Re: [blind-democracy] Flint: A Tale of Two Cities

Bruce Lesnick wrote, in part: "it is no exaggeration to say the
Democratic and Republican parties, along with the system they uphold,
represent a deathtrap for working people."
One would not think that it is so difficult to understand that this
System we exist in is not our System. It belongs to the Corporations
and their elite. But apparently enough smoke and mirrors really can
cloud the minds of honest, trusting workers. Smoke and Mirrors, and a
little Greed tossed into the mix. "Work hard and you shall reap the
benefits". That is the tune played by the Empire's Pipers. With hard
work and a little luck, any of us might claw our way into the Upper
Class, and live the life of Riley.
So we invent the Middle Class, a level between the Working Class and
"Riches beyond belief". Beyond the Middle Class, we imagine an Upper
Class. These are the folks who have almost made it. These Middle
Class and Upper Class folks mostly support the views of the Ruling
Class. They turn against the blue collar and working class folks, as
well as the unemployed and disabled and persons of color. But the
truth is that these Middle and Upper folks are being fooled, and are
opposing their own best interests.
Fact: there is only one political party. It may have any name it
wishes to have, but it is the property of the Ruling Class.
The only sure way of forcing it to serve all Americans, is to destroy
it and replace it with a government that represents the broader
interest and needs of the majority of the People. But of course if
this were to come about without great efforts to educate and mobilize
the Working Class, the new government would be seized by those people
close to the top of the current pyramid. The upper class. Naturally
they would pattern their government after the Capitalistic one from
which they had been profiting, to a degree. They could not believe
that it was the Systems fault. It had to be the fault of those in
control. So they would build a new system just like the old one,
believing that they could make it work.
Until we understand that it is the System that keeps so many good
people under the heel of the Master, we will repeat the same mistakes
over and over.

Carl Jarvis


On 2/10/16, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@freelists.org> wrote:
> http://socialistaction.org/flint-a-tale-of-two-cities/
>
>
> Flint: A Tale of Two Cities
>
> Published February 9, 2016. | By Socialist Action.
> Feb. 2016 Flint
>
> By BRUCE LESNICK
>
> It [is] too much the way of [mainstream politicians] to talk of this
> terrible [crisis] as if it were the only harvest ever known under the
> skies that had not been sown—as if nothing had ever been done, or
> omitted to be done, that had led to it—as if observers of the wretched
> millions … and of the misused and perverted resources that should have
> made them prosperous, had not seen it inevitably coming, years before
> and had not in plain words recorded what they saw. — Charles Dickens, "A
> Tale of Two Cities"
>
> Working people in Flint, Mich., are suffering mightily from the
> poisoning of the city's water supply that resulted from callous
> decisions by government officials—from the unelected emergency city
> manager, on up to the governor and the federal Environmental Protection
> Agency. All of these officials acted in the name of austerity and
> cutting costs. But as is so often the case, the tragedy in Flint is not
> merely the result of individual bad actors but flows from an economic
> system that pits the wealthy few at the top against the vast majority
> who work for a living.
>
> Despite the fact that global wealth and U.S. labor productivity per
> capita have both been increasing exponentially for more than a
> generation, the small unelected handful of financiers and industrialists
> that own and control our economic and political systems—the so-called
> one percent—have been promoting the narrative that times are hard and we
> must all tighten our belts. By "all" they mean everyone except those
> "indispensible" titans of capital who are currently calling the shots.
>
> But in reality, the wealth created for each man, woman and child in the
> U.S. (as measured by GDP per capita) increased from $13,933 in 1981 to
> $54,629 in 2014 (in constant 2015 dollars.) That's an increase of 292
> percent! For Tunisia, the increase in the same period was 244 percent;
> for Greece it was 300 percent. Similar gains can be cited for other
> countries (source: World Bank). Collectively, the planet is awash in
> wealth.
>
> Nevertheless, the false narrative of scarcity has been used to justify
> austerity in Greece, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, France, elsewhere across
> Europe, and all throughout the U.S. And now we have Flint.
>
> Between 2006 and 2013, overall revenue to the state of Michigan
> decreased by 25%. Since 2006, Democratic and Republican officials have
> appropriated $6.2 billion in local sales tax and other revenue to cover
> state budget shortfalls. This has been done despite a law requiring
> those funds to be shared with municipalities. The result was
> predictable: city after city across the state—from Pontiac, to Lansing,
> to Detroit and Flint—has had to cope with calamitous budget deficits.
>
> What caused the decline in revenue? In part, it was due to corporate tax
> giveaways approved by the previous Democratic governor. But the biggest
> factor in the budget squeeze has been the decline of the auto industry.
> From a peak of 1.5 million United Auto Workers union members in Detroit
> in 1978, the number crashed to 400,000 in 2013 as corporate execs moved
> production south or overseas in search of cheaper, nonunion labor.
>
> Then there was the auto industry bailout. In 2009, the federal
> government loaned $29.4 billion to GM and Chrysler on the condition that
> the UAW agreed to allow delays in payments to the union health fund for
> retirees, reduce payments to laid-off workers and deepen the two-tier
> wage program enabling new hires to be paid less for the same work.
> Later, GM would receive another $36 billion as it entered bankruptcy. At
> its peak in 2003, the U.S. auto industry employed 1.1 million workers.
> By 2006, 43% of those jobs had been eliminated.
>
> Flint, with long ties to the auto industry, has felt the squeeze. Of the
> 80,000 Flint autoworkers in the 1970s, only 5,000 remain.
>
> A Michigan state law passed in 2011 allowed for the appointment of
> "emergency managers" to preside over cities deemed insolvent. Once
> appointed, the emergency manager rules supreme. Elected
> officials—including the mayor, city council and school board—can do
> nothing without the manager's approval. In April 2014, the bureaucrat
> that was imposed on the city of Flint switched the city's water supply
> from the Detroit system to the Flint River, hoping to save a few bucks.
> What resulted was a massive epidemic of lead poisoning, due to the
> different chemistry in the Flint River and a long history of using the
> waterway as an industrial waste dump.
>
> A September study by the Hurley Medical Center in Flint confirmed that
> the proportion of Flint children with elevated lead levels has nearly
> doubled since the water source was switched. The tap water drawn from
> the river also contains illegal levels of cancer-causing trihalomethanes
> and other toxins, and is implicated in the spread of Legionnaires Disease.
>
> A massive effort will now be needed to restore clean running water to
> Flint residents and to deal with the long-term health effects from the
> poison brew people have been forced to use for drinking, cooking, and
> bathing for over a year.
>
> No auto executives or members of the ruling rich were harmed in the
> making of this story. The Michigan localities that have suffered the
> most are majority working class and Black. The population of Flint is
> over 56% African American. Forty-one percent of city residents live in
> poverty, and the real unemployment rate for Michigan is over 11 percent.
> In this conflict so far, it is working people who have taken all the
> blows. But it wasn't always that way.
>
> Given Flint's iconic history, it's more than a little ironic that the
> current crisis has its roots in the greed of the auto industry giants
> and their political plenipotentiaries. A generation ago, another battle
> was fought in Flint between the auto barons and the working-class
> majority. In that fight, which began in December of 1936, the balance of
> power was decidedly different.
>
> The United Auto Workers union (UAW) was founded in 1935 in the wake of a
> militant labor upsurge that began sweeping the country the year before.
> Key battles in Minneapolis (truck drivers), Toledo (Electric Auto-Lite),
> San Francisco (general strike), Akron (rubber workers), and Huntsville,
> Birmingham, and throughout the South (textile workers) set the tone. But
> the big automakers had yet to be breached.
>
> In the 1930s, as now, there were competing ideologies for how the
> working people could best fight for their rights. The most conscious,
> radical workers saw the bosses, their government, and the major
> political parties as members of the same team, against which the 99% had
> to wage an uncompromising fight. But the leaders of the newly formed
> Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) saw things differently. As
> Art Preis described in "Labor's Giant Step":
>
> The CIO leaders were class collaborationist to the bone. They sought
> "peaceful coexistence" between predatory capital and exploited
> labor—between robber and robbed. They believed they could persuade the
> employers that unions are a "benefit" to the capitalists themselves and
> thereby secure gains for the workers by the simple means of "reasonable
> discussion" across the conference table. …
> Fortunately for the success of the CIO, the concepts of the top CIO
> leaders did not always prevail. The strident notes of the class struggle
> broke through the "class harmony" chorus and set the dominant tone
> during the decisive days of the rise of the CIO. The bridge to victory
> proved to be not the conference board, nor the inside track to Roosevelt
> in the White House, but the picket line—above all, that "inside picket
> line," the sit-down.
>
> An ongoing organizing drive in the Flint auto plants was met with
> stonehearted resistance by General Motors. The straw that broke the
> camel's back came on Dec. 30, 1936, when management provocatively
> transferred some union supporters. Workers at Flint Fisher Body Plant 2
> responded by sitting down and refusing to leave the factory. Later that
> night, workers saw managers attempting to remove critical machinery from
> Fisher Body Plant 1. The workers at Plant 1 put a stop to that by
> sitting down as well. The shutting down of these two plants brought GM's
> auto production to a screeching halt.
>
> The strike spread to 15 other GM plants, from Detroit to Kansas City.
> Finally, the crucial motor assembly operation at Chevrolet Plant number
> 4 in Flint was occupied. Ultimately, 93% of GM's production workers
> joined the fight. Preis explains:
>
> Victory or defeat for the GM workers depended on a simple strategy:
> keeping their buttocks firmly planked on $50 million worth of GM
> property until they got a signed contract. GM's strategy was to get the
> workers out of the plants by hook or crook so that the police, deputies
> and National Guard could disperse them by force and violence.
>
> The bosses hit the strikers with injunctions, but the sheriff charged
> with delivering the first of these was laughed out of the plant. The
> company attempted to recruit scabs to retake the plants, but soon gave
> that up. Management cut the heat to Fisher Body Plant 2, and police
> attempted to prevent deliveries of food and supplies to the strikers.
> Outside, picketers stormed the police blockade. A battle ensued; police
> guns were answered by bolts and bottles hurled by the workers.
> Eventually, the strikers aimed a freezing stream from a fire hose at the
> cops, successfully turning them back. When the dust settled, 24 strikers
> were injured; 14 had been shot.
>
> Politicians, from the Democratic governor to President Roosevelt, sided
> with GM. The governor positioned 1500 National Guard troops to be ready
> to retake the plants by force. Meanwhile, fellow unionists poured into
> Flint from Toledo, Pittsburgh, Detroit, Lansing, and elsewhere, and
> formed a cordon of solidarity around Fisher Body Plant 1.
>
> GM threatened to turn the heat off again, but the strikers threatened to
> expose the plants firefighting equipment to the cold, freezing the gear
> and thus invalidating GM's insurance coverage. Management was livid and
> demanded that the governor give the order to retake the plants. Governor
> Murphy passed the buck and tried to pressure CIO President John L Lewis
> to reign in the strikers. Lewis explained, truthfully, that he hadn't
> started the strike and he couldn't stop it.
>
> In the end, GM surrendered. The strikers had demonstrated sufficient
> determination and ingenuity for GM to realize its plants would be
> destroyed if they tried to remove the workers by force. The first UAW
> contract with GM was signed on Feb. 11, 1937.
>
> The working people of Flint won that monumental battle in 1937, but the
> corporate titans have never given up on the overall war. This is the
> critical context for the Flint crisis of today. The forces seeking to
> victimize working people in Flint now are the same ones that confronted
> autoworkers in Flint three quarters of a century ago. Those seeking to
> fight against austerity and mount an effective response to the current
> water crisis can learn much from that pivotal chapter in history.
>
> Today, as in the 1930s, it's crucial to understand who is on our side
> and whom we're up against. At the second convention of the UAW in 1936,
> the body unanimously called for the formation of a labor party. It's no
> coincidence that the workers who successfully fought back the GM
> colossus understood that the Democratic and Republican parties were both
> in the boss's hip pocket. This realization was essential for navigating
> the rough terrain as the struggle unfolded.
>
> But by the late 1940s, those who preached class collaboration and
> relying on the Democrats as "friends of labor" had gained the upper
> hand. Socialists and other radicals who, like the Flint sit-down
> strikers, recognized the major political parties for the big business
> appendages they truly are were driven out of the labor movement and
> isolated. Unions like the UAW turned their back on the lessons of the
> Flint sit-down strike. As a consequence, the UAW is a mere shadow of its
> former self, reduced in numbers and diminished in power. Throughout its
> steady decline, UAW leaders have held fast to their
> class-collaborationist outlook. The results of this approach can be seen
> in scattered, broken pieces all around us, including in Flint.
>
> Today, Democratic and Republican party politicians shed crocodile tears,
> expressing the utmost regret for the calamity that has befallen Flint.
> But their concern rings hollow. These are the heirs of the politicians
> who mobilized the press, the police, and the National Guard to side with
> GM and the other corporate behemoths in the labor upsurge of the 1930s.
> These are the political parties that have been running our country for
> generations, with the result being what we see in Flint and all around us.
>
> Witnessing the suffering of the residents of Flint, it is no
> exaggeration to say the Democratic and Republican parties, along with
> the system they uphold, represent a deathtrap for working people.
>
> But there is a way out. There are steps we can take to avoid future
> disasters like the one now unfolding in Flint. This path serendipitously
> addresses many of the other problems we face—from endless war,
> inequality and exploitation, to racism, unemployment, and environmental
> destruction. This road has just one rule: human needs must come before
> profits.
>
> And there is but one way to get there: by recognizing that only working
> people—the vast majority of the population and the producers of all of
> society's wealth—have the power to build a just and rational world. For
> that power to be realized, we must organize collectively and
> independently of our foes at the top of the economic pyramid, refusing
> to be taken in by their lieutenants in the Democratic and Republican
> parties.
>
> While no fight is ever an exact blueprint for another, the guiding
> principles of solidarity and independent political action, demonstrated
> in abundance by the heroic Flint sit-down strikers, remain essential
> tools for the struggles of today.
>
> Bruce Lesnick is a long-time political activist who lives and writes in
> Washington State. He blogs at blogspot.com. He can be reached at
> blesnick@bugbusters.net.
>
> Photo: Flint residents display jar of brown tap water. CNN.
>
>
>
>
>
> Share this:
>
> Facebook
> Twitter
> Google
> Tumblr
>
>
>
> Related
>
>
>
> On the UAW Picket Line in Flint: 'This is a War with General Motors for
> Job Security'
>
> July 5, 1998
>
> In "Labor"
>
>
> Houston Janitors Walk Out
>
> August 13, 2012
>
> In "Labor"
>
>
> Flint UAW Strikers Remember Their History and are Armed!
>
> July 5, 1998
>
> In "Labor"
>
>
>
> Posted in Black Liberation, Economy, Environment, Labor, Marxist Theory
> & History. | Tagged Flint, UAW.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Get Involved
>
>
> Join Socialist Action
> Donate to help support our work
> Get email updates
> Events
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Subscribe to Our Newspaper
>
>
> JAN. 2014 p.1 jpegJAN. 2014 p. 12
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Subscribe Today
>
>
>
> Subscriptions to the monthly print edition of Socialist Action are
> available for the following rates:
>
> - 12 month subscription for $20
> - 24 month subscription for $37
> - 6 month subscription for $10
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn More
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Email Updates
>
>
>
> Enter your email address to subscribe to our free e-mail Socialist
> Action Newsletter. Also to receive notifcations of new web posts by email.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn More
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Newspaper Archives
>
> Newspaper Archives Select Month February 2016 (4) January 2016 (11)
> December 2015 (11) November 2015 (9) October 2015 (8) September 2015
> (10) August 2015 (7) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9) May 2015 (10)
> April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9) February 2015 (11) January 2015 (10)
> December 2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October 2014 (9) September
> 2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10) May 2014
> (11) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11) January 2014
> (11) December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013 (17) September
> 2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013 (15) May 2013
> (14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013 (10) January 2013
> (17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October 2012 (19) September
> 2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June 2012 (3) May 2012
> (19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012 (19) January 2012
> (17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October 2011 (14) September
> 2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011
> (19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February 2011 (16) January 2011
> (15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1) October 2010 (6) September
> 2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9)
> April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (3) January 2010 (9)
> December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5) October 2009 (16) September 2009
> (3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April
> 2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10)
> December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8) October 2008 (16) September
> 2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008 (12) June 2008 (3) May 2008
> (2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14) February 2008 (11) January 2008
> (11) December 2007 (8) November 2007 (1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1)
> April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1) February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11)
> November 2006 (11) October 2006 (13) September 2006 (15) August 2006
> (11) July 2006 (12) June 2006 (7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March
> 2006 (14) February 2006 (5) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9)
> November 2005 (8) October 2005 (13) September 2005 (12) August 2005
> (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005 (16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March
> 2005 (14) February 2005 (19) January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14)
> November 2002 (17) October 2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August 2002
> (21) July 2002 (15) May 2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15)
> January 2002 (15) December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September 2001
> (18) July 2001 (19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September 2000
> (21) August 2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21)
> April 2000 (22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000 (20)
> December 1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September
> 1999 (18) August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999
> (27) April 1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999
> (24) July 1998 (12) 0 (2)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn More
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Pamphlets/Books
>
>
>
> Socialist Action publishes a wide variety of pamphlets on burning issues
> of today such as global warming, women's liberation, the Middle East and
> other subjects.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn More
>
>
>
>
>
> Socialist Action (U.S.): socialistaction@lmi.net | (510) 268-9429
>
> Socialist Action / Ligue pour l'Action socialiste (Canada):
> barryaw@rogers.com
>
> Copyright © 2016 Socialist Action. All Rights Reserved. Site Design by
> Lucid Digital Designs | Site Utilities
>
>
>
>
>
>