I'm not so sure that throwing stones at tanks and throwing tanks with
stones means nearly the same thing. If children are throwing tanks with
stones I don't know whether to picture throwing stones and tanks side by
side or to picture children using stones as a tank throwing device.
Either way it is a good deal more funny than throwing the stones at the
tanks. At least that way I don't have to wonder if it really means
throwing tanks at the stones.
On 1/2/2018 9:19 PM, Bob Evans wrote:
> Alright, whether throwing stones at tanks or throwing tanks with
> stones, the meaning is nearly the same. To get out of this, thank you
> for the suggestion, though both sentential structures are fairly
> correct. Despite this idiotic debate, it seems that seeing children
> throwing stones at tanks is somewhat satisfactory. Carl, I commend
> your courteous remarks, but we unfortunately, won't ever agree. Jason,
> I do not give credit to any Arab state. They are fainthearted,
> dampened, westernly influenced, secularised and civilly defeated. I
> endorse Hamas because it is the only courageous militant element that
> engages against Israeli invaders. As for the remaining threads, I'll
> dispose them for lacking significance. As I plainly stated, I'll
> conveniently dismiss attempts of imperialism, intervension or cultural
> manipulation. I am quite confident and contented with my identity. Why
> do I have to be a traitor or a confused person who poses nonmeaningful
> questions? Why should I waste my time doing this? Because someone in
> the west strenuously strives to strangle my identity and then, coerce
> my frustrated entity into a distorted copy of his culture. I chose to
> subscribe to this list with a pseudonym. I previously outlined my
> justifications for that. I could be named Bob, but I won't be the
> Texan guy in character. I eat western food. I wear western clothe.
> But, I won't buy western thoughts. For the benefit of our children
> here, I rather would collaborate with respectful people abroad. To
> make this a positive outcome, I need someone to help me with the
> following. I recently began to teach sightless children who
> communicate gesturally. I am tasked with teaching them elementary
> Braille. Now, I am genuinely bright-eyed and bushy-tailed to learn
> sign language. But, I am afraid, I am not so sure how to do that
> properly as a blind person. While I utterly recognise sign language
> may substantially differ from culture to another, I want to make a
> start on this. Note, these children need a different conception of
> sign language. Ordinarily, sighted deaf people express themselves
> through visible hand gestures. But, the ones I have just been involved
> with are sightless and nonverbal simultaneously. I am desperate to
> interact with them. I randomly attempt to fathom their perceptions.
> However, I demand to be competent. Kindly, if someone knows anything
> about this, I'll be grateful if he guided me to where I shall begin.
> You may forward this post to anyone who is able to help me achieving
> my objective. Furthermore, has Braille ever been taught to sightless
> and nonverbal children? Do you know any certified curriculum to rely
> on? If someone destines to respond to this thread, please, stick to
> the crucial segment and dismiss what is above. It begins with, "To
> make this". Cordially, Bob Evans.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1/2/18, Carl Jarvis <carjar82@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Greetings and Hope for a Positive New Year for all working class
>> brothers and sisters the World Around.
>>
>> Bob Evans wrote, in part: "...I have strong
>> ties to my faith and heritage. It is not because I was born Muslim. I
>> studied at deep length and concentration Islamic theology. I took
>> various curricula on Koran commentary, Hadith discipline, Shariah
>> jural, classical Arabic, Islamic history, philosophy and eminently
>> prestigious English class at the British Council. I wholeheartedly
>> maintain this foreign language to fend for my heritage and identity."
>> Like Bob Evans, many of us believe ourselves to be reasonable people,
>> and arrive at our present beliefs by processing the information
>> available to us. In Rehab we called it, "Informed Choice". But in
>> the real world it is no choice at all. It is a conclusion brought
>> about by our social norms and the teachings allowed by our particular
>> Ruling Class.
>> We do not want to believe that our minds have been so controlled as to
>> make Free Choice impossible.
>> All of us have been conditioned by our culture, our parents and close
>> family, our Faith, our Peers, and how we process all of this
>> "information". To believe that we were not affected by the World we
>> live in is to suggest that we are "God-like". Donald Trump is such a
>> person. If he tells us that the Media gives us False News, then that
>> is what it is, because Donald Trump has stepped away from the
>> influences that shape most of us. Donald Trump has placed himself in
>> a very small group of individuals. They include the likes of Joseph
>> Stalin, Adolph Hitler, Joseph Smith,Jr., Charles Manson, and the
>> countless Royalty that has oppressed Mankind down through the
>> centuries. All are products of their culture. And all believe
>> themselves to have either risen above the Masses, or been anointed
>> . There is probably no "happy ending" to this story of Mankind, but
>> still we must try to bring about a peaceful conclusion. To do nothing
>> will seal our doom. Until we can live as One People, agreeing to
>> accept each others differences while not attempting to force our
>> beliefs onto others, and tackling together the most pressing threat to
>> our existence, the destruction of Life on Planet Earth, we stand face
>> to face with our own self inflicted extinction.
>>
>> Carl Jarvis
>>
>>
>> On 1/1/18, Bob Evans <ebob824@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> At least 1 in 4 American Christians surveyed recently by Christianity
>>> Today magazine said, they believe it is their biblical accountability
>>> to relentlessly plump for the nation of Israel. This view is commonly
>>> known as Christian Zionism. The Pew Research Center put the figure at
>>> approximately 63% among white evangelicals. Christian Zionism is
>>> pervasive within mainline American evangelism. It is broadly endorsed
>>> among charismatic and independent congregations. This includes the
>>> Assemblies of God, Pentecostals and Southern Baptists, as well as many
>>> of the independent mega churches. It is less prevalent within the
>>> historic denominations, which show significant repute for the work of
>>> the United Nations, support for human rights, the rule of
>>> international law and empathy with the Palestinians. Despite the
>>> explicit abnegation of Christian Zionism by mainstream Christian
>>> bodies, many registered and nondenominational Churches across the
>>> States emphasise the alleged religious obligation to incalculably
>>> stand by Israel, politically and with full financial backing. They
>>> claim their perspective is theologically justified. Thus, the
>>> foundation of Israel in 1948 fulfills a biblical prophecy for them.
>>> So, who is to be considered a Christian Zionist? To answer this
>>> thoroughly, there are major factors to measure someone's stance and
>>> ideology. First, political orientation. In the United States, if
>>> someone happened to be Republican or he strongly boosts for that
>>> particular party, he is most likely to be listed as a Christian
>>> Zionist. Second, regional base. By good chance, many of those who
>>> reside in southern States are in favour of Christian Zionism. Note, I
>>> haven't extrapolated. I used a lucid quantifier to purposely
>>> indicate a considerable amount. Third, Xenophobia. Christian Zionists
>>> are constantly assaulting foreign visitors and licit residents. They
>>> unrelentingly call for unconscionable expatriation. Fourth, racism.
>>> They act superiorly and they disgrace ethnic minorities. They diss and
>>> assault them in a staidly despicable manner. Fifth, Islamophobia. They
>>> methodologically demonise Islam. They viciously misportray its
>>> essence. They misquote its text, they shamelessly lie about its
>>> tenets. Sixth, warmongering. Despite their counterfeit sentiments of
>>> promoting peace, they incessantly advocate for warfare. In one of his
>>> damnable rallies on last Fourth of July, hellion Donald Trump spoke
>>> simultaneously to veterans and faith leaders. They both spatted to his
>>> intolerably belligerent remarks. Seventh, Americanism. Unlike
>>> respectable nations, they coerce whoever wishes to interculturally
>>> communicate with them to become wholly Americanised in character. They
>>> basically manipulate them. Eighth, hate speech. Instead of attempting
>>> to coexist with various ethnic descents, they unstoppably exercise
>>> disparagement. They are at the slightest, bigoted, fanatic,
>>> irresponsible, detestable, repellent and intimidating. Ninth,
>>> Buttonholing for Israel's aggression and invasion. Christian Zionists
>>> are infinitely colluded and possessed by Israeli military aspirations.
>>> They tolerate enormous atrocities committed by insensate Israeli
>>> soldiers. They hardheartedly watch on television, Palestinian children
>>> throwing Israeli tanks with stones. Tenth, Dissimulation. Christian
>>> Zionists are conspicuously notorious of deceiving lay citizens. They
>>> always terrify them from foreign visitors. They are excessively
>>> xenophobic. Ultimately, who is this message for? In plainly parlance
>>> terms, it is for Zionist pastors and preachers. I am here to deliver
>>> them fear. Donald Trump era has brought you turbulent development. It
>>> exposed your genuine figure. There are high mountains to climb. As you
>>> are boosting for warfare, we are advocating for Jihad in return.
>>> Numerous evangelical Christians came out to be what they truly are.
>>> They aren't able to hide their actual intent of intemperately
>>> disseminating evil. At the same time, as always, I ought to hold the
>>> cane from the middle. This is not a rant against all Americans,
>>> Christians or even Jews. Despite your faith or the lack of,
>>> philosophical or political orientation, people who are willing to
>>> refrain from imposing aggression or foreign intervension in our own
>>> affairs are warmly welcome. I proudly collaborated with cecity
>>> associations across the States. We prosperously held projects for
>>> implementing accessibility and advocated for perfect independence to
>>> those who live with sight loss. I have a brilliant Mormon friend
>>> called Alison. She is a loving person. She is truly loyal and
>>> respectful. She lives in Utah. We mutually have incredible deference
>>> for each other's faith and cultural origin. I truly admire her
>>> unfeigned commitment to family and kinship ties. I am only strident
>>> with those who insist to adhere uncongenial temperament. I have strong
>>> ties to my faith and heritage. It is not because I was born Muslim. I
>>> studied at deep length and concentration Islamic theology. I took
>>> various curricula on Koran commentary, Hadith discipline, Shariah
>>> jural, classical Arabic, Islamic history, philosophy and eminently
>>> prestigious English class at the British Council. I wholeheartedly
>>> maintain this foreign language to fend for my heritage and identity.
>>> Unlike secularised and civilly defeated Muslims, I am inconvenient to
>>> unethically indoctrinate. Fortuitously, I am sufficiently conscious of
>>> what is occurring. Thence, I competently recognise what to apprise and
>>> what to despise. I demonstrate in this post the crucial necessity to
>>> persistently repudiate antagonisation acts while at the same time,
>>> sustaining respectful friendship and positive inclusion. This is what
>>> Islam prescribes. We are religiously enjoined to be pious of the
>>> divine while being just and dutiful. Islam has decisive precepts for
>>> states of peace and war. Shariah jural has been filled with
>>> detailed and accurate maxims. It ranges from territorial jurisdiction
>>> to how to go to the toilet. Allah hasn't left us clueless of even the
>>> littlest matters as for the latter. This is our identity and we are
>>> quite proud of it. Anyone attempts to plague us to provoke our
>>> offence, he'll instantly be countered with what he may not like. So,
>>> watch out. It wholly depends on your initial disposal. The way you'll
>>> act, you'll be rewarded. If you aim to instigate hostility,
>>> retaliation is to be radically anticipated. If you intend to be
>>> peaceful, your proposal will appreciatively be rivaled. Hate is not
>>> our fete. Our purpose is to integrate. Cordially, Bob Evans
>
>
>
>
>
>>> ___________________________
>>>
>>>
>>
No comments:
Post a Comment