Barefoot Artists, Inc. is a nonprofit arts organization based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania that uses the power of art to transform impoverished communities. Founded in 2003 by Lily Yeh, Barefoot Artists aims to train and empower local residents, organize communities, and take action for a more compassionate, just and sustainable (better) future. Using the concept and model proven in her 20 years of work in inner city North Philadelphia at the Village of Arts and Humanities in North Philadelphia and in other poor communities in the States, Yeh works on projects in Rwanda, Kenya, Ghana, Ecuador, China, and Rwanda, among others. As the name implies, Barefoot Artists is a volunteer organization with few encumbrances of staff and overhead. Yeh raises funds for specific projects that pair volunteer expertise with local people to improve environment, advance health, education, and economic development. When funds are raised for a project, a call for volunteers is held and a group of volunteers and some paid staff are organized. | |
During the project process, participants learn Barefoot Artists methodology on community building and economic development through art. We aim to inspire the participants such that they will take initiative to start their own projects, bring other volunteers, funding sources and new opportunities to the communities in need. We intend that the various programs initiated by volunteers become multi-faceted and inter-connected so as to better serve the communities. To read more about the Village and see photos of the projects, please click here. |
Sunday, January 30, 2011
independent and interdependent
Friday, January 28, 2011
This may be a better lead in: the amazing blind mowing machine
(Note: recently the National Federation of the Blind has been promoting a Blind Driver Challenge. This widely publicised event was held Saturday,
January 29 at the Daytona International Speedway. Featured was the public debut of a car equipped with a nonvisual
interface that will empower a blind person to drive without sighted assistance.Every new development has its beginnings somewhere back in time. Could the following account be connected to the Blind Car?**********the amazing blind mowing machinebyCarl JarvisLong before many of you were able to do more than wet your diapers and hunt for your lost Binky, my neighbor Earl and I invented the Amazing Blind Mowing
Machine.The year was 1967 and I had been totally blind for just over 2 years. I had devised a tedious method of mowing my lawn, involving a couple of long stakes
with heavy twine tied between them, driving them into the ground at each side of the lawn, then walking out three strides and backing up to the twine again,
moving over a short distance and doing it again. Over and over, each time I reached the opposite edge I'd move the stakes up three paces and repeat the trip.
It got the job done, but it took two and a half hours to mow what I used to mow in just an hour.My neighbor Earl was a backyard inventor, having several patents on some clever and useful gadgets. Watching me got his creative juices running in high
gear."There must be an easier way for you to mow that grass", he mused one day as I was wiping the sweat from my brow. "Do you mind if I try designing something?"
Well I said I didn't mind just so long as I was involved in the design. And so we thought and thought and figured and figured and scratched our heads
and scratched other places, too. Finally it was designed, drawn up, materials purchased, and the finished product was hauled into my yard and set in place.
There it stood, the Amazing Blind Mowing Machine. A long rail ran the length of my lawn, topped with a metal runner. On the runner was attached a pulley.
From the pulley ran a length of heavy fishing line. The line was attached to a device that I strapped to me. It was about 18 inches wide and had a peg
at either side. The fishing line was wound between the pegs. After I mowed one length of my yard I would wind the fishing line up one turn, reposition
myself and trundle back down the lawn just barely overlapping my first cut.And to keep me on target, each peg was attached to a buzzer. If I veered just a bit to the right, "Buzz, buzz, buzz!" And If I went too far to the left,
"Rasp, Rasp, Rasp". So down the yard I went, rasping and buzzing away. It worked, but it drove me crazy.I would have junked the whole thing then and there except old Earl stood tall and proud, smiling his big happy grin.So I thanked him and put cotton in my ears.But that was only the beginning. One fine morning a few days after our trial run, a knock came at my door. There stood a young woman and a young man.
"We're from the Seattle Post Intelligencer", she proudly announced. "We're hear to see your Amazing Blind Mowing Machine in action".Earl must have been watching out his side window, because he came bustling over eager to explain just how he came up with this wonderful invention and how
it had made life so much easier for me. The next morning, there I was. Fortunately not on Page One, but on the first page of B Section. As if that weren't
bad enough, my phone began ringing off the hook. The story had made the AP Wire Service. Calls came in from Tennessee, Florida, Oklahoma, New Jersey,
Kansas and several from local towns. "When are you going into production?" they all clamored. "Boy, how's it work? Can we have it shipped by next April?"
But good things happen to good people. We sold our house and moved several miles away from Earl. I packed up the Amazing Blind Mowing Machine, promising
Earl that I'd be setting it up first thing. Then I stacked it in the garage and forgot it ever existed. New address, new phone number and the calls quit
coming in.But I can't help wondering. Did someone in the National Federation of the Blind hang onto that old AP press release and decide that if it worked for a
lawn mower it just might be adapted to a car?
Thursday, January 27, 2011
should driving be a priority among the blind?
to drive or not to drive
Monday, January 24, 2011
tightwad tuesday and frugal friday
Oregon School for the Blind to be torn down
Federal Crime? Beck's Call to Violence: "Shoot Them in the Head"
what this country needs is a good 2 party system
www.curiouscarlscorner.blogspot.com
Scalia, Thomas Dined at Fancy Koch Dinners Before CitizensUnited Ruling, Advocacy Group Wants DOJ Investigation
The Future Is Becoming More Clear -- Abandon Sprawl
Blind children; are we conditioning them for mediocracy?
Is Critical Journalism Incomprehensible to NPR?
NPR Finds Right-Wing Crank to Spit on Zinn's Grave
we're family
News Alert: Deadly Blast Strikes in Moscow's Main Airport
Regards,
House GOP Group Would Decimate Key Services
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
is our goal to be "like" or to be "Equal"?
Fw: Secrecy News, more leak cases, January 7, 2011
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Fw: [acb-l] Education IN AMerica
What sort of education do we want for blind children?
Monday, January 17, 2011
more on Education IN AMerica for the blind
education in America
thank God we got our priorities straight!
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Reince Priebus. God is on his side!
Helpless in the Face of Madness
The Fed Has Spoken: No Bailout for Main Street
its past time to shake up public education
Fw: Beck's Incendiary Rhetoric Has Motivated Threats,Assassination Attempts
Meet Newly Elected RNC Chair Reince Priebus
by Paul Breer
Truthout, Friday January 14, 2011
http://www.truth-out.org/print/66873
Reince Priebus just became the 65th Chairman of the RNC by garnering 97
votes in the seventh round of voting. After the fourth vote, Michael Steele
dropped out of the running and said, "It's very clear that the party wants
to do something different." Saul Anuzis obtained 43 votes and Maria Cino 28
votes. Here is what you need to know about the new RNC chairman:
block quote--Priebus's law firm sought funds from Obama's stimulus package:
Connecticut GOP chairman Chris Healy noted that Priebus's Wisconsin law firm
helped its clients obtain federal stimulus funds, citing the fact that
Priebus's name was attached to the "Stimulus and Economic Recovery Group."
Priebus immediately responded to the story, claiming he had never worked
with his firm's "Stimulus and Economic Recovery" group.
-His law firm says the recently passed health care bill is constitutional:
Priebus's law firm not only says the law is constitutional, but has touted
its benefits to clients.
-Implicated in voter caging: While Priebus was chair of the Wisconsin GOP,
the state party fomented voter fraud conspiracies and hatched a voter caging
plot with well-funded right-wing allies to suppress minority votes. One
Wisconsin Now Executive Director Scot Ross said, "When voter suppression
allegations have surfaced in Wisconsin for the past decade, the name Reince
Priebus isn't far behind."
-He has the backing of many of the Barbour clan: Henry Barbour, a
committeeman from Mississippi and the nephew of Gov. Hale Barbour (R-MS),
enticed Priebus into running for the RNC chair. Also, Nick Ayers, a close
Barbour associate and executive director of the Republican Governors
Association, reportedly gave behind-the-scenes support to Priebus, leading
many to believe Priebus would favor Barbour for president in 2012. Priebus
responded by saying, "I'm not Haley's choice, I don't think that Haley has
any horse in the race, and he's made that pretty clear on the record."
-Priebus had close ties to former chairman Michael Steele, then stabbed him
in the back: Priebus was Steele's general counsel and frequently served as
Steele's top liaison to committee members. In a memo sent to RNC members,
Connecticut Party chairman Chris Healy said that Priebus is partly
responsible for the RNC's poor performance. Commenting on Priebus' run,
Steele recently said, "It's disappointing, you would hope that the bonds of
loyalty were thicker than they apparently were."
-Priebus mistakenly called for Obama's execution: In a media conference
call about Osama Bin Laden, Priebus slipped and accidentally called for the
"execution" of Obama three separate times. "My guess is he would believe
that Obama should be executed and he oughta be treated as a war criminal,"
Priebus explained.
block quote end
Priebus has said that he is dissatisfied with the 20 million dollar debt run
up by Steele, but as has been shown, Priebus worked closely with Steele
during his tenure. So there's a new face, but it's still the same old
party.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
The Class War Launched by America's Wealthiest Is Getting More Savage
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 4:52 AMSubject: Re: The Class War Launched by America's Wealthiest Is Getting More SavageI can't dispute the stats illustrating income changes through the years, however, there's more in play than economics as regards why, here, in Pittsburgh, our, once thriving neighborhoods, have and continue their descent to ghettos. Of course those children have little chance, but, several of them, despite their parents' choices, will work to succeed!!
