We talk about our modern civilization? Let's pause a moment in our
civilized lives and ask our civilized selves what we would do if we
saw our nine year old son and the nine year old boy next door tossing
lit firecrackers at one another.
Of course you are right. We'd immediately step between them, ordering
them to drop the matches and the fire crackers. And then, depending
upon how our parents handled such matters, we'd apply some discipline
to the seat of their pants.
But what would we do if the neighbor boy's dad came roaring out
snorting and pawing the ground and shouting insults at our son, while
urging his boy to "Aim to Kill! Blow that little snot nose off the
face of the Earth!"
Is that what we would call Leadership? Perhaps we could grab up our
cell phone and call 911. But what if our neighbor was the county
sheriff?
One thing for sure, we need to come up with a better answer than to
charge in and begin tossing more fire crackers.
But this is exactly what Donald Trump is doing, charging in, shouting
threats, bragging that he can wipe a nation off the face of the Earth.
Does he believe that this bluster will cause nations to stop their
pushing and shoving? It sure doesn't seem that he responds favorably
to the threats directed toward himself.
What has become of those wise leaders who can explain to President
Donald Trump that shouting threats never brings about peace or
cooperation. Threats only cause Fear. And Fearful People are more
concerned with developing methods of defense, rather than to make
peace.
Carl Jarvis
On 9/25/17, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@freelists.org> wrote:
> https://socialistaction.org/2017/09/21/trump-we-will-totally-destroy-north-korea/
>
>
> Trump: "We will totally destroy North Korea"
>
> / 4 days ago
>
>
> Oct. 2017 Trump UNBy BARRY SHEPPARD
>
> Trump made this unprecedented threat not in a tweet or off the cuff
> remark but in a written speech before the United Nations General
> Assembly. No other country in the U.N. has ever openly stated its
> intention to destroy another country.
>
> Coupled with his earlier threat to rain down "fire and fury" on North
> Korea, this threat must be seen as one that at least includes the
> possibility of a nuclear attack.
>
> It is true Trump set conditions for this to be carried out, specifically
> that North Korea would threaten the U.S. or its allies. But he left
> vague what this means. He has repeatedly said that the U.S. would not
> tolerate a nuclear-armed North Korea with the ability to deliver a
> weapon to the United States.
>
> North Korea is already a nuclear-armed state. Its recent missile tests
> demonstrate that it is well on its way to be able to hit the U.S., and
> it already has the capacity to hit Guam. North Korea has repeatedly said
> it will continue its nuclear and missile program unless the United
> States finally puts an end to the Korean War by signing a peace treaty
> with the North.
>
> No U.S. politician, from Bernie Sanders on the left to the most extreme
> rightist Republican (take your pick), is ready to do anything that even
> moves in that direction. On the contrary, with bipartisan support the
> U.S. just completed its annual belligerent "war games" in South Korea,
> whose aim is to threaten the North. These "games" include the South's
> army, but that army is under the command of the U.S. occupying force.
>
> South Korea's new president, Moon Jai-in, was elected on the promise of
> seeking dialog with the North, and restricting the deployment of the
> U.S. Thaad anti-missile system. But Trump bullied Moon into reversing
> himself on both. Now the South is deploying a special commando with the
> avowed public goal of assassinating the North's leadership.
>
> One purpose of Trump's threat to destroy North Korea is to force China
> to stop supplying oil to the North, which would devastate its economy,
> in the hopes that this would force the latter to abandon its nuclear
> program. In all likelihood, this will not come to pass.
>
> China does not want the North to collapse, which would be the case with
> an oil embargo for any length of time. That would lead to a U.S.
> invasion resulting in a united Korea as a militarized client state of
> the U.S. on its borders. Even if Xi groveled before Trump and cut off
> the oil, a desperate North, facing collapse, is likely to strike back.
>
> It should be recalled that when President Roosevelt imposed an oil
> embargo on Japan as part of the intensifying rivalry between the two
> powers at the time, Japan replied by striking at the U.S. naval base at
> Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, triggering WWII in the Pacific.
>
> It is obvious that the increasing tensions between North Korea and the
> U.S. pose a very serious danger, and Trump has just upped the ante with
> his U.N. speech.
>
> North Korea has solid reasons for fearing a U.S. attack, given
> Washington's hostility going back to the end of WWII. After the defeat
> of Japan, which had been the colonial power in Korea, the U.S. tried to
> occupy the peninsula as the spoils of war. However, it was only able to
> occupy the southern part of Korea, since the USSR occupied the northern.
> This stalemate explains why there are two Koreas.
>
> What became South Korea was ruled by the U.S. military directly from
> 1945 to 1948. Meanwhile, the Soviet Union withdrew its armed forces from
> the North. In 1948 Washington's military staged phony elections in the
> South, installing the first in a long line of dictators up until 1987.
>
> At the end of the war, the U.S. also tried to occupy parts of China,
> much of which had been occupied by Japan. China was the big prize the
> U.S. coveted. However, this plan had to be scrapped because of a mass
> uprising in the U.S. armed forces called the "bring us home" movement,
> which balked at invading what was viewed as a U.S. ally. The U.S. had
> influence with the government run by the Nationalists.
>
> Then in 1949 the Chinese Revolution completely tore the country out of
> the U.S. imperialist's hands. China now became Washington's enemy. The
> U.S., using hostilities between North and South Korea as the pretext,
> invaded Korea in 1950 and quickly moved deep into the North and
> threatened to continue into China. China countered by sending its army
> into Korea, blocking the U.S. advance.
>
> At that point U.S. President Truman considered using atomic weapons
> against the Chinese and North Koreans. Nine nuclear bombs were
> transferred to the U.S.-occupied Japanese island of Okinawa, along with
> bombers to deliver them. Fortunately, Washington decided against using
> them, which would have meant a major war with China and the Soviet Union.
>
> The war continued until 1953, when a cease-fire recognized that it had
> become a stalemate. The North and South were again divided along
> basically the same lines as before the U.S. invaded. An armistice was
> signed, but not a peace treaty. The U.S. and its puppet regime in the
> South remain in a state of war with the North.
>
> China withdrew its troops from the North, but the U.S. has maintained
> its occupation force in the South up to the present. Washington
> continued its hostile stance toward the North since, including its "war
> games" practices for invasion of the North.
>
> In 1958, the U.S. stationed tactical and strategic nuclear weapons in
> the South, aimed at the North, which would also be used against China
> and the Soviet Union in case of a general nuclear war. At its height,
> there were 950 U.S. nuclear warheads in South Korea. The U.S. weapons
> were removed in 1991 as part of the Strategic Arms Reduction treaty. The
> U.S. threat against the North then resided in the atomic weapons in the
> U.S. Naval fleet in the western Pacific, as well as other parts of
> Washington's nuclear arsenal.
>
> Beside the enormous inequality between small North Korea and the heavily
> armed U.S., there is the gross hypocrisy of Washington. The U.S. was the
> first country to develop atomic weapons and tried at first to keep a
> monopoly on them. That began the nuclear arms race.
>
> The U.S. is the only country to unleash atomic weapons against
> civilians, in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The purpose of
> those bombings had nothing to do with Japan, which had already been
> defeated, but to demonstrate that the U.S. had the inhumanity and will
> to repeat such bombings of cities, first as a threat against the Soviet
> Union before the latter developed its own nuclear weapons, then also
> against China, which did likewise, but also against any potential enemy
> of the U.S.
>
> The U.S. has never renounced the first use of nuclear weapons, and is
> opposed to any possible treaty to abolish such weapons.
>
> Trump's belligerent "America First" speech at the U.N. aimed at the rest
> of the world included much more than the threat destroy North Korea. He
> made stepped-up threats against Iran, Cuba, Syria and Venezuela among
> others, but that is beyond the scope of this article.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Share this:
>
> Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
> 57Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)57
> Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
>
>
> September 21, 2017 in Anti-War, East Asia, Trump / U.S. Government.
