Alright, whether throwing stones at tanks or throwing tanks with
stones, the meaning is nearly the same. To get out of this, thank you
for the suggestion, though both sentential structures are fairly
correct. Despite this idiotic debate, it seems that seeing children
throwing stones at tanks is somewhat satisfactory. Carl, I commend
your courteous remarks, but we unfortunately, won't ever agree. Jason,
I do not give credit to any Arab state. They are fainthearted,
dampened, westernly influenced, secularised and civilly defeated. I
endorse Hamas because it is the only courageous militant element that
engages against Israeli invaders. As for the remaining threads, I'll
dispose them for lacking significance. As I plainly stated, I'll
conveniently dismiss attempts of imperialism, intervension or cultural
manipulation. I am quite confident and contented with my identity. Why
do I have to be a traitor or a confused person who poses nonmeaningful
questions? Why should I waste my time doing this? Because someone in
the west strenuously strives to strangle my identity and then, coerce
my frustrated entity into a distorted copy of his culture. I chose to
subscribe to this list with a pseudonym. I previously outlined my
justifications for that. I could be named Bob, but I won't be the
Texan guy in character. I eat western food. I wear western clothe.
But, I won't buy western thoughts. For the benefit of our children
here, I rather would collaborate with respectful people abroad. To
make this a positive outcome, I need someone to help me with the
following. I recently began to teach sightless children who
communicate gesturally. I am tasked with teaching them elementary
Braille. Now, I am genuinely bright-eyed and bushy-tailed to learn
sign language. But, I am afraid, I am not so sure how to do that
properly as a blind person. While I utterly recognise sign language
may substantially differ from culture to another, I want to make a
start on this. Note, these children need a different conception of
sign language. Ordinarily, sighted deaf people express themselves
through visible hand gestures. But, the ones I have just been involved
with are sightless and nonverbal simultaneously. I am desperate to
interact with them. I randomly attempt to fathom their perceptions.
However, I demand to be competent. Kindly, if someone knows anything
about this, I'll be grateful if he guided me to where I shall begin.
You may forward this post to anyone who is able to help me achieving
my objective. Furthermore, has Braille ever been taught to sightless
and nonverbal children? Do you know any certified curriculum to rely
on? If someone destines to respond to this thread, please, stick to
the crucial segment and dismiss what is above. It begins with, "To
make this". Cordially, Bob Evans.
On 1/2/18, Carl Jarvis <carjar82@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings and Hope for a Positive New Year for all working class
> brothers and sisters the World Around.
>
> Bob Evans wrote, in part: "...I have strong
> ties to my faith and heritage. It is not because I was born Muslim. I
> studied at deep length and concentration Islamic theology. I took
> various curricula on Koran commentary, Hadith discipline, Shariah
> jural, classical Arabic, Islamic history, philosophy and eminently
> prestigious English class at the British Council. I wholeheartedly
> maintain this foreign language to fend for my heritage and identity."
> Like Bob Evans, many of us believe ourselves to be reasonable people,
> and arrive at our present beliefs by processing the information
> available to us. In Rehab we called it, "Informed Choice". But in
> the real world it is no choice at all. It is a conclusion brought
> about by our social norms and the teachings allowed by our particular
> Ruling Class.
> We do not want to believe that our minds have been so controlled as to
> make Free Choice impossible.
> All of us have been conditioned by our culture, our parents and close
> family, our Faith, our Peers, and how we process all of this
> "information". To believe that we were not affected by the World we
> live in is to suggest that we are "God-like". Donald Trump is such a
> person. If he tells us that the Media gives us False News, then that
> is what it is, because Donald Trump has stepped away from the
> influences that shape most of us. Donald Trump has placed himself in
> a very small group of individuals. They include the likes of Joseph
> Stalin, Adolph Hitler, Joseph Smith,Jr., Charles Manson, and the
> countless Royalty that has oppressed Mankind down through the
> centuries. All are products of their culture. And all believe
> themselves to have either risen above the Masses, or been anointed
> . There is probably no "happy ending" to this story of Mankind, but
> still we must try to bring about a peaceful conclusion. To do nothing
> will seal our doom. Until we can live as One People, agreeing to
> accept each others differences while not attempting to force our
> beliefs onto others, and tackling together the most pressing threat to
> our existence, the destruction of Life on Planet Earth, we stand face
> to face with our own self inflicted extinction.
>
> Carl Jarvis
>
>
> On 1/1/18, Bob Evans <ebob824@gmail.com> wrote:
>> At least 1 in 4 American Christians surveyed recently by Christianity
>> Today magazine said, they believe it is their biblical accountability
>> to relentlessly plump for the nation of Israel. This view is commonly
>> known as Christian Zionism. The Pew Research Center put the figure at
>> approximately 63% among white evangelicals. Christian Zionism is
>> pervasive within mainline American evangelism. It is broadly endorsed
>> among charismatic and independent congregations. This includes the
>> Assemblies of God, Pentecostals and Southern Baptists, as well as many
>> of the independent mega churches. It is less prevalent within the
>> historic denominations, which show significant repute for the work of
>> the United Nations, support for human rights, the rule of
>> international law and empathy with the Palestinians. Despite the
>> explicit abnegation of Christian Zionism by mainstream Christian
>> bodies, many registered and nondenominational Churches across the
>> States emphasise the alleged religious obligation to incalculably
>> stand by Israel, politically and with full financial backing. They
>> claim their perspective is theologically justified. Thus, the
>> foundation of Israel in 1948 fulfills a biblical prophecy for them.
>> So, who is to be considered a Christian Zionist? To answer this
>> thoroughly, there are major factors to measure someone's stance and
>> ideology. First, political orientation. In the United States, if
>> someone happened to be Republican or he strongly boosts for that
>> particular party, he is most likely to be listed as a Christian
>> Zionist. Second, regional base. By good chance, many of those who
>> reside in southern States are in favour of Christian Zionism. Note, I
>> haven't extrapolated. I used a lucid quantifier to purposely
>> indicate a considerable amount. Third, Xenophobia. Christian Zionists
>> are constantly assaulting foreign visitors and licit residents. They
>> unrelentingly call for unconscionable expatriation. Fourth, racism.
>> They act superiorly and they disgrace ethnic minorities. They diss and
>> assault them in a staidly despicable manner. Fifth, Islamophobia. They
>> methodologically demonise Islam. They viciously misportray its
>> essence. They misquote its text, they shamelessly lie about its
>> tenets. Sixth, warmongering. Despite their counterfeit sentiments of
>> promoting peace, they incessantly advocate for warfare. In one of his
>> damnable rallies on last Fourth of July, hellion Donald Trump spoke
>> simultaneously to veterans and faith leaders. They both spatted to his
>> intolerably belligerent remarks. Seventh, Americanism. Unlike
>> respectable nations, they coerce whoever wishes to interculturally
>> communicate with them to become wholly Americanised in character. They
>> basically manipulate them. Eighth, hate speech. Instead of attempting
>> to coexist with various ethnic descents, they unstoppably exercise
>> disparagement. They are at the slightest, bigoted, fanatic,
>> irresponsible, detestable, repellent and intimidating. Ninth,
>> Buttonholing for Israel's aggression and invasion. Christian Zionists
>> are infinitely colluded and possessed by Israeli military aspirations.
>> They tolerate enormous atrocities committed by insensate Israeli
>> soldiers. They hardheartedly watch on television, Palestinian children
>> throwing Israeli tanks with stones. Tenth, Dissimulation. Christian
>> Zionists are conspicuously notorious of deceiving lay citizens. They
>> always terrify them from foreign visitors. They are excessively
>> xenophobic. Ultimately, who is this message for? In plainly parlance
>> terms, it is for Zionist pastors and preachers. I am here to deliver
>> them fear. Donald Trump era has brought you turbulent development. It
>> exposed your genuine figure. There are high mountains to climb. As you
>> are boosting for warfare, we are advocating for Jihad in return.
>> Numerous evangelical Christians came out to be what they truly are.
>> They aren't able to hide their actual intent of intemperately
>> disseminating evil. At the same time, as always, I ought to hold the
>> cane from the middle. This is not a rant against all Americans,
>> Christians or even Jews. Despite your faith or the lack of,
>> philosophical or political orientation, people who are willing to
>> refrain from imposing aggression or foreign intervension in our own
>> affairs are warmly welcome. I proudly collaborated with cecity
>> associations across the States. We prosperously held projects for
>> implementing accessibility and advocated for perfect independence to
>> those who live with sight loss. I have a brilliant Mormon friend
>> called Alison. She is a loving person. She is truly loyal and
>> respectful. She lives in Utah. We mutually have incredible deference
>> for each other's faith and cultural origin. I truly admire her
>> unfeigned commitment to family and kinship ties. I am only strident
>> with those who insist to adhere uncongenial temperament. I have strong
>> ties to my faith and heritage. It is not because I was born Muslim. I
>> studied at deep length and concentration Islamic theology. I took
>> various curricula on Koran commentary, Hadith discipline, Shariah
>> jural, classical Arabic, Islamic history, philosophy and eminently
>> prestigious English class at the British Council. I wholeheartedly
>> maintain this foreign language to fend for my heritage and identity.
>> Unlike secularised and civilly defeated Muslims, I am inconvenient to
>> unethically indoctrinate. Fortuitously, I am sufficiently conscious of
>> what is occurring. Thence, I competently recognise what to apprise and
>> what to despise. I demonstrate in this post the crucial necessity to
>> persistently repudiate antagonisation acts while at the same time,
>> sustaining respectful friendship and positive inclusion. This is what
>> Islam prescribes. We are religiously enjoined to be pious of the
>> divine while being just and dutiful. Islam has decisive precepts for
>> states of peace and war. Shariah jural has been filled with
>> detailed and accurate maxims. It ranges from territorial jurisdiction
>> to how to go to the toilet. Allah hasn't left us clueless of even the
>> littlest matters as for the latter. This is our identity and we are
>> quite proud of it. Anyone attempts to plague us to provoke our
>> offence, he'll instantly be countered with what he may not like. So,
>> watch out. It wholly depends on your initial disposal. The way you'll
>> act, you'll be rewarded. If you aim to instigate hostility,
>> retaliation is to be radically anticipated. If you intend to be
>> peaceful, your proposal will appreciatively be rivaled. Hate is not
>> our fete. Our purpose is to integrate. Cordially, Bob Evans
>> ___________________________
>>
>>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment