Fwd: [blind-democracy] Re: Whose Lives Matter?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 11:59:03 -0400
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Whose Lives Matter?
To: blind-democracy@freelists.org

I'm back to reading the history of the Black Panther Party. It's
called Black Against Empire and it's on BARD. So 60 years ago, the
Black Panthers, which formed in order to defend black communities
against police brutality, were saying that African Americans were a
colonized people and should be granted nation status by the United
Nations. To start with, they were requesting UN observers in every
black ghetto in the US. They believed that every black prisoner is a
political prisoner, regardless of the crime of which he had been
accused. A political party was formed, The Peace and Freedom Party,
which had white radical and not so radical allies. Their Presidential
nominee was Eldridge Cleever who had been in prison various times for
some rather ugly crimes. But he was very bright and became extremely
literate. He wrote a book, which I remember, called Soul On Ice, that
became a best seller. Part of the reason that happened was that a
radical white lawyer fell in love with him and used her connections at
Ramparts, a left wing magazine, to get the book published. The person
who was the editor of Ramparts was Robert Sheer who is now the editor
of Truthdig. Anyway, getting back to my original point, sixty years
ago, black people and white radicals were talking about and writing
about the same issues as they are in 2015. Many of the black people
considered themselves to be marxist revolutionaries and
internationalists. Most of the leaders were killed or imprisoned. The
young people in the new black organizations, considered the older
generation to be co-opted by the establishment. Black Lives Matter
seems very tame in terms of its actions and rhetoric, when compared
with the Black Panthers. And our white radicals of today, write blogs
and tweets, rather than marching in the streets, splashing blood on
draft cards, or setting off bombs in public places. The Black Panthers
and the Weather Underground really believed that they were part of a
revolution, that the empire was about to fall. Their naivete is mind
boggling. In 2012, the Green Party white female Presidential and vice
presidential candidates were detained in Nassau County to prevent them
from attending the two party sanctioned presidential debate. And you
all watched a reality show with 10 participants last night on a TV
propaganda network.

Miriam

-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@freelists.org
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Carl Jarvis
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 9:57 AM
To: blind-democracy@freelists.org
Subject: [blind-democracy] Whose Lives Matter?

Just having to ask the question, "Whose Lives Matter?" should set off
the alarms. Will White American Male Corporate Capitalists and their
fellow travelers ever face the fact that their world has already built
that wall, not on the Mexican border, but between White Wealthy
America and everybody else. Black Americans seem to get it, but White
Working Class Americans are still wandering about in the desert.
Because the Ruling Class is mostly White, it only stands to reason
that the laws are slanted to protect White Wealthy Americans.
Discrimination rules. Slavery, under another name, continues to
flourish. White American Working Class is played like a bad fiddle,
dancing first to the tune that they are just a dream away from
reaching riches, to a dance that they are superior to Americans of
Color, to the old tune that, "Our way of life is threatened by Those
People". For generations we bragged that we were the melting pot of
the world. It is not true today, nor was it ever true. People
streamed into this new land, forced by desperate conditions in their
homeland, only to be shuttled into the ghettos and slums of the day,
isolated from the "Real Americans" like those white snobs on Beacon
Hill in Boston.
America is a Land of Myths and Fables, tales spun to cover the real
America, the dirty, racist, angry, frightened America.
Any doctor knows that you can't treat a condition until it has been
identified. Yet, we waltz about ignoring our own festering cancer
that is eating us alive, and pretending that we are the world's most
powerful nation, and the keeper of democracy and peace.
I often wonder just what the last cry of the last human being on earth
will be. And will he/she be white, black or brown? And who or what
will come after us? And will they be able to build from our mistakes,
or will they also turn their resources upon self destruction.
After last night's "debate", the best men the Republican Party can
bring to the presidential race, I have had my Faith shaken. I know
I'll bounce, I always do, but now that I am at the backside of life,
perhaps it's time to simply observe and let the world go to Hell in
that old hand basket.

Carl Jarvis
Carl Jarvis


On 8/6/15, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@freelists.org> wrote:
> http://socialistaction.org/whose-lives-matter/
>
>
> Whose Lives Matter?
>
> Published August 5, 2015. | By Socialist Action.
> DEM 2016 O'Malley
>
> By BILL ONASCH
>
> Netroots Nation bills its live body gatherings as the biggest
> conference of Progressives—by which they mean liberal Democrats. At
> their annual conclave, held in Phoenix in July, they featured a
> presidential candidate Town Hall Meeting that included the two top
> long-shot challengers to Hillary Clinton for the Donkey Party
> nod—Senator Bernie Sanders, the Vermont independent who for the past
> quarter-century has caucused with the Democrats, and Martin O'Malley,
> who just completed two terms as governor of Maryland and prior to that
> served two terms as Mayor of Baltimore. They came prepared to give
> their stock spiel to a friendly audience. But that was not to be.
>
> A vocal contingent from the movement in formation known as Black Lives
> Matter insisted that the Democrat hopefuls respond to their issues.
> I'm sure that as a former mayor of Brown Town Baltimore, this was not
> O'Malley's first exposure to edgy African-American dissent. But, after
> first demonstrating the stereotype that white people can't get the
> hang of rhythmic clapping, he appeared flustered and blurted, "Black
> lives matter, white lives matter, all lives matter."
>
> While few would challenge such banality about the sanctity of life in
> general, O'Malley got a reminder that context rules. The BLM agitators
> were there because Black lives are being taken in alarming numbers by
> those charged to protect and serve them. The Guardian has been
> updating a running count of those killed by police in the USA, along
> with their color. As I write, the total for this year is 648. Broken
> down by fatalities per million of their color's population: 4.12
> Black; 1.77 Latino; 1.58 white.
>
> If the numbers and colors were reversed, if unarmed suburban,
> middle-class white youth were being gunned down by Black cops, it
> would undoubtedly be considered a national crisis. Clearly in America
> today Black lives don't matter as much. But few white liberal
> politicians are willing to explicitly acknowledge this—much less take
> any meaningful action to end this disgrace.
>
> And what about the "socialist" who has been drawing big
> crowds—including 11,000 at a rally in Phoenix—in his quest for the Democrat nomination?
> One of Bernie's most avid supporters, Joe Dinkin, national
> communications director of the Working Families Party, wrote in that
> venerable organ of liberalism, the Nation, "Both candidates did damage
> to themselves; Sanders was defensive, and O'Malley's response included
> the words 'white lives matter.' But Sanders had far more to gain by
> getting this right.
>
> "I approach this incident as a fan of Bernie Sanders. But when he had
> the opportunity to rewrite his own narrative and broaden his own base,
> he failed. … With the protest, Sanders was presented an opportunity on
> a silver platter: He could overcome his perceived negatives and grow
> his base. All he would have had to do was act with a little humility.
> But instead, he talked over the protesters, got defensive about his
> racial-justice bona fides, and stuck to his script.
>
> "Essentially, he appeared to be arguing that economics and class trump
> all. For an audience mourning the death of Sandra Bland, a woman who
> was arrested at a traffic stop on the way to her new job before
> mysteriously dying in police custody, the jobs program Sanders
> suggested just didn't seem like a sufficient answer."
>
> Dinkin makes some good points but you will note that his perspective
> begins with Bernie's missed opportunities. He thinks a few well-chosen
> humble words might have got his candidate off the hook. CYA is what
> "getting this right" means to politicians—not engaging in genuine
> dialog with African-American activists about what needs to be done
> both in the short-term and long-run.
>
> Class and economic issues are key to the goal of eliminating racism
> root and branch. Whites don't need to explain this to Black workers
> who understand it much better than their pale pigment class siblings.
> Black leaders from Frederick Douglass, through A. Phillip Randolph,
> down to Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., have taught African Americans
> to be much more pro-union, and more inclined to advance their struggle
> through mass action, than most white workers who have much more to learn.
>
> The Black Lives Matter movement is focused on an immediate tactical
> objective, while Class and Economic Justice is a long haul strategy.
> They can build one another—synergy. Nothing good comes from
> counterposing them.
>
> Patently, despite great expectations, there has been no progress on
> any aspect of racism on the watch of the currently governing
> ruling-class party with an African-American president in charge and
> Black attorneys general overseeing Justice.
>
> A recent feature in The New York Times begins, "Seven years ago, in
> the gauzy afterglow of a stirring election night in Chicago,
> commentators dared ask whether the United States had finally begun to
> heal its divisions over race and atone for the original sin of slavery
> by electing its first black president. It has not. Not even close.
>
> "A New York Times/CBS News poll conducted last week reveals that
> nearly six in 10 Americans, including heavy majorities of both whites
> and blacks, think race relations are generally bad, and that nearly
> four in 10 think the situation is getting worse. By comparison,
> two-thirds of Americans surveyed shortly after President Obama took
> office said they believed that race relations were generally good.
>
> "The swings in attitude have been particularly striking among
> African-Americans. During Mr. Obama's 2008 campaign, nearly 60 percent
> of blacks said race relations were generally bad, but that number was
> cut in half shortly after he won. It has now soared to 68 percent, the
> highest level of discontent among blacks during the Obama years and
> close to the numbers recorded in the aftermath of the riots that
> followed the 1992 acquittal of Los Angeles police officers charged in
> the beating of Rodney King."
>
> The once optimistic commentators referred to in The Times included
> virtually all participants in Netroots Nation. The Nation held a
> symposium speculating on what President Obama might accomplish in his
> First Hundred Days—an historical reference to FDR's taking office
> during the Great Depression, warmed over by Bill Fletcher Jr. in the
> Black Commentator.
>
> Joe Dinkin is right to be wary of a non-nuanced "economics and class
> trump all," but that formulation is spot on concerning the first Black
> person nurtured by the ruling class to become president. The only
> problem is that the economic policies of the current administration
> are not in the interest of our class—and especially not the doubly
> oppressed Black sector of the working class.
>
> The 100,000 jobs eliminated at the peak of the Great Recession by the
> bankruptcy/bailout restructuring of General Motors and Chrysler,
> imposed by the White House, impacted African Americans hardest of all.
> The attacks on public education through the Race to the Top enriched
> testing and textbook companies as well as charter schools while
> hitting Black communities with massive school closings and attacks on
> teacher seniority and pensions.
>
> Pro-privatization policies have also axed tens of thousands of good
> jobs largely held by African Americans at the U.S. Postal Service. The
> disparity in Black/white unemployment and wage rates remains firmly
> entrenched—helping to make racism profitable for the employers of wage
> labor.
>
> But there was still little criticism of the president at Netroots, and
> most unions and civil rights organizations swallowed their tongues
> long ago. Even the "socialist" in their midst avoids denunciation of
> the reactionary character of the administration winding down its second term.
>
> Ruling-class strategists appear to favor a "bump" from a first woman
> president taking the launch codes from the first Black. The real first
> choice for the Netroots Nation would be Senator Elizabeth Warren—who
> has firmly declined the offer. Hillary Clinton—a loyal and highly
> visible part of the Establishment for as long as any Millennial can
> remember—is a tougher sell. Netroots hopes Bernie can at least force
> her to trim "left." She has in fact already out bid the "socialist" by
> promising to put solar panels on every American home within 10 years of taking office.
>
> The Rev. Jesse Jackson ran an issue campaign for the Democrat
> nomination in 1988. It resembled in some respects the Bernie Sanders
> effort, with one important exception—Rev. Jackson played a leading
> role in mass movements while the "socialist's" resume is mostly based
> on winning elections in Vermont. When the Rev. Jackson gave his
> concession speech at the convention that nominated Dukakis, he
> reminded the delegates that the party needs "two wings to fly."
>
> Though it was not his intention—perhaps not even his
> understanding—this famous quote explains why American politics
> revolves around sentiment, rhetoric, and personalities masking the
> underlying divisions of class and color. It's what enables a tiny
> ruling class to run government without any effective opposition. Those
> who do not yet understand this are not entitled to lead us. If you're
> not part of the solution—you're part of the problem.
>
> I'm confident that, whatever organizational forms may evolve, the
> struggle for Black Lives Matter will continue. So will the Fight for
> Fifteen by low-wage workers who, at least in urban areas, are
> overwhelmingly Black and Latino. We are seeing the early stages of a
> mass movement around climate change. These are battles that deserve
> the support of all workers.
>
> It seems inevitable that in the course of these game-changing
> struggles will come recognition that our side needs a party of our own
> to challenge a political monopoly that benefits from racism, sexism,
> economic exploitation—and has put us in danger of wrecking our
> biosphere. Then—and only then—will working people have a stake in the
> elections.
>
> Photo: A Black Lives Matter protester confronts Maryland Gov. Martin
> O'Malley (right) at the Netroots Nation conference in Phoenix. Ross D.
> Franklin / AP
>
>
>
>
>
> Share this:
>
> Facebook3
> Twitter2
> Google
> Tumblr
>
>
>
>
> Posted in Black Liberation, Elections. | Tagged Bernie Sanders, Black
> Lives Matter, Democratic Party, Democrats, Martin O'Malley, Netroots,
> Phoenix.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Get Involved
>
>
> Join Socialist Action
> Donate to help support our work
> Get email updates
> Events
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Subscribe to Our Newspaper
>
>
> JAN. 2014 p.1 jpegJAN. 2014 p. 12
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Subscribe Today
>
>
>
> Subscriptions to the monthly print edition of Socialist Action are
> available for the following rates:
>
> - 12 month subscription for $20
> - 24 month subscription for $37
> - 6 month subscription for $10
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn More
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Email Updates
>
>
>
> Enter your email address to subscribe to our free e-mail Socialist
> Action Newsletter. Also to receive notifcations of new web posts by email.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn More
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Newspaper Archives
>
> Select Month August 2015 (1) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9) May 2015
> (10) April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9) February 2015 (11) January 2015
> (10) December 2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October 2014 (9)
> September
> 2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10) May 2014
> (11) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11) January 2014
> (11) December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013 (17)
> September
> 2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013 (15) May 2013
> (14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013 (10) January
> 2013
> (17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October 2012 (19)
> September
> 2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June 2012 (3) May 2012
> (19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012 (19) January 2012
> (17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October 2011 (14)
> September
> 2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011
> (19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February 2011 (16) January
> 2011
> (15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1) October 2010 (6)
> September 2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May
> 2010 (9) April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (3) January
> 2010 (9) December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5) October 2009 (16)
> September 2009
> (3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April
> 2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10)
> December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8) October 2008 (16) September
> 2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008 (12) June 2008 (3) May 2008
> (2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14) February 2008 (11) January 2008
> (11) December 2007 (8) November 2007 (1) July 2007 (1) June 2007
> (1) April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1) February 2007 (3) December 2006
> (11) November 2006 (11) October 2006 (13) September 2006 (15)
> August 2006
> (11) July 2006 (12) June 2006 (7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6)
> March
> 2006 (14) February 2006 (5) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9)
> November 2005 (8) October 2005 (13) September 2005 (12) August 2005
> (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005 (16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12)
> March
> 2005 (14) February 2005 (19) January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14)
> November 2002 (17) October 2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August
> 2002
> (21) July 2002 (15) May 2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002
> (15) January 2002 (15) December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24)
> September 2001
> (18) July 2001 (19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September 2000
> (21) August 2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21)
> April 2000 (22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000
> (20) December 1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25)
> September
> 1999 (18) August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999
> (27) April 1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January
> 1999
> (24) July 1998 (12) 0 (2)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn More
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Pamphlets/Books
>
>
>
> Socialist Action publishes a wide variety of pamphlets on burning
> issues of today such as global warming, women's liberation, the Middle
> East and other subjects.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn More
>
>
>
>
>
> Socialist Action (U.S.): socialistaction@lmi.net | (510) 268-9429
>
> Socialist Action / Ligue pour l'Action socialiste (Canada):
> barryaw@rogers.com
>
> Copyright © 2015 Socialist Action. All Rights Reserved. Site Design by
> Lucid Digital Designs | Site Utilities
>
>
>
>
>
>