>
>
> Related posts
>
>
>
>
>
> The story of North Korea
>
>
>
>
>
> Nuclear insanity: U.S. threatens North Korea
>
>
>
> The Passing of Kim Jong Il
>
>
> Post navigation
>
> ← NDP Socialist Caucus urges critical support for MP Niki Ashton
>
> 4th International: Defend the right to self-determination in Catalonia! →
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Get Involved!
> Donate to help support our work
> Get email updates
> Join Socialist Action
>
>
> Newspaper Archives
> Newspaper Archives Select Month September 2017 (12) August 2017 (16)
> July 2017 (17) June 2017 (16) May 2017 (17) April 2017 (14) March
> 2017 (13) February 2017 (19) January 2017 (13) December 2016 (12)
> November 2016 (19) October 2016 (12) September 2016 (10) August 2016
> (10) July 2016 (14) June 2016 (14) May 2016 (9) April 2016 (12) March
> 2016 (14) February 2016 (8) January 2016 (11) December 2015 (11)
> November 2015 (9) October 2015 (8) September 2015 (10) August 2015
> (7) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9) May 2015 (10) April 2015 (12) March
> 2015 (9) February 2015 (11) January 2015 (10) December 2014 (12)
> November 2014 (11) October 2014 (9) September 2014 (6) August 2014
> (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10) May 2014 (11) April 2014 (10)
> March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11) January 2014 (11) December 2013
> (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013 (17) September 2013 (13) August
> 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013 (15) May 2013 (14) April 2013
> (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013 (10) January 2013 (17) December
> 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October 2012 (19) September 2012 (2)
> August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June 2012 (3) May 2012 (19) April
> 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012 (19) January 2012 (17)
> December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October 2011 (14) September 2011
> (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011 (19)
> April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February 2011 (15) January 2011 (15)
> December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1) October 2010 (6) September 2010
> (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9) April
> 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (3) January 2010 (9) December
> 2009 (6) November 2009 (5) October 2009 (16) September 2009 (3)
> August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April 2009
> (6) March 2009 (16) February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10) December
> 2008 (11) November 2008 (8) October 2008 (16) September 2008 (14)
> August 2008 (18) July 2008 (12) June 2008 (3) May 2008 (2) April
> 2008 (3) March 2008 (14) February 2008 (11) January 2008 (11)
> December 2007 (8) November 2007 (1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1)
> April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1) February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11)
> November 2006 (11) October 2006 (13) September 2006 (15) August 2006
> (11) July 2006 (18) June 2006 (7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March
> 2006 (14) February 2006 (5) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9)
> November 2005 (8) October 2005 (13) September 2005 (12) August 2005
> (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005 (16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12)
> March 2005 (14) February 2005 (19) January 2005 (15) December 2004
> (14) November 2002 (17) October 2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August
> 2002 (21) July 2002 (15) May 2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February
> 2002 (15) January 2002 (15) December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24)
> September 2001 (18) July 2001 (19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17)
> September 2000 (21) August 2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26)
> May 2000 (21) April 2000 (22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18)
> January 2000 (20) December 1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999
> (25) September 1999 (18) August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999
> (24) May 1999 (27) April 1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999
> (29) January 1999 (24) July 1998 (12)
>
> Search
>
> View socialistactionusa's profile on Facebook
> View SocialistActUS's profile on Twitter
> View SocialistActionCT's profile on YouTube
>
>
> Subscribe to Our Newspaper
>
>
> Upcoming Events
> New York City: Trump's attack on immigrant rights
> October 11, 2017 at 6:30 pm – 8:30 pm
>
> Word Up Community Bookshop/Libreria Comunitaria, 2113 Amsterdam Ave, New
> York, NY 10032, USA
>
>
>
> Category Cloud
>
> Actions & Protest Africa Anti-War Arts & Culture Black Liberation Canada
> Caribbean Civil Liberties Cuba East Asia Economy Education & Schools
> Elections En Español Environment Europe Immigration Indigenous Rights
> International Labor Latin America Latino Civil Liberties Marxist Theory
> & History Middle East Police & FBI Prisons South Asia Trump / U.S.
> Government Uncategorized Women's Liberation
>
>
> View Calendar
>
>
> Blog at WordPress.com.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Follow
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment