Subject: From LUV News for Friday, July 20, 2012
Now this makes perfectly good sense...
Carl Jarvis
The primary responsibility of the mass media in the Land of the Free is to keep citizens as confused as possible, in order to keep democracy from having a snowball's chance in hell of breaking out. Yesterday's terrorist friends are often today's terrorist enemies-- al Qaeda, for example, created by the CIA in Jimmy Carter's administration under National Security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, replete with Osama bin Laden and other religious fanatics ("good guys" then in our mass media).
But after 9/11 it was decided that al Qaeda would become the bad guys and we could kill anyone labeled with that moniker, together with the entire Taliban, who, apparently, had been good guys because President Bush sent them millions of dollars in aid just months before 9/11.
But now we've killed most of the Afghan al Qaeda and they have dispersed back to their homelands where they have become, voila, good guys again. I say that because the USA supported apparent al Qaeda fighters in Libya who had in recent years been in Iraq fighting Americans, in the new quest to overthrow Gadaffi and get his oil, now mission accomplished. And more al Qaeda in Syria, apparently good guys because we are sending them weapons financed by the Saudis through Jordan (all this for deniability, as if the world is too stupid to know where they come from).
They then blow up Syrian government officials in acts that would be terrorist acts if they happened in client states of the Empire, but they are not called terrorist acts when committed in Syria you see, in the Orwellian language of our mass media. The extremely-controlled mass media go delirious with kudos when Syrian officials get blown to bits.
Ward Churchill lost his job because he pointed out that 9/11 may have been a response to sanctions imposed on Iraq largely pushed by the USA, resulting in the deaths of over half a million Iraqi children under age five, which had most Arabs justifiably upset and seething with rage. This was never called an act of terrorism, in fact Clinton's Secretary of State famously said "We think it was worth it," and I remember thinking at the time, "Her fat ass has never missed a meal, she needs to go hungry for awhile and find out what happens to people from her psychopathic policies."
Some day the National Security State terrorism with its Muslim Holocaust will come back at us in blowback, like the monsters previously released by the Empire (Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein etc.) and corporate media propagandists will stop pushing terrorism long enough to ask again, "why do they hate us?," in their role of spinning reality to keep the masses from understanding almost anything of relevance in their lives --Jack Balkwill
But after 9/11 it was decided that al Qaeda would become the bad guys and we could kill anyone labeled with that moniker, together with the entire Taliban, who, apparently, had been good guys because President Bush sent them millions of dollars in aid just months before 9/11.
But now we've killed most of the Afghan al Qaeda and they have dispersed back to their homelands where they have become, voila, good guys again. I say that because the USA supported apparent al Qaeda fighters in Libya who had in recent years been in Iraq fighting Americans, in the new quest to overthrow Gadaffi and get his oil, now mission accomplished. And more al Qaeda in Syria, apparently good guys because we are sending them weapons financed by the Saudis through Jordan (all this for deniability, as if the world is too stupid to know where they come from).
They then blow up Syrian government officials in acts that would be terrorist acts if they happened in client states of the Empire, but they are not called terrorist acts when committed in Syria you see, in the Orwellian language of our mass media. The extremely-controlled mass media go delirious with kudos when Syrian officials get blown to bits.
Ward Churchill lost his job because he pointed out that 9/11 may have been a response to sanctions imposed on Iraq largely pushed by the USA, resulting in the deaths of over half a million Iraqi children under age five, which had most Arabs justifiably upset and seething with rage. This was never called an act of terrorism, in fact Clinton's Secretary of State famously said "We think it was worth it," and I remember thinking at the time, "Her fat ass has never missed a meal, she needs to go hungry for awhile and find out what happens to people from her psychopathic policies."
Some day the National Security State terrorism with its Muslim Holocaust will come back at us in blowback, like the monsters previously released by the Empire (Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein etc.) and corporate media propagandists will stop pushing terrorism long enough to ask again, "why do they hate us?," in their role of spinning reality to keep the masses from understanding almost anything of relevance in their lives --Jack Balkwill
No comments:
Post a Comment