Of course we should have won the war. If, if, if, if only we had done
what we now think we should have done.
But Brother George, it didn't work for you. So why do you think it
would work for Barak Obama? While you were giggling and flapping
about on TV, looking for those pesky weapons of mass destruction,
thousands of young people, old people and innocent children were being
singled out for death. All of that was on your watch. You are living
proof of the definition of insanity...doing the same thing over and
over, believing you will get different results. And of course you
should be worried about the world your grand children will inherit.
You laid the foundation. You speak out for violence as an answer to
violence. You are living proof that money can buy anything. Even an
incompetent president.
But I am wasting far too much time venting. Why would anyone even
consider your foolish babbling as worth hearing? Crawl back in your
safe little ranch and finish dying.
Carl Jarvis
On 4/28/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> Cole writes: "He said Obama hadn't 'followed through' on threats against
> al-Qaeda and Daesh (ISIL or ISIS), making the US look weak. 'In order to be
> an effective president ... when you say something, you have to mean it,' he
> said. 'You gotta kill 'em.'"
>
> Barack Obama and George W. Bush. (photo: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images)
>
>
> Bush Blames Obama for Lack of Wars ('Follow-Through' on 'Threats')
> By Juan Cole, Informed Comment
> 28 April 15
>
> George W. Bush spoke privately this weekend at a Republican Jewish
> Coalition
> session hosted by casino sleazeball Sheldon Adelson, who made his pile in a
> very shady way in China's Macau and now gets to choose the US president
> with
> his ill-gotten gains. What was remarkable was that Bush launched into a
> criticism of Barack Obama, something he's tried to avoid since fleeing
> Washington in disgrace.
> Unsurprisingly, Bush wanted Obama to make all the same mistakes that he
> did.
> He said Obama hadn't "followed through" on threats against al-Qaeda and
> Daesh (ISIL or ISIS), making the US look weak. "In order to be an effective
> president . when you say something, you have to mean it," he said. "You
> gotta kill 'em." In Bushworld, it is no good warning an adversary about its
> behavior without actually going to war with that nation. (But then why
> issue
> the warning at all?).
> Bush did not kill Bin Laden. Obama did. Bush closed down the CIA Bin Laden
> desk and declared him not a priority, after threatening him. Inconsistent,
> much?
> Bush criticized Obama for withdrawing from Iraq in 2011. But of course it
> was the Status of Forces Agreement negotiated by Bush with the Iraqi
> parliament that stipulated a US departure by the end of 2011. Obama didn't
> make a new policy here; it was the Bush policy that was implemented. Nor is
> it reasonable to have expected the Iraqi parliament to want more US
> Occupation- no such SOFA could then have gotten through parliament. That
> Iraqis had a key role in deciding all this is routinely ignored by the US
> press and politicians, including, now, Bush.
> Bush also essentially called Obama naive over his negotiations with Iran,
> saying he worried about the world his grandchildren would live in. Since
> Bush let al-Qaeda and thence Daesh into Iraq during his military occupation
> of that country, it is he who must bear responsibility, not Obama.
> Moreover,
> during Bush's non-negoatiation with Iran, that country's centrifuges went
> from 6,000 to 19,000. Great dealmaking.
>
> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not
> valid.
>
> Barack Obama and George W. Bush. (photo: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images)
> http://www.juancole.com/2015/04/blames-through-threats.htmlhttp://www.juanco
> le.com/2015/04/blames-through-threats.html
> Bush Blames Obama for Lack of Wars ('Follow-Through' on 'Threats')
> By Juan Cole, Informed Comment
> 28 April 15
> eorge W. Bush spoke privately this weekend at a Republican Jewish
> Coalition
> session hosted by casino sleazeball Sheldon Adelson, who made his pile in a
> very shady way in China's Macau and now gets to choose the US president
> with
> his ill-gotten gains. What was remarkable was that Bush launched into a
> criticism of Barack Obama, something he's tried to avoid since fleeing
> Washington in disgrace.
> Unsurprisingly, Bush wanted Obama to make all the same mistakes that he
> did.
> He said Obama hadn't "followed through" on threats against al-Qaeda and
> Daesh (ISIL or ISIS), making the US look weak. "In order to be an effective
> president . when you say something, you have to mean it," he said. "You
> gotta kill 'em." In Bushworld, it is no good warning an adversary about its
> behavior without actually going to war with that nation. (But then why
> issue
> the warning at all?).
> Bush did not kill Bin Laden. Obama did. Bush closed down the CIA Bin Laden
> desk and declared him not a priority, after threatening him. Inconsistent,
> much?
> Bush criticized Obama for withdrawing from Iraq in 2011. But of course it
> was the Status of Forces Agreement negotiated by Bush with the Iraqi
> parliament that stipulated a US departure by the end of 2011. Obama didn't
> make a new policy here; it was the Bush policy that was implemented. Nor is
> it reasonable to have expected the Iraqi parliament to want more US
> Occupation- no such SOFA could then have gotten through parliament. That
> Iraqis had a key role in deciding all this is routinely ignored by the US
> press and politicians, including, now, Bush.
> Bush also essentially called Obama naive over his negotiations with Iran,
> saying he worried about the world his grandchildren would live in. Since
> Bush let al-Qaeda and thence Daesh into Iraq during his military occupation
> of that country, it is he who must bear responsibility, not Obama.
> Moreover,
> during Bush's non-negoatiation with Iran, that country's centrifuges went
> from 6,000 to 19,000. Great dealmaking.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-Democracy mailing list
> Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
> https://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy
>
No comments:
Post a Comment