector would work, that is, a falsifiable theory of god that
can
be tested, you are right back to making an assertion with no
supporting
evidence and it will be only one of the set of assertions that have
no
support and that set numbers a total of infinity. That is, the
assertion
of a five percent probability of the existence of a god would have
exactly the probability of being true as the assertion that there is
a
hundred percent probability of a god, one in infinity.

_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy



_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy




_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy

Fw: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD


Hi Miriam,
So, you've found he out.  Houdini Jarvis. 
But seriously, when I find a definition that fits, I'll wear it eagerly. 
Trouble is, I used to declare myself to be a Patriotic American.  That definition turned out to be nothing but fiction and deliberate lies by the Ruling Class to keep my People in submission. 
Then I was a Born Again Christian.  Despite all that my father had preached to me, I embraced God Almighty, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit.  That defined me.  Until finally the fog and Bull Shit was washed from my eyes and I realized that Christianity, that All religions are merely another tool in the Master's tool box, just like Patriotism, put there to keep my People imprisoned. 
And so,
God, along with all religion, has been invented by Men for purposes of keeping their slaves in their place and giving them the Right to rule. 
But I can't define whatever it is that began this Universe, if indeed it ever had a beginning. 
I am no longer a Patriotic American.  I say that I am a Citizen of Planet Earth.  But I will not hold to that if something better comes along. 
I turned away from the National Federation of the Blind because Jernigan was playing God over his blind subjects.  I tried to work within the organization but was thrown out for my trouble.  Over the years I have defined myself as a Democrat, working hard within the Party as I had worked within the NFB, to about the same end.  I have been a Liberal, a Progressive and a Radical.  All words. 
At my heart I am simply a Free Spirit.  I can change my mind when new information comes along.  I do not have to apologize for that which I once believed to be the Truth.  While I lean toward Marx, and could well be at least a Socialist, I find that I don't really fit there, either. 
When I directed the Training Center, VRC's would bring a fat folder and place it in my hands saying that they wanted to refer this client to the Center.  "Better read that file.  You'll want to know some of the problems we're dealing with here", they would say. 
I would thank them and set a date for their client to enter our Program.  Then I'd lay the file to one side.  After their initial two week evaluation, where we would meet and get acquainted, I would then sit down and read the file.  It was usually pompous crap.  Words put down to show the importance of the VRC.  Not always.  We did have some human beings working within the Department, but many of our so called professionals were simply inflated hot air balloons.  If I'd read their opinions first, I would have been prejudiced against the client.  I would always be seeing that person through the fat folder. 
Just as we blind people are always seen through that Universal Blind Stereotype. 
Call me what you will, it cannot change the fact that I know who I am.  And I will never again be bound by the rules and pontifications of others.  I will listen, I will learn, as I have learned from you and Roger, and Sylvie, and Alice, and Bob, and Joe, and so many others.  I will alter my thinking, but it will always be mine to do. 
If to you that makes me an escape artist, so be it. 
 
Carl Houdini Jarvis, The Great!!!
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 6:52 PM
Subject: RE: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD

Carl, the man who doesn't want to be pinned down or defined, the escape
artist.

Miriam

________________________________

From: blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org] On Behalf Of Carl Jarvis
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 8:39 PM
To: Blind Democracy Discussion List
Subject: Re: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD


Alice and Miriam,
For sure I don't find any tangible support for the various forms of God as
described in the many Holy Books.  Each is filled with hope and desire.  But
there is no solid facts proving that one of these many Gods really exists. 
On the other hand, I have experienced some interesting phenomena.  Nothing
within my experience explains them.  I am sure that there is an explanation,
but it is currently out of my reach.  I also believe that our senses only
provide us with a small window into all that is going on about us in this
thing we call The Universe. 
Also, I am a Dreamer, with a capital D.  I love wandering off into the "What
if" world. 
What if there really are Flying Saucers?  What if people have found a way to
travel through Time?  What if there is a faster method of moving through
space than at the speed of light?  What if Mary had a little Lamb?  Would
that mean the the Ram is as horny as the shepherd? 
 
Carl Jarvis
 
 
----- Original Message -----

From: Miriam Vieni <mailto:miriamvieni@optonline.net
To: 'Blind Democracy Discussion List'
<mailto:blind-democracy@octothorp.org
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:47 PM
Subject: RE: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD

Alice,

I wasn't talking about agnostics as a group, just about Carl. From
what he
said, it sounded like he was quite sure that there is no God, but he
just
didn't want to say that. I realize that not everyone is in that
place.

Miriam

________________________________

From: blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org] On Behalf Of Alice
Dampman
Humel
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:20 AM
To: Blind Democracy Discussion List
Subject: Re: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD


Miriam, 
I don't think that is the case.it's not that an agnostic does not
have the
"courage of his convictions, " it is that his "conviction" is that
it is
unknowable and impossible to prove   whether God exists or not. That
is the
primary component of agnosticism as I see it. 
Alice

On Mar 27, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Miriam Vieni
<miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:


If you're right, you're an atheist, but you don't have the courage
of your
convictions, just like most other people who call themselves
agnostics.

Miriam

________________________________

From: blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounces@octothorp.org] On Behalf Of Carl
Jarvis
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:30 AM
To: Blind Democracy Discussion List
Subject: Re: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD


Roger,  please never leave this list.  I am absolutely enchanted by
your
explanations.  On the one hand, you cause me to think, an exercise
we should
all be doing daily, and on the other hand, as you march step by step
through
your logical explanations, I find myself grinning from ear to ear. 
You are about the most methodical thinker I've met in a long time. 
Nonetheless, I am going to continue to call myself an Agnostic.  At
least
until I stumble upon a better word.  I place no percentages on
whether God
exists in any form, or not.  I simply see no way of proving that
which
cannot be measured. 
As I've said before, I believe that God had to be invented to answer
unanswerable questions that troubled Man. 
If I'm right, then there is no room for a 5% or 50% possibility of
some sort
of God. 
Of course Believers everywhere will tell me that I'm wrong, that God
does
exist, and that He created Man.  They are 100% positive that they
are right.
But they have 0% proof. 
They would be better off trying to prove that the Easter Bunny
exists.  At
least they can show the numbers of colored eggs that mysteriously
appear
hidden on Easter Day.  Some might argue that the eggs were placed
there by
Mom and Dad, while others would say that a Rabbit came around during
the
night.  The young child can't prove either claim.  All they can see
are the
eggs tucked in open hiding.  And a big basket of tooth decay sitting
at the
end of their beds. 
When the children grow wiser, they figure out just what is going on.

But our Universe is so vast and time is so eternal that we may never
become
wise enough to figure it all out.  So until then, I say we can't
prove the
unprovable. 

Carl Jarvis(the Agnostic)


----- Original Message -----
From: Roger Loran Bailey <mailto:rogerbailey81@aol.com
To: Blind Democracy Discussion List
<mailto:blind-democracy@octothorp.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:50 AM
Subject: THE FIVE PERCENT GOD

I am just getting on my computer for the first time today and I have
not
yet checked my email. Since I have an off line life it will be some
time
before I do check it too, but I have been thinking about Bob's post
about estimating a five percent probability of a god and I feel
compelled to add to my response to him. First, Let's look at how an
estimate of      five percent probability is established. To
estimate a
five percent probability it is necessary to run at least twenty
trials.
Since we are talking about looking for an event that would be the
existence of a creator of the universe then each trial would consist
of
examining a universe and either detecting a god or not detecting
one. If
you looked at twenty universes and found nineteen of them without a
god
and one with a god then you could estimate that the probability of
finding a god for the next one was five percent. Twenty is the
minimum
though. If you examined a hundred universes and found five gods or
if
you examined a thousand universes and found fifty gods then your
estimate of five percent would be a more and more accurate estimate
and
your degree of confidence in that estimate would increase. In order
to
speak of a probability, though, you must have not examined the
universe
that you are estimating a five percent probability of a god for. I
suppose that is this universe. So why do you not examine this
universe
using the same techniques that you used for the other minimum of
twenty
universes and then you could establish a certainty of either a god
or no
god for this universe? Then, have you examined any universes at all?
The
traditional definition of the word universe is everything. That
would
leave you with only one universe to examine at all. It means that
you
only get one trial and you either find one or you don't find one and
so
you either establish a one hundred percent probability or you
establish
a zero probability if your method is unambiguous. If you do not have
an
unambiguous method for detecting a god and you find no evidence of a
god
then you are back at a probability of one in infinity and that
amounts
to zero. Now, there are some cutting edge physicists who propose the

existence of parallel universes. They are really only revising the
definition of the word universe. They posit the existence of
something
that they call the multiverse that contains all of the universes. In
the
way they use those words they are only calling everything the
multiverse
and the word universe is demoted to something less than everything.
This
still remains only a proposal though. It is based on the behavior of

certain subatomic particles and a mathematical model. They have not
actually detected or examined another universe. Have you found a way
to
examine the other universes in the multiverse? If you have I would
be
interested in learning about your technique and you will be looking
at a
Nobel prize. Then, if you have found a way to examine the various
universes in the multiverse, what technique do you use to detect a
god 
for these universes? That would be worthy of a nobel prize too. If,
on
the other hand, you have examined only the universe in which you
reside
then what technique do you use to establish a that five percent
probability and why does it not establish the existence of a god one
way
or another? Is it that it is unreliable and you must run a trial on
the
same universe many times? Does it show the existence of a god only
one
time out of twenty times you use it. I suppose that there are many
unreliable techniques around that might produce results like that in
a
number of fields, but it would be very useful to look closely at the

technique and see if there is a way to refine it to make it more
reliable. The real question is, how do you determine that five
percent
probability of a god? I will tell you what I suspect and if I am
wrong
then I would be very interested in knowing what your method really
is
and that could also be a basis for a nobel prize. I suspect that you
are
just pulling the five percent figure out of thin air. If that is the

case then the figure has no more meaning than the implied
probability of
fifty percent that most agnostics advocate with actually giving
figures.
If that is the case also, then I would expect that you will try to
justify your figure with arguments like, I just feel it or I just
think
it or it just seems that way to me. In other words, you would be
using
the very same arguments that the proponents of a hundred percent
probability use and it would be just as valid, that is, not valid at

all. Unless you can produce a god detector or at least some way that
a
god detector would work, that is, a falsifiable theory of god that
can
be tested, you are right back to making an assertion with no
supporting
evidence and it will be only one of the set of assertions that have
no
support and that set numbers a total of infinity. That is, the
assertion
of a five percent probability of the existence of a god would have
exactly the probability of being true as the assertion that there is
a
hundred percent probability of a god, one in infinity.

_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy



_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy




_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy


_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

There is still hope

    There is still hope. 
 
Yesterday Cathy and I chatted with a Third Grade Class at the Chimacum elementary school.  That's a small community near Port Townsend. 
The class is studying Helen Keller and Louis Braille, as part of their Disability Awareness class. 
What a refreshing experience!  The class consists of 24 8 year olds, a very charming and energetic teacher named Mary, and an older woman working as a teacher's aid. 
Bright, inquisitive, eager young minds.  Very polite and well mannered.  Cathy and I talked with them for a very few minutes, setting the tone, and then just let the questions and conversation take us where it would.  We brought just enough "gadgets" to demonstrate how blind people adapt their lack of sight to function in a world made for sight. 
Of course there were the usual questions that young people always ask, "How did you get blind?", "Do you see nothing but black?", "How do you know when it's morning?" 
But these children also got into questioning how it felt to be blind.  I had begun our conversation by asking, "Will the blind people in the room please clap your hands so I'll know where you are?" 
Of course I was the only one who clapped.  "This is how it is for most of us blind people," I told them.  "We are usually the only blind person in the room." 
A girl asked, "How does that make you feel?  Do you feel left out, being the only blind person in the room?" 
"I don't feel left out now," I told her, "But of course there are times when being blind does set me apart.  Think of how you'd feel if you were the only girl in a room full of boys." 
"Ugh!", she declared. 
"But mostly it would be okay, wouldn't it?" I suggested. 
"No way!" she said firmly. 
Alright, we had better move on. 
When the 45 minutes were over we had just begun.  But the children had to head for their computer class.  The teacher said they had volunteers waiting to work with the children in small groups. 
But they all insisted that we would agree to come back when they had finished their class on disabilities, and they would have more questions. 
And then we stood up to leave and a crowd of happy children all trouped up to give both of us big hugs. 
As we clambered back into our truck I said to Cathy, "There is our future.  And I think it's in good hands." 
 
Carl Jarvis
 
 

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

US Congress prepares new,trade sanctions against Iran

Subject: Re: US Congress prepares new,trade sanctions against Iran

Did you ever notice that God anoints the guy with the biggest bomb?
First of all, who declared the United States the world's Enforcer? 
Secondly, as Peace keepers, the US is doing about as good a job as they are doing at home with their War on Drugs, or War on Poverty. 
Thirdly, isn't it a fact that the ones most hurt by sanctions are the very poor, the elderly, the children and the disabled? 
Good going US, at least you are consistent, doing to others exactly what you do to your own. 
 
Carl Jarvis
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 5:28 PM
Subject: US Congress prepares new,trade sanctions against Iran

http://www.themilitant.com/2013/7710/771054.html
The Militant - March 18, 2013 -- US Congress prepares new trade
sanctions against Iran
The Militant (logo)

Vol. 77/No. 10 March 18, 2013


US Congress prepares new
trade sanctions against Iran

BY LOUIS MARTIN
In a display of bipartisan unity, Congress is preparing to further
expand U.S. sanctions against Iran to what would amount to "a commercial
trade embargo
if fully carried out," according to the New York Times.

For years, Washington has waged a campaign to force Tehran to abandon
its program of nuclear research, which the U.S. government and its
allies say is
geared toward making nuclear weapons. The Iranian government maintains
its program is for power generation and medical purposes.

Republican Rep. Ed Royce from California, who is chairman of the House
Foreign Affairs Committee, and Rep. Eliot Engel from New York, the
committee's ranking
Democrat, jointly introduced legislation Feb. 27 "intended to prevent
Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons ability," the Times reported.

The measure would expand the list of blacklisted Iranian companies to
all those under government management and potentially freeze Iran's
foreign bank
assets held in euros, one of its few remaining ways to repatriate
profits from foreign trade.

Two days later, Senators Lindsey Graham, a Republican, and Democrat
Roberto Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
introduced a
resolution stating, "The United States government should stand with
Israel and provide diplomatic, military and economic support" in the
event Tel Aviv
takes military action against Iran. President Barack Obama is expected
to visit Israel for the first time as president later this month.

At the same time, talks on Iran's nuclear program resumed Feb. 26-27
between Tehran and representatives of the U.N. Security Council—China,
France, Russia,
the U.K. and the U.S.—and Germany. Held in Almaty, Kazakhstan, Central
Asia, these were the first such talks since June last year.

"Threatening Iran is not going to work," Mohammad Khazaee, Iran's
ambassador to the U.N., told CNN March 3. "As soon as you say, 'We are
ready to talk
to you and work with you, but at the same time, we punish you and put
pressure on you and your people'—Iran cannot accept that."

Meanwhile, another set of sanctions adopted in July by Congress kicked
in Feb. 6, blocking Iran from direct access to revenue from oil sales to
nine countries.
Instead, it can only receive credit to purchase goods from those
countries, which include Iran's biggest oil customers, among them China,
India and Turkey.
The measures add to earlier sanctions that have increasingly forced Iran
into oil-for-goods barter deals with its trading partners.

According to a New York Times Feb. 26 report, the six government
representatives at the Almaty talks were planning to offer Iran an
easing of sanctions
on trade in precious metals in exchange for Tehran's agreement to stop
enrichment of uranium to 20 percent purity, shut down its Fordo
underground enrichment
facility, and ship abroad its stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium
for conversion to nuclear fuel.

Sanctions on Iran's trade in gold and other precious metals were signed
into law by President Barack Obama at the beginning of January, aimed at
preventing
countries from trading these metals for Iranian oil and gas.

Tehran has insisted that before any agreement could be reached, all
sanctions be lifted and Iran's "right to enrich uranium" be recognized
as a signatory
of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.

Workers resist economic squeeze

Years of imperialist sanctions appear to have their intended effects,
which include not only damaging Iran's economy, but imposing hardship on
working
people there and feeding factional tensions among the country's rulers.

According to a Feb. 24 Financial Times article, Iran's national
currency, the rial, fell by about 60 percent last year under the
combined impact of U.S.
and European Union sanctions.

Inflation is officially at 28.7 percent and youth unemployment at 28.6
percent. In the last two weeks of January, prices of chicken, eggs and
rice have
increased 23 percent, 30 percent and 37 percent respectively.

Bosses in Iran are taking aim at working people, who in some cases are
fighting back.

For example, the Free Labor Union of Iran website and other dispatches
reported that the 1,200 workers at the Safa Pipe Rolling factory in
Saveh ended
a five-day strike Feb. 7 after the employer finally paid their September
wages. This was the second strike by these workers in two months over
outstanding
wages.

The Iranian parliament approved a plan Feb. 24 to subsidize basic food
staples like rice, vegetable oil and meat, the Financial Times reported.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's supporters in parliament voted against
the food subsidy plan, the Times said, claiming "there was no economic
crisis in
Iran." Politicians backing Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who pressed for the
subsidies, have been blaming Iran's economic problems on Ahmadinejad's
policies.
Ahmadinejad's second and final term will end with elections in June.

Related articles:
Oppose imperialist squeeze on Iran!



Front page (for this issue)
|
Home
|
Text-version home



_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy

it's class based!

Subject: Re: it's class based!

So the solution here is a simple one.  Lower the standard of living and the average life expectancy will drop, thus reducing the need to increase funding for Medicare, as well as raising the eligibility age for social security.  And a spin-off benefit will be a reduction in expensive nursing and assisted living care. 
 
Carl Jarvis
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 6:14 AM
Subject: it's class based!

Long life wealth go together, study says . Michael A. Fletcher. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, Fla. - This prosperous community is the picture of the good and ever

longer life - just what policymakers have in mind when they say that raising the eligibility age for Social Security and Medicare is a fair way to rein

in the nation's troublesome debt. The county's plentiful and well-tended golf courses teem with youthful-looking retirees. The same is true on the county's

41 miles of Atlantic Ocean beaches, abundant tennis courts and extensive network of biking and hiking trails. The healthy lifestyles pay off. Women here

can expect to live to be nearly 83, four years longer than they did just two decades earlier, according to research at the University of Washington. Male

life expectancy is more than 78 years, six years longer than two decades ago. But in neighboring Putnam County, life is neither as idyllic nor as long.

Incomes and housing values are about half what they are in St. Johns. And life expectancy in Putnam has barely budged since 1989, rising less than a year

for women to just over 78. Meanwhile, it has crept up by a year and a half for men, who can expect to live to be just over 71, seven years less than the

men living a few miles away in St. Johns. The widening gap in life expectancy between these two adjacent Florida counties reflects perhaps the starkest

outcome of the nation's growing economic inequality: Even as the nation's life expectancy has marched steadily upward, reaching 78.5 years in 2009, a growing

body of research shows that those gains are going mostly to those at the upper end of the income ladder. The tightening economic connection to longevity

has profound implications for the simmering debate about trimming the nation's entitlement programs. Citing rising life expectancy, influential voices

including the Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction commission, the Business Roundtable and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have argued that it makes sense

to raise the eligibility age for Social Security and Medicare. But raising the eligibility ages - currently 65 for Medicare and moving toward 67 for full

Social Security benefits - would mean fewer benefits for lower-income workers, who typically die younger than those who make more. People who are shorter-lived

tend to make less, which means that if you raise the retirement age, low-income populations would be subsidizing the lives of higher-income people," said

Maya Rockeymoore, president and chief executive of Global Policy Solutions, a public policy consultancy. Whenever I hear a policymaker say people are living

longer as a justification for raising the retirement age, I immediately think they don't understand the research or, worse, they are willfully ignoring

what the data say. A Social Security Administration study several years ago found that the life expectancy of male workers retiring at 65 had risen six

years in the top half of the income distribution but only 1.3 years in the bottom half over the previous three decades. In 1980, life expectancy at birth

was 2.8 years longer for the highest socioeconomic group defined in a research study than the lowest, according to a report by the Congressional Budget

Office. By 2000, the gap had grown to 4.5 years. Life expectancy has increased mainly among the privileged class," said Monique Morrissey, an economist

who focuses on retirement issues at the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal-leaning research organization. For many people, raising the retirement age

would amount to a significant benefit cut. Advocates of raising the retirement age say only a relative handful of older workers would be harmed and that

the vulnerable could be protected by enacting hardship exemptions. Meanwhile, they say, with a wave of baby boomers moving toward retirement and health-care

costs always on the rise, the retirement programs are sustainable only if people are willing to pay higher taxes or accept fewer benefits. Overall, life

expectancy has improved substantially since the first Social Security payments were issued in 1940. Then, a man who made it to 65 could expect to live

12.7 years, compared with 18.6 years in 2010. A woman who turned 65 in 2010 could expect to live 20.7 more years, compared with 14.7 in 1940. That trend

helped persuade lawmakers in 1983 to slowly move the age people could receive full Social Security benefits from 65 to 67, a change that will be complete

in 2027. Now, as the cost of providing old-age benefits has emerged as the key driver of the nation's long-term budget deficit, there is increasing pressure

to again raise the retirement age - this time for both Medicare and Social Security. But given the widening differences in life expectancy for people on

opposite ends of the income scale, "that would mean a benefit cut that falls heaviest on people who generally are most reliant on Social Security for their

retirement income. It is totally class-based," said Eric Kingson, a Syracuse University professor and co-chair of Social Security Works, a coalition opposed

to reducing old-age benefits. The gap in life expectancy has widened as the country's economic life has grown more bifurcated. The high-income Washington

region includes two counties with some of the nation's longest life expectancies. In Montgomery County, life expectancy was 81.4 years for men and 85 years

for women in 2009. In Fairfax County, it was slightly lower - 81.3 years for men and 84.1 years for women. In the District, where 18.7 percent of the population

lives in poverty, life expectancy was 72.6 years for men and 79.6 for women in 2009. Not only is life expectancy diverging by income level, but now some

demographic groups - particularly low-income white women - are losing ground. A study published last week in the journal Health Affairs said that in almost

half of the nation's counties, women younger than 75 are dying at rates higher than before. The counties where women's life expectancy is declining typically

are in the rural South and West, the report said. Putnam County shares many of those characteristics. Forests, picturesque lakes and the beautiful St.

Johns River, the longest in Florida, dot the area. But amid that rural splendor there are few good jobs and, officials said, little access to medical care.

Even people who have health insurance often struggle to make it to doctor appointments, complicating efforts to manage chronic diseases. I see a lot of

people with uncontrolled diabetes or who haven't had their high blood pressure treated in a year or more," said Terrence Soldo, medical director for St.

Vincent's Mobile Health, which runs regular medical clinics in Putnam. There are health-care deserts out here.. . . There is a lack of access because there

are not enough doctors around. County health rankings by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation show that there is one primary care physician for every 2,623

residents in the county. One county east in St. Johns, there are more than double the ratio of family doctors, one for every 1,067. The problem goes beyond

access. In St. Johns, residents are more likely to seek out information to bolster their health. Even when St. Johns residents do not search for health

information, medical professionals say they are at minimum more likely to follow doctors' orders. Being more affluent and educated, you are likely to have

better access to information and you are also more likely to want it," said Joe Gordy, chief executive of Flagler Hospital, which is in St. Johns County.

Jeff Feller, chief executive of WellFlorida Council, a state-designated regional health-care nonprofit organization, described Putnam as part of "the Southern

disease belt. With 38 percent of its children in poverty and just 31 percent of its population with even some college education, there is little wonder

why more than a fifth of Putnam residents are in poor or fair health, double the rate in St. Johns. Adults also smoke at nearly double the rate they do

in St. Johns, and they are far more likely to be obese and far less likely to be physically active, according to rankings developed by the Robert Wood

Johnson Foundation. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out," Feller said. You just have to look at the socioeconomic and demographic differences

- unemployment, education levels, income between the two counties - to understand what is going on. This is fueled by poor economics and a lack of access

to health insurance and health coverage. Those differences are compounded by the resource gap separating the counties. With a healthy tax base that is

recovering from the recession, St. Johns officials are in a better position than those in Putnam to address problems. When St. Johns officials learned

of a change in the infant mortality rate, they quickly joined forces with local nonprofit groups to get information out encouraging prenatal care. Cyndi

Stevenson, a member of the St. Johns County commission, said the county has formed similar partnerships to tackle a wide range of problems. The result

is a county ranked as one of the healthiest places in Florida. Putnam, meanwhile, is ranked near the bottom. She added that the county's relative wealth

helps make life not only better for its residents, but also longer. A good economy does a lot for a family," Stevenson said. fletcherm@washpost.com

 


_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy

Thinking of you on your 21st birthday

Subject: Thinking of you on your 21st birthday
 
Dear Josh,
 
Cathy and I send you our love and best wishes for good things to happen on this, your 21st birthday. 
Honest, we bought a card, addressed an envelope, put it on the mail table right there by the front door to take it to the post office and get the right postage on it, and then went off and forgot it.  Not you, we never forgot you.  I know that we didn't, because on two separate days as we headed down the road to work with clients, I suddenly sat up and said, "Did you bring Josh's birthday card?" 
 
"Me?" Cathy shot back, "You're in charge of the mail." 
End of conversation.  So I guess we blame old grandpa's failing mind...now what was I saying?...
So I know that you're not given to long, wordy messages, but when you have a few minutes we'd enjoy hearing your impressions of Germany and surrounding country...that which you can see from behind the fences.  I suppose at some point in time they will let you take leave off-base and you'll have a chance to do some sight seeing. 
I think you're the first one in our immediate family to trod upon the sacred land of the old Franks.  My Great, Great, Great Grandfather...maybe I missed one Great, anyway, he came from Germany.  His name was John Ludwig.  Born in 1735, he came to America at the ripe old age of 17, in 1752.  He became a sea captain during the Revolutionary War and later moved inland to Illinois.  My grandpa Ludwig was born there, near the Erie Canal, and then his family moved to Iowa where he grew up. 
In 1901 at the same age that you are today, Grandpa hopped a train and headed West.  He arrived in Seattle and bought a bicycle and peddled up the railroad right of way to the town of Snohomish, where his cousin lived.  He then went to Spokane where he became a Nurseryman for an orchard rancher.   
In late 1910 he met Blanche Alexander and courted the sox off her, marrying her in March of 1911.  My mother was their first born, coming along on Christmas Day, in 1911. 
Of course you know the rest.  Mother and dad had me, I married your grandma and one day we found your mother out in the potato patch. 
But to finish my story about Grandpa Ludwig. 
As I said, in 1901 he peddled up to Snohomish and visited his cousin and her husband.  In 1951, exactly 50 years later, Grandpa hopped a train and came over to Seattle.  We all piled into the old Hudson and drove to Snohomish.  Grandpa clambered out of the car and walked up to the door that he'd knocked on 50 years earlier.  The two of them had not seen one another in all those years.  He knocked, and a sweet looking old lady with pure white hair opened the door and shrieked, "Earl!"  That was Grandpa's name.  They knew one another instantly, and danced around on the porch, hugging and laughing while we all sat wondering if we'd been forgotten. 
The funny thing is, I remember watching Grandpa and his cousin hugging and jumping around on the porch, but I can't remember anything about the day, other than the drive to Snohomish.  It's like looking through a keyhole into a room and only seeing what is straight in front, even though you know there's so much more to see. 
Ah, but I am wandering.  The point of all of this ramble is to let you know that you are loved and thought of on this very important day. 
And think of it, you may be the first relative to set foot on German soil in over 260 years.  Hmm...wonder if it's changed much. 
We love you and wish you the best. 
 
Grandpa and Cathy
xoxoxoxo
 
***

 "We do not inherit the land from
our ancestors, we borrow it from our children."

care and feeding of the Empire


When wondering what the future holds for Americans, remember that the Empire must expand.  Empires, by their very nature, cannot stand still.  They either expand or contract and die.  And in either way, the Empire sucks up everything in sight in a desperate attempt to survive. 
Finally, we 98% are *Not part of the Empire.  We are its fodder.  Carl Jarvis
 
From today's LUV News:
 
THE AUSTERITY SCAM


 

Two stories out this morning show that the proposed sequester/austerity programs being discussed by President Obama and Congress are unnecessary and a scam. 

The first is a piece is about the Empire expanding its operations in the Pacific, identified as "rebalancing."  We appear to have unlimited resources for expansion of Empire, even as cutting social programs is being discussed to apply to the peasants. This is about the "defense" of the 1% at the expense of the 99%, as real defense is abandoned.

The second is a piece from Common Dreams showing that there is money aplenty hiding from the budget even as Obama and Boehner are telling us we are in dire straits, beginning, "At a time of record corporate profits, U.S. 'corporate tax dodgers' are parking more of their profits offshore, taking advantage of tax loopholes to shield billions from U.S. taxes."  Do we really need to make the poor and elderly suffer to protect this abomination?


 
 
***    

 "We do not inherit the land from
our ancestors, we borrow it from our children."

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Snake man lobbies against Washington state bill

I like to think that I'm a pretty tolerent guy, but this one got to me. 
"Hey! Your Service Snake just swallowed my Seeing Eye Frog!"
Carl Jarvis
 
 
From The Associated Press
OLYMPIA, Wash. —

A man from Shelton who uses a snake as a service animal traveled to Olympia on Tuesday to lobby against a bill that would narrow the definition of an aid animal.

The measure opposed by Daniel Green would change the state law on service animals to meet federal standards, narrowing the definition to only dogs and miniature horses.

But Green says he's trained his snake to hug him when it feels an epileptic seizure coming to avoid injuries.

At a Senate Labor committee hearing, Green said the new law would preclude him from going to many places. Green kept his snake in a bag during the hearing, but did take it out outside the building.

Restaurants and other retailers have backed the measure, saying that allowing any animal to be considered a service animal creates health hazards and other problems to their customers.

The Blind Man Who Taught Himself to See (long)


The Blind Man Who Taught Himself To See
  Men's Journal Posted By MJ On March 1, 2011 at 7:34 pm In
Features
  Daniel Kish has been sightless since he was a year old.  Yet he
can mountain bike.  And navigate the wilderness alone.  And
recognize a building as far away as 1,000 feet.  How? The same
way bats can see in the dark.
  by Michael Finkel
photograph by Steve Pyke
  The first thing Daniel Kish does, when I pull up to his tidy
gray bungalow in Long Beach, California, is make fun of my
driving.  "You're going to leave it that far from the curb?" he
asks.  He's standing on his stoop, a good 10 paces from my car. 
I glance behind me as I walk up to him.  I am, indeed, parked
about a foot and a half from the curb.
  The second thing Kish does, in his living room a few minutes
later, is remove his prosthetic eyeballs.  He does this casually,
like a person taking off a smudged pair of glasses.  The
prosthetics are thin convex shells, made of acrylic plastic, with
light brown irises.  A couple of times a day they need to be
cleaned.  "They get gummy," he explains.  Behind them is mostly
scar tissue.  He wipes them gently with a white cloth and places
them back in.
  Kish was born with an aggressive form of cancer called
retinoblastoma, which attacks the retinas.  To save his life,
both of his eyes were removed by the time he was 13 months old. 
Since his infancy -- Kish is now 44 -- he has been adapting to
his blindness in such remarkable ways that some people have
wondered if he's playing a grand practical joke.  But Kish, I can
confirm, is completely blind.
  He knew my car was poorly parked because he produced a brief,
sharp click with his tongue.  The sound waves he created traveled
at a speed of more than 1,000 feet per second, bounced off every
object around him, and returned to his ears at the same rate,
though vastly decreased in volume.
  But not silent.  Kish has trained himself to hear these slight
echoes and to interpret their meaning.  Standing on his front
stoop, he could visualize, with an extraordinary degree of
precision, the two pine trees on his front lawn, the curb at the
edge of his street, and finally, a bit too far from that curb, my
rental car.  Kish has given a name to what he does -- he calls it
"FlashSonar" -- but it's more commonly known by its scientific
term, echolocation.
  Bats, of course, use echolocation.  Beluga whales too 
Dolphins.  And Daniel Kish.  He is so accomplished at
echolocation that he's able to pedal his mountain bike through
streets heavy with traffic and on precipitous dirt trails.  He
climbs trees.  He camps out, by himself, deep in the wilderness. 
He's lived for weeks at a time in a tiny cabin a two-mile hike
from the nearest road.  He travels around the globe.  He's a
skilled cook, an avid swimmer, a fluid dance partner. 
Essentially, though in a way that is unfamiliar to nearly any
other human being, Kish can see.
  This is not enough for him.  Kish is seeking -- despite a lack
of support from every mainstream blind organization in America --
nothing less than a profound reordering of the way the world
views blind people, and the way blind people view the world. 
He's tired of being told that the blind are best served by
staying close to home, sticking only to memorized routes, and
depending on the unreliable benevolence of the sighted to do
anything beyond the most routine of tasks.
  Kish preaches complete and unfettered independence, even if the
result produces the occasional bloody gash or broken bone.  (He
once fractured the heel of his left foot after leaping from a
rock and has broken a couple of teeth.) He's regarded by some in
the blind community with deep veneration.  Others, like a
commenter on the National Federation of the Blind's listserv,
consider him "disgraceful" for promoting behavior such as tongue
clicking that could be seen as off-putting and abnormal.
  Kish and a handful of coworkers run a nonprofit organization
called World Access for the Blind, headquartered in Kish's home. 
World Access offers training on how to gracefully interact with
one's environment, using echolocation as a primary tool.  So far,
in the decade it has existed, the organization has introduced
more than 500 students to echolocation.  Kish is not the first
blind person to use echolocation, but he's the only one to
meticulously document it, to break it down into its component
parts, and to figure out how to teach it.  His dream is to help
all sight-impaired people see the world as clearly as he does.
  It begins with the lid of a pot.  "Stand up," Kish instructs,
then guides me to the center of his living room and ties a
blindfold around my head, while mentioning, in a schoolteachery
tone, that I should not for an instant think that wearing a
blindfold represents the experience of being blind.  A blindfold
almost always causes someone who can see to feel frightened,
confused, and disoriented.  Kish is none of these things.
  "Now wait here," he says.  Though he was born and raised in
Southern California, Kish has an odd, almost foreign-sounding
accent -- a bouillabaisse of Canadian, British, and relaxed Los
Angeleno.  He says it's a result of his many travels.  "I'm a
natural mimic," he explains.  Kish is 5-foot-7, thin and fit,
with an impressive mane of dark brown hair and a meandering
winestain birthmark on his left cheek.
  I hear him walk into his kitchen, his bare feet padding faintly
on the hardwood floor.  "I'm very particular about feeling life
and air around my feet," he once wrote in the journal he
braille-typed and shared with me.  I'm barefoot as well.  Kish
asked me to remove my shoes, which is one of his many little
rules you quickly learn to adopt.  Like: He's Daniel Kish, and
anyone who calls him "Dan" more than once may be struck with
withering disdain.  And don't disturb him during his sleep time
-- lately, he's been sleeping just two hours twice a day, usually
from 5 to 7 in the morning and again from 5 to 7 in the evening. 
He often stays up all night dealing with World Access logistics. 
He lives alone and does not have a significant other.  He plays a
lot of Celtic hymnal music.
  I listen as Kish opens a cabinet and rummages amid his pots. 
He returns and stands behind me.  "Make a click," he says.
  It's a terrible click, a sloppy click; what Kish calls a
"clucky click." Kish's click is a thing of beauty -- he snaps the
tip of his tongue briefly and firmly against the roof of his
mouth, creating a momentary vacuum that pops upon release, a
sound very much like pushing the igniter on a gas stove  A team
of Spanish scientists recently studied Kish's click and deemed it
acoustically ideal for capturing echoes.  A machine, they wrote,
could do no better.
  My click will work for now.  Kish tells me that he's holding a
large glass lid, the top to a Crock-Pot, a few inches in front of
me.  "Click again," he says.  There's a distinct echo, a smearing
of sound as if I'm standing in my shower.  "Now click," he says. 
The echo's gone.  "I've lifted it up.  Can you tell?"
  I can, quite clearly.  "Click again," he instructs.  "Where is
it?" I click; there's no echo.
  "It's still lifted," I say.
  "Try again," says Kish.  "But move your head, listen to your
environment."
  I turn my head to the right and click.  Nothing.  Then I click
to the left.  Bingo.  "It's over here," I say, tilting my head in
the direction of the lid.
  "Exactly," says Kish.  "Now let's try it with a pillow."
  There are two reasons echolocation works.  The first is that
our ears, conveniently, are located on both sides of our head. 
When there's a noise off to one side, the sound reaches the
closer ear about a millisecond -- a thousandth of a second --
before it reaches the farther ear.  That's enough of a gap for
the auditory cortex of our brain to process the information. 
It's rare that we turn the wrong way when someone calls our name. 
In fact, we're able to process, with phenomenal accuracy, sounds
just a few degrees off-center.  Having two ears, like having two
eyes, also gives us the auditory equivalent of depth perception. 
We hear in stereo 3-D.  This allows us, using only our ears, to
build a detailed map of our surroundings.
  The second reason echolocation works is that humans, on
average, have excellent hearing.  We hear better than we see. 
Much better.  On the light spectrum, human eyes can perceive only
a small sliver of all the varieties of light -- no ultraviolet,
no infrared.  Converting this to sound terminology, we can see
less than one octave of frequency.  We hear a range of 10
octaves.
  We can also hear behind us; we can hear around corners.  Sight
can't do this.  Human hearing is so good that if you have decent
hearing, you will never once in your life experience true
silence.  Even if you sit completely still in a soundproof room,
you will detect the beating of your own heart.
  Kish does not go around clicking like a madman.  He uses his
click sparingly and, depending on his location, varies the
volume.  When he's outside, he'll throw a loud click.  In good
conditions, he can hear a building 1,000 feet away, a tree from
30 feet, a person from six feet.  Up close, he can echolocate a
one-inch diameter pole.  He can tell the difference between a
pickup truck, a passenger car, and an SUV.  He can locate trail
signs in the forest, then run his finger across the engraved
letters and determine which path to take.  Every house, he
explains, has its own acoustic signature.
  He can hear the variation between a wall and a bush and a
chain-link fence.  Bounce a tennis ball off a wall, Kish says,
then off a bush.  Different response.  So too with sound.  Given
a bit of time, he can echolocate something as small as a golf
ball.  Sometimes, in a parking garage, he can echolocate the exit
faster than a sighted person can find it.
  I accompanied Kish on several occasions as he cruised the busy
streets of Long Beach.  The outside world is an absolute
cacophony.  Every car, person, dog, stroller, and bicycle makes a
sound.  So do gusts of wind, bits of blowing garbage, and
rustling leaves.  Doors open and close.  Change jangles.  People
talk.  Then there are the silent obstacles -- what Kish calls
urban furniture: benches, traffic signs, telephone poles, postal
boxes, fire hydrants, light posts, parked vehicles.  Kish hears
the sonic reflections from his click even in a place teeming with
ambient noise.  "It's like recognizing a familiar voice in a
crowd," he says.  The load upon his mind is undoubtedly immense. 
Yet he casually processes everything, constructing and memorizing
a mental map of his route, all while maintaining an intricate
conversation with me.  It's so extraordinary that it seems to
border on the magical.
  When we walk into a restaurant -- never a simple choice with
Kish, since he's a strict vegan -- he makes a much quieter click. 
Kish describes the images he receives as akin to a brief flick of
the lights in a dark room; you get enough essential information
-- tables here, stairway there, support pillars here -- to
navigate your way through.  "It becomes as ridiculous for blind
people to run into a wall as it is for sighted people," he once
wrote in his FlashSonar manual.  He strolls casually across the
restaurant, making one or two more clicks as we approach our
table, then sits down.  It's both smooth and subtle.  Kish says
that it is rare a sighted person even notices he's making an
unusual noise.  Almost all blind people instantly do.
  What people do notice about Kish is his long white cane.  His
blind person's cane.  Using echolocation, Kish could get around
without one.  For most of his youth, in fact, he never carried a
cane, seeking to avoid the stigma attached to it.  Now, as he
approaches middle age, he's come to believe that whatever can
conveniently provide him with more information about his
environment he will use.  Echolocation's chief liability is that
it is not good at detecting holes in the ground, or small
dropoffs, which a cane can do.  There are also some figure-ground
issues with echolocation -- a park bench can "disappear" when
it's directly in front of a stone wall -- and a cane, in essence,
increases the length of your arm by as much as five feet.
  Kish also keeps aware, during the day, of where the sun is
striking him -- a good way to determine direction -- and how the
cracks between sidewalk blocks line up; if you remain steadily
perpendicular to them, you're not veering.
  When it's all put together, says Kish, he has very rich, very
detailed pictures in his head.
  "In color?" I ask.
  "No," he says.  "I've never seen color, so there's no color. 
It's more like a sonar, like on the Titanic."
  At his high school graduation in 1984, Kish was voted "most
likely to succeed." Photo courtesy Daniel Kish
  Kish can hardly remember a time when he didn't click.  He came
to it on his own, intuitively, at age two, about a year after his
second eye was removed.  Many blind children make noises in order
to get feedback -- foot stomping, finger snapping, hand clapping,
tongue clicking.  These behaviors are the beginnings of
echolocation, but they're almost invariably deemed asocial by
parents or caretakers and swiftly extinguished.  Kish was
fortunate that his mother never tried to dissuade him from
clicking.  "That tongue click was everything to me," he says.
  He has a vivid recollection of sneaking out his bedroom window
in the middle of the night, at age two and a half, and climbing
over a fence into his neighbor's yard.  "I was in the habit of
exploring whatever I sensed around me," he writes in his journal. 
He soon wondered what was in the yard of the next house.  And the
one after that.  "I was on the other side of the block before
someone discovered me prowling around their backyard and had the
police return me home to completely flummoxed parents."
  Kish was born in Montebello, California, into a difficult
family situation.  His younger brother, Keith, was also born with
retinoblastoma -- it's genetic, though neither of Kish's parents
had the disease.  Doctors managed to save enough of Keith's
eyesight so that he doesn't need echolocation.  He's now a middle
school English teacher.  Kish's father, who worked as an
automobile mechanic, was a physically abusive alcoholic, and his
mother left him when Kish was six.
  "I was a violent kid," says Kish.  He frequently got into
fistfights.  "I rarely lost.  My strategy consisted of
immobilizing opponents before they could hit me too often." He
went to mainstream schools and relied almost exclusively on
echolocation to orient himself, though at the time neither he nor
his mom had any concept of what he was doing.  "There was no one
to explain it, there was no one to help me enhance it, and we all
just kind of took it for granted," he says.  "My family and
friends were like, 'Yeah, he does this funny click thing and he
gets around.'?" They called it his radar.  Navigating new places,
he says, was like solving a puzzle.
  He rode his bike with wild abandon.  "I used to go to the top
of a hill and scream 'Dive bomb6' and ride down as fast as I
could," he says.  This is when he was eight.  The neighborhood
kids would scatter.  "One day I lost control of the bicycle,
crashed through these trash cans, and smashed into a metal light
pole.  It was a violent collision.  I had blood all over my face. 
I picked myself up and went home."
  He was raised with almost no dispensation for his blindness. 
"My upbringing was all about total self-reliance," he writes, "of
being able to go after anything I desired." His career interests,
as a boy, included policeman, fireman, pilot, and doctor.  He was
a celebrated singer and voracious consumer of braille books  He
could take anything apart and put it back together -- a skill he
retains.  Once, when I was driving Kish to an appointment with a
student, the GPS unit in my car stopped working.  Kish examined
the unit with his hands, instructed me from the passenger seat
how to get to the nearest Radio Shack, and told me which part to
buy (the jack on the power cord was faulty).  He was named "best
brain" in middle school and graduated high school with a GPA
close to 4.0.  He was voted "most likely to succeed."
  He attended the University of California Riverside, then earned
two master's degrees -- one in developmental psychology, one in
special education.  He wrote a thesis on the history and science
of human echolocation, and as part of that devised one of the
first echolocation training programs.  The ability of some blind
individuals to perceive objects well before they could touch them
was noted as early as 1749 by French philosopher Denis Diderot. 
He theorized it had something to do with vibrations against the
skin of the face.  In the early 1800's, a blind man from England
named James Holman journeyed around the world -- he may have been
the most prolific traveler in history up to that point, Magellan
and Marco Polo included -- relying on the echoes from the click
of his cane.  Not until the 1940's, in Karl Dallenbach's lab at
Cornell University, was it irrefutably proven that humans could
echolocate.
  The thesis was the first time Kish really studied what he'd
been doing all his life; it was the beginning, as he put it, of
"unlocking my own brain." He then became the first totally blind
person in the United States (and likely the world) to be fully
certified as an orientation and mobility specialist -- that is,
someone hired by the visually impaired to learn how to get
around.
  It was never Kish's goal to run a foundation dedicated to the
blind.  He planned to be a psychologist.  But he could not ignore
the fact that few blind people enjoyed anything close to his
freedom of movement, and he had grown weary of society's attitude
toward the blind.  "I am belittled, patronized, disrespected,
invaded, restricted, and presumed weak, vulnerable, or otherwise
incapacitated," he wrote in his journal.  It still drives him
crazy when he's congratulated for simply crossing the street or
preparing dinner.
  In a letter he posted on his website a few years ago, Kish
responded to a public school program in New Jersey called
Kindness Beats Blindness, in which hundreds of middle school
students were blindfolded while others led them around, to
develop sympathy for the blind.  "I have felt beaten and pummeled
by many things," he wrote, "misplaced kindness foremost among
them." When I asked Kish about the letter he said, "I have a
reputation for being a pain in the ass." One of his closest
friends sometimes refers to him as "the bridge burner."
  Young people, says Kish, are especially hard-hit.  "Most blind
kids hear a lot of negative talk.  'Don't do this, don't do that,
don't move.  No, here, let me help y.' The message you get, if
you're blind, is you're intellectually deficient, you're
emotionally deficient, you're in all ways deficient." A few
sighted people have commented to Kish that they'd rather be dead
than blind.
  So in 2001 he started World Access for the Blind.  One of its
missions is to counter every no that blind people hear. 
Blindness, Kish says, should be understood -- by both the blind
and the sighted -- as nothing more than an inconvenience.  "Most
of my life," he writes, "I never even thought of myself as blind. 
In fact, I saw myself as smarter, more agile, stronger, and
generally more capable than most other boys my age."
  World Access operates on what Kish calls "an annual budget of
silliness" -- less than $200,000 a year.  (Kish himself makes
only "a survival wage.") He depends on the "blind vine," the
chattery network of the visually impaired, to spread the word. 
When a potential student, or a parent of a student, agrees to
hire World Access, either Kish or one of three other World Access
teachers -- all blind or visually impaired -- will pay a visit,
whether it's on the other side of Los Angeles or the other side
of the world.
  Lessons can consist of private meetings a few times a month, or
an intensive week of training for students farther afield.  He's
visited a group of blind students in northern Mexico three times
and traveled to Scotland eight times.  In all, Kish has taught in
14 countries, including Armenia, South Africa, Switzerland, and
Ukraine.  Blind students or organizations in more than a dozen
other nations, from Afghanistan to Guatemala, are now on his
waiting list.  The chief focus of World Access classes is setting
students on the path to complete autonomy.  Echolocation is an
essential element of what Kish terms "a holistic approach" that
also includes lessons on comfortable social interactions,
confident self-image, and nonvisual conversational cues (a head
turn can be noted by the sound of hair swishing; arm gestures by
the whisper of skin brushing against clothing; the shift of
someone's body by the creaking of furniture).
  World Access doesn't turn anyone away for lack of resources. 
But there are a couple of reasons why the organization hasn't
trained more students.  The first is Kish's general ethos about
how blind children should be raised.  "Running into a pole is a
drag, but never being allowed to run into a pole is a disaster,"
he writes.  "Pain is part of the price of freedom." This attitude
is not wildly popular, especially in a safety-first nation like
the United States.  Also, echolocation is not easy to master. 
Kish compares it with piano lessons -- anyone can learn basics;
very few will make it to Carnegie Hall.  Only about 10 percent of
the people who learn echolocation, he admits, find their
abilities immediately enriched.
  And then there is resistance from mainstream organizations. 
The National Federation of the Blind, the largest blind
organization in America, does not endorse Kish's work.  "Let's
just say he's unique," says John Paré, the federation's executive
director for strategic initiatives, clearly straining to be
polite.  Paré believes that for most people, echolocation is not
worth the tremendous effort required to grasp it.  "We urge
people to learn how to use a long white cane," he says. 
According to Kish, a colleague once overheard members of the
federation refer to him as Clicker Boy.  "The blindness field is
firmly based in tradition and dogma and is very slow to evolve,"
says Kish.  "It's been traditionally dominated by sighted people
who feel the need to tell blind people what to do."
  The same afternoon I first visit Kish, I also meet Brian
Bushway and Juan Ruiz.  Bushway became blind at age 14 due to a
genetic condition known as optic nerve atrophy and was introduced
to Kish soon after.  Ruiz was born blind and was one of Kish's
first students; Kish began working with him while preparing his
echolocation thesis.  They both told me, individually, that
Kish's teaching transformed them, allowing them to feel at peace
with their blindness and at one with the world.
  Bushway and Ruiz are now in their late 20's and have become
instructors with World Access.  They often hang out at Kish's
home, forming a foul-mouthed and funny little gang.  (Bushway:
"You know why echolocators get all the girls? 'Cause they're
skilled with their tongues and comfortable in the dark.") They've
become so adept at echolocation that, in many ways, they have
surpassed their teacher -- at least in terms of fearlessness,
sociability, and willingness to run into poles.  They're the next
generation of echolocators, ready to take Kish's work and see how
far they can push it.
  If you happen to be blind and want to live a bold,
stereotype-smashing life, there will be blood.  I witness this
firsthand when I spend a day mountain biking with Bushway and
Ruiz.  (Kish, acceding to the realities of near--middle age,
stays home.) We ride on a roller-coastery ridgetop trail in the
Santa Ana Mountains, above the town of Mission Viejo.  Clipped to
the rear fork of each of our bikes is a plastic zip tie, attached
so that the end flicks through our spokes, creating a constant
snapping sound that lets Bushway and Ruiz know where the other
bikes are.  But to determine where the trail is going, and where
the bushes and rocks and fence posts and trees are, the boys rely
on echolocation.
  Bushway is a fearless biker.  He often flies down the dirt
trail in aerodynamic form, hands off the brakes, clicking as fast
and as loud as he can.  "Your brain is on overload," he says to
me during a water break.  "You feel like you can hear every bush,
every tree.  Your body is hyperaware." I try and warn them when
the trail presents a serious consequence, like a long drop-off on
one side or a cactus jutting out.  But mostly I'm just along for
the ride.  It's difficult to believe, even though it's happening
right in front of me.  It's incredible.
  And then, suddenly, it's not.  When I look behind me and see
that Ruiz has drifted back, I stop and wait for him.  I'm just
standing there, silently, and before I realize what's happening,
he is bearing down on me.  I shout, and he pulls the brakes, but
it's too late.  He smashes into me and crushes his left hand
between his handlebar and the back of my seat post.  He falls off
his bike and rolls about in pain, clutching his hand.  There's a
trickle of blood, though nothing seems broken.  I feel terrible,
but Ruiz says it's his fault -- he should have echolocated my
bike, even if I wasn't moving.  We finish the ride, with Ruiz
using only one hand.
  The next day I join Kish and Bushway as they teach Sebastian
Mancipe, who is 15 and has been working with World Access for
three years.  When he started, he rarely came out of his bedroom. 
He had little interaction with the outside world.  He developed
infant glaucoma and was blind by age three months.  His parents
moved from Colombia to the United States to give him a chance at
a better life.  His mother, Viviana, saw a brief appearance by
Kish on the Ripley's Believe It or Not television show, and soon
hired World Access to work with Sebastian.
  He now rides a skateboard.  He ice-skates.  He's popular at
school, stocked with friends and a busy social life.  I follow as
Kish and Bushway stroll around Sebastian's neighborhood, in a
busy section of Burbank.  He'd obviously mastered the
echolocation basics -- the pot lid, the pillow, general shapes. 
Kish and Bushway encourage him to push his skills further  "A
tree," says Kish, clicking a couple of times, "is like a bush on
a pole." They walk on.  "A tree without a bush on top is probably
a telephone pole." They pass a parking lot.  "A large object that
starts out low at one end, rises in the middle, and drops off
again at the other end -- that's a parked car."
  Back at home, I ask Sebastian's mother about the impact World
Access has had on her son.  "It was an awakening," she says.  "He
believes he can do anything.  To see Sebastian as a normal ch..."
She can't complete the sentence before the tears come.
  The longer the waiting list for his services grows, the more
conflicted Kish feels.  He knows what he's doing is important. 
But what he really wants, as more people clamor for his time, as
the frequent-flier miles add up, is to hand over the reins of
World Access and run away from it all.
  He's essentially a loner.  "My constitution," he says, "is that
of Grizzly Adams." In 2003 he purchased a 12-foot by 12-foot
cabin deep in the Angeles National Forest.  It was built in 1916;
he paid $10,000 for it.  To get there he'd take a taxi to the end
of the road and hike in.  "My only company," he wrote in his
journal at the time, "is a small family of mice." He explored the
wilderness.  "I taught myself how to negotiate tricky, winding
trails with sharp switchbacks, how to cross rushing streams on
slippery stones.  I've gone for miles and days without meeting
another soul."
  He was once asked by a colleague what he thought the biggest
problem was with being blind.  "My biggest barrier is people," he
answered.  "Especially sighted people." He has never once in his
life had a girlfriend or, for that matter, a boyfriend.  When I
ask him, via e-mail, to explain why, his response is three words:
"Lack of interest."
  Two tragedies, nearly 20 years apart, have bookended his adult
life.  The first was the death of his dog, a black lab named
Whiska.  This was in 1990.  She was run over by a car while Kish
was walking with her.  Kish has always blamed himself for the
accident.  "I loved Whiska with an intensity that completely
distorted my better judgment," he wrote.  "I spoiled her rotten
and took over her job.  She forgot to watch for traffic, because
I'd always done that for her." He had nightmares for a year after
the accident.  "The chain's just dangling and there's no dog. 
I'll never forget that moment." Not long after, he got another
dog, but soon started traveling and gave him away.  That was his
last pet.
  The second tragedy occurred in January 2007 when his cabin
burned down.  He'd had a wood-burning stove installed, and the
wrong materials were used for the chimney.  The fire was
fast-moving and horrific -- "my last memories of my cabin are the
ominous crackle and rumble of advancing flames" -- and Kish had
no idea if it would engulf the entire canyon, incinerating him as
well.  The disaster haunts him; he keeps a chunk of melted glass
from the cabin in his home in Long Beach.  "A piece of my own
heart has gone up in flames," he wrote.  He plans to one day
return to the woods, perhaps permanently.  "I find people," he
says, "to be incredibly draining."
  Kish has an idea.  Beyond the pot lid and the pillow, beyond
the mission of World Access, there is something he has been
quietly working on for more than a decade.  If his wish is
fulfilled -- if someone else takes over World Access and he's
able to escape from life's perpetual rush hour -- it may prove to
be his true legacy.  What Kish envisions is the next leap in
human echolocation.  His idea is to become more like a bat.
  Bats are the best.  Some can fly in complete darkness,
navigating around thousands of other bats while nabbing insects
one millimeter wide.  Bats have evolved, over millions of years,
to possess the ideal mouth shape and the perfect ear rotation for
echolocation.  They can perceive high-frequency sound waves,
beyond the range of human hearing -- waves that are densely
packed together, whose echoes give precise detail.
  There is evidence that humans could be that good.  Bats have
tiny brains.  Just the auditory cortex of a human brain is many
times larger than the entire brain of a bat.  This means that
humans can likely process more complex auditory information than
bats.  What we'll require, to make up for bats' evolutionary head
start, is a little artificial boost.
  Actually, two boosts.  We need a way to create batlike sound
waves, and we need to be able to hear those waves.  In pursuit of
these goals, Kish has spent time in New Zealand with Leslie Kay,
who worked on underwater sonar for the British Navy during the
Cold War.  For nearly 50 years, Kay tinkered with ideas for
helping the blind to see with sound.  He eventually introduced,
after many weeks of consultation with Kish, a product called the
K-Sonar, a flashlight-size machine that attaches to a blind
person's cane and emits ultrasonic pulses.  The pulses are then
digitally translated into tones humans can hear, through
earphones.  "Flowers actually sound soft," says Kish.  "Stones
sound hard and crisp.  It pretty much represents the physical
environment as music." The problem is range: The K-Sonar can
detect a postage stamp from 15 feet, but not the side of a barn
from 30 feet.
  If money were no object, Kish believes that blind people could
essentially mimic bats within five years.  A next generation of
K-Sonar, using the input from a global consortium of scientists
that Kish has been corresponding with, should have a nearly
limitless range.  Our hearing, Kish says, can be increased
tenfold through surgical augmentation -- basically, inner-ear
microphone implants.  Combine the two and it's possible that the
blind will be able to take up tennis.  Kish figures it would
require $15 million to prove whether or not his idea is feasible. 
He fears he'll never get the opportunity.
  "It's virtually impossible to gather funding for experimental
devices for the blind," he says.  "The blind population is seen
as a lost cause." Kish's patience is running thin.  He is still
reaching out to scientists and studying scholarly journals and
pondering ways to conjure the money.  But more and more these
days, he finds himself daydreaming about rebuilding his cabin and
devoting himself to playing music, to writing.  Let the new crop
of echolocators take over the research and the networking and the
panhandling.  So for the foreseeable future, at least, Kish will
continue to click in his usual way.  And the sighted world will
continue to not notice.
  This article originally appeared in the March 2011 issue of
Men's Journal.

_______________________________________________
acb-l mailing list
acb-l@acb.org
http://www.acb.org/mailman/listinfo/acb-l