Carl, I mean no disrespect, but, unless you've been exposed to living this nightmare...watching your beautiful neighborhood become one huge crime scene, in which your family and friends are the victims, you really, really can't speak to it! Every one in my family, including myself, and most of our neighbors, fell victim to some crime, once the 'element' began moving in, and the police abandoned us, because, they, too, became targets!
And, unions 'were' formed to help the working man, but grew into a colossal greed and power machine!! My Dad worked in Pittsburgh steel mills and on the railroad. My husband was in unions. My sister is in AFSCME, as a county employee, I'd worked for the Commonwealth of PA, also, under AFSCME, so, I know about that which I can state to a certainty. I could send you my own novella on the lies behind the paragraph I'd c/p from what you'd sent:
"Working people can organize and form unions. Unions do more than raise
wages. They improve working conditions and safety. They provide protection
against abuse, intimidation and wrongful dismissal. Non-union employers have
to compete, partly to keep out unions, so the existence of unions helps
everyone. Unions also have political power, they spend money and mobilize
their members to vote."
I do appreciate your sending this. I know it's grim. But, economics in but a mere piece of the puzzle in what creates a criminal!
Best, always,
Gigi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Jarvis" <carjar82@gmail.com>
To: "Gigi" <cjm0806@comcast.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 1:05:34 AM
Subject: The Class War Launched by America's Wealthiest Is Getting More SavageHi Gigi,Whether you agree or disagree with this article, it underscores a serious problem with our American culture. We are no longer putting the protection of *All Americans first. We are putting *Profit first...and second...and...Actually, this struggle has gone on between a government of the people, by the people and for the people versus a government of, by and for greed and plunder. Right now Greed is on the inside rail ahead at least two lengths.Carl Jarvis
The Class War Launched by America's Wealthiest Is Getting More Savage
By Larry Beinhart, AlterNet
Posted on January 13, 2011, Printed on January 14, 2011
http://www.alternet.org/story/149531/
We're in a class war.
It's the corporations and the very wealthiest against all the rest of us.
We're losing.
In 1962 the wealthiest 1 percent of American households had 125 times the
wealth of the median household. Now it's 190 times as much. Is that a case
of a rising tide lifting all boats, just a few of them a little bit higher?
No.
From 1950 to 1965, median family income rose from $24,000 a year to $38,000
a year. That's close to 4 percent a year, close to 60 percent over 15 years.
That's a rising tide.
In 1964 there was a big tax cut. That's when things started to slow down for
average people. By the mid-'70s the rise of the middle class stalled. From
1975 to 2010 median family income rose $42,936 to $49,777. That's not quite
16 percent over 25 years, less than six-tenths of 1 percent per year.
Briefly, when taxes went up under Clinton, median income rose, peaked at
$52,587 in 1999, and then, after Bush cut taxes, declined. Keep in mind that
this is median family income. In the '50s and '60s, family income was
usually earned by a single person. Today, family income normally comes from
at least two people.
At the same time, income for the richest soared. In 1979 the richest 1
percent of Americans earned 9 percent of all U.S. income. Now they earn 24
percent of all U.S. income. One percent of Americans earn nearly one-fourth
of all the income in the country.
Then came the crashes of 2001 and 2008 and the recessions that followed.
The crash hasn't changed anything. Things have become worse.
From 1990 to 2005, adjusted for inflation -- the minimum wage is down 9
percent, production workers' pay is up only over 15 years 4.3 percent.
At the same time, the rich get richer:
Corporate profits are up 106.7 percent. The S&P 500 is still up 141.4
percent since 1990. CEO compensation is up 282 percent. Call it transfer of
wealth. Or call it class warfare.
What's wrong with the rich getting richer?
Slate's Timothy Noah, in "The United States of Inequality," wrote, "Income
distribution in the United States [has become] more unequal than in Guyana,
Nicaragua, and Venezuela, and roughly on par with Uruguay, Argentina, and
Ecuador."
Take a look at that list.
Countries with wide income inequality don't lead the world in research,
technology, industry, and innovation. They're unstable. They have large
underclasses. They have high rates of crime. They have little opportunity.
In such countries the rich have disproportionate power. They take control of
all aspects of society, especially government, the police, and the
judiciary. They become self perpetuating.
If current trends continue, "The United States by 2043 will have the same
income inequality as Mexico." (Tula Connell, Mar 12, 2010, AFL-CIO Now.)
Countries with high levels of income inequality are third-world countries.
Here's how regular people can deal with cultures of high inequality. The
primary, and best, weapon is a progressive tax structure. As people move up
the income ladder they pay a higher rate at each rung. Unearned income -from
dividends and capital gains - is taxed at least as high as earned income
(money that people actually work for.) Tax cuts for the wealthy mark, with
great precision, the decline in fortunes of ordinary Americans. Tax cuts for
the wealthy mark, with equal precision, the increase in inequality. We had a
chance to slow the process by letting the last round, the Bush tax cuts,
expire. We've lost that round.
People can become educated and move on up.
Back in the '60s, when I was growing up, New York City had free
universities. The burgeoning SUNY system charged $400 tuition a semester.
The minimum Regents scholarship was $400 a semester. If a student didn't get
one, he or she could easily earn enough to pay tuition with a summer job.
The same held true for most state university systems across the country.
Today, students have to borrow. The median student debt for an undergraduate
degree - forget about a doctorate, law school, and med school - is $20,000.
The first, and truest, lesson you learn when you go to college is how to be
in service to the banks.
We've lost that battle.
What does it mean?
"Children from low-income families have only a 1 percent chance of reaching
the top 5 percent of the income distribution, versus children of the rich
who have about a 22 percent chance.
"Children born to the middle quintile of parental family income ($42,000 to
$54,300) had about the same chance of ending up in a lower quintile than
their parents (39.5 percent) as they did of moving to a higher quintile
(36.5 percent). Their chances of attaining the top five percentiles of the
income distribution were just 1.8 percent."
(Understanding Mobility in America, April 26, 2006, Tom Hertz, American
University.)
Working people can organize and form unions. Unions do more than raise
wages. They improve working conditions and safety. They provide protection
against abuse, intimidation and wrongful dismissal. Non-union employers have
to compete, partly to keep out unions, so the existence of unions helps
everyone. Unions also have political power, they spend money and mobilize
their members to vote.
Businesses have become very good at beating unions. And they're getting
better at it. According to Business Week, ("How Wal-Mart Keeps Unions at
Bay," 10/28/2002),"over the past two decades, Corporate America has
perfected its ability to fend off labor groups."
In the 1940s a third of private sector employees were unionized. Now it's
down to just 7.2 percent. Unions only remain strong in the public sector,
where membership is 37 percent.
If you read the papers or watch the news, you will see an anti-public
service union story almost everyday. These are the people who teach your
kids, pick up the trash, clean the sewers, drive the buses and trains,
they're the police and fireman. The stories will tell you their pension fund
liabilities will bankrupt the states; that it's unionized teachers who have
ruined our schools. Charter schools - without unions - are the new favorite
charity for billionaires.
When a country is, or becomes, a third-world country, the other thing people
can do is run. To some place richer and freer. Like America.
But when America becomes Mexico, where you gonna run to?
Larry Beinhart is the author of "Wag the Dog," "The Librarian," and "Fog
Facts: Searching for Truth in the Land of Spin." His latest book is
Salvation Boulevard. Responses can be sent to beinhart@earthlink.net.
C 2011 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/149531/
[w2]
Friday, January 14, 2011
MLK's speech April 1967
www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksilence.htm - Cached - Similar
Poor, Poor Sarah? Could she be the next George W. Bush?
I don't know if anyone else caught it, but during the first hour of his show yesterday, left-wing talk show host (and my favorite, to boot) Thom Hartmann indicated that he believed that Sarah Palin's video, along with some other statements by some of the right-wing's finest (not!) talkshow hosts, was a form of stochastic (hope I remembered the spelling correctly correctly) terrorism aimed at lone wolves. The goal of these people, according to Mr. Hartmann, is to encourage "lone wolves" that it is now time to get out and begin doing individual acts of violence against Americans, particularly those on the left, without having to claim responsibility for what they say. Thom says that what Mrs. Palin and her ilk are doing is the same thing that Osama bin-laden is doing when he releases new videos.
Food for thought.
Ted
Thursday, January 13, 2011
WikiLeaks' Most Terrifying Revelation: Just How Much Our GovernmentLies to Us
dear president obama
Monday, January 10, 2011
the Devil made me do it!
to tip or not to tip
Moochers are not all blind and All blind are not moochers
On Independence
Saturday, January 8, 2011
can blind people "see"?
Dream Sight
Friday, January 7, 2011
Preacher Carl
Fw: Obama appoints another liberal? Hah! A Fairy Tale gone bad
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
What America needs is a second Party
Sunday, January 2, 2011
a lesson in organizing
Things haven't changed all that much, have they?
And what is this about trying to charge him with Treason? I didn't know that he'd become a citizen. Are our leaders mad? Or are they telling us that we now consider the entire planet the property of the American Empire.Curious Carl