If You Think DC Is Awful Now, Wait Until Wednesday

Once Chicken Little and Henny Penny stop running around crying, "The
sky is falling in!" it will be back to business as usual...except
twice as bad. Despite all the dire warnings, the rumors of
calamities, and fears from the Moderate/Liberals that this election
marks the end of the Middle Class and the Known World.
And yet, the Empire will go forward with its World Domination Plan,
the polluters will continue to rape the lands and spew death into the
air, justifying it by proclaiming how many jobs they are "creating".
The politicians will stomp and snort and paw the earth as they lock
horns and immobilize government programs and key judicial
appointments. NSA, CIA and FBI will continue to build their Public
"safety net" of secret spying.
Local and state law enforcement agencies will move forward with
preparations to become storm troopers and defenders of the Empire.
Social Services will continue to have their funding cut, and pot holes
will go unfilled.
Of course there will be efforts to undo what Obama hath wrought. But
much of such efforts will be blocked by law, and most of such efforts
will be in a carefully scripted plan to pass all of our nation's woes
onto the back of President Barak Obama, in a concentrated effort to
return the White House to the Republicans in 2016.
Meanwhile, out in the highways and byways, Mister and Missus Regular
American will continue to worry about rising costs, job loss, rising
health insurance costs, over crowded schools, unsafe streets, bully
boy tactics by law enforcement, growing pollution, and the growing
belief that another giant recession is about to come crashing around
their ears.
But hey! the Sea Hawks are 5 and 3 and looking good to make the
play-offs. Then there will be basket ball and ice hockey and probably
soccer...somewhere on the channels. The Voice is going strong on TV,
with all those "All American" kids singing their little hearts out.
Yes, now that the elections are over, we can all return to our
avoidance of choice.

Carl Jarvis


On 11/5/14, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> Alter writes: "If, as expected, Republicans take control of the Senate,
> they
> will try to repeal Obamacare and pass a string of other outlandish bills,
> all of which President Obama will veto. Or they might block some judgeships
> but work with the president in a few areas in order to build an agenda to
> run on in 2016. In other words, we're told, this election is No Biggie."
>
> (illustration: Elena Scotti/The Daily Beast)
>
>
> If You Think DC Is Awful Now, Wait Until Wednesday
> By Jonathan Alter, The Daily Beast
> 04 November 14
>
> Think this election doesn't matter? Then just wait to see what damage a GOP
> Senate will do, especially when it comes to climate change.
>
> Well before the midterms, a weary conventional wisdom set in: This is a
> "Seinfeld election"-an election, like the hit comedy, "about nothing." If,
> as expected, Republicans take control of the Senate, they will try to
> repeal
> Obamacare and pass a string of other outlandish bills, all of which
> President Obama will veto. Or they might block some judgeships but work
> with
> the president in a few areas in order to build an agenda to run on in 2016.
> In other words, we're told, this election is No Biggie.
> This analysis, which you will hear again tonight on all the networks,
> ignores the ferocious radicalism of today's Republican Party. As majority
> leader, Mitch McConnell might want to cut deals, but he will be dealing
> with
> a GOP caucus in the Senate that increasingly resembles the one John Boehner
> must contend with in the House, not to mention a base that has derailed
> several attempts to present a more moderate agenda on issues ranging from
> taxes to immigration.
> The biggest impact of a GOP takeover will be on appointments. Many Obama
> administration sub-Cabinet positions (e.g. Surgeon General) have gone
> unfilled because of GOP opposition. Now many will likely remain vacant for
> another two years. Republicans don't care. They hate government (except
> when
> it gives them a paycheck) and making it run worse just helps them convince
> the public that Democrats are incompetent.
> The federal bench will be harmed by dozens of vacancies going unfilled,
> causing a case backlog. Meanwhile, none other than Sen. Ted Cruz is slated
> to become chairman of the subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee
> responsible for constitutional rights. Imagine the hearings he will hold.
> With any luck, the press won't cover them, but don't hold your breath.
> Should Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (a cancer survivor) or one
> of the other justices have to step down, all hell would break loose.
> Republicans would likely block any Obama nominee to the high court,
> especially for one of the conservative seats, leaving a 4-4 partisan split
> until early 2017, meaning that important cases would go undecided. Talk
> about gridlock.
> The worst effect of a Republican takeover would be on the environment. The
> climate-change denial caucus would likely grow larger and more radical.
> Take
> Joni Ernst, a GOP darling now favored to be the next senator from Iowa.
> Ernst, best known for castrating pigs, doesn't just want to ease
> environmental regulation; she favors abolishing the EPA altogether. That's
> right-get rid of the agency created under Richard Nixon that has cleaned up
> the nation's water and air. And if you think moderate Republicans are
> shunning her, consider that former President George H.W. Bush has been
> called in to help her campaign.
> Moderates and independent voters in states like Iowa, Colorado, and North
> Carolina who cast their ballots for Republican candidates for the Senate
> should know that they are contributing greatly to the ascendancy of
> climate-change denial-a generation of politicians dedicated to burying
> their
> heads in the sand.
> The ostrich-in-chief-and proud of it-is a former mayor of Tulsa, Oklahoma,
> who once compared the director of the EPA to Tokyo Rose and the agency to
> the Gestapo. If Republicans win the Senate on Tuesday, Oklahoma Sen. James
> Inhofe, now in his fourth term, is set to become the next chairman of the
> Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, a position he held from
> 2003 to 2007, when the Republicans last held control. He will make it his
> business to carry water for the fossil-fuel industry, smear climate
> scientists, and do everything else in his considerable power to prevent the
> country and the world from confronting the slow motion crisis of climate
> change.
> Inhofe is not just a climate-change denier; he is a warrior for
> corporate-funded half-truths and outright lies. While McConnell and other
> Republican candidates this year have adopted the mantra, "I'm not a
> scientist" to dodge pesky climate-change questions, Inhofe charges ahead
> with an Orwellian argument.
> In his 2012 book, The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy
> Threatens Your Future, Inhofe explains how he is a prophet without honor in
> his time. "First I stood alone in saying that anthropogenic [manmade]
> catastrophic global warming is a hoax," he writes, launching into an attack
> on Al Gore. "Now Gore stands alone in his dismissal of reform, openness,
> transparency and peer-review to ensure good science."
> That's a pretty good encapsulation of how Inhofe will run his committee if
> the GOP takes control and he succeeds Sen. Barbara Boxer as chairman.
> Notice
> how he says it is Gore who rejects "openness" and "peer review." It's the
> old I'm-rubber-you're-glue approach. A reader commenting on Amazon put it
> this way: "Where are the publications in Nature, Science, Proceedings of
> the
> National Academy of Sciences, Nobel Prizes in chemistry or physics? None.
> Zero. Nada. Absolutely nothing. Oldest trick in the bully book: Call the
> others a hoax so that the bully's hoax goes unnoticed. This 'book' is a
> hoax."
> Of course pointing this out won't stop Inhofe, who will use the gavel to
> pound away at environmentalists as if they-not the climate-change
> deniers-are the ones abusing science.
> In the time since Inhofe was last chairman, the deniers received a gift
> from
> the gods in the form of what they predictably call "Climategate." This was
> a
> scandal involving the disclosure of emails and documents at the Climate
> Research Unit at Britain's East Anglia University that suggest a couple of
> bad apples among the tens of thousands of scientists who believe climate
> change is real-scientists who ignored or twisted some data.
> Inhofe will use his large megaphone to try to convince the world these this
> 2009 incident is proof of "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the
> American public." The world's most eminent climate scientists, who all
> believe climate change is real, are, according to Inhofe, "in it for the
> money" and apparently part of the vast conspiracy that he says he will
> devote the rest of his days to exposing.
> Actually, Inhofe does a few other things in the Senate, too, like pushing
> for federal disaster relief funds for the residents of Moore, Oklahoma,
> which was devastated by a 2013 tornado, while voting to deny such funds for
> the victims of Hurricane Sandy. Inhofe said the two disasters were
> different
> because the hurricane drew so many moochers.
> When Inhofe last chaired Environment and Public Works, George W. Bush was
> in
> the White House and Inhofe reserved most of his barbs for Democrats and the
> press. In January, if the GOP wins Senate control, he will go after Obama
> and the EPA with a vengeance.
> The first goal will be to reverse Obama's recently announced regulation of
> carbon emissions from coal-fired plants. With the help of McConnell, who is
> expected to be re-elected in large part on the coal issue despite his
> continued unpopularity in Kentucky, Republicans could attach a repeal of
> the
> rule to the so-called Continuing Resolution.
> That's the bill-up for consideration either in December or sometime next
> year-required to keep the government open. If Inhofe and the climate-change
> deniers have their way, they will force Obama to veto that bill, then blame
> him for forcing a government shutdown. The resulting negotiation, they
> hope,
> would gut the EPA regulation.
> Inhofe has a record of recklessness that shouldn't be underestimated. After
> he landed a private plane at a closed Texas airfield in 2010 and almost
> killed a group of construction workers, the airport manager was quoted as
> saying, "I've got over 50 years flying, three tours of Vietnam, and I can
> assure you I have never seen such a reckless disregard for human life in my
> life. Something needs to be done. This guy is famous for these violations."
> One advantage of Inhofe taking the gavel is that he might have to start
> playing defense. We got an indication of that last July when Sen. Sheldon
> Whitehouse schooled him in a floor debate after Inhofe and other
> Republicans
> blocked a resolution declaring that climate change is real. Whitehouse
> noted
> that Inhofe charged that government agencies had been "colluding" to peddle
> climate-change threats.
> Did this include NASA, the U.S. Navy and the National Weather Service? Was
> Inhofe suggesting we shouldn't trust those agencies with the lives of
> astronauts and sailors, or that we should disbelieve weather forecasts? Was
> he suggesting that Wal-Mart, Pepsi, Mars, Google, Apple and the entire
> property and casualty insurance business were in on a big lie? Whitehouse
> concluded by citing surveys showing that even young Republicans believed
> that only people who were ignorant, out of touch, or crazy rejected climate
> science.
> Historians looking back 100 years from now to the early 21th century are
> likely to conclude the same thing as they chronicle the biggest story of
> our
> time: How the United States and other great nations fiddled while the world
> burned.
> On Sunday, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)-reflecting
> a
> consensus of global scientists-issued another dire report, this one warning
> that temperatures in many regions could grow so hot that it will become
> difficult for large percentages of the world's population to work or play
> outdoors during the hot months of the year. The report repeated warnings of
> catastrophic food shortages, refugee crises, major cities and even entire
> countries left underwater by flooding, and mass extinction of plants and
> animals.
> Even in an era when the public detests Washington, the U.S. Senate remains
> a
> powerful platform to advance ideas, including historically bad ones. So
> voters might want to consider who else-and what else-they are elevating
> when
> they go to the polls on Tuesday and vote for ostriches.
> Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not
> valid.
>
> (illustration: Elena Scotti/The Daily Beast)
> http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/04/if-you-think-d-c-is-awful-n
> ow-wait-until-wednesday.htmlhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/04
> /if-you-think-d-c-is-awful-now-wait-until-wednesday.html
> If You Think DC Is Awful Now, Wait Until Wednesday
> By Jonathan Alter, The Daily Beast
> 04 November 14
> Think this election doesn't matter? Then just wait to see what damage a GOP
> Senate will do, especially when it comes to climate change.
> ell before the midterms, a weary conventional wisdom set in: This is a
> "Seinfeld election"-an election, like the hit comedy, "about nothing." If,
> as expected, Republicans take control of the Senate, they will try to
> repeal
> Obamacare and pass a string of other outlandish bills, all of which
> President Obama will veto. Or they might block some judgeships but work
> with
> the president in a few areas in order to build an agenda to run on in 2016.
> In other words, we're told, this election is No Biggie.
> This analysis, which you will hear again tonight on all the networks,
> ignores the ferocious radicalism of today's Republican Party. As majority
> leader, Mitch McConnell might want to cut deals, but he will be dealing
> with
> a GOP caucus in the Senate that increasingly resembles the one John Boehner
> must contend with in the House, not to mention a base that has derailed
> several attempts to present a more moderate agenda on issues ranging from
> taxes to immigration.
> The biggest impact of a GOP takeover will be on appointments. Many Obama
> administration sub-Cabinet positions (e.g. Surgeon General) have gone
> unfilled because of GOP opposition. Now many will likely remain vacant for
> another two years. Republicans don't care. They hate government (except
> when
> it gives them a paycheck) and making it run worse just helps them convince
> the public that Democrats are incompetent.
> The federal bench will be harmed by dozens of vacancies going unfilled,
> causing a case backlog. Meanwhile, none other than Sen. Ted Cruz is slated
> to become chairman of the subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee
> responsible for constitutional rights. Imagine the hearings he will hold.
> With any luck, the press won't cover them, but don't hold your breath.
> Should Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (a cancer survivor) or one
> of the other justices have to step down, all hell would break loose.
> Republicans would likely block any Obama nominee to the high court,
> especially for one of the conservative seats, leaving a 4-4 partisan split
> until early 2017, meaning that important cases would go undecided. Talk
> about gridlock.
> The worst effect of a Republican takeover would be on the environment. The
> climate-change denial caucus would likely grow larger and more radical.
> Take
> Joni Ernst, a GOP darling now favored to be the next senator from Iowa.
> Ernst, best known for castrating pigs, doesn't just want to ease
> environmental regulation; she favors abolishing the EPA altogether. That's
> right-get rid of the agency created under Richard Nixon that has cleaned up
> the nation's water and air. And if you think moderate Republicans are
> shunning her, consider that former President George H.W. Bush has been
> called in to help her campaign.
> Moderates and independent voters in states like Iowa, Colorado, and North
> Carolina who cast their ballots for Republican candidates for the Senate
> should know that they are contributing greatly to the ascendancy of
> climate-change denial-a generation of politicians dedicated to burying
> their
> heads in the sand.
> The ostrich-in-chief-and proud of it-is a former mayor of Tulsa, Oklahoma,
> who once compared the director of the EPA to Tokyo Rose and the agency to
> the Gestapo. If Republicans win the Senate on Tuesday, Oklahoma Sen. James
> Inhofe, now in his fourth term, is set to become the next chairman of the
> Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, a position he held from
> 2003 to 2007, when the Republicans last held control. He will make it his
> business to carry water for the fossil-fuel industry, smear climate
> scientists, and do everything else in his considerable power to prevent the
> country and the world from confronting the slow motion crisis of climate
> change.
> Inhofe is not just a climate-change denier; he is a warrior for
> corporate-funded half-truths and outright lies. While McConnell and other
> Republican candidates this year have adopted the mantra, "I'm not a
> scientist" to dodge pesky climate-change questions, Inhofe charges ahead
> with an Orwellian argument.
> In his 2012 book, Error! Hyperlink reference not valid., Inhofe explains
> how
> he is a prophet without honor in his time. "First I stood alone in saying
> that anthropogenic [manmade] catastrophic global warming is a hoax," he
> writes, launching into an attack on Al Gore. "Now Gore stands alone in his
> dismissal of reform, openness, transparency and peer-review to ensure good
> science."
> That's a pretty good encapsulation of how Inhofe will run his committee if
> the GOP takes control and he succeeds Sen. Barbara Boxer as chairman.
> Notice
> how he says it is Gore who rejects "openness" and "peer review." It's the
> old I'm-rubber-you're-glue approach. A reader commenting on Amazon put it
> this way: "Where are the publications in Nature, Science, Proceedings of
> the
> National Academy of Sciences, Nobel Prizes in chemistry or physics? None.
> Zero. Nada. Absolutely nothing. Oldest trick in the bully book: Call the
> others a hoax so that the bully's hoax goes unnoticed. This 'book' is a
> hoax."
> Of course pointing this out won't stop Inhofe, who will use the gavel to
> pound away at environmentalists as if they-not the climate-change
> deniers-are the ones abusing science.
> In the time since Inhofe was last chairman, the deniers received a gift
> from
> the gods in the form of what they predictably call "Climategate." This was
> a
> scandal involving the disclosure of emails and documents at the Climate
> Research Unit at Britain's East Anglia University that suggest a couple of
> bad apples among the tens of thousands of scientists who believe climate
> change is real-scientists who ignored or twisted some data.
> Inhofe will use his large megaphone to try to convince the world these this
> 2009 incident is proof of "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the
> American public." The world's most eminent climate scientists, who all
> believe climate change is real, are, according to Inhofe, "in it for the
> money" and apparently part of the vast conspiracy that he says he will
> devote the rest of his days to exposing.
> Actually, Inhofe does a few other things in the Senate, too, like pushing
> for federal disaster relief funds for the residents of Moore, Oklahoma,
> which was devastated by a 2013 tornado, while voting to deny such funds for
> the victims of Hurricane Sandy. Inhofe said the two disasters were
> different
> because the hurricane drew so many moochers.
> When Inhofe last chaired Environment and Public Works, George W. Bush was
> in
> the White House and Inhofe reserved most of his barbs for Democrats and the
> press. In January, if the GOP wins Senate control, he will go after Obama
> and the EPA with a vengeance.
> The first goal will be to reverse Obama's recently announced regulation of
> carbon emissions from coal-fired plants. With the help of McConnell, who is
> expected to be re-elected in large part on the coal issue despite his
> continued unpopularity in Kentucky, Republicans could attach a repeal of
> the
> rule to the so-called Continuing Resolution.
> That's the bill-up for consideration either in December or sometime next
> year-required to keep the government open. If Inhofe and the climate-change
> deniers have their way, they will force Obama to veto that bill, then blame
> him for forcing a government shutdown. The resulting negotiation, they
> hope,
> would gut the EPA regulation.
> Inhofe has a record of recklessness that shouldn't be underestimated. After
> he landed a private plane at a closed Texas airfield in 2010 and almost
> killed a group of construction workers, the airport manager was quoted as
> saying, "I've got over 50 years flying, three tours of Vietnam, and I can
> assure you I have never seen such a reckless disregard for human life in my
> life. Something needs to be done. This guy is famous for these violations."
> One advantage of Inhofe taking the gavel is that he might have to start
> playing defense. We got an indication of that last July when Sen. Sheldon
> Whitehouse schooled him in a floor debate after Inhofe and other
> Republicans
> blocked a resolution declaring that climate change is real. Whitehouse
> noted
> that Inhofe charged that government agencies had been "colluding" to peddle
> climate-change threats.
> Did this include NASA, the U.S. Navy and the National Weather Service? Was
> Inhofe suggesting we shouldn't trust those agencies with the lives of
> astronauts and sailors, or that we should disbelieve weather forecasts? Was
> he suggesting that Wal-Mart, Pepsi, Mars, Google, Apple and the entire
> property and casualty insurance business were in on a big lie? Whitehouse
> concluded by citing surveys showing that even young Republicans believed
> that only people who were ignorant, out of touch, or crazy rejected climate
> science.
> Historians looking back 100 years from now to the early 21th century are
> likely to conclude the same thing as they chronicle the biggest story of
> our
> time: How the United States and other great nations fiddled while the world
> burned.
> On Sunday, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)-reflecting
> a
> consensus of global scientists-issued another dire report, this one warning
> that temperatures in many regions could grow so hot that it will become
> difficult for large percentages of the world's population to work or play
> outdoors during the hot months of the year. The report repeated warnings of
> catastrophic food shortages, refugee crises, major cities and even entire
> countries left underwater by flooding, and mass extinction of plants and
> animals.
> Even in an era when the public detests Washington, the U.S. Senate remains
> a
> powerful platform to advance ideas, including historically bad ones. So
> voters might want to consider who else-and what else-they are elevating
> when
> they go to the polls on Tuesday and vote for ostriches.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-Democracy mailing list
> Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
> https://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy
>