----- Original Message -----From: Roger Loran BaileySent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 9:00 AMSubject: Re: Progressive Breakfast: How Obama Can Prevent Another Debt Limit CrisisThe word fuck is a perfectly good word. Think about this. Back before 1066 the people living in the land that gave rise to the English language were speaking a lnaguage known as Anglo-Saxon, otherwise known as Old English. Then the Normans invaded led by William the conqueror. The Normans were speaking a form of Latin closely related to French and now extinct. After conquering the Anglo-Saxon people the new rulers were very contemptuous of their new subjects and proceeded to try to wipe out the entire Anglo-Saxon culture including the language. Records from the time indicate that they were expecially contemptous of the language, describing it as the sound of barking dogs. The Normandish language was polysyllabic while the Saxon language tended to be more monosyllabic and that helps you tell which words were derived from Normandish and which were derived from Anglish or Saxonish. The attempt to destroy the language was unsuccessful, but they did change it in the process of trying. In fact, the battle of Hastings in 1066 is usually counted as the point in which Old English transitioned into Middle English. Even today the speach of the British upper class in comparison to that of the lower class is a residue of the Norman conquest. Words of Anglo-Saxon origin were considered to be contemptible and words of Latin origin were considered to be admirable. Look at some of those words and note that words of Normandish derivation tend to have multiple syllables while the Anglo-Saxon words tend to be of one syllable. You have copulate and fuck. You have flatulence and fart. You have dick and penis. You have defecate and shit. You have vulva and twat. You even have saliva and spit. For whatever reason it seems that body parts and functions were especially singled out for this double standard, but it even extends to other kinds of words. You have dog and canine for example. In almost every case the word that is derived from Normandish is considered to be respectable while the word that is derived from Anglo-Saxon is considered to be contemptible or at least lower class. So when you speak of words that are derived from a Latin origin as the correct word and those of a more monosyllabic Anglish nature to be somehow undesirable you are expressing approval of a foreign conquest that happened nearly a thousand years ago.
On 5/31/2012 10:54 AM, Carl Jarvis wrote:"X" huh? Well, I always have disliked "Balls". Very chauvinistic, Moocho Macho. Intestinal Fortitude(IF) might be better. But "X"? Is that because that part of the body is still considered X rated? Somehow I think we just have to get over our silliness about the most central parts of our bodies. We can talk with ease about every part of our body except our reproductive parts.Ever since Adam and Eve put on those scratchy Fig leaves, we've been afraid or ashamed to peek under them. And we have invented more insipid names for our vagina's and penis's and our breasts and our testicles.Now here is a real challenge for those T Party folk. They need to promote legislation that requires people to use only proper terms when speaking of the human body.Of course saying "Copulate You!" probably doesn't carry the intended feeling.Carl Jarvis----- Original Message -----From: Bob HacheySent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 9:55 PMSubject: Fw: Progressive Breakfast: How Obama Can Prevent Another Debt Limit CrisisHi all,Note the first piece here. If only potus had the testicular fortitude to declare the debt ceiling unconstitutional and really begin to practice what he preaches. That is, he claims to be in favor of a more level playing field.But, alas, I'm afraid this idea is little more than wishful thinking.Although Obama probably doesn't have the balls to try such a bold move, I'd wager that Jill Stein has the egs to do it!(I learned the eggs term from a good friend who has been one of my mentors.)Bob Hachey----- Original Message -----Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 7:42 AMSubject: Progressive Breakfast: How Obama Can Prevent Another Debt Limit Crisis
![Campaign for America's
Future]()
MAY 30, 2012
On the menu this morning
MORNING MESSAGE: How Obama Can Prevent Another Debt Limit Crisis
Romney Flip-Flops On Coal in Colorado
![Share on
Facebook]()
JAMELLE BOUIE
How Obama Can Prevent Another Debt Limit Crisis"...the most important political news of the year came a few weeks ago when House Speaker John Boehner promised a repeat of last summer's debt ceiling showdown ... for three-and-a-half years, Republicans ... opposed the stimulus, pushed for spending cuts, blocked further measures to improve the economic picture, and then blamed Obama for the results. With that in mind, causing another debt ceiling crisis would be par for the course. The smart thing for Obama to do would be to declare the debt ceiling unconstitutional, and direct the Treasury to ignore it. In the short-term, there would be a firestorm of controversy. But in the long-term, he will have taken a potent weapon off the table, and potentially saved his reelection bid." Click here to see Jamelle Bouie at the June 18-20 Take Back the American Dream conference. Big Money Drowning Election
GOPers prepare to spend $1B on election. Politico: "Republican super PACs and other outside groups shaped by a loose network of prominent conservatives – including Karl Rove, the Koch brothers and Tom Donohue of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce – plan to spend roughly $1 billion on November's elections for the White House and control of Congress ... Koch-related organizations plan to spend about $400 million ahead of the 2012 elections - twice what they had been expected to commit ..."
Conservative super PACs swamping Senate Dems. Bloomberg: "Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio and former Virginia Governor Tim Kaine, who is seeking a Senate seat, are being outspent by at least a 3-to-1 ratio on television advertising ... The disparity could take a greater toll on House and Senate Democrats than on Obama because his re-election committee, which entered May with $115 million in cash on hand, is expected to have enough money to get its message out to voters and counter attacks."
Big money steps in for Gov. Walker. NYT: "Gov. Scott Walker, the Republican of Wisconsin who faces a recall election next week, raised more than $5 million in the last month alone ... That brings Mr. Walker's total fund-raising since the start of 2011 to more than $30 million ... While [Mayor Tom] Barrett has raised far less than Mr. Walker overall, Mr. Barrett's campaign said it had almost $1.5 million on hand for the final week of campaigning, nearly even with what Mr. Walker's campaign says it has left — $1.6 million."
Romney Looks To Bust Up CFPB
Romney campaign previews policy proposals to ease up on Wall Street. WSJ: "Glenn Hubbard, a top economic adviser to Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, said the former Massachusetts governor will soon detail proposals for health care and financial regulation ... he said Mr. Romney would propose ... replacing the new system for dismantling failing financial companies ... a new system of consumer financial regulation that either moves the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau outside of the Federal Reserve or breaks up the new agency ... wind down the mortgages and securities in the portfolios at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ... One of Mr. Romney's chief budget goals is to reduce government spending to 20% of gross domestic product by the end of his first term – 2016. Such a move would require large spending cuts..."
Bloomberg analyzes the Obama and Romney capital gains tax plans: "Romney proposes keeping the current 15 percent capital gains rate for the estimated 2 percent of households making more than $200,000 a year and eliminating investment taxes for everyone else. Obama wants the rate to rise to 23.8 percent as scheduled in 2013 ... The current 15 percent top capital gains rate compares with a 35 percent top tax rate for ordinary income ... Eliminating preferential rates on capital gains and dividends would reduce by 5.8 percent the after-tax income of households making more than $1 million a year, compared with a drop of 0.9 percent for all U.S. households, according to the Tax Policy Center..."
"More Than 10,000 Wealthy American Households Paid No Income Tax In 2009" reports HuffPost.
Romney "upstaged" by Trump. NYT: "... during campaign events on Tuesday, Mr. Romney showed little willingness to distance himself from Mr. Trump or address further questions. He broke from his recent practice of making himself available to reporters on his plane or on the rope line. He also canceled some interviews with local news media. Mr. Obama's campaign, meanwhile, seized upon Mr. Trump's comments, releasing a Web video on Tuesday morning that accused Mr. Romney of being unwilling to stand up to 'voices of extremism.'"
Romney Flip-Flops On Coal in Colorado
"Romney Implies That Colorado Doesn't Have Clean Energy Jobs, Despite The State Having More Than 70,000 Of Them" reports ThinkProgress.
Romney used to back coal regulation. Salon.com: "...Romney was not always so pro-coal. In 2006, after he pulled out of a regional greenhouse gas emission agreement, Romney released an alternative plan that called for coal-burning power plants to 'pay to plant a forest in Brazil if those trees absorb the amount of carbon dioxide the plant must reduce from its smokestacks,' according to a Boston Globe article from September ... in 2003, Romney made a big show of taking on a polluting coal-fired power plant. He held a press conference in front of the PG&E facility and yelled, 'I will not create jobs or hold jobs that kill people, and that plant kills people.'"
Coal takes a big hit in KY. NYT: "...when the operator of the Big Sandy plant announced last year that it would be switching from coal to cleaner, cheaper natural gas, people here took it as the worst betrayal imaginable ... More than 100 of the 500 or so coal-burning power plants in the United States are expected to be shut down in the next few years. ... The decline is largely because new pollution rules have made coal plants more costly, while a surge in production of natural gas through the process of hydraulic fracturing, known as fracking, has sent gas prices plummeting."
Recovery Act Still Creating Jobs
"Hundreds of Thousands of People Still Owe Their Jobs to the Recovery Act" notes CBPP: "A new Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that ... between 200,000 and 1.5 million people employed in March owed their jobs to the Recovery Act ... three years after its enactment, it is still saving and creating jobs."
The Recovery Act helped turn around the manufacturing industry, finds Center for American Progress' Christian Weller.
Yet older workers still struggle to re-enter workforce. W. Post: "The percentage of workers between the ages of 25 and 54 who have jobs now stands at 75.7 percent ... Before the recession the proportion hovered at 80 percent ... this measure of prime-age workers captures more of the ongoing turbulence in the job market. It reflects 'missing workers' who have stopped looking for work and aren't included in the unemployment rate."
Breakfast Sides
More state waivers for No Child Left Behind. NYT: "The Obama administration freed eight states from core provisions of the No Child Left Behind education law on Tuesday, bringing to 19 the number of states granted waivers this year, and officials said that even more states would soon qualify for them."
GOP preparing health care shift. TPM: "Senate Republicans are echoing the House GOP's shift in favor of some of the more popular 'Obamacare' provisions ... Whether coverage of pre-existing conditions is economically viable for insurers without an individual mandate is a dubious proposition, but practical realities are taking a back seat to election year imperatives."
Some Senate GOPers open to tax increases as part of "grand bargain." Politico: "Interviews with more than a dozen Senate Republicans show a growing openness to higher tax revenues to reach a so-called grand bargain on overhauling Medicare, other entitlements, discretionary spending and the Tax Code. On top of that, a small group of House GOP freshmen are balking at conservative activist Grover Norquist's anti-tax pledge, while six Republican senators recently declined to sign a GOP letter calling for the immediate extension of the Bush-era tax cuts."
USA Today edit board knocks Dem shift on Bush tax cuts: "Until recently, Democrats have been determined to end the Bush tax cuts for families making more than $250,000 — a poor compromise, but better than leaving all the cuts in place. In an election-year ploy, though, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California has upped the ante, calling on Republicans to hold an immediate vote on making the tax cuts permanent for anyone making less than $1 million a year, while ending the cuts for everyone who makes more ... At a time when any fair deficit-reduction plan requires a combination of spending cuts and revenue increases, Democrats have foolishly given Republicans their de facto endorsement for ruling out tax hikes for anyone but the super-wealthy."
past progressive breakfasts »
If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for updates from the Campaign for America's Future.
This message was sent from the Campaign for America's Future. We apologize if you received this message in error. If you would like to unsubscribe from some or all of our emails, please visit our unsubscribe page.
OurFuture.org | Donate | Contact Us ![Become a fan on
Facebook]()
_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy
_______________________________________________ Blind-Democracy mailing list Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy
_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy
Saturday, June 2, 2012
God's Word...or Words...or...
The fact is that words are a very cumbersome method of conveying information. Especially over long centuries and in different tongues. Bible scholars have struggled for ever trying to find exactly what God's true Word is.
This puzzles me. If God knows the beginning and the end, then He surely must have known that we would be fussing over the meaning of each of His words.
Maybe God should have just sent us picture books. Pictures don't lie...do they?
But then, I'm not as smart as God.
Curious Carl
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment