Dick,
When you say, "Ambulance Chaser", are you speaking of those unscrupulous weasley lawyers who rush in, trying to make a quick buck off someone's misery?
Or are you speaking of attorneys who are sworn to protect the interests of folks currently in no position to defend themselves from the pressures brought to bear by insurance companies who have only their own best interests at heart?
The insurance industry has worked hard to promote Ambulance Chasers as unscrupulous chiselers, interested in suing for their own profit.
What then do we call those fine upstanding attorneys whose lips are pressed to the ample backsides of the insurance CEO's?
Carl Jarvis
----- Original Message -----From: R. E. Driscoll SrSent: Friday, January 25, 2013 12:22 PMSubject: Re: H.J.Res. 15:Joe:
I agree and the man we have in office at the present time is one hell of a 'rock thrower' in my opinion. Very dangerous from the legal standpoint. Would have made a very successful ambulance chaser in my opinion.
R. E. (Dick) Driscoll, Sr.
On 1/25/2013 12:12 PM, joe harcz Comcast wrote:You know once one throws a few rocks at Goliath sooner or later on is sure to hit its intended mark.----- Original Message -----From: R. E. Driscoll SrSent: Friday, January 25, 2013 11:28 AMSubject: Re: H.J.Res. 15:Ted:
While I tend to agree with you. I find it interesting to note that there are people out there who are still trying and trying and trying. Some day they may succeed!
R. E. (Dick) Driscoll, Sr.
On 1/25/2013 10:15 AM, ted chittenden wrote:Dick: The proposed Constitutional Amendment is going absolutely nowhere! For this Amendment to pass, 2/3 of the House would have to vote for it, then 2/3 of the Senate, and finally, it would have to be ratified by 2/3 of the states. And in absolutely *none* of these areas is 2/3 support available. -- Ted Chittenden Every story has at least two sides if not more. ---- "R. E. Driscoll Sr" <llocsirdsr@att.net> wrote: All: Found the following this morning. H.J.Res. 15: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, ... ...of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President. Introduced: Jan 04, 2013 (113^th Congress, 2013--2015) Sponsor: Rep. José Serrano [D-NY15] <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/jose_serrano/400366> Status: Referred to Committee The resolution's title was written by the resolution's sponsor. H.J.Res. stands for House joint resolution. Track this bill <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hjres15#> Take a Position <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hjres15/advocacy> Implication is that this is how Mr. Obama is going to try for a third term. R. E. (Dick) Driscoll, Sr. (About Ads | Advertise Here) <http://www.govtrack.us/advertising> _______________________________________________ Blind-Democracy mailing list Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy
_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy
_______________________________________________ Blind-Democracy mailing list Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy
_______________________________________________
Blind-Democracy mailing list
Blind-Democracy@octothorp.org
http://www.octothorp.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-democracy
No comments:
Post a Comment