Right on target, Roger.
"...A labor party is not only about elections but about building a
fighting labor movement to achieve major change..."
For my way of thinking, this is critical to our eventual success. And
by the way, this article will never find its way into the Mass Media.
I am posting it on my blog, and I encourage others to do the same.
Carl Jarvis
On 9/6/15, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@freelists.org> wrote:
> http://socialistaction.org/bernie-sanders-the-labor-movement/
>
>
> Bernie Sanders & the labor movement
>
> Published September 5, 2015. | By Socialist Action.
> Sept. 2015 Sanders labor
>
> By ANN MONTAGUE
>
> Socialist Action has published several articles in recent issues
> exposing Bernie Sanders and the Democratic Party. This included a look
> at past primary elections that were used to raise workers' hopes that
> there would be a place for their aspirations within the Democratic
> Party. Another article looked at Sanders' role in Congress and his
> history with the Democratic Party.
>
> It is also important to investigate what is happening in the working
> class in relation to the Sanders campaign. Examining the changing
> attitudes towards socialism and independent labor campaigns can help us
> to see beyond Sanders in order to evaluate the shifts in the
> working-class electorate.
>
> We are in the midst of a financial and social crisis that has been
> festering for almost a decade. The economic crisis has brought on an
> upsurge of fightback activity from low-wage workers. At the same time,
> however, most union workers have yet to respond with the same militancy
> as their non-union low-wage brothers and sisters.
>
> Long-time union activists have frequently asked each other, "Where are
> all the young workers?" The first answer is that many of them are in the
> Fight For $15 movement, and the second answer is that they are attending
> Bernie Sanders rallies. We have seen in the period of about 10 weeks
> this summer over 100,000 people crammed into sports arenas in a variety
> of cities to hear Sanders' populist message about economic inequality
> and the fight against the "Billionaire Class."
>
> The many millennials, students, and young workers at the Sanders rallies
> have been joined by union members—a lot of them. These groups are all
> motivated by the same anger. They are angry at Wall Street and the
> taxpayer bailout of the banks, the lingering effects of the financial
> crisis, skyrocketing rents, the high cost of health care and shrinking
> income while the wealthy 1% profits from policies of austerity, war, and
> the prison industrial complex.
>
> Crisis of union democracy
>
> In the labor movement today, there is nothing as routine as the union
> bureaucracy's deciding to support the Democratic presidential candidate.
> An early endorsement is often expected to show the Democratic Party
> bosses that there will be money and foot soldiers ready for them
> regardless of their anti-labor policies during the previous four years.
> Preaching "lesser evilism" to any union member who might balk at their
> marching orders is also part of the routine.
>
> This year is slightly different. Distrust is evident toward Hillary
> Clinton on a signature labor issue, the unpopular Trans-Pacific
> Partnership (TPP), and also because of her close ties to Wall Street.
> The fact that Clinton is openly raising $2 billion for her campaign has
> also not gone well in the unions.
>
> With the populist Bernie Sanders on the scene, many union members are
> saying "slow down" on endorsements. The issue within some unions has
> moved from which candidate to support to "why don't the members have a
> vote."
>
> When Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of
> Teachers (AFT), announced they were the first national union to endorse
> Clinton, there was a strong backlash among teachers across the country
> based on the undemocratic process and rumors that Clinton had offered
> Weingarten a position in her cabinet.
>
> A month later, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace
> Workers (IAM) announced it would endorse Hillary Clinton. President Tom
> Buffenbarger announced in a press release that the decision was made
> based on an internal survey of 1700 members. Again the union members
> were irate. One comment on their Facebook page was indicative of the
> members: "What a sham. Not in the least bit democratic … only 1700 out
> of 600,000 members is not a majority. … You guys need to wake up and
> listen to the members."
>
> Mary Kay Henry, president of SEIU, could see the way the wind was
> blowing and quickly said that there would be no early endorsement and
> that they would continue pushing issues of economic inequality.
>
> When the National Nurses Union was the first national union to endorse
> Sanders, the most common comment from union members was about their
> process. As one member of a different union, who didn't support any
> Democratic Party candidate, commented, "Did you see that? Their members
> all voted. It was the members who actually made the decision."
>
> While on the surface it appears that this is merely a disagreement over
> which candidate the union will endorse, it could be the beginning of
> deeper conversations about the struggle for union democracy. Hopefully,
> more specific discussions will also take place concerning Sanders' lack
> of any solution to the attacks on workers that are increasing every day.
>
> The lack of union democracy regarding presidential endorsements is not
> the only thing that has agitated the rank and file this summer. In July
> and August there were events to celebrate the 50th anniversary of
> Medicare. But instead of the regular "lobby and call your legislator"
> event, there were working-class rallies to demand the expansion and
> improvement of Medicare.
>
> These rallies were called the National Day of Action to Protect, Expand
> and Improve Medicare and were organized by National Nurses United, Labor
> Campaign For Single Payer, AFL-CIO, and the union-based Alliance For
> Retired Americans. One of the largest rallies was on Aug. 8 at the
> Westlake Mall in Seattle, where 5000 rallied for both "Medicare For All"
> and Medicaid expansion. The energized Seattle labor movement showed up,
> coming off of their winning a $15 minimum wage, their growing movement
> to fight skyrocketing rents, and the re-election campaign of socialist
> Seattle city council member Kshama Sawant.
>
> Every time there is a spark of rebellion in the working class, it
> ignites more activity. Two years of regular fast-food strikes became a
> movement of low-wage workers. The activity expanded from one-day strikes
> to include union bargaining campaigns. Then it moved to mass rallies and
> marches aimed at local governments. Now union members are emerging from
> decades of acceptance that union bureaucrats should make the decisions
> about candidate endorsements.
>
> Poll results reflect the changing attitudes towards the major capitalist
> parties and an increasing interest in socialism. A Gallup Poll completed
> in 2014 shows that 43% of respondents do not identify themselves as
> Democrats or Republicans. They consider themselves "independent." This
> percentage is a new high for Gallup, which has been polling on this
> question since 1988. Identification as a Democrat has declined the most
> during this period.
>
> A poll in June of this year showed that 52% now support "government
> redistribution of wealth" by increasing taxes on the rich. This is the
> greatest support for wealth redistribution that has been measured since
> 1940. The pollsters also asked if respondents would vote for a
> "socialist" for president, and a high 47% answered that they would do
> so. The combination of increased support for wealth re-distribution and
> the fact that the word "socialist" is no longer taboo demonstrate a
> major shift.
>
> For a labor party!
>
> This is the time to start talking about an independent workers' party.
> Workers both young and old are angry at the economic and the political
> system, and while at this time many are turning to a self-described
> "socialist" who is running as a Democrat and who has said he will
> support the eventual nominee of the Democratic Party, some union members
> are talking about a party of their own.
>
> The traditional labor party is based in the union movement. While union
> membership in the United States is low compared to countries that have
> traditional labor parties, the labor movement itself has been energized
> by the movement of low-wage workers and their allies.
>
> An August Gallup Poll reports that increasing numbers support unions
> while union membership remains at about 12%. Approval of unions jumped
> to 58%, which is an increase of 10% since 2009.
>
> There was also an increase of those who want unions to have more
> influence on the political process (37%).However, those calling on the
> Democratic Party candidates for solutions to the problems we face will
> never find satisfaction. The fight against the "billionaire class"
> cannot be waged by the party controlled by billionaires.
>
> Likewise, the struggles against racism and anti-immigrant bigotry will
> not be championed by the Democratic Party. They will never stop saying
> that the solution to racist cops is body cameras, and that the solution
> to the immigration "problem" is to increase the militarization of the
> border and to increase enforcement of laws against undocumented workers.
>
> A labor party is not only about elections but about building a fighting
> labor movement to achieve major change. Building independent workers'
> power in the political arena as well as in the workplace and the streets
> can help build a bridge from anger and disappointment to a successful
> struggle for pressing demands. The call for a labor party can be that
> initial step.
>
>
>
>
>
> Share this:
>
> Facebook29
> Twitter1
> Google
> Tumblr
>
>
>
>
> Posted in Elections, Labor. | Tagged Bernie Sanders, Democrats, labor,
> unions.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Get Involved
>
>
> Join Socialist Action
> Donate to help support our work
> Get email updates
> Events
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Subscribe to Our Newspaper
>
>
> JAN. 2014 p.1 jpegJAN. 2014 p. 12
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Subscribe Today
>
>
>
> Subscriptions to the monthly print edition of Socialist Action are
> available for the following rates:
>
> - 12 month subscription for $20
> - 24 month subscription for $37
> - 6 month subscription for $10
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn More
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Email Updates
>
>
>
> Enter your email address to subscribe to our free e-mail Socialist
> Action Newsletter. Also to receive notifcations of new web posts by email.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn More
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Newspaper Archives
>
> Select Month September 2015 (3) August 2015 (7) July 2015 (13) June
> 2015 (9) May 2015 (10) April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9) February 2015
> (11) January 2015 (10) December 2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October
> 2014 (9) September 2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June
> 2014 (10) May 2014 (11) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February
> 2014 (11) January 2014 (11) December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11)
> October 2013 (17) September 2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11)
> June 2013 (15) May 2013 (14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February
> 2013 (10) January 2013 (17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8)
> October 2012 (19) September 2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18)
> June 2012 (3) May 2012 (19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February
> 2012 (19) January 2012 (17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33)
> October 2011 (14) September 2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011
> (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011 (19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15)
> February 2011 (16) January 2011 (15) December 2010 (17) November
> 2010 (1) October 2010 (6) September 2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July
> 2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9) April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8)
> February 2010 (3) January 2010 (9) December 2009 (6) November 2009
> (5) October 2009 (16) September 2009 (3) August 2009 (2) July 2009
> (5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April 2009 (6) March 2009 (16)
> February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10) December 2008 (11) November 2008
> (8) October 2008 (16) September 2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008
> (12) June 2008 (3) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14)
> February 2008 (11) January 2008 (11) December 2007 (8) November 2007
> (1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1) April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1)
> February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11) November 2006 (11) October 2006
> (13) September 2006 (15) August 2006 (11) July 2006 (12) June 2006
> (7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March 2006 (14) February 2006 (5)
> January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9) November 2005 (8) October 2005
> (13) September 2005 (12) August 2005 (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005
> (16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March 2005 (14) February 2005 (19)
> January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14) November 2002 (17) October 2002
> (19) September 2002 (22) August 2002 (21) July 2002 (15) May 2002
> (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15) January 2002 (15) December
> 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September 2001 (18) July 2001 (19) June
> 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September 2000 (21) August 2000 (19)
> July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21) April 2000 (22) March
> 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000 (20) December 1999 (20)
> November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September 1999 (18) August 1999
> (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999 (27) April 1999 (25)
> March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999 (24) July 1998 (12)
> 0 (2)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn More
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Pamphlets/Books
>
>
>
> Socialist Action publishes a wide variety of pamphlets on burning issues
> of today such as global warming, women's liberation, the Middle East and
> other subjects.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn More
>
>
>
>
>
> Socialist Action (U.S.): socialistaction@lmi.net | (510) 268-9429
>
> Socialist Action / Ligue pour l'Action socialiste (Canada):
> barryaw@rogers.com
>
> Copyright © 2015 Socialist Action. All Rights Reserved. Site Design by
> Lucid Digital Designs | Site Utilities
>
>
>
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment