There are many ways to kill freedom of the press. You might buy off
reporters, if you have unlimited funds. You could even buy entire
networks and paper chains. You even might be able to indoctrinate
budding young journalists in the ways of the Ruling Class.
Or, if all else fails, you always have the ability to threaten those
who refuse to knuckle under. And all the time those in power repeat
over and over that we have a free press.
Which Saint was it who threw himself into the briar patch each time he
had a negative thought? Finally he announced that he was free to
think and say anything he chose. One day, if the Empire has its way,
our journalists will no longer fear for their well being. They will
be "free" to say and write whatever they choose.
Carl Jarvis
On 12/16/14, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
> DOJ Says It Will Subpoena NYT Reporter James Risen
> Published on
> Tuesday, December 16, 2014
> by
> Common Dreams
> DOJ Says It Will Subpoena NYT Reporter James Risen
> Given the Justice Department's extensive investigation into Risen,
> journalist's attorney questions whether prosecution will really limit
> questioning
> by
> Lauren McCauley, staff writer
>
> James Risen told Democracy Now in October that he believes that a "major
> part" of President Obama's legacy will be his attempt to "erode press
> freedom in the United States." (Screenshot: Democracy Now!)
> The United States government has confirmed that it will seek limited
> testimony from New York Times reporter James Risen, according to court
> documents filed Tuesday, in regards to his relationship with the alleged
> CIA
> leaker Jeffery Sterling.
> Ahead of the official filing, press freedom advocates had welcomed the news
> that the Department of Justice would not press the journalist to expose the
> anonymous source or sources for his 2006 book, State of War.
> According to the Justice Department filing (pdf), Holder has authorized
> prosecutors to seek Risen's testimony in regards to the facts that Risen
> has
> a confidentiality agreement with his source or sources for his book, as
> well
> as for two earlier New York Times articles, and that Risen had a previous
> "non-confidential reporter-source relationship" with Jeffrey Sterling.
> Sterling is accused of leaking information related to a botched CIA mission
> to sabotage Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program, which Risen writes
> about
> in his book.
> Risen's attorney, Joel Kurtzberg, told the Alexandria, Virginia court on
> Tuesday that although Risen had expressed willingness to confirm some of
> that information previously, he was unsure if his client would comply in
> this case. The federal government's pursuit of Risen has become a battle
> over the First Amendment rights of journalists and, according to advocates,
> threatens the ability of reporters to promise confidentiality to sources.
> Reporting on the hearing, Politico reporter Josh Gerstein, who has followed
> the Risen case closely, wrote that Kurtzberg "made clear that whatever
> questions Risen ultimately answers would ultimately be under compulsion of
> a
> subpoena."
> "He's certainly not volunteering to be here," Kurtzberg told the court.
> Further, according the Washington Post: "Edward B. MacMahon Jr., Sterling's
> attorney, said he was just reviewing the prosecutors' filing, but he noted
> that their investigation into Risen was extensive and said the idea of
> limited questioning of the reporter was 'hard for us to fathom at this
> point
> in time.' He said prosecutors had obtained Risen's FedEx records, credit
> card receipts and even some type of Western Union transaction to at least
> one of his children."
> It was also noted during the hearing that the DOJ filing did not specify
> whether defense lawyers would be limited in their questioning of Risen.
> Investigative journalist Marcy Wheeler speculates that the government may
> be
> hoping that Sterling's defense team will demand Risen's complete testimony
> in an effort to keep Sterling out of prison.
> Kurtzberg did confirm that Risen would attend a January 5th hearing, which
> the court called a "moot of Mr. Risen's testimony," during which the court
> can determine "exactly what questions Mr. Risen will answer [...] without
> burdening the jury's time."
> This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
> License
> Share This Article
> DOJ Says It Will Subpoena NYT Reporter James Risen
> Published on
> Tuesday, December 16, 2014
> by
> Common Dreams
> DOJ Says It Will Subpoena NYT Reporter James Risen
> Given the Justice Department's extensive investigation into Risen,
> journalist's attorney questions whether prosecution will really limit
> questioning
> by
> Lauren McCauley, staff writer
>
> James Risen told Democracy Now in October that he believes that a "major
> part" of President Obama's legacy will be his attempt to "erode press
> freedom in the United States." (Screenshot: Democracy Now!)
> The United States government has confirmed that it will seek limited
> testimony from New York Times reporter James Risen, according to court
> documents filed Tuesday, in regards to his relationship with the alleged
> CIA
> leaker Jeffery Sterling.
> Ahead of the official filing, press freedom advocates had welcomed the news
> that the Department of Justice would not press the journalist to expose the
> anonymous source or sources for his 2006 book, State of War.
> According to the Justice Department filing (pdf), Holder has authorized
> prosecutors to seek Risen's testimony in regards to the facts that Risen
> has
> a confidentiality agreement with his source or sources for his book, as
> well
> as for two earlier New York Times articles, and that Risen had a previous
> "non-confidential reporter-source relationship" with Jeffrey Sterling.
> Sterling is accused of leaking information related to a botched CIA mission
> to sabotage Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program, which Risen writes
> about
> in his book.
> Risen's attorney, Joel Kurtzberg, told the Alexandria, Virginia court on
> Tuesday that although Risen had expressed willingness to confirm some of
> that information previously, he was unsure if his client would comply in
> this case. The federal government's pursuit of Risen has become a battle
> over the First Amendment rights of journalists and, according to advocates,
> threatens the ability of reporters to promise confidentiality to sources.
> Reporting on the hearing, Politico reporter Josh Gerstein, who has followed
> the Risen case closely, wrote that Kurtzberg "made clear that whatever
> questions Risen ultimately answers would ultimately be under compulsion of
> a
> subpoena."
> "He's certainly not volunteering to be here," Kurtzberg told the court.
> Further, according the Washington Post: "Edward B. MacMahon Jr., Sterling's
> attorney, said he was just reviewing the prosecutors' filing, but he noted
> that their investigation into Risen was extensive and said the idea of
> limited questioning of the reporter was 'hard for us to fathom at this
> point
> in time.' He said prosecutors had obtained Risen's FedEx records, credit
> card receipts and even some type of Western Union transaction to at least
> one of his children."
> It was also noted during the hearing that the DOJ filing did not specify
> whether defense lawyers would be limited in their questioning of Risen.
> Investigative journalist Marcy Wheeler speculates that the government may
> be
> hoping that Sterling's defense team will demand Risen's complete testimony
> in an effort to keep Sterling out of prison.
> Kurtzberg did confirm that Risen would attend a January 5th hearing, which
> the court called a "moot of Mr. Risen's testimony," during which the court
> can determine "exactly what questions Mr. Risen will answer [...] without
> burdening the jury's time."
> This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
> License
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-Democracy mailing list
> Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
> https://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy
>
No comments:
Post a Comment