Friday, December 16, 2016

Re: [acb-l] article in response to 60 minutes biased reporting on the ADA

Thank you, thank you, thank you for this insightful post by Arlene
Mayerson. Those ACB members who have followed the fine work of Arlene
and of Lainey Feingold
and Linda Dardarian, understand full well that these are lawyers of
the highest integrity. Veterans in the struggle for First Class
Citizenship by blind and visually limited Americans know well the
lawyers who stand with us and understand and agree with our Cause, and
those who simply see us as an opportunity to turn a buck.
Anderson Cooper showed me that he falls in the latter category,
whether he is a lawyer or not.
Within his carefully crafted TV article, Cooper demonstrates for all
of us just how to go about biasing public opinion.
We, the ACB members, know that Lainey Feingold
and Linda Dardarian, spent hours discussing the ADA with Cooper. They
left believing that he, by his own word, would present a segment that
made some effort to reflect their conversation.
Frankly, I don't know if I'm more outraged by the implicit slur Cooper
laid upon Lainey Feingold
and Linda Dardarian, or the fact that he was so disingenuous as to
mislead them regarding his real intent.
Finally, Arlene Mayerson's article should stand as a warning to all of
us in the ACB, that we are at odds with the huge corporations that
currently hold our government captive. We need to never forget to
thank those fearless lawyers who continue to stand beside us.
Thank you, Arlene Mayerson, Lainey Feingold
and Linda Dardarian, for all you do on our behalf.

Carl Jarvis



On 12/16/16, akp--- via acb-l <acb-l@acblists.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> An excellent article. Good on you!
>
>
>
> Ann P.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Jeanne Fike via acb-l [mailto:acb-l@acblists.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 1:14 PM
> To: acb-l@acblists.org
> Subject: [acb-l] article in response to 60 minutes biased reporting on the
> ADA
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> The following article by Arlene Mayerson (below my name) was shared on
> another list I'm on. Some of you may be interested in her response to the
> Anderson Cooper's 60 minutes story.
>
> Arlene Mayerson was instrumental in forcing Child Protective Services of
> California to leave a new-born baby with its blind parents in one notable
> situation. Also, she was the lead attorney in ACB's case against Social
> Security to force them to provide statements to recipients in braille, large
> print and audible sources which ACB won in large part due to her dilligence
> and ability to explain things to the court.
>
> Jeanne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SHAME ON YOU, ANDERSON COOPER: 60 Minutes Mocking the ADA Impact Fund
>
>
>
> December 13, 2016
>
> Arlene Mayerson, Directing Attorney, Disability Rights Education and Defense
> Fund
>
>
>
> Anderson Cooper would be the first to call out Donald Trump s ridicule of a
> reporter with a disability with righteous indignation. Yet, on December 4,
> 2016 Cooper used the 60 Minutes broadcast to throw people with disabilities
> under the bus in the name of journalism. He used his power and prestige to
> denigrate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the honorable
> lawyers that enforce it.
>
>
>
> Cooper could not have been more successful, if his intent was to lead the
> parade of horribles against the ADA. I suggest that presenting a skewed
> piece of journalism which serves only to undermine the first national law
> providing civil rights protections for people with disabilities is at least
> as harmful as mocking a reporter with a disability.
>
>
>
> Under the auspices of doing a story on the anniversary of the ADA, Anderson
> Cooper and his team came to the birthplace of the disability movement,
> Berkeley, California, and talked to many who have benefitted from the ADA.
> They spent hours with two of the most honorable lawyers one will ever meet,
> Lainey Feingold and Linda Dardarian, who have done a world of good to make
> America more accessible to people with disabilities. Most of this change
> came about as a result of cooperative negotiations between these lawyers and
> the businesses seeking these clients as customers. From accessible ATM s
> where blind individuals can bank, to traffic lights with sound so blind
> pedestrians can safely cross the street, these negotiated settlements have
> allowed access to basic community life for the millions of blind Americans
> who had been deprived of the daily independence we all take for granted.
>
>
>
> Disability rights advocates were both figuratively and literally decapitated
> in the broadcast Feingold and Dardarian took the time to explain to Cooper
> and his CBS colleagues various successful ways to provide access for people
> with disabilities. They rightfully expected a sound journalistic piece that
> would highlight these options.
>
>
>
> So, what did Cooper spotlight in his story on the ADA? A tempest in a
> teapot: a story about a few lawyers who file a lot of frivolous suits
> against small businesses. Those stories are at most a footnote to the
> historic story of inclusion of a large segment of our population previously
> excluded by unnecessary barriers and unexamined prejudice. Cooper instead
> chose to make the successes of the ADA a mere footnote in his hatchet job of
> a piece.
>
>
>
> I have been practicing disability law for almost 40 years, as the Directing
> Attorney of Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, Inc. (DREDF). We
> were intimately involved in the passage the ADA in 1990, the first law in
> history protecting the civil rights of people with disabilities in order to
> reverse centuries of exclusion, segregation and extreme prejudice against
> people with disabilities. The stories Congress heard about how poorly people
> with disabilities have been treated in America resulted in a sweeping
> bi-partisan approval of the ADA.
>
>
>
> Since passage, we at DREDF have used the ADA to allow children with diabetes
> to attend school, to allow people who are blind and deaf to have access to
> the rapidly growing world of e-commerce and online education, to allow
> people who had no options other than institutionalization to live in the
> community with the rest of us, to allow people with disabilities access to
> basic health care barred by inaccessible offices and equipment, and so much
> more. The only reference to DREDF in the piece was a headless shot of our
> development director using a walker. She did not volunteer to be used this
> way.
>
>
>
> DREDF, Dardarian, and Feingold are not alone in our pursuit of justice for
> people with disabilities. The Disability Law Bar Association is comprised of
> over 250 lawyers who are among of the most honest, sincere, passionate and
> skillful lawyers one could ever meet. These lawyers do the profession of law
> proud by using their skills to open doors that have been closed shut too
> long.
>
> But, Cooper would probably say (as you, the reader, might) that he was just
> reporting the fact that unscrupulous lawyers bring frivolous claims under
> the ADA to the detriment of small business owners. But, therein lies the
> problem that was all too evident in this election cycle treating the
> outlier as the norm, the exceptional as the ordinary and the abuse as the
> practice. It does not require an exhaustive study of biased journalism to
> recognize the fact that selective reporting, even if based in truth, can
> serve the nefarious purpose of perpetuating an untrue impression. Take for
> example the widely reported story that a girl died after receiving the
> cervical-cancer HPV vaccine, while the fact that 1.4 million girls received
> the vaccine with only beneficial results goes unreported. Whether it is
> called selective reporting or cherry picking, the 60 Minutes piece on the
> ADA took the rare abuse of the ADA and made it the story.
>
> That is a disservice to people with disabilities who finally have a civil
> rights law that challenges centuries old barriers and prejudice. The
> Americans with Disabilities Act is one of the most important advances in
> modern history; and it was presented as a scam. Shame on you, Anderson
> Cooper.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

No comments:

Post a Comment