Today's airing of Democracy Now is an eye opener for those who believe
that impeaching Trump will solve our problems. Trump is merely the
scab covering a pus pocket. Pull him off and the only change will be
that everything will be instantly covered, and we will have no idea
where to turn.
We keep making the same mistakes. We focus on one individual, when
the cause of our up coming destruction is an entire anti American
Movement. The Movement is dedicated to reducing our government to
"pimple" size. The driving force in this fast growing movement is
only interested in the freedom to do as they please. We keep trotting
out heart rendering tales of starving children, rat infested slums,
crumbling schools and roads and bridges, and single mothers burning
their second hand furniture in order to keep some heat for their
children. Because most of us have a sense of compassion, and care for
those less fortunate than ourselves, we think that the Ruling Class
have the same compassion. When will we learn that the Ruling Class is
held captive by Greed and His lieutenants Lust and Envy? They have no
time in their grubbing lives for compassion. Compassion is a sign of
weakness, to them. We, the People, are held in contempt. Even as
these professional pirates smile and tell us what we want to hear, in
their private conversations they sneer and spit upon us and our
beliefs. It's all a big game to them. Winner take all. And we think
we can discuss issues and talk sense into these alien minds? We try
to believe we can compromise with them, even as the only outcome in
their minds is to conquer us. Some of our leaders say we need to
listen to all sides. But how do we listen to all sides when one side
is hiding behind lies and misconception? Take the time today to go
to:
democracynow.org
Listen to who owns Trump, and much of America. These snickering,
sneering privateers are not role models. They are the real Terrorists
in our midst. They are monsters. They have no ability to show
compassion. It is not in their genes.
Am I coming through yet?
Carl Jarvis
On 3/23/17, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Have you heard of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency? (photo: U.S.
> Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District/Getty Images/Foreign Policy)
>
>
>
>
> James Bamford | The Multibillion-Dollar US Spy Agency You Haven't Heard Of
>
> By James Bamford, Foreign Policy
>
> 22 March 17
>
>
>
> How President Trump might turn an all-seeing spy apparatus on innocent
> American citizens.
>
> In a heavily protected military base some 15 miles south of Washington,
> D.C., sits the massive headquarters of a spy agency few know exists. Even
> Barack Obama, five months into his presidency, seemed not to have
> recognized
> its name. While shaking hands at a Five Guys hamburger restaurant in
> Washington in May 2009, he asked a customer seated at a table about his
> job.
> "What do you [do]?" the president inquired. "I work at NGA, National
> Geospatial-Intelligence Agency," the man answered. Obama appeared
> dumbfounded. "So, explain to me exactly what this National Geospatial." he
> said, unable to finish the name. Eight years after that videotape aired,
> the
> NGA remains by far the most shadowy member of the Big Five spy agencies,
> which include the CIA and the National Security Agency.
>
> Despite its lack of name recognition, the NGA's headquarters is the
> third-largest building in the Washington metropolitan area, bigger than the
> CIA headquarters and the U.S. Capitol.
>
> Completed in 2011 at a cost of $1.4 billion, the main building measures
> four
> football fields long and covers as much ground as two aircraft carriers. In
> 2016, the agency purchased 99 acres in St. Louis to construct additional
> buildings at a cost of $1.75 billion to accommodate the growing workforce,
> with 3,000 employees already in the city.
>
> The NGA is to pictures what the NSA is to voices. Its principal function is
> to analyze the billions of images and miles of video captured by drones in
> the Middle East and spy satellites circling the globe. But because it has
> largely kept its ultra-high-resolution cameras pointed away from the United
> States, according to a variety of studies, the agency has never been
> involved in domestic spy scandals like its two far more famous siblings,
> the
> CIA and the NSA. However, there's reason to believe that this will change
> under President Donald Trump.
>
> Throughout the long election campaign and into his first months as
> president, Trump has pushed hard for weakening restraints on the
> intelligence agencies, spending more money for defense, and getting tough
> on
> law and order. Given the new president's overwhelming focus on domestic
> security, it's reasonable to expect that Trump will use every tool
> available
> to maintain it, including overhead vigilance.
>
> In March 2016, the Pentagon released the results of an investigation
> initiated by the Department of Defense's Office of Inspector General to
> examine military spy drones in the United States. The report, marked "For
> Official Use Only" and partially redacted, revealed that the Pentagon used
> unarmed surveillance drones over American soil on fewer than 20 occasions
> between 2006 and 2015. (Although the report doesn't identify the nature of
> the missions, another Pentagon document lists 11 domestic drone operations
> that principally involved natural disasters, search and rescue, and
> National
> Guard training.)
>
> The investigation also quoted from an Air Force law review article pointing
> out the growing concern that technology designed to spy on enemies abroad
> may soon be turned around to spy on citizens at home. "As the nation winds
> down these wars . assets become available to support other combatant
> command
> (COCOM) or U.S. agencies, the appetite to use them in the domestic
> environment to collect airborne imagery continues to grow."
>
> Although the report stated that all missions were conducted within full
> compliance of the law, it pointedly noted that as of 2015 there were no
> standardized federal statutes that "specifically address the employment of
> the capability provided by a DoD UAS (unmanned aircraft system) if
> requested
> by domestic civil authorities." Instead, there is a Pentagon policy
> governing reconnaissance drones that requires the secretary of defense to
> approve all such domestic operations. Under these regulations, drones "may
> not conduct surveillance on U.S. persons" unless permitted by law and
> approved by the secretary. The policy also bans armed drones over the
> United
> States for anything other than military training and weapons testing.
>
> In 2016, unbeknownst to many city officials, police in Baltimore began
> conducting persistent aerial surveillance using a system developed for
> military use in Iraq.
>
> Few civilians have any idea how advanced these military eye-in-the-sky
> drones have become. Among them is ARGUS-IS, the world's highest-resolution
> camera with 1.8 billion pixels. Invisible from the ground at nearly four
> miles in the air, it uses a technology known as "persistent stare" - the
> equivalent of 100 Predator drones peering down at a medium-size city at
> once
> - to track everything that moves.
>
> With the capability to watch an area of 10 or even 15 square miles at a
> time, it would take just two drones hovering over Manhattan to continuously
> observe and follow all outdoor human activity, night and day. It can zoom
> in
> on an object as small as a stick of butter on a plate and store up to 1
> million terabytes of data a day. That capacity would allow analysts to look
> back in time over days, weeks, or months. Technology is in the works to
> enable drones to remain aloft for years at a time.
>
> The Department of Homeland Security has been at these crossroads before. In
> 2007, during the presidency of George W. Bush, the department established
> an
> agency to direct domestic spy satellite stakeouts and gave it a bland name:
> the National Applications Office. But Congress, concerned about a "Big
> Brother in the Sky," cut off funding. In 2009, it was killed by the Obama
> administration.
>
> Still, unlike domestic electronic surveillance by the NSA, which has been
> closely scrutinized and subjected to legislation designed to protect civil
> liberties, domestic overhead spying has escaped the attention of both
> Congress and the public. The Trump administration may take advantage of
> that
> void.
>
> Initiating a new age of "persistent surveillance," Trump could use the spy
> world's overhead assets to target Muslims or members of Black Lives Matter.
> The president has spoken in favor of increasing the scrutiny of mosques;
> aerial assessment would allow him to track worshippers. Drones could aid in
> the mass roundup of illegal immigrants intended for deportation, and Trump
> has said he may send federal forces to Chicago to quell the violence.
> Drones
> could offer the city the unblinking eye for 24/7 vigilance.
>
> Of course, all that would require a significant expansion of the National
> Geospatial-Intelligence Agency to analyze the domestic imagery. Before that
> can happen, Trump, like Obama, has to discover there is such an agency.
>
> e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
>
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment